barre

Too Few Americans Take Advantage of Local Parks

WEDNESDAY, May 18, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Most neighborhood parks in the United States are geared toward younger people, which limits their use, a new study suggests.

“Relatively modest investments could make parks much more conducive to physical activity for everyone, regardless of age, gender or income level,” said study author Dr. Deborah Cohen, a senior natural scientist at the Rand Corp.

Researchers who analyzed use of more than 170 parks across the country found few activities designed to attract adults and older people. Even girls and young women are less likely than males to play in neighborhood parks, the study authors noted.

“Our nation’s public parks have much unmet potential to be a center of physical activity for adults, older Americans and females,” Cohen said in a news release from the nonprofit research organization.

Walking loops were most effective at getting older people to be physically active. Gyms, fitness zones and exercise areas also helped older people to engage in moderate to vigorous activity, the study showed.

“It’s really sad that so few seniors are using our public parks,” Cohen said. “We need to make changes to attract older people to parks to exercise and stay active, especially with the increasing rates of chronic disease among older people and as our nation’s population grows older.”

For the study, observers were sent into 174 local parks in 25 cities of at least 100,000 people. During the spring and summer of 2014, they analyzed the types of activities offered, who used them and how.

Girls accounted for only 40 percent of children playing in the parks. Among teens, only 35 percent were female, the researchers found. They noted that girls of all ages were less likely to play any organized sports and more likely to be sedentary than boys.

Residents of poor neighborhoods were also less likely to use their local park — even if it was similar to parks in higher-income neighborhoods, the study showed. It’s unclear if this was the result of safety concerns, but the researchers recommended better marketing to boost usage in poorer neighborhoods. Offering more supervised activities could also help, they noted.

The researchers also interviewed the parks’ senior administrators. They found none routinely monitored or tracked usage of their facilities, programs or sports leagues.

“The fire department or the police department can tell you exactly how many people use their services, but parks and recreation departments have not had any metrics to adequately report who is using their facilities,” Cohen said. “The tools we created for this project are now being used by researchers across the United States and could help park managers better understand who is using their facilities.”

Across the United States, there are more than 108,000 public parks and 65,000 indoor facilities that are managed by more than 9,000 park and recreation departments. Local parks range in size from 2 acres to 20 acres, the researchers reported.

The researchers also discovered that investment in city parks was modest, even though they’re recommended for health. The average annual per capita spending for parks in the nation’s 100 largest cities was $73 in 2013, according to the Trust for Public Land. This represents less than 1 percent of all spending on health care for each person that year, according to the report.

The study was published May 18 in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

More information

The U.S. National Institutes of Health provides more information on the benefits of physical activity.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1rTIFv4

VIDEO: Extreme ab workout

 
Sheena-Lauren Personal Trainer - Women's Health and Fitness Magazine

WH&F Head Trainer Sheena-Lauren shares her exclusive ab workout.



Source : WHF TV http://ift.tt/1Tn0mgP

Could Spuds Be Bad for Blood Pressure?

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 17, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Potatoes are a popular staple of the American diet, but eating too many — whether boiled, baked, mashed or fried — may raise the risk for high blood pressure, a new study suggests.

Consuming four or more servings of potatoes a week was linked with an increased risk for high blood pressure — 11 percent for baked, boiled or mashed and 17 percent for fried — compared with eating less than one serving a month. Surprisingly, potato chips didn’t appear to increase the risk, the Harvard researchers reported.

“We hope that our study continues the conversation about potatoes and the risk of hypertension and other diseases,” said lead researcher Dr. Lea Borgi, of the renal division at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

But one dietitian not involved with the study suggested the blame shouldn’t rest with potatoes, but with the add-ons people put on their spuds — such as sour cream and bacon bits.

For the study, Borgi and her colleagues followed more than 187,000 men and women who took part in three large U.S. studies for more than 20 years. During that time, participants filled out questionnaires about their diet. None of the participants had high blood pressure at the beginning of the study.

Potatoes have what’s called a high glycemic index compared with other vegetables. And, that can trigger a sharp rise in blood sugar, which might explain the findings, Borgi said. The glycemic index measures how carbohydrates raise blood sugar.

Borgi pointed out that this study didn’t prove potatoes cause high blood pressure, only that they seem to be associated with an increased risk.

Nevertheless, the researchers suggested that replacing one serving a day of potatoes with a non-starchy vegetable might lower the risk of high blood pressure.

Because of their high potassium content, potatoes have recently been included as vegetables in the U.S. government’s healthy meals program, the researchers noted.

“Our findings have potentially important public health ramifications, as they don’t support the health benefits of including potatoes in government food programs,” Borgi said.

The report was published May 17 in the journal BMJ.

One nutrition expert said it’s not potatoes that are the problem as much as all the fixings people put on them.

“The poor potato’s reputation gets dinged again with this study,” said Samantha Heller, a senior clinical nutritionist at New York University Medical Center in New York City.

Potatoes have been a staple in human diets for centuries, long before high blood pressure was the problem it is today, she said.

“Americans ate, on average, close to 50 pounds of potatoes per person in 2013, the bulk of which came from french fries,” Heller said. “As a dietitian, I am not sure I can even classify commercial french fries as potatoes. They have been transformed into sticks of grease, salt, trans fats and who knows what else?” she said.

And while potatoes are a good source of vitamin C, potassium, minerals, energy and fiber (if not peeled), the reality is most Americans eat potatoes coated in salt, slathered in butter or loaded with sour cream, cheese and bacon bits, Heller said.

“It is no wonder that researchers found that high consumption was associated with poor health,” she said.

But potatoes can be a healthy part of a balanced diet, Heller said.

“You can make mashed potatoes with olive oil, nonfat milk or soy milk and add mixed herbs and spices. I do not peel the potatoes and I mix in vegetables, such as sauteed spinach and garlic,” she said.

Baked potatoes are also great with salsa, Heller said.

“But watch portions,” she added. “For example, today’s russet potatoes can be the size of a city bus. Alternate potatoes with other whole grain starches like brown rice or pasta. And remember, only about a quarter of your plate should be taken up with starchy foods.”

Efforts made by HealthDay News to reach the National Potato Council for comment on the study were unsuccessful.

More information

Visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for more on a healthy diet.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/27xfk9W

What an Anxiety Attack REALLY Feels Like

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Rapid heartbeat. Nausea. Sweating. If you’ve ever experienced a panic attack, you know how scary and paralyzing it can be.

Last month, a 22-year-old woman from the UK named Amber Smith made headlines when she shared Facebook photos of herself before and after a panic attack. In the first image, she’s “[d]ressed up, make up done, filters galore”—but the second image shows her looking frightened with eyes red from crying.

Smith explained that she posted the photos to fight the stigma that surrounds mental health issues. “I’ve been battling with anxiety and depression for years and years,” she wrote. “And there’s still people that make comments like ‘you’ll get over it’, ‘you don’t need tablets, just be happier’, ‘you’re too young to suffer with that.'”

If you too have panic disorder, which is a psychiatric condition in which people have recurring panic attacks (also known as anxiety attacks), you are not alone—it affects about 2.4 million people in the U.S., according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness. On Whisper, the app that lets you share anonymous messages, many people have opened up about their struggle with this debilitating form of anxiety. Here, 14 comments that capture what it’s really like.

RELATED: 12 Signs You May Have an Anxiety Disorder

I never knew panic attacks felt like you were dying until I started having them.

 

 

 

 

I have too many triggers for my panic attacks... It is exhausting and no matter how hard i try i cant suppress it.

 

 

 

 

I have panic attacks alone in my room. It takes hours to stand back up wash the tears off my face and leave again

 

 

 

 

My panic attacks are getting more frequent, and sometimes that can be the trigger.

 

I suffer from panic attacks on a regular basis. I feel so helpless, frightened, and alone.

These images came from the Whisper app.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1qs4wbz

Exposure to Pesticides May Increase ALS Risk

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, May 9, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Exposure to pesticides and other chemicals may increase the risk for ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), a fatal neurological disease, researchers say.

Three toxins in particular were associated with greater risk for the progressive condition, often called Lou Gehrig’s disease because it killed the legendary baseball player with that name.

“We are identifying these toxic, persistent, environmental pollutants in higher amounts in ALS patients compared to those who do not have ALS,” said study co-author Dr. Stephen Goutman. He is assistant professor of neurology at the University of Michigan and director of its ALS Clinic.

This new study doesn’t prove pesticides cause ALS, but it does build on an association suggested in previous research, Goutman said. Scientists already suspect pesticides may contribute to Parkinson’s disease, another neurodegenerative disorder.

For this study, Goutman and his colleagues evaluated 156 patients with ALS and 128 without the disease. Participants were asked about occupational and residential exposure to environmental toxins. Blood samples were taken to measure pesticide levels.

The researchers looked at 122 environmental chemicals and pesticides. Three in particular were linked to heightened ALS risk, Goutman said.

Persistent exposure to the pesticide cis-chlordane increased ALS risk nearly sixfold. Exposure to pentachlorobenzene—which was used in the manufacture of fungicides—doubled the odds for ALS. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers, used as a flame retardant in furnishings and textiles, raised the risk by about 2.7 times, the researchers said.

Military service was also linked to greater risk for developing ALS, but the investigators can’t explain why.

ALS, a progressive disease, affects nerve cells in the brain and the spinal cord. As the nerve cells that control muscles die, patients lose the ability to speak, move, breathe and eat, according to the ALS Association.

Experts contend that a combination of genetics and environmental factors triggers the condition, Goutman said.

The study was published online May 9 in JAMA Neurology.

The study, conducted between 2011 and 2014, was funded in part by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Merit Cudkowicz is director of the ALS Clinic at Massachusetts General Hospital. She said the new study “raises possibilities of the association of certain pesticides and ALS, but is far from certain.”

Those possible risk factors need to be studied further, added Cudkowicz, co-author of a journal editorial accompanying the study.

Goutman and Cudkowicz recommended avoiding pesticides. This is especially wise, Goutman said, for anyone with a family history of ALS.

However, it “really is hard to avoid” these chemicals, he noted, adding they’re in the air and soil, and often linger for years.

More information

To learn more about amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, visit the ALS Association.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1sovdyZ

We Tried Cricket Chocolate Chip Cookies So You Don’t Have To

Photo: MyRecipes

Photo: MyRecipes

CRICKET cookies. Yes, you read that right. Entomophagy is by no means a new practice to those of other countries, but the eating of insects is quickly gaining momentum in the Western world. They say it’s the future of low-fat, high-protein cooking. Plus, you eat the whole thing. Sustainable much?

Get this: Just 100 grams of cricket contains a whopping 12.9 grams of protein. Ounce for ounce, you get nearly twice the protein of beef. They’re also a complete protein, which means they contain all nine of the essential amino acids. It’s hard to argue with stats like that.

Still not convinced? We figured. We know these critter cookies aren’t for the faint of heart, so that’s why we gave them a try for you.

RELATED: DIY Breakfast Tarts

On one recent, fateful day in our food studios here in Birmingham, Alabama, we developed and taste-tested a recipe for chocolate chip cookies that included 2 cups of cricket flour. “Oh, whew, cricket flour. That’s not so bad,” you say? Well, we also tossed in an additional 1/2 cup of dry, roasted whole crickets with the chocolate chips just for the fun of it. So. Fun.

After shooting the video and baking the cookies, it was time to ensue the taste test. Our team of pro chefs and bakers gathered around the large tasting table and stared at the plate of bug cookies piled high in the center. The conversation went something like this:

“Yeah, these are Fear Factor cookies right here.”

“Come on guys, be brave and grab a good one. You want to see some real crickets in there.”

RELATED: The Top 10 Newbie Cooking Mistakes

(Everyone grabs a cookie)

“I don’t think I got enough cricket.”

“No, no…the less body parts the better.”

“I want to really taste the cricket. I need more cricket.” (Grabs a different cookie)

 “That one’s a whole abdomen. Uh, yep. That’s a cricket family.”

(Counting to 3, they all take a bite simultaneously.)

“I think I can feel legs between my teeth.”

“It’s just like walnuts. Little crunch. Definitely crispy.”

“I can basically feel it, like, moving in my mouth. Hmm. It’s pretty nice.”

“Honestly, these are pretty good. They taste like normal chocolate chip cookies with a nutty undertone.”

“Just okay. They taste kind of grainy. Is that the crickets?”

“I think it’s good.”

“They taste very earthy and nutty, just like what you’d expect from a wheat flour chocolate chip cookie. I could have done without the addition of the dry, roasted crickets.”

(More thoughts later on…)

“If you just grabbed the cookie and didn’t know what it was, you honestly wouldn’t know.”

“Not the best chocolate chip cookie I’ve ever had.”

“I took them home to my 12-year-old son, and he ate it because he’s adventurous and loves trying new things. He thought they were fun. My 8-year-old daughter also tried it. She didn’t spit it out.”

“I wasn’t worried about the bugs. I knew I was about to eat a cricket cookie, so the bugs didn’t freak me out.”

Overall? Our editors actually gave these cricket cookies a thumbs up. Check out the video from the official tasting.

This article originally appeared on MyRecipes.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1XxPEpi

Why Pleasant Mealtimes Could Be Key to Alzheimer’s Care

TUESDAY, May 17, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Making meals more enjoyable for people with dementia might reduce their risk of malnutrition and dehydration, researchers report.

Family-style meals and music, in particular, showed promise for improving eating and drinking habits, British researchers found.

“It is probably not just what people with dementia eat and drink that is important for their nutritional well-being and quality of life — but a holistic mix of where they eat and drink, the atmosphere, physical and social support offered, the understanding of formal caregivers, and levels of physical activity enjoyed,” said lead researcher Lee Hooper, of the University of East Anglia.

The researchers assessed various ways of improving food and fluid intake among more than 2,200 people with dementia.

“The risk of dehydration and malnutrition are high in older people, but even higher in those with dementia,” Hooper said in a university news release.

Understanding how to help people eat and drink well is very important in supporting health and quality of life for people with dementia, she explained.

“We found a number of promising interventions — including eating meals with caregivers, having family-style meals, facilitating social interaction during meals, longer mealtimes, playing soothing mealtime music, doing multisensory exercise and providing constantly accessible snacks,” Hooper said.

Providing education and support for both formal and informal caregivers also appeared helpful, she added.

However, further research is needed to pinpoint the most effective methods, she said.

The study was published recently in the journal BioMed Central Geriatrics.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more on dementia.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1XxPpe7

Nearly Half of All Heart Attacks Don’t Have Symptoms, Study Says

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Silent heart attacks, which have no symptoms but still involve a loss of blood flow to the heart, make up 45% of all heart attacks and triple the chances of dying from heart disease, according to a study published Monday.

The study, published in the American Heart Association’s publication Circulation, found that silent heart attacks make up nearly half of all heart attacks and increase the chance of death by all causes by 34%. The study, which examined almost 1,000 patients, also found that silent heart attacks are more common in men but more deadly in women.

Silent heart attacks are often undetected by the patient, and may not be noticed until patients have an electrocardiogram to measure their heart’s electrical activity.

“The outcome of a silent heart attack is as bad as a heart attack that is recognized while it is happening,” said lead author Elsayed Z. Soliman in a statement accompanying the release of the study. “And because patients don’t know they have had a silent heart attack, they may not receive the treatment they need to prevent another one.”

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TiwcaQ

Why This Beauty Vlogger Is Rubbing Socks on Her Face

There are a ton of ways to apply your foundation — fingers, brushes, airbrushes and now…. socks! Popsugar brought this crazy (genius?) tutorial to our attention and we cannot get over it.

Beauty vlogger Mayra Isabel shared this foundation hack that she created—using socks, from Walmart no less, to do her foundation. On the list of things we try to keep away from our faces, socks are pretty high up there, but you’re going to want to reconsider after seeing the finished look.

RELATED: This Customizable Eyeshadow Packaging Will Speak to Your Inner ’90s Kid

Mayra explains that you can’t and really shouldn’t just use any sock. According to her the toe and ankle are the most important parts of the apparatus, and need to be extremely soft and cushiony to work. Essentially you just flip the sock inside out and you’re good to go. Mayra herself is surprised at how streak-less and even the finish is and she’s right! Her finish foundation looks flawless. She also used her sock to do her concealer and contour. Maybe we’ve finally found a purpose for all of those miscellaneous solo socks we have lying around!

This article originally appeared on InStyle.com/MIMI.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1WBKWrW

Your Sunscreen Might Not Have the SPF You Think It Does

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Summer is coming, and according to a recent report from Consumer Reports, the SPF label on your sunscreen bottle might not be providing the protection you need.

For an investigation published May 17, Consumer Reports tested 65 water-resistant sunscreen lotions, sticks, and sprays with a labeled SPF of 30 or higher. They found that 28 of them—a full 43 percent of the products tested—did not meet their advertised protection level. Two of the sunscreens even clocked in at an SPF of 8.

RELATED: 7 Manicure Mistakes You Might Be Making

“Yet again, our sunscreen testing has shown that consumers may not be getting the protection they’re paying for,” Trisha Calvo, deputy editor of health and food for Consumer Reports, said in a statement. “Just because a sunscreen claims to offer a certain level of protection doesn’t mean it does. We create and release these ratings to ensure that consumers are informed about what sunscreens work best so they can protect themselves and their families from damaging sun exposure.”

The organization also looked at data from four years of sunscreen testing—104 products in all—and found that 50 percent came in below the SPF number printed on the label, and a third tested below an SPF 30, the minimum level recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology. The data also showed that mineral sunscreens, which rely on natural protectants like Titanium dioxide and Zinc oxide, are more likely to fall below their SPF claims: 74 percent compared to 42 percent of chemical sunscreens.

RELATED: 6 Eye Creams for Your Most Annoying Skin Concerns

SPF, or sun protection factor, is a measure of the sunscreen’s ability to prevent harmful UV rays from damaging the skin. That said, the American Academy of Dermatology recommends applying 1 ounce (“enough to fill a shot glass”) of a broad-spectrum, water resistant sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or higher to dry skin 15 minutes before going outside. You should reapply every two hours, or after swimming or excessive sweating, according to the directions on the bottle. And don’t just rely on sunscreen: wear sun-protective clothing, a wide-brimmed hat, or sunglasses, when possible, and aim to avoid the sun during its most intense hours (between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.).

RELATED: The Best Skincare Products for Babies

For optimum protection, Consumer Reports advises consumers to choose a chemical sunscreen with an SPF of 40 or higher to increase the likelihood that it will deliver at least an SPF 30. Their top recommendations included: La Roche-Posay Anthelios 60 Melt-In Sunscreen Milk Lotion ($36, laroche-posay.us), Pure Sun Defense SPF 50 lotion ($6, walmart.com), No-Ad Sport SPF 50 lotion ($14, walmart.com), Banana Boat SunComfort Continuous Spray SPF 50+ ($8, target.com), and Equate Sport Continuous Spray SPF 50 ($8, walmart.com).

This article originally appeared on RealSimple.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TGD7dL