barre

Music Soothes Nervous Eye Surgery Patients

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Listening to relaxing music before eye surgery reduces patients’ anxiety and their need for sedation, a new French study suggests.

“Music listening may be considered as an inexpensive, noninvasive, non-pharmacological method to reduce anxiety for patients undergoing elective eye surgery under local anaesthesia,” said lead researcher Dr. Gilles Guerrier, from Cochin University Hospital in Paris.

The study included 62 people who had outpatient cataract surgery while awake and under local anesthesia. The surgery lasted an average of 15 minutes.

Some patients listened to relaxing music through headphones for about 15 minutes before their surgery, while others did not. Those who listened to music could choose from 16 styles, such as jazz, flamenco, Cuban, classical and piano.

Compared with those who did not listen to music, patients in the music group had much lower anxiety scores, received significantly less sedatives during surgery, and were much more satisfied after surgery.

The study was to be presented Friday at the Euroanaesthesia meeting in London. Such research is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

“The objective is to provide music to all patients before eye surgery,” Guerrier said in a meeting news release. “We intend to assess the procedure in other type of surgeries, including orthopedics where regional anesthesia is common. Moreover, postoperative pain may be reduced by decreasing preoperative anxiety, which is another study we intend to perform.”

More information

The U.S. National Eye Institute has more about cataracts.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OSCtbw

Pet Pooch May Help Ease PTSD in Veterans

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Dogs may be more than best friends for military veterans struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a small study suggests.

Researchers found that vets who were given pet dogs showed significant improvement in their PTSD symptoms.

The study included 19 U.S. veterans receiving treatment for the condition. PTSD can develop as a reaction to a terrifying event, such as war, natural disasters, sexual assault and other physical violence or trauma. People with the condition may have prolonged anxiety, flashbacks, nightmares and other life-altering symptoms.

Nine of the veterans were randomly selected to receive a dog immediately. The other 10 were placed on a three-month waiting list for a dog. The dogs were simply pets, not trained service animals.

Not only did the veterans with dogs show fewer PTSD symptoms, they also reported lower levels of depression and loneliness, according to the team led by Dr. Stephen Stern. He’s with the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Most of the veterans with dogs said they developed close bonds with their pets and became more physically and socially active. Many also said they had improvements in their overall happiness, ability to cope with stress and relationships with others.

Two experts in PTSD care said the findings aren’t all that surprising.

“Many clients that we have treated at our center have extolled the benefits of pets in their recovery,” noted Mayer Bellehsen, who directs the Feinberg Division of the Unified Behavioral Health Center in Bay Shore, N.Y.

While preliminary, “this pilot study begins to substantiate the experiences of our clients,” he said.

Dr. Jeffrey Borenstein is president of the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. “We know that veterans with PTSD have benefited from equine [horse] therapy,” he said, “so it makes sense that social interactions with man’s best friend might also be helpful.”

“However, more research is needed to show whether dogs are truly effective in helping veterans with PTSD, and understanding the reasons why that is the case,” Borenstein added.

The study was presented recently at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in Atlanta. Findings presented at meetings are generally viewed as preliminary until they’ve been published in a peer-reviewed journal.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Mental Health has more on PTSD.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/20M15ZV

Asthma Symptoms Can Bloom in Springtime

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Asthma symptoms increase in spring, making it especially important for people with the lung disease to be aware of triggers and risk factors, an expert says.

“Asthma is a lifelong disease that causes wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness and coughing,” said Dr. Linda Rogers, director of the clinical asthma program at Mount Sinai-National Jewish Health Respiratory Institute, in New York City.

“While there is no cure for asthma, a personalized care plan including appropriate medications and education on triggers and proper care techniques can prevent attacks from occurring, helping patients lead a full and active life,” she said in a Mount Sinai news release.

An asthma attack can cause airways to swell, which constricts airflow and results in difficulty breathing. Common asthma triggers include tobacco smoke, outdoor air pollution, dust mites, pet dander, idling cars, cockroach allergen and mold.

Asthma affects 25 million Americans, or 8 percent of the nation’s population, according to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

More information

The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute has more about asthma.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/20LQpdN

Is Smoking During Pregnancy Tied to Offspring’s Schizophrenia Risk?

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Smoking during pregnancy may increase the risk that a child could develop schizophrenia, new research suggests.

“This is, so far, the largest study to show an association between prenatal nicotine exposure and schizophrenia,” said study author Dr. Solja Niemela. She is a professor of psychiatry and addiction medicine at the University of Oulu, Lapland Hospital District, in Rovaniemi, Finland.

Although the study didn’t prove cause and effect, the finding is the first to be based on blood sample analyses that provided evidence of nicotine exposure in the womb, rather than on less reliable maternal recollections of smoking behavior, Niemela added.

Still, she added that “the causes of schizophrenia are multifaceted.”

“It is likely that prenatal smoking exposure alone does not cause schizophrenia,” said Niemela. “Rather, there is [probably] an interplay of genetic and environmental factors.”

Niemela and her co-authors from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health in New York City and the New York State Psychiatric Institute reported the results in the May 24 issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.

Prior research had indicated that between 12 percent and 25 percent of all pregnant women in Western nations smoke, the investigators said.

The problem: Once absorbed by the mother-to-be, nicotine can pass easily into the placenta and enter the fetus’ bloodstream. This can raise the risk of a host of complications that could affect a newborn’s brain, the researchers said.

But earlier efforts to assess the dangers that maternal smoking might pose for schizophrenia among children have been inconclusive, the researchers said.

The new investigation focused on nearly 1,000 Finnish teens and young adults who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia. All had been drawn from Finland’s comprehensive national registry of births covering the years 1983 to 1998.

To gauge the participants’ nicotine exposure while in the womb, the study authors analyzed data from blood samples that had been obtained from the pregnant mothers during routine HIV, syphilis and hepatitis screenings that all pregnant women in Finland undergo.

The researchers looked at maternal levels of cotinine, a tobacco byproduct considered to be a standard measure of tobacco exposure.

Cotinine levels were tallied for both mothers of children with schizophrenia and an equivalent grouping of mothers of children without schizophrenia.

The result: Even after accounting for the pregnant mother’s age, the child’s birth weight and/or any maternal history of psychiatric disorders, the investigators concluded that “heavy” nicotine intake during pregnancy appeared to be associated with a 38 percent rise in the risk for schizophrenia among offspring.

The study authors said they weren’t able to assess schizophrenia risk that might be associated with childhood exposure to secondhand smoke following birth. They noted, however, that nicotine exposure from secondhand smoke is “considerably lower” than exposure while in the womb.

So, “given the high frequency of smoking during pregnancy,” said Niemela, “these results, if replicated, may ultimately have important public health implications for decreasing the incidence of schizophrenia.”

But, she reiterated, many factors, both genetic and environmental, play a role in schizophrenia risk.

That thought was seconded by Elaine Walker, director of the Mental Health and Development Program at Emory University in Atlanta.

“It is currently assumed that schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders are associated with a broad range of risk factors, both prenatal and postnatal, that can alter brain development,” she said.

“These factors likely interact with pre-existing brain vulnerabilities, some of which may be due to inherited genetic risk factors and others a result of spontaneous genetic mutations that are not possessed by either parent,” Walker added. “Schizophrenia is therefore considered to be a complex illness that involves many and varied causes.”

Walker also said that “as is the case with most prenatal risk factors, the majority of individuals [in the study] who were exposed to smoking did not develop a serious mental illness.”

But she noted that the study “adds to our understanding of the broad range of prenatal factors that have the potential to incrementally contribute to risk for schizophrenia [and] highlights the importance of good prenatal care and health for the prevention of a wide range of illnesses in children.”

More information

There’s more on schizophrenia at U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1sfVnV7

NIH Experts Cast Doubt on Rat Study Linking Cellphones, Tumors

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Experts at the U.S. National Institutes of Health are questioning the validity of a widely reported study in rats that linked cellphone radiation to tumors.

The study, released Friday by the federal government’s National Toxicology Program (NTP), found “low incidences” of two types of tumors in male rats exposed to the type of radio frequencies emitted by cellphones, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The two types of tumors were glioma brain cancer and benign schwannomas of the heart, according to the $25 million study that is one of the largest and most comprehensive to assess the health impacts of cellphones.

“Given the widespread global usage of mobile communications among users of all ages, even a very small increase in the incidence of disease resulting from exposure to [radio-frequency radiation] could have broad implications for public health,” according to an NTP summary of partial findings from the study released late Thursday, the WSJ reported.

However, NIH experts were quick to highlight flaws in the study, according to the Associated Press.

For example, they pointed out that the study exposed rats to very high levels of cellphone radiation, beginning in the womb and then through the first two years of the rats’ life. Even then, only 2 percent to 3 percent of male rats — and no females — developed a tumor.

The fact that none of the female rats developed a tumor is odd, the NIH experts said, as is the fact that rats who did not get exposed to the radiation died at higher rates than those who did get exposed.

The unexposed rats also failed to develop tumors at a rate that would be expected in a “normal” population, the NIH experts noted.

Based on these findings, “I am unable to accept the authors’ conclusions,” wrote outside reviewer Dr. Michael Lauer, deputy director of NIH’s office of extramural research. “I suspect that this experiment is substantially underpowered and that the few positive results found reflect false positive findings.”

He also said that the fact rats exposed to the radiation actually lived longer “leaves me even more skeptical of the authors’ claims.”

The complete results of the NTP study will be released by the fall of 2017, the NTP said.

The NIH helped oversee the study, and earlier this week said, “It is important to note that previous human, observational data collected in earlier, large-scale population-based studies have found limited evidence of an increased risk for developing cancer from cellphone use.”

Many studies have found no link between cellphones and harmful health effects. For example, a recently released Australian study found no increase in brain cancer rates since mobile phones became available there nearly three decades ago, and similar findings have been made in other countries.

Others believe the new findings may have merit, however. Ron Melnick ran the NTP project until retiring in 2009. He recently reviewed the study and said: “Where people were saying there’s no risk, I think this ends that kind of statement.”

In the meantime, the study’s impact on Federal Communications Commission (FCC) cellphone safety rules is unclear.

“Scientific evidence always informs FCC rules on this matter,” said a spokesman for the agency, which has been briefed on the findings. “We will continue to follow all recommendations from federal health and safety experts including whether the FCC should modify its current policies.”

More information

Visit the U.S. National Cancer Institute for more on cellphones and cancer risk.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1sfV6RQ

Make That Memorial Day BBQ Tasty — and Safe

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — As Americans fire up their grills this Memorial Day weekend, experts note that while there isn’t enough evidence to conclude that barbecued meat increases cancer risk, it’s still a good idea to take some precautions.

“Here’s what we do know. Cooking meat at a high temperature — like grilling — creates substances called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [PAHs] and heterocyclic amines [HCAs], said Alice Bender, head of nutrition programs at the American Institute for Cancer Research.

“Smoking or charring meat also contributes to the formation of PAHs. These substances are carcinogens, with the potential to cause changes in DNA that may lead to cancer,” Bender said in a news release from the nonprofit organization.

She outlined how to reduce the potential risks associated with grilling. Research has suggested that marinating meat before putting it on the barbecue can decrease the formation of HCAs.

If you’re using large cuts of meat, partially precook them in the microwave, oven or on a stove immediately before you put them on the grill. That will reduce the length of time the meat is exposed to flames, Bender said.

Another way to shorten cooking time on the barbecue is to cut meat into smaller portions.

Trim fat off the meat to reduce flare-ups and charring, cook the meat in the center of the grill, and flip it often, Bender said.

Try putting vegetables and fruits on the barbecue, because grilling them produces no HCAs.

It’s also important to remember that no matter how you cook it, eating too much red meat and processed meat increases the risk of colon and stomach cancer, Bender said.

“What matters most is what you cook, not how you cook it,” she said. “It’s clear that what you eat day to day — focusing on vegetables, whole grains, beans and fruit over red meat — provides the most cancer protection.”

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more about how meat is cooked and cancer risk.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TF506p

6 Sun Safety Tips for ‘Don’t Fry Day’

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The Friday before Memorial Day has been designated “Don’t Fry Day” by the National Council on Skin Cancer Prevention, to remind Americans about the importance of sun safety.

“As we move into spring and summer, many Americans will start spending more time outdoors. However, exposure to harmful UV rays from the sun and indoor tanning can increase the risk of skin cancer,” Carolyn Heckman, chair of the Don’t Fry Day campaign, said in a council news release.

Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the United States, with nearly 5 million cases diagnosed each year. That’s more than breast, colon, lung and prostate cancers combined.

“Taking the time to get educated about the risks of UV exposure, along with taking steps to protect yourself from UV rays can make a big difference for your health while still allowing the opportunity to enjoy outdoor activities,” Heckman said. She is an associate professor in the Cancer Prevention and Control Program at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia.

Here are six tips for protecting your skin:

  • Use sunscreen whenever you’re outdoors. Liberally apply a broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF (sun protection factor) of at least 30 before outdoor activities. A broad-spectrum product offers protection from UVA and UVB rays, according to the experts. Apply sunscreen at least 15 minutes before heading out.
  • Reapply sunscreen frequently. Put sunscreen on again every two hours while you’re outside, or more often if you’re swimming or sweating.
  • Stay indoors when the sun is strongest. Try to stay inside or in the shade between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.
  • Take extra care near water or sand. The sun’s rays are stronger when they reflect off sand or water, so you may burn faster.
  • Cover up. It’s not always feasible, but when you can, cover up as much skin as possible. A wide-brimmed hat and sunglasses can protect your face and eyes.
  • Don’t intentionally try to tan.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on sun safety.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TF5oBO

Exploring Zika’s Path Through the Placenta

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — New research seems to shed light on how the Zika virus infects, but doesn’t kill, placenta cells.

The mosquito-borne virus can cause severe birth defects in babies whose mothers are exposed to Zika during pregnancy, but scientists don’t know exactly how that happens.

“Our results substantiate the limited evidence from pathology case reports,” said senior author Mehul Suthar, an assistant professor of pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine, in Atlanta.

“It was known that the virus was getting into the placenta. But little was known about where the virus was replicating and in what cell type,” Suthar said in a university news release.

Scientists conducted experiments using immune cells from placentas of healthy women who had full-term babies delivered by cesarean section.

The Zika virus used in the study is the strain circulating in Puerto Rico. The researchers said it’s closely related to the strain in Brazil, where the virus-related birth defects became apparent last spring.

The researchers found that Zika can replicate in immune cells from the placenta without killing them. They said this may explain how the virus can pass through the placenta of a pregnant woman and infect developing brain cells in her fetus.

In Brazil, the result has been an estimated 5,000 cases of microcephaly, a condition in which an infant is born with an abnormally small head and underdeveloped brain.

When they examined placenta cells from different women, the researchers also found wide variation in the levels of Zika virus replication. This suggests some women may be more susceptible to infection than others, the researchers said.

“Not every pregnant woman who is infected by Zika transmits the virus to her fetus,” Suthar said. “Host genetics and nonviral factors, including nutrition and microbiota, as well as timing may be influencing infectivity.”

Suthar added that a better understanding of these factors could lead to preventive measures, and eventually antiviral therapies.

The study was published May 27 in the journal Cell Host & Microbe.

Zika-related viruses in the flavivirus family include dengue, West Nile and yellow fever, and are rarely transmitted from mother to fetus, the researchers noted.

“Zika may be unique in its ability to infect placental cells and cross the placental barrier, in comparison with other flaviviruses,” Suthar said.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on the Zika virus.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TF51XZ

New Labeling Offers More Protection for Meat Lovers

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — When you head to the grocery store to select your steaks for grilling this Memorial Day weekend, you might notice a new safety label on the package.

This month, the U.S. Department of Agriculture issued a new rule stating that mechanically tenderized beef must now be labeled as such and include safe cooking instructions for consumers.

The tenderizing process involves piercing certain cuts of beef with needles or small blades to break up tissue and increase tenderness. But those blades can push germs to the interior of the meat, making proper and thorough cooking crucial.

Mechanically tenderized beef looks the same as beef that has not been treated this way, so labeling is needed to alert consumers about this increased food safety risk, according to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service.

The new labeling rule took effect May 17.

“These products, like all whole cuts of beef, should be cooked to a minimum internal temperature of 145 degrees Fahrenheit as measured with a food thermometer before removing meat from the heat source,” the USDA said in an agency news release.

“For safety and quality, allow meat to rest for at least three minutes after it has been removed from the heat source before carving or consuming. During this rest time, the internal temperature is either constant or slightly rises to destroy pathogens,” the agency added.

Since 2000, there have been six reports in the United States of food illness outbreaks linked to mechanically tenderized beef prepared in consumers’ homes and restaurants, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Undercooking the products was a major contributing factor in all those cases, the CDC said.

According to the USDA, “home cooks, restaurants and other food service facilities will now have more information about the products they are buying, as well as useful cooking instructions so they know how to safely prepare them.”

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on food safety.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1XWnjJK

Rare Antibiotic-Resistant Superbug Found in U.S. Woman

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

FRIDAY, May 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — U.S. researchers have identified the nation’s first patient with an infection resistant to all existing antibiotics.

Scientists have warned for years the day could come when “superbugs” resisted all last-resort antibiotics. This new case, involving a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman, suggests that day may soon be here.

“It is the end of the road for antibiotics unless we act urgently,” Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said at a National Press Club event in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

Although the patient survived, it’s feared the resistance could spread to other bacteria, according to media reports.

The woman was treated last month for a urinary tract infection at a military clinic in Pennsylvania. The culprit was identified as E. coli bacteria. It’s a common type of germ. But in this case, tests showed it was resistant to first-line antibiotics—those usually used for these infections.

Another kind of antibiotic proved successful in treating the infection. However, subsequent testing revealed that the particular E. coli was genetically resistant to the drug colistin.

Colistin, an older antibiotic, fell out of favor in the 1970s because of nasty side effects, the Associated Press reported. Now, however, it’s used to fight difficult-to-treat bacteria resistant to a class of antibiotics called carbapenems. Carbapenems are one of the last lines of defense, the AP said.

Experts say that if carbapenem-resistant bacteria also gain resistance to colistin, it could leave doctors with no treatment options for infections.

“This is another piece of a really nasty puzzle that we didn’t want to see here,” said Dr. Beth Bell, who oversees CDC’s emerging infectious diseases programs, the AP reported.

Other countries have already had cases of superbugs resistant to all antibiotics. But this is the first time it has occurred in the United States.

Researchers from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., confirmed the woman’s infection. They reported on the case May 26 in a journal of the American Society of Microbiology.

CDC and Pennsylvania health officials are still trying to determine how the woman—who has not recently traveled outside of the United States—became infected with the colistin-resistant E. coli.

The colistin-resistant gene has been found in people and animals in Canada, China and Europe. American health officials said Thursday that colistin-resistant E. coli has been found in a pig in the United States. But they added that there was no apparent connection to the Pennsylvania woman, the AP reported.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about antibiotic-resistant bacteria.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1XWnbtM