barre

5 Things About Miscarriages You Probably Don’t Know

Last Friday, Mark Zuckerberg announced (on Facebook of course) that he and his wife Priscilla Chan are expecting a baby girl. In the emotional and public post, the CEO also disclosed that Chan had three miscarriages while the couple was trying to conceive.

Miscarriage is a “lonely experience,” Zuckerberg said, because most people don’t talk about it. But speaking with friends who had lost pregnancies and went on to have healthy babies restored the couple’s hope. “We hope that sharing our experience will give more people the same hope we felt and will help more people feel comfortable sharing their stories as well,” he explained.

Nearly 1.7 million likes and more than 117,000 shares later, it’s clear that the couple’s post has raised awareness of miscarriage, and has encouraged others to speak out, too.

Read on to find out more about what we know—and don’t—about this little discussed topic.

RELATED: Unsolicited Pregnancy Advice, Examined

They are more common than you think

“Miscarriages are definitely more common than people realize,” Joshua Klein, MD, a reproductive endocrinologist and fertility specialist at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, told Health. Reason number one, he added, is that people simply don’t talk about them. And this can make women who miscarry feel alone and unsupported, Dr. Klein said.

Overall, he says, 25% to 30% of pregnancies end in miscarriage. But because early miscarriages can be mistaken for a late, heavy period—or even a regular period—they often go unnoticed. The percentage of miscarriages among women who actually know they are pregnant is lower, at 10% to 15%, according to the March of Dimes.

The older a woman is, the higher her miscarriage risk. Women in their 20s have a 9% to 17% chance of miscarriage. At about 35, miscarriage risk is 20%, at 40 it’s 40%, and by 45 it can be 80%, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

RELATED: 7 Women’s Health Problems Doctors Miss

Dad’s age also plays a role

While the effect of a woman’s age on her risk of miscarriage is well known, the age of her partner is also a factor. One large study by Columbia University researchers found a 60% higher risk of miscarriage for fathers 40 and older, regardless of the mother’s age. A European study from the journal Human Reproduction showed a greater likelihood of miscarriage in women 35 and older if their partner was at least 40. Yet another investigation, from the American Journal of Epidemology in 2005, showed a 27% increased miscarriage risk for men 35 and older.

Two or three in a row are cause for concern

Once a woman has experienced two or three miscarriages in a row, Dr. Klein says, she is considered to have recurrent pregnancy loss. At this point, it’s a good idea to see a fertility specialist, who can determine if medical issues are interfering with her ability to carry a pregnancy. The short list of possible culprits includes blood clotting disorders, structural problems of the uterus, immunologic issues, and genetic factors, he says.

Problems with blood clotting or immunologic factors can be treated with medication, while anatomic issues can be treated with surgery, according to Dr. Klein. And while it’s not possible to “treat” genetic factors related to miscarriage, he added, it is possible for couples to undergo in vitro fertilization with eggs and sperm screened with genetic testing.

RELATED: Pregnant? Diet Changes to Make Right Now

Mismatched chromosomes are usually to blame

Most of the time, miscarriage is due to an embryo not having the right number of chromosomes, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Egg and sperm should have 23 chromosomes each. But too many or too few chromosomes—in egg, sperm, or both—produce an embryo that probably won’t survive.

Older women have more miscarriages because their ovaries produce more abnormal eggs as time goes on, Dr. Klein says. That’s why some women who aren’t ready to have children in their younger years may opt to freeze their eggs. And sperm can also be more prone to genetic mistakes as men age.

There’s no need to wait three months to try again

The conventional medical wisdom has been that women need to wait several months after a miscarriage to start trying to get pregnant again. But getting pregnant soon after a miscarriage doesn’t mean you are at greater risk of losing that second pregnancy, Dr. Klein says. Instead, he explains, women can wait for a month to allow their menstrual cycle to normalize, and start trying again. Waiting too long is an especially bad idea for older women, he adds, for whom every cycle counts. “You may be hurting yourself by waiting, and you’re not helping yourself.”

RELATED: What People Don’t Understand About Miscarriages




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1M9V6KL

7 Tips to Actually Succeed at Your Digital Detox

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

DailyBurn-Life-Logo

If your summer is packed with Instagram-worthy barbecues, vacations and trips to the beach, first of all, congrats! But if you’re not careful, you may spend most of your time glued to Facebook — or, worst of all, your work email. While you might assume keeping up with your inbox gives you peace of mind, research shows that reading messages from the office often just makes people angry. Talk about a summer bummer.

RELATED: Do You Have Text Neck? 3 Ways to Fix Your Posture Problems

It’s one thing to know you should take time for a digital detox, but it’s entirely different to actually pry that phone out of your hands. Whether you’re addicted to refreshing your Gmail, or can’t stop scrolling through your phone out of habit, quitting your gadgets can be tough.

Instead of going cold turkey on tech, try these expert-backed tips for how to limit your time plugged in, so you can get the R&R you really need.

Digital Detox, Done Right: 7 Ways to De-Stress

1. Stop Blaming Your Job
There are some people with high-risk jobs who have to check email at all hours. (Hi, Barack Obama.) But there are many others who don’t need to — and do so anyway. “That’s unhealthy because there’s not a reason for your nervous system to be wired to ‘workaholic,’” says Marilyn Puder-York, Ph.D., a psychologist and executive coach for CEOs and executives in New York City. If you’re responding to emails at 10 p.m. because you decide to, not because your job dictates, take a step back. Tell yourself you can check your inbox — but that you’re not going to respond unless it’s something really important.

RELATED: 5 Ways to Stop Stress Eating From Taking Over Your Brain

2. Set Boundaries with Your Boss
Talk to your boss before you leave for vacation rather than assuming you still have to be ‘on’ 24/7. Puder-York advises saying something like this: “Before I go on vacation, I want to double check that I can unplug and check emails only once a day. Is that OK?” (We bet they say yes.) Then, put your autoreply up. “Doing so shows accountability and respect for others,” she says. And don’t forget to turn off phone notifications so you’re not tempted all day.

3. Don’t Give Up Email Entirely (Just Set Limits)
We’re giving you permission to check email during downtime — but limit that to certain times of the day. (Like before your family is awake, or after they wind down at night.) Try to set a time limit, too. Whether that’s 20 minutes or a half-hour will differ for every person, says Wendy R. Boswell, Ph.D., a professor of management at Texas A&M University. Setting the right boundaries (rather than going in without a plan and checking all day) is key to making everyone happy.

RELATED: Is Stress Hurting Your Relationship? Here’s How to Fix It

4. Get Your Partner on Board
Tech drain can be contagious. In one study, people who used email during off-hours didn’t think it was a problem in their personal life. But their spouses felt differently, saying it had a negative impact on their time together, says Boswell, who authored the study. Push your partner to have a chat with his or her boss. If he or she doesn’t expect employees to be glued to their devices at all times then there’s no reason that you two can’t have “alone time” to chill out together.

5. Be Strict
When you see that an email pops up, or a like on your recent Facebook post, you get a rewarding hit of dopamine. “It feels good because you’re being recognized. That’s why it becomes an addiction to check who’s reached out to you,” says Puder-York. Still, it’s important to give yourself a break. Downtime recharges your brain and protects against things like burnout and loss of productivity. Julie Morgenstern, a productivity expert and author of Never Check E-mail in the Morning, says her clients tell her they have success by repeating mantras, like the common canine command ‘Leave it.’ It sounds funny, she says, but it works.

RELATED: 10 Reasons You’re Exhausted and What to Do About It

6. Take a Deep Breath
Scrolling through Instagram or checking Gmail is so ingrained it almost feels wrong not to. “Your brain is addicted to the stimuli, so when you don’t check, it’s like, where’s my fix?” says Morgenstern. The key is to breathe through the urge. “Clients tell me that after taking a few calming breaths, they can feel a gear shift happening in their brain. They can move from tech-addicted to being social and engaging with others around them,” she says. Warning: Resisting the urge to Instagram may feel difficult at first, but eventually you’ll strengthen your will (just like a muscle) and shift into tech-free mode faster.

7. If All Else Fails, Hide Your Phone
You know the diet advice that tells you to keep trigger foods (ice cream, cookies, chips) out of the house? Use the same technique for your phone. Morgenstern advises turning the dinger off and putting the device on the other side of the room or in another room altogether. If it’s near you, you can’t help but resist the impulse. But if it requires you to get up constantly? Well, that phone won’t look so attractive anymore.

More from Dailyburn:

6 Scenarios That Stress You Out But Shouldn’t

7 Ways to Carve Out Time to Meditate

8 Signs You’re Way Too Stressed (and How to Deal)

dailyburn-life-logo.jpg Life by DailyBurn is dedicated to helping you live a healthier, happier and more active lifestyle. Whether your goal is to lose weight, gain strength or de-stress, a better you is well within reach. Get more health and fitness tips at Life by DailyBurn.



from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KOYZob

Here’s What Self-Adjusting Lipstick Looks Like on Four Different People

elf-lipstick-silo

Photo: e.l.f.

Like the mood rings of the ’90s that changed colors depending on how you were feeling (er, your body temperature), the latest trend in beauty is similarly “magical”products that promise to color-change based on your skin tone or skin chemistry.

We decided to put these gimmicky products to the test, starting with the e.l.f. Gotta Glow Lip Tint ($6, eyeslipsface.com). This balm is supposed to transform into a unique shade of pink when it comes in contact with the moisture and pH level of your lips, getting you a custom color that’s perfect for you. It’s a super cool idea, but does it really look different on different women?

We had four Health staffers try it out. Check out the before (left) and after (right) pictures below for our results (and the fun color names we got to make up).

RELATED: The Best Makeup Colors For YOUR Face

Fruit punch

maryann-elf

Photo: Chelsea Burns

Watermelon rose

julie-elf

Photo: Chelsea Burns

Royal pink

roz-elf

Photo: Chelsea Burns

Very Berry

christine-elf

Photo: Chelsea Burns

As you can see, the cotton candy colored lipstick took on a completely different shade for each staffer only seconds after application. Not only do you get a custom lip color for $6, our testers also said that it leaves lips feeling silky smooth and hydrated. If you really love the color you can also apply it to your cheeks for a personalized flush. Verdict: more than a gimmick!

RELATED: We Found a Longwear Lipstick That Actually Lasts All Day




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OOluaw

Crohn’s Disease, Colitis Tied to Anxiety in Study

TUESDAY, Aug. 4, 2015 (HealthDay News) — People with inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, have an increased risk for an anxiety disorder, especially women, a new study suggests.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of disorders that cause chronic inflammation of the digestive tract.

“Patients with IBD face substantial chronic physical problems associated with the disease,” lead author Esme Fuller-Thomson, a professor from the University of Toronto, said in a university news release. “The additional burden of anxiety disorders makes life much more challenging so this ‘double jeopardy’ must be addressed.”

The study authors looked at 269 Canadian adults who had been diagnosed with an inflammatory bowel disease. The researchers found that these patients were two times more likely to have had generalized anxiety disorder at some point in their lives than adults without Crohn’s or colitis.

And for women, the risk was four times greater than for men, the investigators found.

In addition, people with an inflammatory bowel disease and a history of childhood sexual abuse had a sixfold increased risk of an anxiety disorder. And those with Crohn’s or colitis who reported having moderate or severe chronic pain were twice as likely to have an anxiety disorder as those with mild or no pain, the study revealed.

Although this study found an association between people with an inflammatory bowel disease and the likelihood of an anxiety disorder, it wasn’t designed to prove a cause-and-effect relationship between these conditions.

Findings were published online recently in the journal Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

“The study draws attention to the need for routine screening and targeted interventions for anxiety disorders. Particularly among the most vulnerable patients with IBD: women, individuals who are in chronic pain, and those with a history of childhood sexual abuse,” study co-author and adjunct lecturer Joanne Sulman, from the University of Toronto, said in the news release.

The study also highlights the link between physical and mental health, according to Patrick McGowan, an assistant professor of biological sciences at the University of Toronto. He was not directly involved in the study.

“We sometimes think of the two as if they are entirely separate entities but the reality is they are intimately linked. Both involve genuine physical changes in the body and affect each other,” McGowan said in the news release.

More information

The U.S. Office on Women’s Health has more about inflammatory bowel disease.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1hif3lA

Better Control of Drug-Resistant Germs Could Save Thousands of Lives: CDC

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Aug. 4, 2015 (HealthDay News) — An immediate, focused effort to halt the spread of antibiotic-resistant germs could save tens of thousands of lives and prevent hundreds of thousands of new infections over the next five years, a new government report suggests.

As many as 37,000 lives could be saved, and 619,000 new infections prevented, if community health departments and health care facilities form tight support networks to quickly identify and address emerging outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, said report author Dr. John Jernigan.

He directs the Office of HAI (Health care-Associated Infections) Prevention Research and Evaluation at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“When health care facilities and health departments in a community work together to share information about resistance, and then use that information to guide and target prevention efforts, then we would expect to see up to 70 percent fewer patients affected by drug-resistant germs,” Jernigan explained.

Although local health departments will probably need increased funding to coordinate these efforts, the CDC report estimates that almost $8 billion in hospital bills could be avoided over five years by halting the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Antibiotic-resistant germs like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and CRE, which no longer respond to drugs designed to kill them, cause more than 2 million illnesses and at least 23,000 deaths each year in the United States, according to the CDC.

The powerful antibiotics needed to treat these germs also leave patients vulnerable to Clostridium difficile, an opportunistic bacteria that invades a person’s gut after antibiotics have wiped out the intestinal flora that normally would fend off such an infection.

C. difficile caused close to a half-million illnesses in 2011, and an estimated 15,000 deaths a year are directly attributable to the life-threatening diarrhea that results from C. difficile infections, the CDC added.

Computer models show that these bugs will continue to gnaw away at America’s health care system, according to the Vital Signs report published Aug. 4 in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

“Over the next five years, unless we implement nationwide improvements in infection control and antibiotic prescribing, if no action is taken, these infections will continue to increase,” Jernigan said.

Individual hospitals are trying to control the spread of antibiotic-resistant germs, but those efforts are being undermined by other hospitals and long-term care facilities, the CDC researchers found.

“We know that germs can spread between health care facilities in a community, when patients are transferred from one facility to the other,” Jernigan explained. “Antimicrobial resistance problems in one hospital can affect what happens in another hospital when they share patients. Even if one facility is following recommended infection control practices, that doesn’t protect them from patients bringing antimicrobial-resistant germs into their facility from other hospitals or nursing homes.”

Jernigan said community health departments are in the perfect position to coordinate infection control between hospitals, since they already are collecting information on health care-associated infections and antibiotic resistance.

If a health department detects a problem at a hospital, it can notify that hospital and all other facilities connected with it that infection control efforts need to be stepped up, he said. Patients carrying resistant bugs can be placed in private rooms, health care workers can take additional precautions to prevent the spread of germs, and more caution can be used with antibiotics.

But Jernigan said nursing homes and other long-term care facilities need to be brought into the network, since many patients bring antibiotic-resistant germs with them when they are transferred to hospitals.

Dr. Eric Howell, immediate past president of the Society of Hospital Medicine, agreed that long-term care facilities are key members of a community’s network and need to be included in efforts to track infections.

“It really needs to include all of the health care institutions. The trick is to make it so people want to participate because it’s valuable to them,” said Howell, division director of the Collaborative Inpatient Medicine Service at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in Baltimore. “People participate not because it’s mandated, but because it’s a high-value data repository for the hospital and their individual clinicians. They’re willing to input data because they get so much out in return.”

The CDC has included $264 million in its budget for the 2016 fiscal year to strengthen surveillance efforts and promote better collaboration among health care facilities, Jernigan said. The agency’s Antibiotic Resistance Solutions Initiative is expected to reduce infections of CRE, MRSA and C. difficile by half or more if successfully implemented, officials said.

However, federal laws that protect patient privacy could be an obstacle, since they hamper the ability of hospitals to share information, said Dr. Henry Chambers, chief of the division of infectious diseases at San Francisco General Hospital and a professor at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.

“I think the laws are over-interpreted and actually interfere with a number of health care measures,” Chambers said. “You’ve got to know who’s who, right? If you’re one of those people who has an antibiotic-resistant infection, there has to be a way to communicate that at an institutional level and not a provider level.”

More information

Visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for more on antibiotic resistance.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1N8tgLW

The Sad Beauty Trend New Moms Don’t Need

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

After a workout, when you’re sick, when you’ve just had a baby: There are certain times in life when nobody’s expecting you to look picture perfect. Sadly, it seems like some new moms haven’t gotten the memo, or just don’t care. Today recently reported on the trend of mothers hiring hair stylists and makeup artists to do them up before they take that first photo with their new baby.

Perhaps it’s the Facebook and Instagram effect—we’re always on display these days, so why not post-birth? Perhaps we can blame Kim Kardashian (because, hey, why not blame her for what’s wrong in this world). Whatever the reason, this is becoming A Thing, and it’s a shame. Women have long had to answer to the calling of looking gorgeous, and today there are more ways than ever to do it whether it’s by Botox injections or some advanced hair straightening technique. When you’ve just been through labor or had a C-section, though, nobody’s expecting a glamour shot. Why put that pressure on yourself?

By all means, women should apply makeup if it makes them feel comfortable (concealer: every new mom’s BFF), but there’s no reason to call in a pro. See: bonding time with baby. See also: better things to spend your money on. And then there’s the fact that, really, this isn’t about mom. As Savannah Guthrie said, in response to the props she got on social media last summer for posing makeup-free (and hairdo-free) after giving birth to her daughter, “I figured everyone would be looking at little Vale, anyway. She is the star of the pictures, after all.”

RELATED: What Pregnancy Does to Your Health




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1P4KriF

Dogs Have Special Spot in Brain for Human Faces

TUESDAY, Aug. 4, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Dogs process human faces in a specific region of their brains, researchers report.

“Our findings show that dogs have an innate way to process faces in their brains, a quality that has previously only been well-documented in humans and other primates,” study senior author Gregory Berns, a neuroscientist at Emory University in Atlanta, said in a university news release.

The discovery of this face-processing area in the temporal cortex may help explain why dogs are so sensitive to human social cues, according to the authors of the study published Aug. 4 in the journal PeerJ.

“Dogs are obviously highly social animals, so it makes sense that they would respond to faces. We wanted to know whether that response is learned or innate,” said Berns, who leads the Dog Project in the university’s psychology department.

The six dogs in the study were trained to voluntarily enter a functional MRI machine and remain motionless during scanning without the need for restraints or sedation. Their brains were scanned while they were shown videos of faces and everyday objects.

A region in the dogs’ temporal lobe showed much more activity when they saw human and dog faces than everyday objects. The researchers have named this region the dog face area.

The findings show that dogs are born with this innate response to faces. If it was learned — for example, by associating a human face with food — then faces would trigger a response in the reward region of their brains, Berns explained.

People have at least three face-processing regions in the brain. Being able to identify faces is important for any social animal, the researchers suggested.

“Dogs have been cohabitating with humans for longer than any other animal,” study first author Daniel Dilks, an assistant professor of psychology at Emory, said in the news release.

“They are incredibly social, not just with other members of their pack, but across species. Understanding more about canine cognition and perception may tell us more about social cognition and perception in general,” he explained.

More information

The National Canine Research Council has more on the the human-canine bond.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OO0PmZ

Regular Pot Use as Teen Not Tied to Long-Term Health Problems: Study

TUESDAY, Aug. 4, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Regular marijuana use doesn’t appear to put teens at increased risk for depression, lung cancer or other physical and mental health problems later in life, contends a new study that challenges previous research.

“What we found was a little surprising,” lead researcher Jordan Bechtold, a psychology research fellow at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, said in a news release from the American Psychological Association.

“There were no differences in any of the mental or physical health outcomes that we measured regardless of the amount or frequency of marijuana used during adolescence,” Bechtold explained.

The study included more than 400 males in Pittsburgh who were followed from age 14 to 36. Fifty-four percent were black, 42 percent were white and 4 percent were from other racial/ethnic groups.

The participants were divided into four groups based on their marijuana use: low or non-users (46 percent); early regular users (22 percent); those who only smoked marijuana when they were teens (11 percent); and those who started using marijuana later in their teens and continued using the drug (21 percent).

Early regular users had much higher marijuana use. The study found their use rapidly increased during their teens to a peak of more than 200 days per year on average by the time they were 22 years old. After that, their marijuana use fell slightly, the study authors said.

Because only males were included in the study, the researchers could not draw any conclusions about women and marijuana use.

“We wanted to help inform the debate about legalization of marijuana, but it’s a very complicated issue and one study should not be taken in isolation,” Bechtold said.

Some previous studies have suggested that teens who use marijuana are at increased risk for cancer, delusions, hallucinations and other psychotic symptoms, asthma and other respiratory problems later in life, but this study found no such links.

Bechtold and colleagues also found no association between teen marijuana use and depression, anxiety, allergies, headaches or high blood pressure later in life.

The study was published online Aug. 3 in the journal Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

More information

The U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse has more about marijuana.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1VZNbCR

‘Yo-Yo’ Dieting Won’t Raise Cancer Risk, Study Finds

TUESDAY, Aug. 4, 2015 (HealthDay News) — “Yo-yo dieting” does not increase cancer risk, a new study suggests.

This type of dieting, also called weight cycling, features repeated episodes of weight loss followed by weight gain. Previous research has suggested that weight cycling may trigger biological processes that could lead to cancer.

For the new study, investigators analyzed data from more than 132,000 men and women who were aged 50 to 74 when they enrolled in an American Cancer Society study in 1992. The researchers looked at how weight cycling affected overall cancer risk and the risk for 15 specific types of cancer.

Over 17 years of follow-up, more than 25,000 of the participants developed cancer. However, weight cycling was not associated with overall cancer risk or increased risk for any of the 15 types of cancer examined in the study, according to Victoria Stevens, strategic director of laboratory services at the American Cancer Society, and colleagues.

The study was published online recently in the American Journal of Epidemiology.

The findings show that people trying to lose weight should be encouraged to do so, even though they may regain the pounds they shed, the researchers said.

“For the millions of Americans struggling to lose weight, the last thing they need to worry about is that if it comes back, they might raise their risk of cancer,” Stevens said in a society news release.

“This study, to our knowledge the largest and most comprehensive to date on the issue, should be reassuring. Our findings suggest that overweight and obese individuals shouldn’t let fears about their ability to maintain weight loss keep them from trying to lose weight in the first place,” she added.

More information

The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute explains how to select a weight-loss program.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1VZNbCN

Two Vaccines Every Pregnant Woman Should Get

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

When you’re pregnant, you pay extra-close attention to nearly everything you put into your body, from a tuna fish sandwich to everyday pain medication. So you might also feel extra nervous about getting a flu shot or other vaccines. But some vaccines are actually crucial during pregnancy: “Being immunized not only protects the health of a pregnant woman, it protects her baby from the day it’s born,” says Sonja Rasmussen, MD, editor-in-chief of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Thanks to antibodies that are passed from mother to baby in utero, getting certain vaccines when you’re pregnant can actually help defend your newborn from potentially deadly diseases. Keep yourself and your baby healthy by getting these two shots:

RELATED: Adult Vaccines: What You Need and When

Influenza (aka flu)

Flu vaccines are recommended for everyone 6 months and older, including pregnant women. Pregnant women get sicker from the flu and are especially vulnerable to complications from the flu, including hospitalization and death.

Getting the flu while pregnant can also lead to preterm birth, low birth weight, and other problems for the baby. Yet only about 50% of women get vaccinated during pregnancy, Dr. Rasmussen noted recently at a press event sponsored by the March of Dimes.

That stat is all the more alarming considering that a flu vaccine not only protects the mother, it also protects her baby from getting the flu up to 6 months (the age at which babies can be vaccinated themselves). And infants under 6 months are at especially high risk of complications from the flu, such as pneumonia.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also urges all pregnant women to get a flu shot, during any stage of pregnancy. (Pregnant women should not get the nasal spray form of the flu vaccine, which contains a weakened live virus.)

RELATED: 10 Biggest Myths About the Flu

Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis)

Pertussis (the “p” in Tdap), otherwise known as whooping cough, is a highly contagious illness that causes violent, uncontrollable coughing. It can lead to serious complications, including pneumonia and trouble breathing, especially in infants and young children. (Listen to this super scary recording of a baby with whooping cough at Sounds of Pertussis.)

Recent years have seen a surge of whooping cough cases, peaking in 2012 with nearly 50,000 cases reported to the CDC. There were also 20 deaths, the majority of them babies younger than 3 months old.

Because of these dangers, experts now advise that pregnant women get a Tdap vaccine during every pregnancy. Research shows that Tdap is safe during pregnancy and helps protect babies until they are old enough to be vaccinated themselves (starting at 2 months). Yet only 14% of pregnant women get a pertussis vaccine, Dr. Rasmussen says.

Ideally, you should get Tdap during the third trimester—but no later than 36 weeks, to allow at least 2 weeks for your body to build up the maximum levels of protective antibodies, says Dr. Rasmussen. Your antibodies will decrease over time, so if you get pregnant again, you’ll need another Tdap dose to protect that baby, too.

For even more protection, make sure your partner and anyone else who’ll come into regular contact with your baby (grandparents, siblings, caregivers) has been vaccinated, too. The health of your baby is worth it.

RELATED: 7 Kinds of Cough and What They Might Mean




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1T0eR67