barre

Move of the Week: Arabesque Lift & Balance

Talk about a triple threatthe arabesque lift & balance will help tone your legs, core, and butt. Not to mention, it’s one of the best exercises for improving balance. While the move may seem tricky at first, follow Tracy Anderson’s instructions and you’ll be a pro in no time.

RELATED: The Full-Body Fat Blast Workout

Here’s how to do it: You can use a set of 1.5- to 2.5-lb ankle weights, or none at all. Start on all fours, with your hands beneath your shoulders; extend your left leg behind you, above your hip, and raise your left arm toward the ceiling. Hold this position as you rock forward onto your right knee, lifting your right foot and left leg at the same time. Repeat that movement and each time you rock forward, try to hold it a little longer.

Trainer tip: To help stabilize your body, remember to keep your core engaged.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Ui5d1N

Fewer Inhaled Steroids May Be OK for Asthmatic Children

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Inhaled steroid therapy is commonly used to treat asthmatic children with persistent, daily wheezing episodes.

However, a new study suggests that the powerful medicines may not be needed on a daily basis for kids whose wheezing occurs sporadically, such as when they catch a cold.

“It makes sense that these children with frequent symptoms require daily treatment, whereas those who wheeze just during viral illnesses may only need treatment during illnesses,” study lead author Dr. Sunitha Kaiser, of the University of California, San Francisco, said in a university news release.

Two experts who reviewed the study had different reactions to the findings, however.

“The less-frequent use of steroids is good news for children, since chronic steroid use can stunt growth,” said Dr. Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City.

Child asthma specialist Dr. Melodi Pirzada was more cautious.

“This article may put our preschooler asthmatics in dangerous territory,” she said. “A child who is a known asthmatic without daily controller medications is at great risk to have a life-threatening asthma attack. In these cases, it is better to overdo treatment rather than come up short.”

Pirzada is chief of pediatric pulmonary medicine at Winthrop-University Hospital in Mineola, N.Y.

In the new study, Kaiser’s team analyzed 22 studies involving more than 4,500 children age 6 and younger. All suffered at least two episodes of asthma or wheezing in the previous year.

In 15 of the studies, kids with persistent asthma or wheezing had a 30 percent reduction in the risk of serious flare-ups if they used inhaled steroids on a daily basis.

Six other studies focused on more sporadic (not daily) use of the inhalers by kids whose wheezing was not persistent, and was typically only spurred by a cold. Those studies found a 35 percent reduction in flare-ups compared to a placebo, the researchers said.

Two more studies compared the effects of daily inhaled steroids and more sporadic inhaled steroid use in kids with wheezing induced by common colds. Those studies found no difference in the amount of severe flare-ups, Kaiser’s group said.

There were no studies that compared daily-versus-intermittent use of inhaled steroids for kids with chronic, daily asthma or wheeze.

Based on the findings, the researchers believe non-daily use of inhaled steroids may be effective for kids with asthma episodes induced by a cold.

Young children with cold-related wheezing “don’t experience wheezing between colds and for them limiting frequency of inhaled steroids to the duration of a cold was as effective,” Kaiser said.

The study authors said their findings may be welcomed by parents troubled by the side effects of inhaled steroids, despite studies suggesting the drugs cause minimal problems.

Many parents are reluctant to give too many steroids to children, the researchers explained, because they believe it may stunt a child’s growth. Studies have connected mild growth suppression with use of the drugs, Kaiser’s team said, but the effect gradually lessens over time.

“We have no definitive data to indicate that intermittent dosing of inhaled steroids impacts growth differently than daily dosing,” Kaiser said, “but it’s generally accepted that reducing frequency of a drug will minimize side effects. Children should be followed closely to monitor benefits and side effects.”

The analysis also “confirms that inhaled steroids are first-line treatment for children with asthma and wheezing. The more we can control their symptoms with inhaled steroids, the less the need to treat children with systemic high-dose steroids,” Kaiser said.

The findings appear May 26 in the journal Pediatrics and are consistent with the guidelines of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program of the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the researchers said.

Still, Pirzada isn’t convinced that intermittent dosing can be a safe strategy for young children.

“This study has the potential to make the struggle of pediatricians and asthma specialists more difficult in regards to prescribing daily inhaled steroids to prevent asthma attacks,” she said. “In many cases, we see patients who do not take their medication on a consistent basis ending up in the emergency department or the hospital, fighting for their lives.”

About 9 million children in the United States have asthma, and half of all children aged 5 and younger have had one or more episodes of wheezing, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

More information

The American Academy of Pediatrics has more about steroids and respiratory conditions.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/20KnHd6

5 Power Lunges for Killer Glutes

Power-Lunges-Pin

Photo: Ryan Kelly / Daily Burn 365

DailyBurn-Life-Logo

These moves come to you from four top Daily Burn 365 trainers. For a new, 30-minute workout every day, head to DailyBurn.com/365.

Now that spring has finally sprung, you might be itching to run your first 5K or break a new personal record at your next half-marathon. While it’s true you need to mix up your paces to run faster, doing lower-body exercises, such as power lunges, helps you run more efficiently and carry you through longer runs. When you’re at the last leg of your race, your mind and heart will thank your hamstrings, glutes, and calves for helping you cross the finish line.

And that’s not all. If cardio isn’t your thing, lunges will bring the heat in other ways. Hello, mobility and power! Lunges will also help improve your coordination and balance since the move is broken down into single-leg components. Plus, you don’t need any equipment to fit these lower body moves in and reap the benefits.

“Lunges strengthen your lower body, including the glutes, hamstrings and calves,”says Daily Burn 365 trainer Gregg Cook. “But what makes lunges different from a squat that it challenges your balance. You have a broader base for support with a squat, but with a lunge, you have a split stance, which makes it inherently more difficult to balance,” he says. “Lunges are also more dynamic, and your body needs to re-adjust to absorb the body weight and figure out where it is in space.”

Here are some beginner-friendly power lunges to get started.

RELATED: 9 Reasons Not to Skip Leg Day

 5 Lunges for Stronger Legs and Glutes

dara-lunges-3

GIF: Daily Burn 365

1. Lateral Lunges
If plyometric exercises put pressure on your knees, consider this side lunge, which helps strengthen the muscles around your knees and improves flexibility and hip mobility, too. These classic lateral lunges also help stretch your hamstrings (a godsend for runners), while engaging your core.

How to: Stand with your feet hip-width apart, hands at your sides (a). Take a big step back with your right leg and land on the ball of your foot (b). Bring your hands together as you lower your body down to the floor while bending your knees. Make sure your right knee doesn’t touch the floor. Your left knee should form a 90-degree angle to the floor (c). Next, reverse your lunge and return to the starting position (d). Then, take a big step to your right and bend your knee as you lower your body and bring your hands together. Make sure your knee doesn’t extend past your right toes (e). Sit your hips back into the stretch and keep your left leg straight with your feet flat on the floor. Reverse your position and return to the starting position (f). Do eight reps of one reverse and lateral lunge on each leg before moving onto the other side.

RELATED: 5 Calorie-Blasting Cardio Exercises (No Treadmill Required!)

GIF: Daily Burn 365

GIF: Daily Burn 365

2. Standing Split Lunge
Once you feel more comfortable with balancing on one leg, this standing split lunge is perfect for adding more pep into your step and transitioning into plyometric lunges. It’s also a great active stretch to warm up your body before a workout. You even engage your core muscles, while increasing your heart rate to boot.

How to: Stand with your feet hip-width apart with your hands at your sides (a). Take a big step back with your right leg and land on the ball of your foot (b). As you lower your body down to the floor, bring your right hand forward and your left hand back (c). Make sure your right knee hovers over the floor, and your left knee forms a 90-degree angle to the floor (d). Now, straighten your left leg and pop up to draw your right leg in front of you (e). Return to a reverse lunge and do eight reps before moving onto your left side.

RELATED: The 12 Move Total-Body Workout: The Daily Burn Dozen

Phoenix-Lunges-3

GIF: Daily Burn 365

3. Pendulum Lunges
This variation challenges your balance and coordination further by applying more pressure on one set of muscles at a time. And while this one is performed without weights, as you get stronger, you can consider adding dumbbells.

How to: Stand with your feet hip-width apart, hands at your hips (a). Take a big step forward with your right leg, and lower your body down to the ground, bending your right knee to form a 90-degree angle to the floor (b). Once you’ve lowered your body to the floor, clasp your hands under your right thigh. Hold this position for a few seconds before unclasping your hands and returning to standing position (c). Now, take a step back with your right leg to do a reverse lunge, clasping your hands under your left thigh (d). Reverse your lunge and return to the starting position (e). Do eight pendulum lunges on each side.

RELATED: The 7 Best Strength Exercises You’re Not Doing

Prince-Lunges

4. Lunge to Back Hand
These pulsing lunges train your glutes in a new way, while activating your arm muscles as well. We don’t use dumbbells in this exercise, but you can work your way up to incorporating weights or a body bar.

How to: Stand with your feet hip-width apart with your arms at each sides shoulder height (a). Take a big step back with your right leg and land on the ball of your foot (b). As you lower your body to the floor and pulse your right leg, bring your arms forward, crossing your arms out in front of you (c). Do eight reps on each side.

RELATED: 5 Strength Training Moves to Help You Run Faster

GIF: Daily Burn 365

GIF: Daily Burn 365

5. Plyo Lunges
A perfect combination of cardio and strength, these plyometric lunges get your heart rate up while toning your muscles and burning fat. In this variation, we pause to do a lunge after two jumps.

How to: Stand with your feet hip-width apart, hands at your sides. Step your right foot back and your left foot in front (a). Lower your body to the ground, keeping your right knee bent and your left knee perpendicular to the ground (b). Scissor jump your legs twice and land with your right foot in front and your left foot is behind. Be sure to land with both knees bent to provide you with support (c). Three sets of eight reps.

Want more quick and easy moves you can do right at home, head to DailyBurn.com/365 — it’s free for 30 days!

This article originally appeared on DailyBurn.com.

More from Daily Burn:

5 Beginner-Friendly CrossFit Workouts

The 50 Best Half-Marathons in the U.S.

7 No-Crunch Exercises for Six-Pack Abs

dailyburn-life-logo.jpg Life by Daily Burn is dedicated to helping you live a healthier, happier and more active lifestyle. Whether your goal is to lose weight, gain strength or de-stress, a better you is well within reach. Get more health and fitness tips at Life by Daily Burn.



from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TECt0L

Knee Replacement Patients May Be Able to Hit the Shower Sooner

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Knee surgery patients are usually instructed to wait two weeks after surgery to take a shower to reduce the risk of infection. But a small new study suggests this may not be necessary.

Researchers found no differences in bacterial swabs from those who waited two weeks to shower compared with those allowed to shower after about two days.

That’s no doubt welcome news to the many patients who’ve struggled to find a way to bathe without getting their incision wet.

The study, led by Dr. Harold Rees, an orthopaedic surgeon at Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Ill., followed 32 patients. Half were randomly assigned to shower after two weeks. The other half could shower as soon as their surgical dressing was removed — typically two days after surgery.

None of the patients developed a post-operative infection, the study found. And, unsurprisingly, patients permitted to shower sooner were much happier than those who couldn’t, the study authors said.

Being able to shower soon after surgery was a priority for the majority of both groups, according to the report. Given a choice, people said they would have preferred to shower sooner rather than later after their procedure.

“What is needed now is a larger-scale study that can evaluate if early versus delayed wound cleaning has any effect on surgical-site wound infection risk for [knee replacement surgery],” the researchers wrote.

The findings were published online in the Journal of Arthroplasty.

More information

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has more about knee replacement surgery.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/25oMZnK

Breast Milk Best From the Breast?

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Infants fed directly from the breast are less likely to develop ear infections than those who are fed pumped breast milk from a bottle, a new study suggests.

The study also found that infants who receive breast milk by either method have a lower risk of diarrhea.

Researchers studied nearly 500 new mothers and their infants and found that one month of feeding at the breast was associated with a 4 percent lower risk of ear infections. Doing so for six months was associated with a 17 percent lower risk.

But compared to babies were were exclusively fed from the breast, the risk of an ear infection rose 14 percent among infants who were bottle-fed pumped breast milk for one month. And that risk climbed to 115 percent among those who received pumped breast milk for six months, according to the study published recently in the Journal of Pediatrics.

“While it is not completely clear why ear infections may be related to bottle feeding, it could be because bottles can create a negative pressure during feeding. This negative pressure is then transferred from the bottle to the middle ear of the infant during feedings, which may precipitate ear infections,” said senior study author Sarah Keim.

Keim is a principal investigator with the Center for Biobehavioral Health in The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, in Columbus, Ohio.

“We certainly don’t want women to stop pumping because there are not adequate data or guidelines about whether pumped breast milk is an equivalent substitute for feeding at the breast, so more research needs to be done,” she said in a hospital news release.

The researchers also found that infants fed either directly from the breast or with pumped breast milk from a bottle for six months had a 30 percent lower risk of diarrhea, while those fed formula for six months had a 34 percent increased risk.

That result suggests that the type of food, not the method of feeding, may affect an infant’s risk of diarrhea, the study authors said.

They also found that mothers who fed their infants breast milk only were wealthier than those who fed their infants formula, and that women who only used bottles to feed breast milk and/or formula to their infants were poorer than those who fed their infants at the breast.

“This finding is consistent with previous research that shows positive associations between socioeconomic status and breast-feeding. Initiation and duration of breast-feeding may be explained by health care and information resources available to and accessed by mothers of greater socioeconomic status,” Keim said.

More information

The U.S. Office on Women’s Health has more on breast-feeding.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/25oNleb

Fewer U.S. Kids Die From Abusive Head Trauma: CDC

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Half as many babies and preschoolers in the United States are dying from abusive head trauma as in 2009, federal health officials reported Thursday.

Deaths of children under age 5 from this form of violence dropped an average 13 percent annually between 2009 and 2014, with the biggest falloff in the last two years of the study, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Experts said the statistics reflect good news — for the most part.

“I am heartened by the recent decrease in abusive head trauma, but one case is still too many,” said Rahil Briggs, director of pediatric behavioral health services at Montefiore Medical Group, in New York City.

Helping families get parenting support is the best way to prevent these deaths, Briggs and others agreed.

Abusive head trauma — often called shaken baby syndrome — is caused by direct trauma to the child’s head or severe shaking. Such injuries can lead to fatal skull fractures or bleeding in the brain, said study author Erica Spies, of the CDC’s Division of Violence Prevention.

“Abusive head trauma is one of the leading causes of child maltreatment fatalities among infants and children,” Spies said.

Although the exact reasons for the decline in cases are unknown, Spies said that easing of economic pressures in recent years may have played a role.

National rates of abusive head trauma held steady from 1999 to 2009, and fell significantly after 2009, her team found.

Nearly 2,250 deaths of children under 5 from intentional head injury occurred between 1999 and 2014, the CDC said. Eighty-six took place in 2014 — down from 179 five years earlier, the report notes.

Head trauma accounts for about one-third of deaths from child abuse in the United States, the researchers said. It often occurs after an infant’s crying frustrates, angers or stresses parents, Spies said.

Showing parents and caregivers how to establish safe, secure and nurturing environments for children can help prevent these deaths, Spies said. In addition, parents can be taught safe ways to respond to persistent crying, she said.

To further reduce the chances of these deaths, experts recommend stepping up efforts aimed at prevention.

“Identifying parents likely to abuse their children is an important step in preventing abuse by helping them manage stress, instead of shaking the baby or throwing the baby against the wall,” said Dr. Barbara Pena, research director in the emergency department of Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, in Miami.

Although child abuse is seen in all types of homes, families at increased risk include those under the most stress, such as the poor and those “who are struggling with life,” she said.

“Providing moms with social workers or other support is essential,” Pena said. “Parents who feel stressed and unable to cope should reach out to their pediatrician or social agencies that can help.”

Briggs said that adding behavioral health services to primary care “is one of the best ways” to identify and help families at risk for abusive head trauma.

“We must increase our focus on prevention, including parent-child interventions that build on strengths and resilience, while teaching more effective ways to discipline children, manage stress and ensure positive outcomes,” Briggs said.

The new study appears in the CDC’s May 27 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. For the study, researchers used data from the National Vital Statistics System, 1999 to 2014.

More information

For more on child abuse, visit the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/25oMUAx

FDA Approves Implant to Battle Opioid Addiction

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new long-acting implant that can help treat people addicted to heroin and prescription painkillers was approved Thursday by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

“Opioid abuse and addiction have taken a devastating toll on American families. We must do everything we can to make new, innovative treatment options available that can help patients regain control over their lives,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf said in a statement. “Today’s approval provides the first-ever implantable option to support patients’ efforts to maintain treatment as part of their overall recovery program.”

Probuphine is placed in the upper arm of recovering addicts and releases a steady six-month dose of buprenorphine, an anti-addiction drug designed to combat the cravings that come with opioids like heroin or powerful prescription painkillers like Percocet or OxyContin. Buprenorphine is already available as a pill or a film that can be placed in the mouth.

The steady flow from the implant will reduce fluctuations that can occur when taking a medication once or twice daily, and it removes the need for a patient to remember to take it, said Dr. Annie Umbricht, an expert in substance abuse treatment at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

“A person suffering from addiction would not have to go through the up-and-downs of a daily medication, and therefore will feel much more normal,” Umbricht explained.

Clinical trials published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2010 showed the implant led to higher abstinence rates among addicts, with 40 percent remaining drug-free compared with 28 percent receiving a placebo.

People given the implant also were more likely to remain in treatment, about 66 percent compared with 31 percent of the placebo group.

“It really reduces or eliminates cravings, and they don’t start searching around for opiates,” said Dr. Scott Segal, president and chief medical officer of the Segal Institute for Clinical Research in Miami, one of the centers that participated in the clinical trials.

The implant provides patients with no-fail treatment during its six-month period of effectiveness, Segal said.

“Things happen in life,” he said. “You miss your doctor’s appointment, the pharmacy doesn’t have the medication and there’s problems. The implant takes relapse off the table.”

It takes about 15 minutes to place the implant, Segal said, and side effects are similar to oral buprenorphine. They include headache, depression, constipation, nausea, vomiting and back pain, according to the FDA.

“I was concerned that patients would [not] like this option, and I was dead wrong,” he said. “The patients enrolled quickly. They liked it. They tolerated it well. And they were upset when we took them off the implant at the end of the study.”

The United States is experiencing an epidemic of prescription drug abuse, and the new implant could also help counter that, Umbricht said.

There were 28,647 overdose deaths related to heroin and prescription pain killers in 2014, an average of 78 per day, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That’s because people undergo treatment and lose their tolerance for opioids, but then leave treatment with a high risk of relapse, Umbricht said.

“We know the rate of relapse after drug treatment is more than 90 percent,” Umbricht said. “These people have lost their tolerance, but they don’t realize it. They are at high risk for overdose.”

The implant can help stabilize addicts during treatment, and then provide them with support against relapse once they’ve been released, she said.

Buprenorphine provides effects that are similar to, but weaker than, opioids like heroin or methadone, according to the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

But those effects level off at moderate doses, lowering the risk of misuse and addiction, SAMHSA says.

Buprenorphine also interferes with the effects of full-strength opiates, Segal said.

“It tends to saturate the receptors that respond to opiates,” he said. “Even if you were to take opiates with it, you won’t get high. It provides pain relief, but doesn’t give them the buzz or high that heroin would.”

The implant eliminates one other concern associated with oral buprenorphine — the likelihood that someone with a prescription will share their pills with friends.

Researchers estimate that as much as 50 percent of oral buprenorphine prescriptions are “diverted,” Umbricht said.

The intent is most likely to help other people quit their drug habit, Umbricht said, but without drug counseling those addicts are not likely to succeed.

“That person is not going to get the psychosocial support they need,” Umbricht said, adding that drug sharing also maintains illegal behaviors that recovering addicts need to shake.

Addiction specialist Dr. Kevin Cotterell agreed.

“The prospect of a long-acting opiate agonist-antagonist surgically implanted for use in the treatment of addiction to opiates is very encouraging,” said Cotterell, a psychiatrist with South Oaks Hospital in Amityville, N.Y. “It will help in overcoming problems with compliance, which is a great barrier to recovery. It will enhance safety and reduce diversion if used widely.”

More information

For more on buprenophine, visit the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/25oMRF0

Fastballs a Fast Track to ‘Tommy John Surgery’?

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new study finds that throwing a lot of fastballs may increase a pitcher’s risk of an elbow injury requiring “Tommy John surgery.”

“Our findings suggest that throwing a high percentage of fastballs rather than off-speed pitches puts more stress on the elbow,” said study author Dr. Robert Keller.

“This leads to elbow fatigue, overuse and, subsequently, injury,” Keller, chief resident in the department of orthopedic surgery at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, said in a hospital news release.

Tommy John surgery is named after the big league pitcher who was the first to undergo the operation more than 40 years ago. Its medical name is ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction. The procedure involves replacing the UCL in the medial elbow with a tendon from the same arm or the hamstring area.

The researchers found that 83 Major League Baseball pitchers who underwent Tommy John surgery averaged 7 percent more fastballs than those who did not have the surgery.

Other types of pitches — such as curveballs, sliders and change-ups — were not associated with increased risk of the outpatient surgery, the study found.

Nearly 25 percent of current MBL pitchers have had Tommy John surgery, the researchers said.

However, the findings need to be interpreted with caution, said senior study author Dr. Vasilios Moutzouros, an orthopedic surgeon at Henry Ford Hospital.

“Our research should not be interpreted by pitchers who may now think they can go out and throw 80 percent of curveballs and not be at risk of injury. With overuse and continued stress on the elbow, the potential for injury over time is very real and at any playing level,” he said.

The findings were published recently in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

More information

Stop Sports Injuries offers baseball injury prevention tips.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1THfrc0

Tough Economy, Alcohol Fuels Suicide Risk in Men: Study

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Heavy drinking may fuel the risk of suicide among men when the economy is sinking, new research suggests.

Previous studies found a link between increased suicide risk among Americans and economic downturns. So, investigators from the University of California, Los Angeles decided to examine the role alcohol plays in that association.

In general, recessions are linked with an overall decline in drinking, but heavy drinking increases, particularly among people affected by the economic downturn, said study author Mark Kaplan, a professor of social welfare at UCLA.

“Surprisingly, there is evidence that individuals intoxicated at the time of death did not necessarily have a history of alcohol abuse prior to suicide,” Kaplan said.

The researchers analyzed data from 16 states to compare alcohol use between suicide victims and the general population in 2005-2007, during the 2008-2009 recession, and again in 2010-2011.

The percentage of suicide victims who were drunk at the time of their death rose during the recession. Among men, heavy drinking among suicide victims increased more than in the general population.

But the same did not hold true for women who died by suicide, the researchers found. Instead, the rate of heavy drinking by women was identical to the general population.

The findings show the “heightened importance” of drinking as a risk factor for suicide among men during economic downturns, according to the researchers. But the study did not prove that heavy drinking caused men to die by suicide.

Alcohol control policies such as higher prices and taxes could reduce the risk of alcohol-related suicide during a recession, along with programs to help people who lose their jobs, Kaplan said.

The study will be published in the July issue of the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on suicide prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1THg31l

Healthy Living May Offset Genetic Breast Cancer Risk

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, May 26, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Women who carry common gene variants linked to breast cancer can still cut their risk of the disease by following a healthy lifestyle, a large new study suggests.

In fact, lifestyle might be especially powerful for women at relatively high genetic risk of breast cancer, researchers found.

“Those genetic risks are not set in stone,” said senior researcher Nilanjan Chatterjee, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

The study found that four lifestyle factors were key: Maintaining a healthy weight; not smoking; limiting alcohol; and not using hormone therapy after menopause.

The researchers estimated that if all white U.S. women did those things, almost 30 percent of breast cancer cases could be avoided. And a majority of those averted cancers would be among women at increased risk because of family history and the gene variants they carry.

The study did not include women with the BRCA gene mutations that substantially raise the risks of breast and ovarian cancers.

Instead, it focused on 92 gene variants that, individually, would make only a small difference in a woman’s breast cancer risk.

But the variants are much more common than BRCA mutations, Chatterjee said. And their effects on breast cancer risk add up, he explained.

One question has been, how much does lifestyle matter for those women?

The answer: “Lifestyle factors may be even more important for women at higher genetic risk than for those at low genetic risk,” he said.

The findings were published online May 26 in JAMA Oncology. The results were based on records from more than 40,000 women tested for 24 gene variants previously linked to breast cancer risk.

Chatterjee’s team created a “model” for predicting a woman’s risk of breast cancer, using that genetic information plus other factors. Those other factors included ones that can’t be changed — such as family history of breast cancer and the age menstruation started — along with lifestyle habits.

The researchers then added one more element to the mix: They estimated the effects of 68 other gene variations that the women weren’t tested for.

Overall, the study suggests, the average 30-year-old white woman has an 11 percent chance of developing breast cancer by age 80.

Some women would face higher odds because of their genes and other factors they cannot change. But lifestyle choices would actually make the biggest difference for them, Chatterjee said.

Even women with the highest risks (the top 10 percent) could get their breast cancer odds down to average by maintaining a healthy weight, not smoking and drinking, and not using hormone therapy, the study suggests.

“The bottom line is, this study provides evidence that, on a population level, a certain number of breast cancer cases would be prevented if women did these things,” said William Dupont, a professor at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tenn.

He added a word of caution on hormone replacement, though. The evidence suggests that a short period on menopausal hormones has only a small effect on breast cancer risk.

“I don’t think women should take this to mean that they have to go ‘cold turkey’ after menopause,” said Dupont, who co-authored an editorial published with the study.

Dupont also stressed that the model the researchers created has limitations. So it should not be used to “predict” any one woman’s risk of breast cancer.

Of course, other than the small number of patients tested for BRCA mutations, most women would not know if they carry genes tied to a higher breast cancer risk.

But in the future they might, Chatterjee said. As the cost of genetic analysis goes down, he said, it’s possible women will be tested for common variants that affect their breast cancer risk.

Dupont agreed. That information, he said, could help doctors give women more-individualized advice on breast cancer screening, for example.

But Dupont also pointed to the complexity of diseases like breast cancer. Many genes “come together” to influence the risk — and, as the current study illustrates, they’re only part of the picture.

For now, he and Chatterjee stressed the importance of a healthy diet, exercise, and not smoking — for everyone.

Although more research is needed to confirm the findings in non-white women, Chatterjee said the same general patterns would most likely apply to them, too.

More information

The American Cancer Society has more on breast cancer risk.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1THfHrm