barre

What’s the Difference Between Iced Coffee and Cold Brew?

Credit: Getty Images

Credit: Getty Images

For coffee drinkers, warmer weather signifies the much-anticipated switch from a hot cup of joe to a tall glass of iced. It makes sense, then, that a new trend in iced coffee is taking both coffee shops and grocery stores by storm: cold-brew coffee. The hype is nothing to scoff at: Starbucks reported a 20 percent increase in iced drink sales nationwide after it introduced cold brew coffee in stores, according to Bloomberg. But what sets it apart from traditional iced coffee? Here’s everything you need to know.

Iced Coffee: This is just what it sounds like: coffee that is brewed hot, poured over ice, and served cold.

Cold Brew Coffee: Coarse-ground coffee is steeped in room-temperature water for an extended period of time, the grounds are filtered out, and the result is a coffee concentrate that is mixed with milk or water and poured over ice. Because the coffee is never heated, the acids and oils that can give hot coffee its bitter taste are never released, resulting in a smoother sip. Getting thirsty? It’s incredibly easy to make at home. If you prefer tea to coffee, we have a cold-brew recipe for iced tea, too.

This article originally appeared on RealSimple.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1YWnVNI

Watch How Nail Trends Have Changed in the Past 100 Years

When it comes to nail art, the sky is the limit nowadays. Chrome tips that will cost you a whopping $2000? Check. Fruity nails? Check. Nail art inspired by Disney characters that got the Snapchat treatment? Sure, why not?

Instagram and Pinterest are full of #nailinspo, and we couldn’t be happier about that. But have you wondered where every trend came from, or when it was really at its peak?

RELATED: Blake Lively Presents, a Mini Eiffel Tower Made Out of Nail Polish Bottles

Mode.com created a video answering exactly that, and it’s mesmerizing. Apparently, a hundred years ago, women would only wear their nails short and polish-free. Things started to get interesting in the middle of the ’30s when colored nails debuted. We’re not going to spoil the video for you, but just so you know, there are plenty of good nail art ideas in there.

The metallic nails of 1976? Need.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1XS11J4

Zika Virus Likely to Spread in U.S. ‘in the Next Month or So,’ Official Says

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

The Zika virus will likely begin spreading in the U.S. “in the next month or so,” a top health official said Sunday, highlighting the need for “forceful preparation.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said the federal government needs to ensure any local outbreaks of the disease don’t spread widely. “We already have Zika in the United States. But it is travel-related,” Fauci said during an appearance on ABC’s This Week.

“The concern is that we will have local transmission,” he added. “In other words, people who get infected in the United States, get bitten by a mosquito, but who have never left the continental United States. We fully expect that that will happen as we get to the more robust mosquito season in the next month or so.”

“We need to make sure that those local outbreaks don’t become sustained and don’t become disseminated,” Fauci said. “That’s the reason why we need to have a very, very forceful preparation right now before that happens.”

There are more than 500 travel-related cases of the Zika virus in the U.S., according to new figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. None of them were locally transmitted by mosquitoes.

President Obama has asked Congress to allocate $1.9 billion in emergency funding to combat the spread of the virus.

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1YWl9ba

High-Salt Diets May Raise Heart Risks for Kidney Patients

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — People with chronic kidney disease face higher odds of heart attack or stroke if they have high-salt diets, a new study suggests.

“Moderate sodium reduction among patients with chronic kidney disease and high sodium intake may lower [heart] risk,” concluded a team led by Dr. Jiang He, of Tulane University in New Orleans.

About one in every 10 Americans is affected by chronic kidney disease, and more than one-third of U.S. adults have heart disease, the researchers noted. The role of daily salt intake in kidney patients — and its effect on heart risk — hasn’t been clear, however.

To learn more, the investigators looked at outcomes for almost 3,800 patients with chronic kidney disease at seven locations across the United States. The patients provided urine samples to researchers at the beginning of the study in 2003, and then once a year over the next two years. Their medical histories were then followed until 2013.

The study couldn’t prove cause and effect. However, people who scored in the highest 25 percent in terms of daily sodium intake had significantly higher rates of key cardiac events, the findings showed.

For example, more than 23 percent of people in the high-sodium group experienced heart failure, compared with about 13 percent of those who took in the least amount of salt per day.

About 11 percent of people in the high-salt group experienced a heart attack, compared with just under 8 percent of those with the least daily salt. The rate for stroke was just over 6 percent versus nearly 3 percent, respectively, according to the report.

One expert said the findings make sense, but there was one caveat.

“It’s entirely possible that what the study suggests is true: that a lower salt intake in the setting of chronic kidney disease could lower heart disease risk,” said Dr. Naveed Masani, a kidney disease specialist at Winthrop-University Hospital in Mineola, N.Y.

“That said, the advice has to be individualized per patient between their primary care doctor, their cardiologist and their nephrologist [kidney specialist],” he stressed. “One size does not fit all.”

The findings were published May 24 in the Journal of the American Medical Association. They were also scheduled for presentation the same day at the annual meeting of the European Renal Association and European Dialysis and Transplant Association in Vienna, Austria.

More information

Find out more about chronic kidney disease at the National Kidney Foundation.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1YWltqx

More Evidence That Smog a Heart Threat

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Air pollution can worsen heart disease risk factors, especially in people with diabetes, a new study suggests.

“We found an association between air pollution exposure in the intermediate term and undesirable changes in cholesterol,” said study first author Maayan Yitshak Sade, of Ben-Gurion University and Soroka University Medical Center in Israel.

“This suggests that cumulative exposure to air pollution over the course of a lifetime could lead to elevated risk of cardiovascular disease,” Sade added.

The researchers analyzed the results of more than 600,000 blood samples taken between 2003 and 2012 from more than 73,000 adults in southern Israel. All of the participants were smokers or had been diagnosed with diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure or too low/too high levels of fat in the blood.

Those exposed to higher levels of air pollution in the previous three months had higher blood sugar levels, higher levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol and fats in the blood, and lower levels of “good” HDL cholesterol than those exposed to lower levels of air pollution.

In general, the link between air pollution and these heart disease risk factors was higher among people with diabetes. However, there appeared to be a protective effect among those taking diabetes medications other than insulin.

The study was published May 24 in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

“While air pollution is linked with relatively small changes in cardiometabolic risk factors, the continuous nature of exposure and the number of people affected gives us cause for concern,” said senior study author Dr. Victor Novack, also of Soroka University Medical Center and Ben-Gurion University.

“Even small changes in glucose levels and glycemic control can contribute to increased risk of cardiovascular disease,” he said in a journal news release.

More information

The World Health Organization has more on air pollution and health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1YWllqW

Colon Cancer Rising in People Under 50

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Although overall colon cancer rates are declining, the rates among Americans under 50 have jumped more than 11 percent in the past decade, a new study finds.

Over the same decade, the number of cancers in those 50 and older fell by nearly 3 percent, the study found.

“Our findings suggest that health care providers should be more vigilant about detecting symptoms in younger patients and also should consider lowering the threshold for colonoscopy screening,” lead researcher Dr. Elie Sutton said during a media briefing. Sutton is a research fellow at Mount Sinai West Hospital in New York City.

“We really don’t know why colon cancer is increasing in younger patients,” he said. “We can speculate that it’s due to increases in inflammatory bowel disease or a change in diet, but really there is no clear consensus on that.”

The researchers also found that colon cancer among those under 50 was often diagnosed when the cancer was already advanced, Sutton said.

About five years ago, a study found a similar trend toward young onset, Sutton said. “Between the time of the previous research and our study, we still have not adequately addressed the risk of colorectal cancer in people under the age of 50. It’s critical that we reverse this trend so that we are able to reduce, and hopefully eliminate, it in all populations, regardless of age,” he said.

Colon and rectal (colorectal) cancer is the third most common cancer, according to the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI). The NCI estimates there will be more than 134,000 new cases in 2016. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths, second only to lung cancer, the NCI reports.

For the study, Sutton and colleagues reviewed data on more than 1 million colorectal cancer cases listed in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013.

While the study found that the number of these cancer cases is rising about 1 percent a year in people under 50, the majority of cases still occur after 50, Sutton said.

These findings mirror those of a study from the Jan. 25 online issue of the journal Cancer. That study found that one in seven colon cancer patients is under 50. Younger patients are more likely to have advanced stage cancer, but they live slightly longer without a cancer recurrence because they are treated aggressively, the University of Michigan researchers said.

The findings from these studies made both research teams wonder if colon cancer screening, which usually starts at 50, might need to begin earlier.

“This is a really important issue because rates of colon cancer are increasing in young adults,” said Rebecca Siegel, the strategic director of surveillance information services at the American Cancer Society.

“People are guessing it has to do with obesity and changing patterns in diet, but we need more research in this area — no one knows why this is happening,” she said.

New screening guidelines that take into account these findings are in the works now, Siegel said.

But even under the current guidelines some people under 50 should have a colonoscopy. These include people with a family history of colon cancer, and parents and siblings who have had benign tumors in the colon, called adenomas or polyps, she said.

The results of the study were scheduled to be presented Tuesday at Digestive Disease Week in San Diego. Findings presented at meetings are typically viewed as preliminary until they’ve been published in a peer-reviewed journal.

More information

For more about colon cancer, visit the American Cancer Society.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1YWkEOs

Weight-Loss Surgery Helps Treat Type 2 Diabetes

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Weight-loss surgery quickly improves blood sugar control in people with type 2 diabetes, and should be recommended or considered as a treatment for certain obese people with diabetes.

That’s the message of a joint statement endorsed by 45 international professional organizations. It appears in the June issue of the journal Diabetes Care.

“Given the rapid developments in the field, it is important to focus on this topic for those who care for individuals with diabetes. These new guidelines, based on the results of multiple clinical studies, validate that [weight-loss] surgery is indicated in certain people with diabetes and can yield significantly improved outcomes,” editor-in-chief of Diabetes Care Dr. William Cefalu said in a journal news release.

These are the first guidelines recommending surgery as a treatment option specifically for diabetes, he added. The statement is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association.

The guidelines emerged from an international conference — the Second Diabetes Surgery Summit — held last fall in London.

Evidence from 11 clinical trials and other sources shows that in most patients, surgery can either reduce blood sugar levels below diabetic thresholds (“diabetes remission”) or maintain adequate blood sugar control despite major reduction in medication usage, according to the authors.

While relapse of high blood sugar may occur in up to 50 percent of patients who have a remission after weight-loss surgery, most maintain substantial long-term improvement in blood sugar levels, the evidence showed.

“Despite continuing advances in diabetes [drug treatment], fewer than half of adults with type 2 diabetes … attain therapeutic goals designed to reduce long-term risks of complications, especially for [blood sugar] control, and lifestyle interventions are disappointing in the long term,” Cefalu and colleagues wrote in the commentary.

Weight-loss surgery has been shown to improve blood sugar control more effectively than any known drug treatment or lifestyle changes, the report authors said.

Weight-loss surgery — also known as metabolic surgery — involves reducing the size of the stomach or rerouting the small intestine. It’s as safe as commonly performed operations such as gallbladder surgery, but there are still risks of complications. There’s also the risk of long-term nutritional deficiencies, the statement authors said.

Despite these good results, current clinical guidelines haven’t included weight-loss surgery as a recommended treatment for diabetes, the commentary noted.

The new guidelines recommend weight-loss surgery to treat type 2 diabetes in people with Class III obesity. Class III obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or more. BMI is a rough estimate of body fat based on height and weight calculations. For example, someone who’s 5 feet 8 inches tall weighing about 265 pounds has a BMI of 40, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The guidelines also recommend weight-loss surgery for those with Class II obesity with high blood sugar that isn’t adequately controlled by drugs or lifestyle changes. Class II obesity is defined as a BMI of 35 to 39.9. As an example, a 5-foot-8 person who weighs 240 pounds has a BMI of 36.5, the CDC says.

Weight-loss surgery should also be considered to treat type 2 diabetes in people with a BMI of 30 to 34.9 with inadequately controlled high blood sugar, according to the guidelines. Someone who’s 5-foot-8 and weighs 200 pounds has a BMI of just over 30, according to the CDC.

Study first author Dr. Francesco Rubino said, “Surgery represents a radical departure from conventional approaches to diabetes. The new guidelines effectively introduce, both conceptually and practically, one of the biggest changes for diabetes care in modern times.” Rubino is a professor of metabolic and bariatric surgery at King’s College London, in England.

“This change is supported by documented clinical efficacy and by the evidence of an important role of the gut in metabolic regulation, which makes it an appropriate target for anti-diabetes interventions,” he added.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases has more on weight-loss surgery.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1YWlue5

Antidepressants Not Just for Depression Any More

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Doctors prescribe antidepressants for a wide range of medical problems other than depression, apparently fueling the boom in sales of these medications, researchers report.

Depression accounts for only a little more than half the antidepressant prescriptions issued by Quebec physicians during the past decade, the Canadian study found.

Doctors also issued antidepressants to treat anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain, panic disorders, fibromyalgia, migraine, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and a host of other “off-label” conditions for which the drugs are not approved, according to the report.

Two out of every three non-depression prescriptions for antidepressants were handed out under an off-label purpose, the findings showed.

“The thing that’s of concern here is that when prescribing for conditions other than depression, often these are for indications such as fibromyalgia and migraine where it’s unknown whether the drug is going to be effective, because it’s never been studied,” said senior author Robyn Tamblyn. She is a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at McGill University in Montreal. “These doctors are prescribing in the dark,” she said.

Antidepressant use in the United States increased almost 400 percent between 1988-1994 and 2005-2008, with the most recent figures showing 11 percent of teens and adults take antidepressants, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Researchers have suspected part of this boom may be that doctors are prescribing antidepressants for off-label indications that haven’t been evaluated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Tamblyn said.

To investigate, Tamblyn and her colleagues gathered electronic medical records generated by primary care physicians in Quebec between 2006 and 2015.

During that period, about 102,000 antidepressant prescriptions were written by 158 physicians for nearly 120,000 patients, the investigators found.

Only 55 percent of antidepressant prescriptions were handed out to treat depression, the researchers said.

Other illnesses treated with antidepressants included: anxiety disorders (18.5 percent); insomnia (10 percent); chronic pain (6 percent); and panic disorders (4 percent).

In several conditions listed, no antidepressant has ever been approved for their treatment, the researchers noted. These include migraine, menopause, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and digestive system disorders.

Other conditions treated with antidepressants included sexual dysfunction, premenstrual syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, urinary problems and bulimia.

Depression expert Dr. Peter Kramer said antidepressants have a wide range of potential uses, given how they work.

“I’ve always written these are not necessarily best called antidepressants,” said Kramer, a clinical professor emeritus of psychiatry and human behavior at Brown University in Providence, R.I.

“They are active in the nervous system, but whether they reverse depression or they intervene against certain kinds of injuries against nerve cells in some general way that isn’t targeting depression, that seems to be an open question,” added Kramer, who wasn’t involved in the study.

Some doctors use a sedating antidepressant called Trazodone to counter insomnia in addicts weaning themselves off drugs, Kramer said. Others have used low doses of tricyclic antidepressants, such as amitriptyline to treat chronic pain.

“I’m a little more skeptical about broad-brush research results that make doctors look as if they are foolish,” Kramer said. “I like to start with the presumption that something thoughtful is going on, and try to figure out what that is.”

However, some off-label antidepressant use might be occurring out of a developed tradition, rather than any practical or scientific knowledge, said the study’s lead author, Jenna Wong, a researcher at McGill.

“They’ve become well-known off-label uses for these drugs in the medical community,” Wong said. “It’s kind of like a culture among doctors. You see your colleague prescribing it, and then you would be more likely to.”

Kramer and Tamblyn agreed that clinical trials need to be performed on these off-label uses for antidepressants, to either prove or rule out the drugs’ effectiveness.

“If doctors are using medicines in these areas, we should do more formal research on those areas,” Kramer said.

In the future, depression researchers have to keep in mind that antidepressant prescriptions are not a good way to track the mood disorder, since half of the time these drugs are aimed at treating other conditions, he added.

In other words, “we shouldn’t use antidepressant prescribing as a proxy for depression,” Kramer said.

The study results were published May 24 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about depression treatment.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OLlN5J

No Welcome Mats for Diabetes, Obesity in ‘Walkable’ Neighborhoods

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — If you live in a neighborhood where it’s easy to walk to shops, schools and jobs, a new study says all that hoofing about appears to stave off excess weight and diabetes.

The research found the rate of overweight and obesity increased in Ontario, Canada neighborhoods with poor “walkability” between 2001 and 2012. But overweight and obesity remained about the same in places where people can walk or bike where they need to go, the study reported.

During that same period, the rate of diabetes remained about the same in less walkable areas, but declined in places that fostered walking and biking.

“We know that the differences weren’t because people in the most walkable neighborhoods were going to the gym more,” said senior researcher Dr. Gillian Booth.

“Their overall leisure time activities were not different, in terms of amount of energy expenditure. The difference we saw really came down to differences in transportation,” said Booth, a clinician scientist with the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto.

Even better, residents in the most walkable neighborhoods increased their amount of walking and biking as time passed, said Dr. Robert Ratner. He’s the chief scientific and medical officer for the American Diabetes Association.

“That suggests if you build it, they’ll use it, and that’s a very, very encouraging sign,” Ratner said of urban design that promotes pedestrian traffic. “We’ve always wondered if people would change if we changed the environment. This shows they will.”

For this study, Booth and her colleagues judged almost 9,000 urban neighborhoods in Ontario. They scored a neighborhood’s walkability based on four factors: population density, residential density, walkable destinations, and street connectivity. Urban density promotes walking, as do streets tightly arranged in a grid fashion, she said.

The research team then used more than a decade’s worth of data from Canadian health surveys to compare neighborhoods and see if walkability plays a role in preventing obesity or diabetes.

Rates of walking, cycling and public transit use were significantly higher in the more walkable areas. People also tended to drive less often in walkable areas, the investigators found. Exercise, diet and smoking patterns didn’t vary between the neighborhoods.

These results show that city planners, elected officials and architects potentially have the ability to help determine the future health of their communities through urban design and planning, Ratner said.

“There’s a public policy perspective called ‘health in everything,’ where no matter what you’re doing, you need to consider what impact a policy will have on the health of the population,” he said.

Officials also can promote walking in already-built places that have poor walkability, Booth suggested.

For example, they can build safe bike lanes and create multi-use paths for walking and biking, or they can expand public transit, she said. Studies have shown that more walking takes place in areas with good public transit, because people have to walk to and from the bus stop.

Improving public transit is “one thing you could do to have another option of moving from one place to another without being dependent on a car,” Booth said.

However, Ratner added that more rigorous clinical studies are needed to prove that areas specifically designed to increase walkability have a direct effect on obesity, diabetes and other health problems.

“We need to begin the experiments to show how these interventions will work,” he said. “Go in and study communities so we can learn what really will make a difference in health.”

The study’s findings were published May 24 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

More information

For more on the health benefits of walking, visit Harvard Medical School.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OLlCXZ

Balloon-in-a-Pill May Be New Weight-Loss Tool

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 24, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new ingestible and inflatable balloon system seems to be a noninvasive way to fill up the stomach and curb appetite, researchers report.

The balloon system, known as Obalon, helped obese people lose nearly 7 percent of their body weight, the investigators added.

So, how exactly does such as system work?

“Patients swallow a capsule containing a balloon tethered to a small catheter,” said study author Dr. Shelby Sullivan, director of bariatric endoscopy at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

“Once it’s reached the stomach, we inflate the balloon with a nitrogen mixed gas,” Sullivan said.

Patients ingest three capsules in all: the second at three weeks, and a third at either week nine or 12. When expanded, each balloon holds about a cup of gas (750 cubic centimeters in all) to fill the stomach and reduce eating urges, the researchers explained.

At six months, all balloons are removed through an outpatient procedure (endoscopy), in which a flexible tube is inserted through the mouth and into the stomach.

“Because there’s no incision and no breaking of the skin we don’t think of it as ‘invasive’,” said Sullivan. Removal takes about 16 minutes, she added.

Obalon is not yet approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Ongoing studies to assess its benefits have been funded by the system’s manufacturer, Obalon Therapeutics. A second balloon system, known as Elipse, is also being tested in ongoing trials.

Sullivan and her colleagues are to present their findings on Tuesday at the Digestive Disease Week meeting in San Diego. Findings presented at meetings are generally viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Nearly 79 million Americans adults are considered obese, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher. BMI is a rough estimate of body fat based on height and weight measurements.

There are a number of invasive treatment options for those struggling with “extreme obesity” (a BMI of 40 or higher), such as gastric bypass surgery. For those in the BMI range of 30 to 40, adjustable gastric banding (AGB) is an option, according to the U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

The Elipse system entails swallowing just one balloon that is then filled with distilled water, rather than gas. After four months, that balloon automatically deflates and is naturally excreted, without endoscopic removal.

For the Obalon trials, 366 obese patients were divided into two groups. Half swallowed three Obalon balloons; the other half swallowed three sugar (placebo) capsules. The volunteers were between 22 and 64 years old.

Over six months, the placebo group lost 3.6 percent of their weight, on average, compared with 6.8 percent among the Obalon patients. And nearly two-thirds of the Obalon group lost at least 5 percent of their weight, compared to just a third of the placebo group, the study showed.

Sullivan characterized the Obalon as a “step forward,” compared with currently available gastric balloons.

“Current balloons require giving patients a lot of anti-nausea and anti-spasmodic medications,” she explained. “The Obalon is a lot better tolerated. And while current balloons prompt 80 percent of their weight loss in the first three months before trailing off, we didn’t see any slow-down over time in the rate of weight loss with the Obalon.”

Sullivan said it would be hard to estimate the cost of the new system right now. She acknowledged that it’s unlikely to be immediately covered by insurance.

“But, assuming it’s the same price as the other balloon systems at my own institution, I would guess it would probably be somewhere around $1,500,” she said.

She added that the Obalon could be available by the end of the year, and so is “much farther along in the development process” than the Elipse.

Dr. John Morton, past president of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and chief of bariatric and minimally invasive surgery at Stanford University in California, said the Elipse system may eventually have a leg up on Obalon.

“I think the Elipse is potentially truly revolutionary because it’s something that you can swallow and, unlike the Obalon, excrete on your own,” he said. “And the other issue is that saline balloons always do better than air balloons, which not everyone can easily swallow.

“But the Obalon system has been available overseas for years, particularly in Mexico, and have been placed with some frequency,” Morton acknowledged. “And there haven’t been any head-to-head comparisons, so it’s hard to make a scientific assessment until we do that.”

More information

There’s more on bariatric treatments for weight loss at U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OLlUhH