barre

This Is the ‘Fittest Woman on Earth’

Meet the 2015 “Fittest Woman on Earth”: Katrin Tanja Davidsdottir. After battling it out in the brutal sun for five consecutive days against 39 women in 13 grueling tests of strength, endurance, and overall fitness, the Iceland native walked away yesterday afternoon with the top spot and bragging rights as the 2015 Reebok CrossFit Games winner. (So much for my predictions!) Yet Davidsdottir remains humble.

Instagram Photo

RELATED: 5 Calorie-Torching CrossFit Workouts to Try

“I honestly didn’t come into this weekend with a goal of winning. What my goal was was to focus on myself and on the one task at hand,” Davidsdottir said in a post-Games interview. “I just wanted to come up to every event and know that that was my best at the time.”

What makes this victory even sweeter for the three-time competitor, who trained with two-time Games winner Annie Thorisdottir (who unfortunately had to withdraw from this year’s competition after suffering a “heat injury” last Friday), is that this is her redemption story. A poor performance on the legless rope climb in the 2014 Reebok CrossFit Games European Regional killed her dreams of going to the Games that year.

“Not making it last year was heartbreaking. Every single day since then it’s just been hard work,” Davidsdottir also said, according to a CrossFit official Instagram post.

Instagram Photo

RELATED: How to Become an Exercise Addict

While her hard work paid off, these Games were still no easy feat for Davidsdottir. In fact, she struggled during event 12, Pedal to the Medal I, in which competitors had to complete 3 pegboard ascents (a new-to-games challenge), a 24-calorie row, 16-calorie bike and 8 dumbbell snatches at 70 –pounds, all within a 6 minute time cap. Despite that, she roared back just two minutes later during Pedal to the Medal II (7 minutes to complete 12 parallette handstand push-ups, 24-calorie row, 16-calorie bike, and 8 kettlebell deadlifts using 248 pounds), to come in first.

In fact, it was this event that gave the 22 year-old the push in points she needed to jump into first place. (Davidsdottir finished with 790 points, 40 more than second place finisher Tia-Clair Toomey.)

Instagram Photo

All that’s left to say is kudos, Davidsdottir. You definitely get the badass award in our book.

If you missed any part of the Games, you can relive all the amazing feats of athleticism and ego-crushing moments here.

RELATED: CrossFit’s Camille Leblanc-Bazinet: ‘I’m Glad I Don’t Have a Thigh Gap’




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1InNvkC

Americans Becoming More Accepting of Gays, Lesbians, Study Finds

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Bias against gays and lesbians is falling among Americans, a new study finds.

“Many people have this gut feeling that our culture has changed. We wondered whether people’s attitudes were really changing, or if people today just feel more pressure to say they support lesbian and gay people,” lead researcher Erin Westgate, a doctoral psychology student at the University of Virginia, said in a university news release.

Just last month, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that marriage between same-sex couples is legal in all 50 states.

Westgate and her colleagues analyzed data gathered from more than a half-million Americans between 2006 and 2013, and found that implicit (unconscious) bias against gays and lesbians fell 13 percent during that time, while explicit (self-reported) bias decreased 26 percent.

“Implicit biases can occur outside of conscious awareness or conscious control. People may know that they have them and not be able to control them,” study co-author Brian Nosek, a psychology professor at the University of Virginia, said in the news release. “This is the first evidence for long-term change in people’s implicit attitudes on a cultural level.”

Implicit bias declined the most among women, whites, Hispanics, liberals and younger people. The smallest changes were seen in men, blacks, Asians, conservatives and older people.

However, nearly all demographic groups showed declines in both implicit and explicit bias, according to the study published recently in the online journal Collabra.

“People today are genuinely more positive toward gay and lesbian people than they were just a decade ago,” Westgate said. “The research shows that attitudes across the board are truly changing — it’s not just a function of people feeling less comfortable admitting their bias in a culture that has become more open.”

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine offers resources about LGBT health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1h0zcwu

What This Mom With Terminal Cancer Is Leaving Behind for Her Daughter Will Melt Your Heart

Like every mom, Heather McManamy wants to be a part of the most important moments in her 4-year old daughter’s life. Her wedding day, the day she gets her driver’s license, her first broken heart—and McManamy is not going to let her battle with breast cancer stop her from being involved in her daughter’s future milestones.

The 35-year-old mother from McFarland, Wis., was diagnosed with stage 2 breast cancer in April 2013, but the news took a turn for the worse when doctors told her cancer was terminal just a little over a year later.

“Once you’re stage four there is no cure,” she explained to her local NBC station in Madison. “The list I have of treatments to try is dwindling.”

RELATED: 22 Ways to Help a Friend With Breast Cancer

While she has pledged to do “anything and everything” she can to beat the disease, McManamy wants to make sure no matter what happens that at least a small part of her will be there for her daughter, Brianna, during the important milestones of her life.

For the past few months, McManamy has written over 40 greeting cards that offer advice, share jokes, and wish happiness for Brianna to have for the rest of her life.

“They’re like this physical representation of ‘this is all of the stuff I’m going to miss,'” she explained to ABC News. “I’m going to miss everything and I never like missing anything. I’m always the last one to leave the party.”

McManamy also said she has created some videos for Brianna to view as she gets older. She said the most important thing is for her daughter to be happy, even if she’s not there.

“I don’t care what she does in her life,” she said. “I just want her to find her happiness. Life is short. If she’s true to herself, everything will be OK.”

RELATED: 15 Worst Things You Can Say to Someone Battling Breast Cancer




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OLQHvO

Your (Delicious) Secret Weapon for Staying Cool

It’s going to be sweltering this week in the Northeast and other parts of the country, and we have a delicious way for you to stay cool that’s much more fun than hiding in the air conditioning

Turns out the secret to managing the heat is a childhood treat: the slushy. In a 2010 study published in the journal Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, athletes who drank a slushy (scientific name: “ice slurry”) before a workout were able to run 19% longer than those who drank ice water. Researchers say sipping slushies helped the runners bring down their body temperatures, and that it can be used as a practical way for athletes to stay cool while competing in hot weather.

RELATED: 35 Summer Foods Under 90 Calories

Whether you’re planning to exercise outdoors this week or not, firing up your blender with the following recipes is a tasty way to stay cool. Some contain alcohol, which is totally optional.

Cantaloupe and Lime Slushy

Frozen cantaloupe and fresh lime juice are blended with a little bit of honey for a fruity, frozen treat.

Watermelon and Lime Granita

A new way to love summery watermelon for just 143 calories per serving.

Mango-Mint Slush

Mango and lime lend a tropical flair, while mint is cooling and refreshing. Mint also aids digestion.

Spicy Frozen Bloody Marys

If you prefer savory to sweet drinks, this one’s for you. The cucumbers in this slushie are extra hydrating, too.

Blueberry-Coconut Slush

Coconut milk and shredded coconut make this slushie a little bit creamy, and add some protein and healthy fat, too.

Tropical Fruit Slush

It’s like a vacation in a glass: passion fruit, guava and papaya combine for a drink that will leave you feeling like you’re sitting under a palm tree.

RELATED: Beat the Top Summer Health Hazards




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OLIp6U

Does Facebook Lead Young Women to Dangerous Diets?

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — A new study provides insight into how Facebook use by young women can lead to poor body image and risky dieting.

The study included 128 college-aged women who completed an online survey about their eating habits and their emotional connection to Facebook — such as how much time they spent on the social networking site and number of Facebook friends — and whether they compared their bodies to friends’ bodies in online photos.

Women who had a greater emotional connection to Facebook were more likely to compare their bodies to their friends’ bodies and to engage in more risky dieting, the study found.

However, those who did not use the site to compare themselves to others were less likely to be concerned about body image or engage in risky dieting, the research showed.

The University of North Carolina School of Medicine study is published in the August issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health.

“I think that Facebook could be an amazing tool to nurture social support and connections with friends and families. And if you’re getting that kind of social support from the site, you might be less likely to be worried about your body size,” senior author Stephanie Zerwas, assistant professor of psychiatry, said in a university news release.

“But if you’re using it as a measuring stick to measure how your body appears in pictures compared to your friend’s body, Facebook could also be used as a tool to foster dangerous dieting behavior,” she added.

More information

The U.S. Office on Women’s Health has more about body image.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1D6pCSo

After Breast Cancer, Many in Appalachia Say No to Lifesaving Drugs

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — About one-third of breast cancer survivors in the Appalachian region of the United States do not take potentially lifesaving drugs, even though their drugs are covered by insurance, a new study finds.

The study included 428 breast cancer survivors in the Appalachian counties of Kentucky, Ohio, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. All of the women had Medicare Part D insurance that covers prescription medications.

About 30 percent of the women did not follow through with their prescribed adjuvant hormone therapy, which reduces the risk of cancer recurrence, the University of Virginia researchers discovered.

“Almost a third of the prescriptions for adjuvant hormone therapy were not filled, which is much, much higher compared to what we usually see in commercially insured populations,” Rajesh Balkrishnan, of the department of public health sciences, said in a university news release.

“Usually it ranges from about 10 [percent] to 15 percent, so this is almost double that. A third of the women going without adjuvant hormone therapy — that is a scary prospect,” he added.

The study was published in the July issue of the journal Medicine.

Cancer is a leading cause of death in Appalachia, where access to health care can be a challenge. Women often have to drive many miles to get to the nearest cancer center or the pharmacy, Balkrishnan said.

He and his colleagues also found that the women in the study were more likely to stick with an older drug, tamoxifen, than with newer aromatase inhibitors.

“One, the diffusion of newer technologies is much slower in Appalachia. Also, the other issue that comes to the forefront is that many of these medications have pretty severe side effects,” Balkrishnan said.

It’s also likely that many patients are not counseled properly on how to manage the side effects of these medications and how to take medications in conjunction with other aspects of their lifestyles and daily living, he explained.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more about breast cancer.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1D6pzGq

High Blood Sugar May Boost Alzheimer’s Risk

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — High blood sugar associated with prediabetes may increase the risk for Alzheimer’s disease, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that insulin resistance — higher-than-normal levels of blood sugar that often precede type 2 diabetes — was related to poorer performance on memory tests taken by late-middle-age adults.

“The findings are interesting because people with diabetes are at increased risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease, but we are only now learning why they may be at increased risk,” said lead researcher Barbara Bendlin, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The study results suggest that insulin resistance could increase the risk for Alzheimer’s disease by altering the way the brain uses sugar (glucose), which is its primary fuel, she said.

However, “by altering insulin resistance in midlife, it may be possible to reduce future risk of Alzheimer’s disease,” Bendlin said. Medications and a healthy lifestyle are possible ways to do that, she said.

According to the American Diabetes Association, 29.1 million Americans have diabetes, and more than half of adults older than 64 have prediabetes. Poor diet, obesity and sedentary lifestyles are associated with insulin resistance, Bendlin noted.

“Healthier lifestyles may contribute to healthier brain aging by reducing insulin resistance,” Bendlin said.

One expert cautioned that having prediabetes, or insulin resistance, doesn’t mean you’re doomed to develop Alzheimer’s, the most common form of dementia.

This study shows that insulin resistance may make mental functioning worse and may be linked to reduced use of insulin in areas of the brain associated with Alzheimer’s disease, but this does not mean that insulin resistance leads to Alzheimer’s, said Dr. Luca Giliberto, an investigator at the Litwin-Zucker Research Center for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y.

“We do not know what causes Alzheimer’s disease,” said Giliberto, who was not involved in the study. “We don’t know if lowering blood sugar will prevent Alzheimer’s.”

For the study, Bendlin’s team gave memory tests to 150 adults with no mental impairments, at average age of 61. The researchers also measured insulin resistance and had the participants undergo a PET brain scan.

More than two-thirds of the participants had a parent who suffered from Alzheimer’s, about 40 percent had a gene mutation associated with increased Alzheimer’s risk and roughly 5 percent had type 2 diabetes, according to the study.

The researchers found insulin resistance was associated with poorer processing of sugar throughout the brain. Worse performance in immediate memory was linked to lower sugar metabolism in the left medial temporal lobe, the authors said.

The report was published July 27 online in JAMA Neurology.

Dr. Sam Gandy, director of the Center for Cognitive Health at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, said it appears there may be a difference “between the dementia related to full-blown diabetes, which seems to be primarily dementia caused by hardening of the arteries in the brain, and the mental impact of insulin resistance, which some investigators believe is associated with Alzheimer’s.”

In the brain, insulin helps transmit messages between cells, he noted.

“We have long thought of Alzheimer’s as a disease of defective brain signaling,” said Gandy, who had no role in the study. “Conceivably, there is also a disease of defective insulin signaling, which this paper would support.”

If that’s true, Gandy added, “then efforts at sensitizing the brain to insulin, using drugs such as pioglitazone [Actos, a diabetes drug], would make sense and might well lead to slowing of degeneration.”

Giliberto recommended healthy living as the best way to keep blood sugar under control and perhaps protect mental health.

“Increasing our health by reducing fats, reducing sugar, improving insulin resistance may reduce the risk of other factors, such as diabetes, on the susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease and mental decline,” Giliberto said.

More information

For more on Alzheimer’s disease, visit the U.S. National Institute on Aging.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GUSKr0

Are Hospitals Overusing Neonatal Intensive Care?

By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — A new report finds that more babies are being treated in neonatal intensive care units at many U.S. hospitals, and the infants are bigger and less premature.

While they don’t know for sure, researchers suggest this is a potential sign that these expensive interventions are being overused.

The report authors analyzed nearly 18 million births from 2007-2012, and found that the number of babies who were treated in neonatal intensive care units grew from 6.4 percent to 7.8 percent.

“An increase of this level over six years raises questions,” said study author Wade Harrison, an urban health scholar at Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, in New Hampshire. “Infants admitted to the units are increasingly likely to be of normal birth weight. More than half of all admissions are for normal or high-birth weight newborns. This suggests the need for further study since the units were initially developed to care for the most premature infants.”

Neonatal intensive care units, or NICUs, have been used in the United States for more than 50 years. They’re designed to provide intensive care to infants with special medical needs, particularly those born prematurely.

But intensive care for babies is expensive and can come with risks of its own, Harrison said. On the medical side, X-rays, antibiotics and IVs can be harmful.

Also, providing unnecessary care can reduce bonding between parents and babies, make breast-feeding more difficult, and cause parental worry and stress, he added.

Meanwhile, Harrison said, there’s been a lack of research into neonatal intensive care as a whole because most studies only look at their treatment of babies with very low birth weights. In fact, any baby can undergo treatment in the units, he explained.

In the new study, researchers looked at births from 38 states and Washington D.C., in 2007 through 2012. More than 84 percent of infants with low birth weight were admitted, compared with 4 percent of those with normal birth weights.

But over time, the researchers found, newborns admitted to the units became larger and less premature.

What’s going on? The study doesn’t pinpoint an answer, but Harrison said possible causes include lower thresholds for admittance. The research didn’t indicate that the babies being admitted are sicker, although he acknowledged that the findings may have missed signs of that being the case.

What about fraud aimed at getting higher reimbursements for intensive care? It “was not something we were interested in examining nor could it be answered using the birth certificate data we used in the study,” Harrison said.

However, Dr. Robert White, a neonatologist in South Bend, Ind., said there’s only one reason for the higher number of very small babies being admitted to the unit: More are being resuscitated after birth and surviving.

As for babies of normal weight, he said there are a variety of reasons. For one, diabetic mothers are having babies with blood sugar problems that often require treatment in an intensive care unit. “Another cause of increased admission of term-infants is narcotic withdrawal,” he said, “now often due to prescribed” drugs.

Guidelines regarding the use of the units have also changed, he said. “An infant born at 34 weeks with no medical problems, for example, is now expected to be cared for in a neonatal intensive care unit, whereas that was less likely to be the case in the past.”

Still, he said, “we cannot ignore that perverse financial incentives still exist for both physicians and hospitals to provide care in a unit if it can be medically justified, even if it is not medically essential.”

What can parents do? If told that a baby needs care in one of these units, they should ask about a private room “where they can comfortably stay for as long as necessary with their baby,” White said.

These rooms allow families to stay with their newborn “at a crucial and stressful time and increase the family’s opportunity to take an active role in their baby’s care and medical decision-making,” White said.

More information

For more about premature babies, visit the March of Dimes.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1S89CGp

Drug Makers May Delay Reporting Patient Harms to FDA: Study

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Drug companies may be endangering the lives of patients by not promptly reporting cases of drug-related illness or death to federal regulators, a new report suggests.

About 10 percent of cases where a drug does serious harm to a person are not reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration within the required 15-day period, the new analysis reveals.

Worse, it appears that drug makers are more likely to delay reporting if a patient death is involved, said senior study author Pinar Karaca-Mandic, an associate professor of health policy and management at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health.

“A larger fraction of these serious and unexpected events that involved a patient death were delayed — about 12 percent of events with patient death, compared to 9 percent of events without patient death,” Karaca-Mandic said.

Drug makers delayed filing more than 40,000 reports that involved patient death between 2004 and 2014, researchers found. They also delayed reporting nearly 120,000 events that did not involve a patient death.

The analysis was published online July 27 as a research letter in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

“Everyone wants to be sure the drugs we’re taking are safe, and it is the FDA’s role to make sure the drugs we’re taking are safe,” said Dr. Rita Redberg, chief editor of the journal and a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. “If adverse event reports are getting filed late, that means safety warnings are delayed and more people are taking dangerous drugs without knowing it.”

For this report, researchers pored through a decade’s worth of data from the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, eventually reviewing more than 1.6 million reports. About 95 percent of these reports come from drug companies, the authors noted in background information.

They found that drug manufacturers promptly report within the required 15-day period close to 91 percent of cases that do not involve patient deaths, and almost 87 percent of cases that do involve a death.

But the remaining cases were reported late, often by months.

“What was also surprising was that typically these were not delays of just a few days,” Karaca-Mandic said. “For example, among events that involved a patient death, about 6 percent were reported within 16 to 90 days, about 3 percent within 91 to 180 days, and about 3 percent were delayed more than 180 days.”

Redberg added that it’s very likely that the problem is much worse than spelled out in this study.

“Although they reviewed well over 1 million adverse events, it’s estimated that only 2 percent of all adverse events ever get reported to the FDA,” she said.

A spokesperson for PhRMA, an organization that represents the pharmaceutical industry, said, “Patient safety is the highest priority for biopharmaceutical companies, which diligently submit hundreds of thousands of safety reports to the FDA every year.”

“It is important to remember that prior to reporting any adverse event, including serious unexpected adverse events, companies must investigate the reports that they receive from patients and health care professionals,” the spokesperson added. “Companies typically verify the accuracy of patient and physician reports, and often contact adverse event reporters to supplement the information that they provide to the FDA.”

Karaca-Mandic said the FDA relies on these reports to inform consumers about safety problems that crop up after a drug hits the market, and the agency has the power to revoke a drug’s approval or suspend drug sales if the manufacturer fails to promptly report adverse events.

Instead, the agency typically issues warning letters to companies that are dragging their feet, the authors said.

Karaca-Mandic cited a May 26, 2010, letter to Pfizer Inc. in which the FDA rapped the knuckles of the pharmaceutical giant for reporting delays ranging from nine months to more than three years late.

In another letter to Actelion Pharmaceuticals U.S. Inc. on Sept, 14, 2010, the FDA cited the manufacturer’s “failure to report approximately 3,500 patient deaths,” she added.

The FDA needs to step up its enforcement of reporting requirements, Redberg said in an editorial accompanying the study.

“We need to be able to depend on the FDA to monitor safety of our drugs once they’re approved, especially because the FDA is moving toward faster and faster drug approval, which means that we are depending more and more on this post-market reporting,” she said.

FDA spokesman Christopher Kelly said the agency had not yet reviewed the study and had no comment on the findings.

Consumers and physicians also can take matters into their own hands and report adverse reports directly to the FDA, rather than going through the drug company, Redberg added.

“Most of the adverse events are getting reported to the manufacturer, and they’re supposed to report to the FDA,” she said. “As there are these delays, it seems better to have people report directly to the FDA.”

More information

For more information on reporting an adverse drug event, visit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GUSHeN

Nasal Balloon Can Treat Youngsters for ‘Glue Ear’

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — A simple procedure using what’s known as a “nasal balloon” can treat hearing loss in children with a common middle-ear problem, preventing unnecessary and ineffective treatment with antibiotics, according to a new study.

Many young children develop a condition in which the middle ear fills with thick fluid — so-called “glue ear.” Often, children have no symptoms and parents seek medical help only when they notice that youngsters have hearing problems.

Dr. Jordan Josephson is an ear, nose and throat specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. He said that kids are much more prone to glue ear because “the eustachian tube — which is the tube that connects the ear to the back of the nose — gets clogged,” often during a sinus infection, allergy or even pollution-linked inflammation.

Right now, treatments such as “antibiotics, antihistamines, decongestants and intranasal steroids are ineffective and have unwanted effects, and therefore cannot be recommended,” wrote a team of British researchers led by Dr. Ian Williamson of the University of Southampton in England.

In certain cases, drainage tubes can help some children with glue ear, the study authors said.

However, in the new study, Williamson’s team assessed another glue ear treatment — “autoinflation” with a nasal balloon — in a group of 320 children aged 4 to 11 years. During the treatment, the child blows through each nostril into a nozzle to inflate the balloon.

The children were randomly assigned to either use the balloon treatment three times a day for one to three months, or to undergo standard care.

Compared to those in the standard-care group, children who used the balloon treatment were more likely to have normal middle-ear pressure at one month (about 36 percent versus 47 percent, respectively), and at three months (about 38 percent versus 50 percent, respectively). They also had fewer days with symptoms, the researchers reported.

“Autoinflation is a simple, low-cost procedure that can be taught to young children in a primary-care setting with a reasonable expectation of compliance,” according to the study authors, who believe the treatment should be used more widely in children over age 4.

One expert in the United States said the technique is really nothing new.

The nasal balloon “has been around for decades,” Josephson said. “When I treat children with these problems, I tell the parents to have the child blow up balloons and squeeze their nose and try to pop their ears,” he explained.

“This treatment is similar to popping your nose when your ears get clogged on airplanes,” he said.

But another expert stressed that the balloon technique isn’t always the answer.

“While autoinflation presents a non-invasive option in some cases, it cannot always do away with the need for further intervention,” said Dr. Joseph Bernstein, chief of pediatric otolaryngology at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City. He also believes that more study is needed into the effectiveness of the nasal balloon, and possible risks or side effects.

The study was published July 27 in the CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about otitis media with effusion.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1S89CpW