barre

7 Pretty Nail Polishes You’ll Be Wearing All Spring

Out with the old and in with the new—nail polish, that is. With the weather warming up, it’s time to swap out your darker shades and go for more bright, pastel, or nude tones to flatter all of your springtime fashion. Here’s a look at seven of our favorite new colors for spring.

JINsoon Painted Ladies Keppel Nail Lacquer ($18; nordstrom.com)

This collection is named after the famed Painted Ladies houses in San Francisco (think opening credits of Full House). We’re loving this pastel green that has a hint of turquoise in it. This shade will work great from now until fall.

Photo: nordstorm.com

Photo: nordstorm.com

Smith & Cult Nailed Lacquered in She Said Yeah ($18; birchbox.com)

A favorite among Birchbox shoppers, this shade is an opaque, muted periwinkle. The polish is also 8-free, meaning it’s free of dibutyl phthalate, toluene, formaldehyde, formaldehyde resin, camphor, xylene, ethyl tosylamide, and triphenyl phosphate.

Photo: birchbox.com

Photo: birchbox.com

Zoya April Nail Polish ($10; amazon.com)

If you tend to stick with nude hues, try this polish. It has a bit of a blush tint to it, so it’s perfect for everyday wear. Plus, all Zoya polishes are free of formaldehyde, toluene, DBP, and camphor.

Photo: amazon.com

Photo: amazon.com

Essie Lounge Lover ($9; amazon.com)

Escaping to warmer weather? This peachy pink is the perfect polish for your toes and fingers for when you’re making an escape, plus it reminds us of flamingos!

Photo: essie.com

Photo: essie.com

Dior Vernis Gel Shine & Long Wear Nail Lacquer in Bleutte ($27; nordstrom.com)

Blue can be a bit scary for newbies, but this shade has a nice pastel hint which makes it oh-so-subtle with just a touch of color. This shade would be perfect to wear with your Easter best.

dior-bleutte

Photo: nordstrom.com

Deborah Lippmann Gel Lab Pro Polish in Get Lucky ($20; sephora.com)

Not a fan of pastel? Try this sage-tinged blue that can work as a neutral and take you from the boardroom to date night. The gel-like formula gives you the look of gel without all the nail damage.

Photo: sephora.com

Photo: sephora.com

OPI New Orleans Take A Right On Bourbon ($10; sallybeauty.com)

Metallics are all the rage this season, so a pewter-hued polish is perfect for any springtime outings where you need to dress up just a bit.

Photo: sallybeauty.com

Photo: sallybeauty.com

 




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/220pIqs

Science Explains Why You Can’t Stop Eating Potato Chips

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

TIME-logo.jpg

You might think fatty foods are delicious, but fat alone isn’t actually very appetizing. (The true taste of fat, according to recent research, tastes rather like frying oil that’s been heated too long.) The taste you can’t resist is due to the sugar or salt that’s often present in fatty foods.

Lately, researchers have taken a closer look at salt. Eating lots of it has been linked to obesity, even independent of calorie consumption. Some research even shows that liking salty, fatty foods is linked to overeating and overweight even more than having a taste for sweet fatty foods. Now, a new study published in the Journal of Nutrition suggests that salt is playing an even more powerful role than we thought in making us eat more.

The researchers from Deakin University in Australia recruited 48 healthy people and measured their sensitivity to the taste of fat by mixing up three drinks—identical except for the addition of a very low concentration of a fatty acid in one of them—and asking them to identify the fatty drink. Past research has found that the lucky few who are more sensitive to the taste of fat eat less of it.

Then, once a week for four weeks, everyone ate four different lunches. The lunches looked pretty much the same—elbow macaroni with tomato sauce—but the researchers manipulated the amount of salt and fat in each pasta dish. The dishes were either low-fat/low-salt, low-fat/high-salt, high-fat/low-salt, or high-fat/high-salt. They measured how much they ate and also rated their reaction to the food on scales including pleasantness, hunger and fullness.

Adding salt to the meals increased how pleasant people thought the food was. They also wanted to eat more of the high-salt meals than the low-salt meals (not surprisingly), but that didn’t hold true for the high-fat foods over those low in fat.

Those salt cravings seemed to influence how much people ate, too. Salt made people eat 11% more food and calories, regardless of how much fat was in the meal. “Over the course of a day, that’s really a significant amount,” says principal investigator and Deakin University professor Russell Keast.

But the most telling finding came from the people sensitive to the taste of fat, who typically eat less of it. When faced with the meals low in salt, they had really good control over how much they ate. “But when we add salt to that food, all of a sudden those controls are gone,” Keast says. The people with sharper fat sensitivity, which normally helps stop overeating, ate salty food in the same volumes as those who were the least sensitive to fat—suggesting that people perceive salt so favorably that it dulls the fullness signals they’re supposed to feel.

“We’re effectively blunting out their satiation response,” Keast explains. “When we think of the food supply in terms of salt and fat being optimized, the salt is having the effect of washing away what would be a normal biological mechanism that we’ve got to actually stop ourselves from eating.”

Fat can still be blamed for a good portion of overeating. The high-fat meals led the people in the study to eat 60% more calories. But because fat is so energy-dense, they were eating the same volume of food. Eating more salt, however, did correlate to eating more food. Salt, therefore, seems to be driving the excessive consumption of fat, calories and food in general—something to remember the next time you pop open a bag of chips.

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Yy34jN

Beauty Salon Secret Menus and Treatments You Never Knew About

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

I love a grande latte just as much as the next girl, but the Starbucks secret menu isn’t the only one you need to be aware of. We were curious (unsurprisingly so) if salons and spas had their own secret menus, so we reached out to a few of our faves, and, to our complete delight, we struck beauty gold. Turns out, a bunch beauty destinations have little-known or even un-advertised treatments you can score and ask for.

Sephora

We’re about to give you another reason to stop by Sephora, sorry, but not sorry. On Sundays, the store offers beauty lessons on different techniques you’ve always wanted to master. So yes, you can contour like a Kardashian if you want to.

The store even offers 15-minute mini makeovers, and, with their IQ technology, you can get color matched and find what products are the best for you.

If you happen to be in the New York City area (or just want to take a trip to the big apple—seriously, why not?), Sephoras in Manhattan offer one complimentary service. So, essentially, you can walk out with a bag for of beauty products and better brows.

RELATED: 3 Household Items That Double as Surprising Beauty Boosters

Aveda

So, what you see on the Aveda menu is what you get—plus a whole lot more! With every service, the company offers what they call “Aveda rituals.” Basically, they’re calming, mini, complimentary treatments that you get along with what you booked. You’ll get offered a cup of tea when you enter a salon, or you may get a scalp massage before your haircut. Sign. Me. Up. But really, that massage is solid.

Red Door Spa

Yet another reason to get psyched for spring—you know, besides finally being able to use all that pastel nail polish you’ve stocked up on. Red Door Spas offer special seasonal treatments that aren’t on the menu. This month, the hotspot offers an exfoliating and body-polishing brandied pear and marshmallow melt body treatment and mani/pedi. But in April? It’s all about the Mint Julep Sprtizer beauty treatment, which starts off with a citrus-scented body scrub and is followed up with of mint julep and lavender-infused shea butter hydrating formula.

RELATED: Everything You Need to Know About Exfoliating

Erno Laszlo

A treatment at this luxe beauty destination is as personal as they come. Everything is made custom to your skin concern, so there’s not really a menu, per say. However, at the end of your bespoke treatment, there is a little unexpected surprise—LED light therapy to boost your collagen production and detox your skin.

You’re apparently put in a room for 15 minutes (sounds like the perfect amount of time for a cat nap to me!) where the Institute’s specialists customize the light to fit your needs.

Nordstrom Beauty

While Nordstrom Beauty counters across the U.S. offer complimentary services to help you find the perfect product, the store just kicked it up another notch with what they’re dubbing a Style Bar. Like music to your ears, no?

At select locations across the country, like the Grove in LA and in downtown Seattle, you can book full service treatments with some of your favorite brands. Think getting your brows done with Anastasia of Beverly Hills and a gel mani with OPI.

RELATED: Your Bare Beauty Essentials for Your Spring Break Extravaganza

BeautyRX by Dr. Schultz Peel Bars

BeautyRx is most known for its professional glycolic, 15-minute peels at the Butterfly Studio Salon in New York City and other pop-up locations across the east coast. And while the face is the point of interest for these super quick yet effective treatments, you can also ask for an add-on glycolic treatment for your hands, an area that’s often forgotten but needs just as much L-O-V-E. That means SPF too, people.

It will add one anywhere from $10 to $25 to your facial peel bill, but for hand model-like digits, it’s worth it, right?

This article originally appeared on MIMIchatter.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7jHNv

Watch Jillian Michaels’ Heartwarming Proposal to Longtime Girlfriend Heidi Rhoades

Congratulations are in order for Jillian Michaels! The fitness entrepreneur popped the question to longtime partner Heidi Rhoades on the finale episode of her E! reality show Just Jillian.

To stage the proposal, Michaels invited Rhoades to a private theater, where she played a fake movie trailer that included photos of the couple and their two adorable children, Lukensia, 5, and Phoenix, 3. At the end of the touching video (trust us, there’s no way you won’t get choked up!), the couple’s friends and family held up signs that spelled out the question, “Will you marry me?”

RELATED: Jillian Michaels’ Top 5 Shape-Up Moves

Michaels got down on one knee as the movie ended. “I know I’m an ass—- a lot of the time, but if you will continue to put up with me, I would like you to marry me,” she said to Rhoades.

To the camera, Michaels reflected on why Rhoades is “the perfect person” for her. “The only place where there’s like a solace, and a respite, and a safe haven is with my family,” she said. “Heidi is the nucleus of that family. She’s the glue that really holds everything together, and I think without that, I would be lost.”

RELATED: This 7-Move Jillian Michaels Circuit Will Change Your Body

When Michaels appeared on the cover of Health last October, she hinted that a proposal could happen soon. “We were domestic partners. And then we had to co-adopt each other’s kids,” she said. “Then we were like, ‘OK, we’re going to wait until everybody can get married.’ Now everybody can get married!”




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TM4ZlZ

Sharapova Not the First to Use Performance-Enhancing Drug

WEDNESDAY, March 9, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Many elite athletes were taking meldonium — the drug that led to the suspension of tennis star Maria Sharapova this week — before it was banned earlier this year, a new study reveals.

Sharapova, 28, shocked the tennis world when it was announced she tested positive for the performance-enhancing drug at the 2016 Australian Open.

But the Russian tennis star was hardly alone in using the heart drug. After examining lab tests and information from athletes and medical teams, researchers concluded that nearly 500 competitors may have used meldonium during the Baku 2015 European Games in Azerbaijan last June.

The research — conducted for the European Olympic Committees — contributed to the World Anti-Doping Agency’s decision to ban meldonium as of Jan. 1, 2016, according to a report published online March 8 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Sharapova, reportedly the highest paid woman in sports, tested positive for the substance on Jan. 26 — after the ban took effect.

“Meldonium is reported to be used by athletes to potentially enhance personal performance and shorten the recovery period after physical activity,” the researchers wrote.

“This study highlights the widespread and inappropriate use and prescribing of this prescription drug in a generally healthy athlete population.”

The researchers found that 13 medalists or event winners were taking the drug during the games, and 66 athletes tested positive for it. Overall, meldonium use was detected in athletes competing in 15 of the 21 sports at the games.

Meldonium use was significantly under-reported by athletes at the games, Klaus Steinbach, chair of the European Olympic Committees Medical and Anti-Doping Commission, and colleagues concluded.

According to the study, meldonium is prescribed in a number of Eastern European countries to protect the heart and keep blood flowing through the arteries.

More information

The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency explains the dangers posed by performance-enhancing drugs.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7jGZN

Brain Bleed Risk From Warfarin May Be Higher Than Thought

WEDNESDAY, March 9, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The widely used blood thinner warfarin — also known as Coumadin — may raise the risk of severe bleeding inside the skull by much more than previously thought, a new study suggests.

Researchers examined data from nearly 32,000 U.S. veterans, aged 75 and older, with a common heart rhythm disorder called atrial fibrillation. The investigators found that almost one in three suffered an “intracranial” bleed while taking warfarin for the condition.

“Atrial fibrillation (“a-fib”) is a common heart rhythm disorder in elderly patients. And in patients with a-fib, treatment with the blood thinner warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by nearly two-thirds,” explained study lead author Dr. John Dodson.

“However, many clinicians are hesitant to prescribe warfarin in elderly patients, often because of concerns over head trauma due to falls, which can result in catastrophic bleeding,” said Dodson. He is assistant professor of medicine at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City.

Dodson noted that, until now, “no large study has looked at how common traumatic intracranial bleeding is in clinical practice, or if there are conditions that make patients higher risk.”

To help find out, his team tracked outcomes between 2002 and 2012 for the population of elderly veterans, who all took warfarin for atrial fibrillation.

The study found that rates of traumatic intracranial bleeding among seniors with atrial fibrillation was higher than previously reported.

“Nearly one-third of patients experienced more than one episode of traumatic intracranial bleeding,” Dodson pointed out, and many patients “also still experienced strokes during this time period.”

The investigators also pinpointed several factors that raised bleeding risk: dementia, anemia, depression, use of anticonvulsant drugs, and highly variable levels of warfarin in the blood.

“These findings highlight the important balance between the benefits and risks of warfarin therapy in elderly patients with a-fib, and the need for a personalized approach,” Dodson said.

Two experts agreed that finding the right balance — between preventing clots but not raising bleeding rates — has always been tough when it comes to treating atrial fibrillation.

“As the elderly population continues to grow, the incidence of conditions like atrial fibrillation also rises. And the mainstay of treatment continues to be blood thinners such as warfarin,” said Dr. Richard Temes, director of the Center for Neurocritical Care at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y.

Temes said that newer (and much pricier) blood thinners — drugs such as Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Xarelto — have recently been developed, but come with their own problems. “As physicians, we need to carefully weigh the risks of using blood thinners in the elderly population, which is prone to falls and head injury, with the risks of stroke,” he said.

Another expert agreed. “This article highlights a common problem facing the medical community — the risks and benefits of anticoagulation in the elderly with atrial fibrillation, since this group has both a high risk of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage,” said Dr. Joseph Germano, associate director of electrophysiology at Winthrop-University Hospital in Mineola, N.Y.

The study was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and published online March 9 in the journal JAMA Cardiology.

More information

The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute has more on atrial fibrillation.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7jE4i

Diabetes Treatment May Affect Breast Density

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, March 9, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Women with diabetes who take insulin appear to have a higher risk of dense breasts, a known risk factor for breast cancer, new research suggests.

Women with diabetes who take insulin “have considerably increased breast density [compared to] women without diabetes,” said study lead researcher Zorana Andersen. She’s an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Southern Denmark in Esjberg.

Conversely, women taking the oral medication metformin instead of insulin to treat their diabetes seem less likely to have dense breasts, Andersen said.

Women with breasts that were more than 75 percent dense had a four to six times higher risk of breast cancer than women whose breasts were fattier, with a density of less than 25 percent, the researchers said.

Andersen and her team emphasized that, while insulin treatment was linked with greater chances of higher breast density, that doesn’t prove insulin increases breast cancer risk. The study wasn’t designed to prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

Andersen was to present the findings Wednesday at the European Breast Cancer Conference in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Research from meetings is generally viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

For the study, Andersen evaluated more than 5,600 women. They all had mammograms between 1993 and 2001. The average age was 56. Most of the women were past menopause. More than half had breasts classified as mixed or dense. Slightly more than 2 percent of the women had diabetes.

Overall, women with diabetes were less likely to have mixed or dense breasts, the study found.

However, women taking insulin injections were more than twice as likely to have dense or mixed (dense and fatty) breasts, the study found. This was true regardless of their body mass index, or whether they had gone through menopause — when breasts may become less dense, the researchers said.

Meanwhile, women with diabetes who managed their condition with diet or with non-insulin medications were less likely to have dense breasts, the study found.

Diabetes has previously been linked with a higher risk of breast cancer, Andersen said. But, exactly why there has been an association hasn’t been clear. It’s also not clear how insulin may be increasing the odds of denser breasts.

Cancer cells grow rapidly and uncontrollably, and growth factors are crucial for cancer to progress, Andersen said. “Insulin is a growth promoting factor of all body tissues,” she said, “and thus it is plausible that it can increase the amount of epithelial or stromal tissue in the breast, thus increasing overall breast density.”

For now, Andersen said, women should be aware that different types of diabetes treatments seem to affect breast density differently. Women on insulin should consider asking their doctor about whether they need extra screening with mammograms and other tests, she added.

Andersen wants to look further at the effect of different diabetes treatments on breast cancer risk, including the finding that the non-insulin medications were linked with less breast density.

Dr. Wei Feng is an endocrinologist at the City of Hope Cancer Center, in Duarte, Calif. She called the study finding interesting and novel. She also said she’d like to see more research on the link between non-insulin medication, such as metformin, and reduced breast density.

More Information

To learn more about breast cancer, visit American Cancer Society.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7jDNL

Scientists Use Stem Cells to Correct Infant Cataracts

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, March 9, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new surgical technique for removing cataracts might allow the eye’s stem cells to regenerate a healthy lens, if preliminary findings hold up.

In an early study of infants born with cataracts, researchers used a minimally invasive approach to remove the eye’s damaged lens — while keeping the native stem cells intact. Stem cells are primitive cells that give rise to different types of mature tissue.

Those stem cells were then able to form a new lens, the researchers reported March 9 in the online edition of the journal Nature.

Experts cautioned that more research is needed to know whether the approach is better than the standard treatment for infantile cataract.

And it’s not clear whether it could be used for the much more common type of cataract that affects older adults, said Dr. Ali Djalilian, a clinical spokesperson for the American Academy of Ophthalmology, who was not involved in the research.

“But are these findings interesting and exciting? Definitely,” said Djalilian, who also directs the corneal epithelial biology and tissue engineering lab at the University of Illinois School of Medicine, in Chicago.

A cataract is a clouding of the eye’s lens, usually caused when proteins in the lens start to clump together as a person ages. But it’s also possible for infants to be born with a cataract in one or both eyes. About three out of every 10,000 children have cataracts, according to the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

Right now, doctors may perform surgery to remove a baby’s cataract, but there is controversy about whether the lens should be replaced with an artificial lens — which is standard for adults. The other options are contact lenses or glasses.

“There’s a huge need for better treatments for congenital cataract,” said researcher Dr. Kang Zhang, founding director of the Institute for Genomic Medicine at the University of California, San Diego.

Zhang said his team’s approach — tested in animals and 12 babies with congenital cataracts — could offer a way to harness the body’s own healing capacity.

The eye’s lens contains so-called epithelial stem cells, which generate replacement lens cells throughout life — though that declines with aging, according to Zhang.

During traditional cataract surgery, most of those stem cells are removed, Zhang explained. So, his team developed a less invasive approach that preserves the lens “capsule,” a membrane that gives the lens its shape.

That essentially “left the bag intact,” Zhang said, and the resident stem cells were able to regenerate a clear lens in all 12 babies over three months.

The investigators also reported less inflammation in the eyes and less lens clouding, compared with 25 babies who had standard cataract surgery.

Still, Djalilian said, the study followed the children for only a short time, and it’s not clear what the long-term effects on vision will be.

One risk, he said, is that the cataract will come back in the new stem-cell-generated lens.

That is a possibility, Zhang agreed. He acknowledged that much more research is needed before the stem cell approach can become standard therapy.

Other researchers are trying to use stem cells to treat various eye diseases. In another study in the same issue of Nature, scientists reported that they were able to use human stem cells to generate several types of eye tissue.

The researchers then transplanted some of that tissue into rabbits blinded by damage to the cornea. Eventually, the transplanted tissue repaired the animals’ eyes and restored their vision.

Zhang sees his team’s approach as particularly promising because there is no transplanted tissue.

“Our work focuses on using stem cells that are right at the place of injury,” he said, a fact that could avoid potential problems such as infection transmission or immune system rejection.

Zhang said he does plan to test the approach in treating age-related cataract — a very common condition that affects more than half of Americans who live to age 80, according to the U.S. National Eye Institute.

Djalilian had some caveats, however.

The idea of trying the treatment on adults “isn’t too far-fetched,” he said. But, he also pointed out that regenerating a lens in a baby and regenerating one in a 70-year-old are two different things.

The “environment” of a baby’s eye is designed for growth and development, Djalilian explained. With an older adult, he said, regenerating a lens would likely take more “manipulation,” such as using proteins called growth factors.

Plus, even though there is room for improvement in age-related cataract treatment, Djalilian said, the current treatments are “usually quite successful.”

More information

The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus has more on congenital cataract.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7T412

U.S. Cancer Death Rate Continues to Fall

WEDNESDAY, March 9, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Overall rates of cancer and deaths from cancer in the United States continue to decline, a newly released report says.

However, an increase in liver cancer deaths is cause for concern, the report authors noted. An increase in hepatitis C infections is likely a major reason for the increase, they said.

“The latest data show many cancer prevention programs are working and saving lives,” Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a news release from the organizations that issued the report.

“But the growing burden of liver cancer is troublesome. We need to do more work promoting hepatitis testing, treatment, and vaccination,” Frieden added.

The Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer is released each year by the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

Between 2003 and 2012, the overall death rate for all cancers fell 1.5 percent a year. There were decreases in cancer deaths for both men and women, and among all major racial and ethnic groups.

During that time, rates of new cancer cases fell among men and remained stable for women. The drop in new cancer cases is largely due to progress in prevention and early detection, and the decrease in cancer deaths may also be due to improved treatments, the experts suggested.

Tobacco control programs have contributed to lower rates of lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, along with other types of cancer, according to the report.

While the overall news is good, liver cancer incidence and death rates rose sharply compared to other cancer types, the report revealed.

Between 2008 and 2012, liver cancer cases rose an average of just over 2 percent a year, the findings showed. Liver cancer deaths increased nearly 3 percent a year among men and more than 3 percent a year among women during the same time. In all racial and ethnic groups, about twice as many men as women were diagnosed with liver cancer, the report noted.

Between 2008 and 2012, liver cancer rates were highest among American Indian/Alaska Native men and Asian/Pacific Islander men.

In addition, the findings showed that people born between 1945 and 1965 had the highest rates of hepatitis C and liver cancer-associated deaths.

“Research over the past decades has led to the development of several vaccines that, given at the appropriate ages, can reduce the risk of some cancers, including liver cancer,” Dr. Douglas Lowy, acting director of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, said in the news release.

“Determining which cancers can be effectively prevented by vaccines and other methods is one of our top priorities at NCI, and one which we believe will truly make a difference in cancer incidence and mortality trends,” Lowy added.

A major contributing factor to liver cancer in the United States is hepatitis C infection, which accounts for just over 20 percent of the most common liver cancers. People born between 1945 and 1965 have a six times increased risk of hepatitis C infection and the CDC recommends they be tested for it.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C infection can greatly reduce the risk of liver cancer. Hepatitis B infection can also increase the risk of liver cancer, and is a common risk factor among Asian/Pacific Islanders, especially Asians who weren’t born in the United States. Obesity, type 2 diabetes and excessive alcohol use are also linked to an increased risk of liver cancer, the report said.

“We have the knowledge and tools available to slow the epidemic of liver cancer in the U.S., including testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B vaccination, and lowering obesity rates,” said Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society.

“We hope that this report will help focus needed attention and resources on liver cancer,” he added.

More information

The American Cancer Society has more on liver cancer.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7T3Ky

3 Healthier Jerky Options With No Artificial Additives

Strips of dehydrated meat are having an It-girl moment, thanks to newer kinds that are free of artificial additives (a far cry from the old gas station staple). Our top protein packed picks:

RELATED: 31 Superfood Secrets for a Long and Healthy Life

1. Field Trip Gluten Free Turkey Jerky ($8; amazon.com)

Three pals came up with the idea of making their own no-junk jerkies after sharing a bag of locally made strips on a ski lift.

field-trip-turkey-jerky

Photo: Amazon.com

2. Krave Black Cherry BBQ Pork Jerky ($20; amazon.com)

The options include a number of gourmet flavors, like black cherry barbecue pork; the strips marinate for 48 hours before baking.

krave-pork-jerky

Photo: Amazon.com

3. Trader Joe’s Wild King Salmon Jerky ($6; at Trader Joe’s)

The grocery chain recently switched the fish used in its salmon jerky recipe from chum to Alaskan king salmon

king-salmon-jerky

Photo: Traderjoes.com




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1R7T4yg