barre

Got Unused Meds? Here’s What to Do

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — While doing your spring cleaning, don’t just toss out expired or unused prescription medications.

Unwanted drugs need to be properly disposed of to reduce the risk of abuse or accidental use, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration says.

Follow disposal instructions on the drug label or patient information that came with the medicine. Don’t put medicines down the sink or flush them down the toilet unless this information specifically says to do so.

Call local law enforcement agencies to find out if your community has a medication take-back program or event. Or, ask your local trash or recycling services about medication disposal services and guidelines, the FDA suggests.

Another option is to deliver unused medicines to collectors registered with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). These authorized sites may be retail, clinic or hospital pharmacies, and law enforcement offices. Some have mail-back programs or drop boxes. To find an authorized site in your community, go to the DEA website or call 800-882-9539.

If the drug labeling has no disposal instructions and there is no take-back program in your area, you can throw the medicines in the garbage if you take certain precautions, the FDA said.

For starters, remove the medicines from their original containers and mix them with unpleasant materials — such as used coffee grounds, dirt or kitty litter — to make the drugs less appealing to children and pets and unrecognizable to people who may go through your trash looking for drugs.

Then put the mixture in a sealable bag, empty can or other container to prevent the medicine from leaking or spilling out of the garbage bag.

It’s also a good idea to scratch out all identifying information on the drug label to make it unreadable. This will help protect your identity and personal health information, explained the FDA’s Ilisa Bernstein.

If you have any questions about proper disposal, ask your pharmacist.

Bernstein added that the same steps can be taken for getting rid of over-the-counter drugs.

More information

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has more about the disposal of medicines.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1rk40gw

Additional Treatments Offer Little Benefit for Pancreatic Cancer: Study

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Additional treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer don’t appear to boost survival, a new French study reports.

Researchers looked at the effects of adding a second drug — erlotinib (Tarceva) — to the initial round of chemotherapy. They also tested whether adding radiation to a second round of chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) would offer any survival benefit.

Unfortunately, the addition of the second drug didn’t help people live longer, and those on chemoradiotherapy didn’t fare any better.

“Chemoradiotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy,” said the study’s senior author, Dr. Pascal Hammel. Hammel is from the department of gastroenterology-pancreatology at Beaujon Hospital, in Clichy, France.

The study was funded by the pharmaceutical company Roche, the maker of Tarceva, and the French National Institute of Cancer.

More than 53,000 Americans are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer annually, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) says. About 42,000 Americans die each year from the disease, the NCI reports.

The new study focused on 449 people with pancreatic cancer. Their average age was just over 63.

All received standard four-month chemotherapy with the drug gemcitabine (Gemzar). Gemzar is currently used to treat a range of cancers, including pancreatic, ovarian, breast, and non-small cell lung cancers, the drug’s labeling information says. For the study, about half the patients (219) also took Tarceva along with Gemzar.

After completing initial treatment, imaging tests revealed that 269 patients appeared to have tumors that were under control. That meant their cancer was stable and didn’t appear to have spread, or metastasized.

But the tumors couldn’t be surgically removed because they had developed around the arteries surrounding the pancreas, study authors said.

About half this group of stable patients (136) received two additional months of the same chemotherapy regimen. The other half (133) was treated with a combination of radiation and the chemotherapy drug capecitabine (Xeloda).

After three years of follow-up, the researchers found that patients given Gemzar chemotherapy alone survived an average of 13.6 months. Those given the combination of Gemzar and Tarceva had an average survival of 11.9 months, the study found.

Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy lived an average of 15.2 months. Those who got chemotherapy alone lived an average of 16.5 months, the study found.

Hammel said there’s still work to be done to improve the results of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments.

But for now, Dr. Deborah Schrag agreed that “the French trial demonstrates that routine addition of chemo-radiation following initial chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer does not improve survival compared to continued chemotherapy.” Schrag, chief of the Division of Population Sciences, Medical Oncology, at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, wrote an accompanying editorial in the same issue of the journal.

“[And] given the burdens of daily radiation therapy, there is no routine role for the application of this treatment strategy,” added Schrag.

Schrag said it’s possible there might be a certain group of pancreatic cancer patients who could get some measurable benefit from radiation. “Further evaluation of the tumor samples from the study participants might help to more precisely determine who might benefit from radiation, and such data are eagerly awaited,” she said.

More information

There’s more on pancreatic cancer at U.S. National Cancer Institute.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Tk5Rbx

Radon in the Home May Be Linked to Blood Cancers in Women

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — New research suggests a strong link between exposure to high levels of radon in the home and women’s risk of blood cancers.

Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says. It’s known to cause lung cancer and is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States, the researchers said.

The American Cancer Society collected information over 19 years on more than 140,000 Americans as part of a prevention study. During that time, just over 3,000 cases of blood cancer were diagnosed. The cancers included leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma, the study found.

Women who lived in counties with the highest radon levels were 63 percent more likely to develop blood cancers than those in counties with the lowest radon levels. There was no link seen among men, the study noted.

The study was published online recently in the journal Environmental Research.

“The overall lifetime risk of hematological [blood] cancers in the United States is about 2 percent, so even a 60 percent relative increase would still mean a relatively small absolute risk,” study leader Lauren Teras, American Cancer Society, said in a journal news release.

It’s also important to note that the study was only designed to show an association, and not a cause-and-effect link.

“Nonetheless, radon is already associated with lung cancer, and if other studies confirm the link to blood cancers, we think it would warrant strengthened public health efforts to mitigate residential radon risks,” Teras added.

The study authors said further research is needed to learn more about the link between radon and blood cancers, and whether women actually have a higher risk than men.

In 2016, it’s expected there will be more than 171,000 new U.S. cases of blood cancers and more than 58,000 deaths from these cancers, the researchers said.

More information

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more about radon.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Tk5P3o

Parents and Social Media: Do as I Say, Not as I Do

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Despite concerns about their children’s use of social and other media, many parents may set a less-than-ideal example by spending a lot of time using the technology themselves, British researchers report.

The study included 107 parents of children who were age 5 and older. The researchers asked them how much time they and their children spend using technology, watching television, listening to music, playing video games and social networking.

Both parents and children spend a lot of time doing those activities, the study showed. There was a strong association between the amount of time parents did these things and how much their children did them.

Yet two-thirds of the parents said they were concerned about their children’s use of social and other types of media, the researchers said.

“Our findings suggest parents are worried about their children’s use of technology, which makes it interesting that their own use of it has so much influence on their children,” said study author Judith Ramsay, from Manchester Metropolitan University.

“We need to raise parental awareness of the strong effect they have and this influence must also be taken into account by professionals developing policies that promote safe use of the internet for children,” she said in a university news release.

The study was presented at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, in Nottingham. Findings presented at meetings are generally viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

More information

The American Academy of Pediatrics has more on social media and children.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Tk5OfU

For ADHD, Start With Behavior Therapy, Not Drugs: CDC

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Behavior modification therapy is preferable to drugs for treating children 2 to 5 years old who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, U.S. health officials say.

“Behavior therapy has been shown to help improve symptoms in young children with ADHD and can be as effective as medicine, but without the side effects,” said Dr. Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Research has shown that the benefits of behavior therapy can last for years,” she said Tuesday during a midday media briefing.

Medicines such as Ritalin are appropriate for some children, Schuchat said. But behavior therapy doesn’t have the side effects such as stomach aches, irritability, appetite loss and sleep problems often associated with ADHD medications, she said.

Also, the effects of long-term use of ADHD medications by young children are still unknown, she added.

Because of this, the CDC is “encouraging pediatricians and other health care providers to work with families to make sure children with ADHD are receiving the most appropriate treatment,” Schuchat said. This should include a discussion about behavior therapy as a first step, she said.

ADHD causes hyperactivity, impulsiveness and attention problems. About 2 million of the more than 6 million American children with ADHD were diagnosed before age 6. Young children with ADHD tend to have the most severe symptoms and benefit from early treatment, according to the CDC Vital Signs report released May 3.

In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics also recommended that before giving medicine to a young child, parents should be referred for training in behavior therapy.

But according to the new CDC report, about 75 percent of young children being treated for ADHD are started on drugs, and only about half get any type of psychological services, including behavior therapy.

In eight or more behavioral training sessions, a therapist teaches parents how to encourage positive behavior while strengthening the bond with the child, according to the CDC.

Brandon Korman, chief of neuropsychology at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, in Miami, agrees with the report. “I am a big proponent of behavioral training,” he said.

“The therapy provides a structure for kids who have problems concentrating, staying focused, organizing their world and planning ahead,” he said.

Some parents would rather give their child drugs to solve the problem, Korman said. But “when parents can not only learn to deal with their children’s behavior but also be a conduit to improving behavior… that’s the best way to go,” he said.

Improved behavior, self-control and self-esteem can help kids at school, at home and in relationships, the CDC said. While learning and practicing these skills requires more effort than opening a pill bottle, the lasting benefits make this approach a worthwhile investment, the agency said.

Key skills emphasize:

  • Positive communication: Parents learn to give children their full attention and reflect their words back to them. This shows you’re listening and care about what they say.
  • Positive reinforcement: Praise for doing something right helps kids behave the same way again.
  • Structure and discipline: Children do better when their world is predictable. Establishing routines and schedules helps the child know what to expect each day. And responding to the child’s behavior the same way each time fosters faster learning.

Behavioral training is not available everywhere, or covered by all insurance plans, Schuchat said. However, some centers base their fees on income or offer group sessions, which are less costly than individual sessions, she said.

For the report, CDC researchers looked at annual health care claims starting in 2008 for at least 5 million young children (2 to 5 years old) insured by Medicaid and another 1 million young children with employer-sponsored insurance.

Overall, a little more than 75 percent of young children received ADHD medicine. Only 54 percent of kids with Medicaid and 45 percent of kids with employer insurance received any type of psychological services, which might have included parent training. The number of children with ADHD receiving psychological services has not changed over time, the agency said.

“Parents aren’t the cause of their child’s ADHD, but they can play an important role in treatment,” Schuchat said.

More information

For more about ADHD, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Tk5OMU

Why The Biggest Loser Contestants Gain Back the Weight

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

TIME-logo.jpg

It’s an unfortunate truth that many people who lose a significant amount of weight will gain it back. But a new study of contestants of the popular reality show The Biggest Loser suggests that a slowed metabolism—not a lack of willpower—is largely to blame.

In new research to be published in the journal Obesity, researchers followed contestants from The Biggest Loser season 8 for six years to see what happened to them after they lost so much weight, the New York Times reports. Led by Kevin Hall, a scientist at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the researchers found that people’s resting metabolism—how many calories they burn when they’re at rest—changes dramatically after weight loss.

The men and women had normal metabolisms for their weight when they were obese, the Times reports. However, once they dropped a massive amount of weight, their resting metabolisms slowed so significantly that they were not burning enough calories to maintain their new size. This is a normal reaction to weight loss; what was surprising was that as time passed and the people gained back weight, their metabolisms continued to slow, making the process harder.

The winner of season 8, Danny Cahill, lost nearly 240 pounds in less than a year. Since then, he’s gained back 100 pounds, the Times reports. But the findings may also apply to people who lose less.

The new study adds to a growing body of research aimed at understanding why it’s so difficult for people to lose weight, and why some are more successful than others. Other recent studies have suggested that people’s bodies respond dramatically differently to the same foods. In the future, weight loss advice may need to be more personalized, some experts suggest.

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1rtAHIO

Could Infant Colds, Other Infections Raise Type 1 Diabetes Risk?

By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Colds and other infections in the first six months of life may boost the odds of a child developing type 1 diabetes by nearly 20 percent, new research suggests.

The suspicion that infections play a role in the development of type 1 diabetes isn’t new. Experts have long suspected that viral infections may trigger the disease.

“This study really just bolsters the idea of early life events being crucial for the development of the immune system,” said Jessica Dunne, director of discovery research for JDRF (formerly the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation). JDRF provided some of the funding for the new study.

“But the jury is still out,” she added. And the study authors themselves noted that their study can’t prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

It also isn’t clear exactly how such infections might play a role in type 1 diabetes.

“Various mechanisms have been discussed to explain how infectious diseases might induce [an autoimmune response] in type 1 diabetes,” said the study’s lead author, Andreas Beyerlein from the Institute of Diabetes Research in Munich, Germany.

Animal studies have indicated that different viruses can affect the beta cells in the pancreas in more than one way. For example, Beyerlein said, some viruses appear to cause the cells to break down. Others may cause immune system cells to mistakenly attack the beta cells, sensing them as foreign invaders instead of healthy tissue.

However the destruction might occur, the end result is that people with type 1 diabetes are left with too few healthy beta cells to produce enough insulin to survive.

Insulin is a crucial hormone involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates. It allows the glucose (sugar) from those carbohydrates to fuel the cells in the body and brain. Without enough insulin, a person will die. That’s why people with type 1 diabetes must take multiple daily injections of insulin, or use an insulin pump. The pump is a small device worn externally that delivers insulin through a catheter inserted under the skin.

The new study included information from claims data on infants born between 2005 and 2007 in Germany. The database used covers approximately 85 percent of the German population, the study authors said.

During that time, almost 300,000 babies were born. Over a follow-up period of about 8.5 years, 720 children developed type 1 diabetes, the study found.

Nearly all — 93 percent — of the children had at least one infection in their first two years of life, as did 97 percent of those who developed type 1 diabetes, the study showed.

Infections were broken down by category (respiratory tract, stomach, skin and eye) and causes, such as viral or bacterial.

Children who had a respiratory infection during the first six months of life had 17 percent higher odds of getting type 1 diabetes later. Those who had a viral infection in the first six months had a 19 percent higher risk of type 1 compared to kids who didn’t have a viral infection early in life, the study reported.

“It could be that the viruses are somehow miseducating the immune system,” Dunne said.

Viruses cause most common colds and upper respiratory infections, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Until the results of longer-term, more in-depth studies are in, there’s not a lot of specific advice for parents. Dunne said one such study — the TEDDY (The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young) study — screened thousands of kids at birth worldwide and the goal is to follow their health for 15 years. About eight years have been completed now, she said.

“Kids get a lot of infections early in life, and the flip side of this suggests that getting those infections may be critical for developing a healthy immune system. So, there’s a fine balance, but we’re too early to understand what the balance is, and we need to stop short of having kids live in a bubble,” Dunne said.

Beyerlein agreed. “The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes is still not well understood. So there is no established prevention strategy.”

Beyerlein added that because there’s no known way to prevent type 1 diabetes, parents of children who already have the disease shouldn’t blame themselves because they couldn’t have done anything to stop it.

Findings from the study were published May 3 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

More information

Learn more about type 1 diabetes from the American Diabetes Association.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/26Q7BDQ

Why Labradors Often Get Fat

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — One of America’s favorite dog breeds, the Labrador retriever, has a genetic variant that seems to make them more likely to gain weight, a new study suggests.

“Labradors make particularly successful working and pet dogs because they are loyal, intelligent and eager to please, but importantly, they are also relatively easy to train. Food is often used as a reward during training, and carrying this variant may make dogs more motivated to work for a tidbit,” said the study’s senior co-author, Giles Yeo, of the University of Cambridge in England.

“But it’s a double-edged sword,” Yeo added. “Carrying the variant may make them more trainable, but it also makes them susceptible to obesity. This is something owners will need to be aware of so they can actively manage their dog’s weight,” he said in a university news release.

As in humans, obesity in dogs can shorten their lives, make it harder for them to get around and increase their risk for diabetes, cancer and other chronic diseases, the researchers said.

For the study, veterinarians weighed more than 300 Labradors and assessed their health. The researchers examined the dogs’ DNA, looking for variants in three obesity-related genes. The dogs’ owners also completed a questionnaire about their pet’s food-related behavior.

The investigators found that the gene variant, known as POMC, is strongly linked with weight, obesity and appetite in Labradors and flat coat retrievers.

The variant is also important in regulating how the brain recognizes hunger and feeling satisfied or full after a meal, the researchers said.

“People who live with Labradors often say they are obsessed by food, and that would fit with what we know about this genetic change,” said the study’s first author, Dr. Eleanor Raffan, from the University of Cambridge.

At least one copy of this variant is carried by 23 percent of Labradors. For each copy of this gene, researchers found dogs are, on average, four pounds heavier. This is significant because dog owners control how much food their dogs eat and how much exercise they get.

“This is a common genetic variant in Labradors and has a significant effect on those dogs that carry it, so it is likely that this helps explain why Labradors are more prone to being overweight in comparison to other breeds,” Raffan said.

“However, it’s not a straightforward picture as the variant is even more common among flat coat retrievers, a breed not previously flagged as being prone to obesity,” Raffan added.

More research is needed to understand the POMC gene and how it affects the health of both dogs and people, the researchers said.

The study was published May 3 in Cell Metabolism.

More information

The Association for Pet Obesity Prevention has more about ideal weights for dogs.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/24nklms

Too Many People Still Take Unneeded Antibiotics: Study

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Nearly one-third of the antibiotics prescribed in the United States aren’t appropriate for the conditions being treated, a new federal government study shows.

“We were able to conclude that at least 30 percent of the antibiotics that are given in doctors’ offices, emergency departments and hospital-based clinics are unnecessary, meaning that no antibiotics were needed at all,” said lead researcher Dr. Katherine Fleming-Dutra.

Such misuse has helped fuel the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which infect 2 million Americans and kill 23,000 every year, said Fleming-Dutra, a pediatrician and epidemiologist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Antibiotics are most misused in the treatment of short-term respiratory conditions, such as colds, bronchitis, sore throats, and sinus and ear infections, the researchers reported.

“About half of antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory conditions were unnecessary,” Fleming-Dutra said.

In this study, Fleming-Dutra and her colleagues analyzed more than 184,000 outpatient visits reported in a 2010-2011 national medical care survey. Of those sampled visits, nearly 13 percent resulted in antibiotic prescriptions.

About 262 million outpatient antibiotic prescriptions were dispensed in 2011 in the United States, but until now no one knew how many of those prescriptions were inappropriate, she said.

To assess misuse of antibiotics, the researchers relied on national treatment guidelines to look for conditions that should never be treated using antibiotics, such as the common cold, sore throats caused by viral infections and bronchitis.

“Nobody should be giving antibiotics for the common cold,” Fleming-Dutra said. “It gets better without antibiotics.”

The investigators also included bacterial infections that can clear up on their own without the help of antibiotics, such as sinus and ear infections. In those cases, the researchers relied on regions that already are exercising good antibiotic control as a national benchmark for how often antibiotics should be used to treat these conditions.

Collectively, acute respiratory conditions led to 221 antibiotic prescriptions annually for every 1,000 people, but only 111 prescriptions were deemed appropriate for these conditions, the study authors said.

Among all conditions, an estimated 506 antibiotic prescriptions were written annually for every 1,000 people, the researchers concluded. Of these, 353 prescriptions were estimated to be appropriate.

The study findings were published in the May 3 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Even though the data is five years old, “if I had to guess, things would not be that different if we looked in 2016,” said Dr. Sara Cosgrove, an associate professor of infectious disease and epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. “There hasn’t really been a lot of work dedicated to improving antibiotic use.”

Many of these misused antibiotics are likely prescribed due to misunderstanding between doctors and patients, said Cosgrove, who wrote an editorial that accompanied the study.

“Really, when patients ask for an antibiotic, to some degree they may be asking, ‘Please give me something that will make me feel better,’ ” Cosgrove said. “If we know that an antibiotic is really not likely to make people feel better, we still can provide alternatives for symptom relief that will help people feel better. We need to redirect our thinking a little bit on both sides.”

Fleming-Dutra agreed. “Doctors think the patient wants antibiotics, and they want the patient to be satisfied with their care, so that often drives clinicians to prescribe when they shouldn’t,” she said.

“Probably most patients can be satisfied without antibiotics, even if they expect them. But it takes more communication between the clinician and the patient to help everybody understand what’s best in those circumstances,” Fleming-Dutra concluded.

To restrict antibiotic use, Cosgrove pointed to a very simple solution evaluated by a recent study — a poster placed in doctors’ waiting rooms indicating a commitment to avoiding antibiotic overuse.

The poster was associated with a 20 percent drop in antibiotic prescriptions, because hanging the poster created “buy-in” among doctors and provided patients a better understanding of the issue before they got to the exam room, she said.

“By the time the patient-doctor interaction happens, they’re more on the same page,” Cosgrove said.

Doctors also could be required to justify in writing any antibiotic prescription they hand out. “It has a modest impact, kind of giving you that little poke — you know, you should feel a little guilty about this, maybe you shouldn’t do it,” she said.

Researchers also are working on rapid tests that can distinguish viral infections from bacterial infections, so antibiotics aren’t wasted against viruses, Cosgrove said. However, these tests will cost more than cheap antibiotics, and will take some time to develop.

“It’s complex, because all humans are colonized in respiratory tracts with bacteria. You can’t just take a swab of your mouth and look for bacteria, because they’re going to be there,” Cosgrove said.

Such tests will have to be able to distinguish “bad” bacteria from normally occurring bacteria, she said.

More information

For more on antibiotic-resistant bacteria, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/24nkjv5

Training Program for Those With Autism Often Results in Low-Paying Jobs: Study

TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) — While a U.S. government-funded job training program for people with autism has a high success rate, many who get jobs earn well below the federal poverty line, a new study finds.

“We found that over half of the people with autism who used Vocational Rehabilitation services got jobs,” said study author Anne Roux, a researcher at the A.J. Drexel Autism Institute in Philadelphia.

The Vocational Rehabilitation system is one of the nation’s largest sources of public assistance for people with disabilities seeking work.

“While it was the same rate as people with other types of disabilities who used the program, the wages, hours worked and range of job types for people with autism were low — placing them at risk for poverty,” Roux explained in a Drexel University news release.

Autism, or autism spectrum disorder, is the general term for a group of complex disorders of brain development. People with autism generally face difficulties with social interaction and communication.

The researchers found that the number of people with autism who applied to the Vocational Rehabilitation program more than doubled between 2009 and 2014 — from over 7,400 to more than 17,700. Of those who were eligible, 68 percent received job training.

Three out of five people with autism had a job when they left the program. Most were in office and administrative support, food preparation/serving and building/grounds cleaning and maintenance.

More than 80 percent had part-time jobs. Those with part-time jobs had a weekly median income of $160, well below the federal poverty line of $224 a week, the researchers noted.

The 20 percent with full-time jobs had a weekly median income of $380, according to the institute’s National Autism Indicators Report.

“Unemployment is a critical issue facing people [with autism] who have valuable contributions to make but not enough opportunities to have work,” said Paul Shattuck, leader of the institute’s Life Course Outcomes Research Program.

“Anything we can do to understand the support systems that are in place to secure employment for adults with autism will enable us to better assist this population in the future,” he said in the news release.

More information

The Autism Society has more about autism and employment.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1rQWsma