barre

4 Awe-Inspiring Trails to Run Before You Die

Yes, any old dirt path in your local park is worthy of a run, but here are four awe-inspiring trails to blaze before you die. You’ll be glad you did.

The Dip Sea Trail in Marin County, Calif.

Run here for killer views of redwood trees, grasslands, and the Pacific Ocean.

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

RELATED: Best Vacation Spots for Hiking

Crater Lake National Park in Oregon

Trek this lake’s rocky rim, surrounded by the lush greenery of the Pacific Northwest, and enjoy views of Mount Shasta.

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

RELATED: Gear Up for the Great Outdoors

Kalalau Trail in Kauai, Hawaii

Catch glimpses of waterfalls as you run across rolling valleys along the Na Pali Coast. Finish on the beaches of Hanakapi’ai and Kalalau.

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Rim to Rim in Grand Canyon National Park, Ariz.

From the North Rim, you’ll jog more than 14 miles downhill along the North Kaibab Trail before climbing nearly 10 back up on the South Rim’s Bright Angel Trail, taking in rock formations along the way.

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1So7ffT

Many Breast Cancer Patients May Not Need Chemo: Study

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, April 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Many breast cancer patients receive chemotherapy they don’t need, according to the results of a long-awaited clinical trial.

A genetic test called MammaPrint determined that nearly half the women slated for chemotherapy based on standard clinical assessments didn’t really need to undergo the challenging treatment.

Researchers planned to announce the findings Monday at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) meeting in New Orleans.

After surgery to remove their tumors, breast cancer patients with a MammaPrint score recommending against chemotherapy had a 95 percent survival rate, said co-researcher Laura van ‘t Veer, the test’s inventor.

“That’s very high, and we showed that it doesn’t differ between those who are treated and those who are not treated by chemotherapy,” said van ‘t Veer, leader of the breast oncology program at the University of California, San Francisco Diller Family Cancer Center.

The clinical trial involved nearly 6,700 women at 111 medical centers in nine countries. It “represents what we in medicine call the highest level of evidence,” AACR President Dr. Jose Baselga said.

“This study is telling us in a very clear way we can spare many women chemotherapy,” said Baselga, chief medical officer of Memorial Hospital at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, in New York City.

Previously, doctors guessed whether a woman needed chemo by measuring the tumor, examining its cells under a microscope, and using genetic testing to determine whether the tumor would respond to hormone therapy, Baselga said.

The MammaPrint test looks at a panel of 70 genes within the tumor itself to assess its aggressiveness and the odds it will come back without chemotherapy, van ‘t Veer said.

“Our test looks under the hood, at the engine of the tumor,” she said. “The biology tells more about the tumor than simply examining its size, because you’re really looking into the tumor.”

MammaPrint has been on the U.S. market since FDA approval in 2007. But, many cancer doctors have waited for the results of this clinical trial to see how well it works, Baselga said.

Although the results should be considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, Baselga said “this is the result we were hoping for.”

In the clinical trial, researchers sorted breast cancer patients into four groups, based on whether MammaPrint testing or traditional clinical assessment recommended chemotherapy.

MammaPrint reduced chemotherapy prescriptions by 46 percent among the more than 3,300 patients in the trial categorized as having a high risk of breast cancer recurrence based on common clinical and pathological criteria, the researchers said.

Further, just over 2,700 patients who had a low MammaPrint risk score but a high clinical risk score wound up with a 94.7 percent five-year survival rate, whether they got chemo or not, the researchers said.

Dr. Stephanie Bernik, chief of surgical oncology at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, said the results of this study were eagerly anticipated.

“If we can select those patients that don’t need chemotherapy, unneeded treatment can be avoided and we will be one step closer to making sure treatment for breast cancer is tailored to the individual,” she said.

MammaPrint testing will be particularly valuable for young women with breast cancer, said Dr. Victor Vogel, director of Breast Medical Oncology/Research for the Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania.

Young women have been more likely to receive chemotherapy in standard breast cancer care, even though it can destroy their fertility and leave them open to long-term health problems, Vogel said.

“In my training, if you had a young woman with breast cancer, she got chemotherapy,” Vogel said. “But now we can be selective, and we know there’s a very large number of young women with small hormone-responsive tumors who do not need chemotherapy.”

Vogel said he frequently uses the MammaPrint test in his practice, and found that it helps all patients regardless of how they fare on it.

“It works both ways,” he said. “It reassures the people who don’t need chemotherapy, and when you get a big score that says there would be benefit, it encourages the patient they’re doing the right thing by taking chemotherapy.”

MammaPrint is covered by Medicare and is reimbursed by most large health insurers in the United States, van ‘t Veer said.

The test is expected to save health care dollars, Baselga said.

“You are saving all the money for chemotherapy that would be used for no reason, and you are protecting women from chemotherapy that is toxic and they don’t need,” he said.

More information

For more on breast cancer treatments, visit the American Cancer Society.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1So7eZs

Botox Can Be Used for Chronic Migraine, Experts Say

MONDAY, April 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Botox is a safe and effective treatment for chronic migraine and three other neurological disorders, an updated guideline from the American Academy of Neurology says.

Long used to smooth wrinkles, botulinum toxin is made by a type of bacteria. The toxin blocks the release of substances at nerve endings, reducing muscle contraction and the transmission of pain signals, the researchers explained.

The authors of the updated guideline reviewed scientific studies on the four preparations of botulinum toxin available in the United States. They concluded that the treatment is generally safe and effective for four neurological conditions: chronic migraine, spasticity in adults, cervical dystonia and blepharospasm.

Chronic migraine is defined as having migraines 15 or more days a month, the study authors explained. Spasticity in adults is muscle tightness that interferes with movement and typically occurs after a stroke, spinal cord or other neurological injury. Cervical dystonia is a disorder of the brain that affects neck muscle control, resulting in involuntary head tilt or neck movement. Blepharospasm is a movement disorder that causes the eyes to close uncontrollably, guideline author Dr. David Simpson and colleagues said. Simpson is with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City.

The last time the guideline was updated — in 2008 — there wasn’t enough information to make a recommendation on chronic migraine. This time, the guideline authors found research that showed that botulinum toxin provides a small benefit for people with chronic migraines.

The updated guideline was published online April 18 in the journal Neurology. The new guideline is also scheduled to be presented Monday at the American Academy of Neurology’s annual meeting in Vancouver, Canada.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more about Botox injections.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1So7bNo

3 Things You Need to Know Before Running a Beer Mile

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Move over, color runs! Beer miles (in which you down a brew after every quarter mile) are the new race du jour. Professional beer miler and world-record holder Lewis Kent—recently signed by Brooks—offers tips for surviving an ale-filled dash.

RELATED: These Are the Best Running Shoes of 2016

Choose wisely

Stouts and darker beers tend to be thicker and harder to chug. For a smoother sip that’s less likely to upset your stomach, reach for a lager or blond beer instead.

Gulp, don’t sip

Being speedy is great, but the real skill is rapidly tossing back those suds. “If it takes you a minute or longer than your competition, your lead will disappear quickly,” says Kent.

RELATED: 15 Running Tips You Need to Know

Pace yourself

Run your first lap 5 to 10 seconds more slowly than normal; you’ll be less out of breath and able to drink your second beer a lot more easily. If you hammer the first two laps, beers three and four are going to hurt.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/23TDn0f

Novel E-Skin May Monitor Health, Vital Signs

MONDAY, April 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — In a bid to take high-performance wearable electronics to a new level, Japanese researchers have developed an “e-skin” that may be a noninvasive way to monitor patients’ health and vital signs.

The ultra-thin, flexible film can light up and display numbers or images. It moves easily with the body and is resistant to air and water damage, according to the scientists who created the technology.

The electronic skin is less than 2 micrometers thick. It is made up of layers of inorganic and organic materials, including Silicon Oxynitrite and Parylene.

The researchers, led by Takao Someya and Dr. Tomoyuki Yokota at the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Engineering, also attached transparent indium tin oxide electrodes, enabling them to create electronic devices called polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) and organic photodetectors.

These devices are six times more efficient than existing PLEDs, producing less heat and consuming less power. This makes them ideal for direct application to the skin and medical uses, such as measuring pulse rate and oxygen levels in the bloodstream, the e-skin’s creators said.

Until now, such devices have been thicker, much less flexible, and not stable enough to survive when exposed to air. The protective film created by the research team extends the life of the device from a few hours to several days.

The researchers said that the ultra-thin and flexible e-skin may be used to measure the oxygen levels and heart rate of athletes. The technology, they added, could also be utilized in many other applications.

“The advent of mobile phones has changed the way we communicate. While these communication tools are getting smaller and smaller, they are still discrete devices that we have to carry with us,” Someya said in a university news release.

“What would the world be like if we had displays that could adhere to our bodies and even show our emotions or level of stress or unease? In addition to not having to carry a device with us at all times, they might enhance the way we interact with those around us or add a whole new dimension to how we communicate,” he said.

More information

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has more on digital health, including wearable technology.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Vy7ed1

Doctors May Be Ordering Too Many Neck Artery Scans: Study

By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, April 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new study suggests that many heart patients are scanned for potential blockages in their carotid arteries for uncertain or inappropriate reasons.

The carotid arteries, which run up both sides of the neck, deliver blood to the brain. If they become blocked, that can cause a stroke. Once spotted, a blockage can be treated with surgery or medication, the researchers said.

But among more than 4,000 VA patients in the study, scans for uncertain reasons happened more than 83 percent of the time, while scans for inappropriate reasons happened 11 percent of the time. Only slightly over 5 percent of these patients were screened for appropriate reasons, the study found.

“The vast majority were done for uncertain or inappropriate reasons,” said Dr. Larry Goldstein, chairman of the department of neurology at the University of Kentucky School of Medicine. He wrote a commentary accompanying the study.

Experts differ about who should be scanned and why they should be scanned. It is typically done using an ultrasound device that detects blockages.

Some surgeons frown on screening, and believe it’s better for certain patients to be treated with medication instead of riskier surgery.

“If you screen someone and say, ‘You’ve got a narrowed carotid artery,’ they’re going to want something done,” said Dr. Frank Veith, a veteran vascular surgeon who was not involved in the study. “But the procedures drive up health care costs, and patients can have strokes or die because of them [the procedures].”

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that only adults who’ve had a stroke or mini-stroke should be screened.

But the study authors said other recommendations suggest certain people should be screened even if they don’t show symptoms of illness, such as those whose carotid arteries make a unique sound known as “bruit” when monitored via a stethoscope. Carotid bruit is a swishing sound heard in the artery as blood tries to move around a blockage.

In the study, led by Dr. Salomeh Keyhani of the University of California, San Francisco, researchers tracked patients — all aged 65 or older, with an average age of 74 — who underwent surgery to open their carotid arteries between 2005 and 2009. The patients didn’t have symptoms, and almost all had undergone screening.

Veith, a professor of surgery at New York University Medical Center and Cleveland Clinic, said most surgeries to open carotid arteries aren’t necessary. In general, he said, these patients would be “better served” by being treated with anti-cholesterol drugs.

How did the procedures become routine in the first place? Studies from decades ago suggested surgery in many cases, Veith explained, but they haven’t been updated in the era of medications that lower cholesterol levels.

“The old studies are now obsolete and don’t apply anymore,” he said. “New studies have to be done to show whether it’s worthwhile or not.”

Goldstein had a similar perspective.

“Clinicians do not want to miss a potential opportunity to prevent stroke. However, there is concern that the results of the prior studies may no longer be valid due to advances in medical therapy,” Goldstein said.

As for screening, Veith said it’s probably appropriate in some cases, since it can help determine who might need medication, “but not as a way to detect patients who should get operated on.”

For his part, Goldstein said the new research has some weaknesses. The main one is that it was limited to patients who underwent surgical procedures. “This is the tip of the iceberg, as it does not address the likely considerably larger population of patients who get the test and did not have a procedure,” he said.

Also, the study almost entirely looked at male veterans. Only a few dozen women were included. As a result, he said, “the results may not be generalizable to other populations.”

What should physicians do?

“Consider carefully the reason the screening test is being performed and the consequences of a positive, negative or equivocal result, and have that discussion with patients before the test,” Goldstein advised.

As for patients, they “should understand their risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular disease and, in consultation with their health care providers, take steps to reduce their risks,” Veith added.

He noted that ongoing research will offer more insight into the value of surgical procedures for carotid artery blockages versus medication.

The study is published in the April 18 issue of JAMA Internal Medicine.

More information

For more about guidelines regarding carotid screening, try the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Vy7ecN

Have Scientists Found ‘Virginity Genes’?

By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, April 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Parents, when you have “the talk” with your kids, keep these new study findings in mind: Genetic makeup may help determine when people lose their virginity.

The study results matter because people who have sex and babies earlier appear to fare worse educationally and have poorer physical and mental health, said study co-author Ken Ong.

“Genes influence the ages of first intercourse and first birth by acting on both personality and physical characteristics,” said Ong. He is an epidemiologist with the University of Cambridge in England, who analyzed genetic data of hundreds of thousands of people.

Researchers have previously linked the start of puberty to genetic factors, but Ong said it wasn’t known how genes may affect the timing of first sex and when females first give birth. The new study finds a “moderate genetic component” for both, although not a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

“We already know that the timing of puberty is under clear genetic influence, as well as environmental factors like diet and weight,” said Dr. Tim Spector, professor of genetic epidemiology and director of twin research at Kings College London in England. “Our increasing childhood obesity problems are making puberty increasingly early,” said Spector, who wasn’t involved in the study.

The start of puberty decreased from an average of 18 years in 1880 to 12.5 years in 1980, according to background notes with the study.

Wouldn’t earlier puberty automatically lead to earlier sex and earlier birth? It’s not that simple, the researchers suggested.

Decades ago, when puberty occurred years later, people tended to have first sex later than now but give birth earlier, Ong explained. “In recent years, there is — on average — nearly 10 years between first sexual intercourse and having your first child,” Ong said.

In the new study, Ong and colleagues examined genetic data and other records of nearly 400,000 people in the United Kingdom, the United States and Iceland. The investigators linked several genetic variations to age at first intercourse, and found some linked to age at first birth, number of children, age of puberty and willingness to take risks.

Spector said the study “convincingly confirms” previous research suggesting that genes affect the age you lose your virginity, although they aren’t the ultimate deciders.

“Twin studies from our group and others have also shown that age of first sexual intercourse as well as number of partners is also around 50 percent heritable,” he said.

There’s also a “clear link” between genes that promote early sexual activity and genes that promote risk-taking, Spector added. “These genes are likely to have an effect throughout life,” he said.

What do the study findings mean in day-to-day life? “The main message is that our teenage behaviors are a mix of our genes and environment,” Spector said.

Ong agreed, adding that your fate isn’t entirely dictated by your genes. Working to delay early puberty could stave off some problems created by early sex and early birth, he said. He believes the study results “strengthen the argument to find safe and effective ways to avoid children starting puberty at very young ages.”

But David Karasik, a genetic researcher with Israel’s Bar-Ilan University, cautioned that it’s still not clear why the age of puberty has fallen over the past century. The question, he said, is whether it has to do with your environment or your genes — with their activity affected by diet and lifestyles — or both?

Whatever the case, some people are genetically predisposed to reproduce earlier, Karasik said, and sex education might fail in those people. Then again, social norms can affect the choices people make. It’s a matter of “nature versus nurture,” he said, “as in every human trait.”

The study findings were published in the April 18 online edition of Nature Genetics.

More information

For more about genetics, visit the American Society of Human Genetics.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Vy7dWr

How Your Checking Account Affects Your Mood

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

TIME-logo.jpg

Nice as it is, having a higher salary might not be the key to happiness. An even more important figure linked to life satisfaction is the number sitting in your checking account, according to a new study published in the journal Emotion.

In the study, researchers looked at data from 585 customers at a U.K. bank. That included survey information, like how stressed they were about their finances and how satisfied they were with their lives, along with the balances of their checking and savings accounts.

The amount of easily accessible cash people had predicted how satisfied they were with their lives—a link explained by how comfortable people felt about their finances. In fact, liquid wealth appeared to be even more important than income or debt status in predicting a person’s happiness. “No matter how much the customers had or earned, no matter how much debt they had, having a buffer of easily accessible cash was associated with greater happiness,” says Peter Ruberton, the study’s lead author and a doctoral candidate in social personality psychology at the University of California, Riverside.

When the researchers looked at how life satisfaction changed with the amount of cash in the accounts, they saw that the link tapers off after balances climb to a couple thousand dollars. “That first $1,000 is more important than the next $9,000,” Ruberton says. “The hedonic benefits to your happiness will be experienced once you save enough to feel comfortable with your finances, but saving above that point buys you relatively little in terms of wellbeing.”

That’s heartening news for people of all income levels who can manage to save just a little bit, which may be all it takes to get a happiness bump.

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Sq78Uu

This Trailer Perfectly Sums Up Why People Want to Run the Boston Marathon

Timed to Marathon Monday, a sneak peek at the first feature-length documentary about Boston’s legendary race has been released. Called simply Boston—and set to hit theaters in 2017—the film captures the history and spirit of the country’s premiere and oldest marathon.

Directed by Jon Dunham, the filmmaker behind the running-cult classics Spirit of the Marathon and Spirit of the Marathon II, Boston features neat archival footage and interviews with past champions to tell the colorful story of the race from its beginning in 1897 through 2014, one year after the bombing.

RELATED: 11 Training Tips for Running Your First Half-Marathon

“There’s no one that can watch the Boston Marathon and not be inspired somehow, by someone,” Olympian Shalane Flanagan points out in the trailer. As the 30,000 entrants run their 26.2 today, this 60-second clip from the documentary is a moving reminder of why these athletes push their bodies to the limit to qualify for the exclusive race.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Snyjfw

Americans Embraced Record Number of Lip Procedures in 2015

MONDAY, April 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Hoping to look more kissable perhaps, Americans underwent a record number of lip procedures last year.

“We live in the age of the selfie, and because we see images of ourselves almost constantly on social media, we’re much more aware of how our lips look,” Dr. David Song, president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, said in a society news release.

There were more than 27,400 lip implants performed in 2015 — a 48 percent increase since 2000. That averages out to one lip implant every 19 minutes, the society said, noting the procedure became more popular among both men and women.

Lip injections, which include Botox and various soft-tissue fillers, also rose steeply last year, reaching nearly 9.2 million. That’s an increase of more than 1,000 percent since the year 2000, the plastic surgeons said.

Lip procedures have been the second-fastest-growing facial procedure in the United States since 2000. Only dermabrasion procedures have climbed more rapidly.

Dr. Robert Houser, a plastic surgeon in Westerville, Ohio, said that lips are an easy place for people to start. “A patient may not be ready to commit to something as dramatic as a facelift or eyelid surgery, but there are a variety of ways you can change the shape of your lips,” he said.

Some people prefer the temporary nature of injections, Houser said. “If a patient doesn’t like the injections, it’s fine, because within a few months they wear off and everything is back to normal,” he explained. “But if they do like what injections do for their lips, they have to keep coming back every few months to maintain them.”

The alternative, Houser said, is a more permanent but still reversible lip implant.

More information

The U.S. Office on Women’s Health has more about cosmetic surgery.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1VdZEV3