barre

Here’s What You Should Know About Natural Family Planning

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

I’d like to try natural family planning for birth control. But does it work?

Also called fertility awareness, natural family planning (NFP) is an umbrella term for various ways to forecast the time in your cycle when you are most likely to get pregnant—such as monitoring your daily temperature, checking for changes in cervical mucus and counting the days since your last period. When practiced perfectly, it can work nearly as well as medical birth control, according to some studies.

But the key word here is perfectly. Many women find that painstakingly tracking their periods, their temperature and the consistency of their cervical mucus is quite time-consuming. And unless you’re going to use condoms during your fertile days, you may need to remain abstinent for up to two weeks out of the month. That’s why the research also shows a very high dropout rate.

Don’t even attempt NFP for birth control if you have irregular periods, or if you’re taking antibiotics or antihistamines—these drugs can lead to changes in your cervical mucus, making it difficult to tell if you’re on a fertile day or not.

Health‘s medical editor, Roshini Rajapaksa, MD, is assistant professor of medicine at the NYU School of Medicine and co-founder of Tula Skincare.

RELATED: 

20 Weird Facts About Sex and Love

Top 10 Myths About Safe Sex and Sexual Health

15 Factors That Affect A Woman’s Fertility




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GiDUdK

3 Things You Should Know About the FDA’s New Trans Fat Ban

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

You may have read that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) resolved this week to officially ban artificial trans fat from the U.S. food supply by 2018. I think it’s a great decision, but this move doesn’t mean that double-stuffed sandwich cookies will now be good for you (sorry). Here’s why, and three other things you should know about the FDA’s major action.

Trans fats are seriously bad for your health

Since this news broke, a few people have asked me if this ban is really necessary, or if a little trans fat here and there is really that big of a deal. My responses are yes, and yes. Numerous studies have linked man-made trans fat to health problems including heart disease, infertility, cancer, type 2 diabetes, liver problems, obesity, and even memory deficits. One study (albeit in animals) found that even when eating the same number of calories and identical amounts of fat, monkeys fed trans fat gained four times more weight and 30% more belly fat than those who ate monounsaturated fats instead.

RELATED: Fats You Can—and Should—Eat

You should still read ingredient lists

Food companies have three years to remove trans fat from their products, so until it’s eradicated, you’ll have to do a little sleuthing to avoid it. A report out this year from the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that up to 37% of foods in grocery stores may contain trans fat—and that’s possible even if the label says “trans fat free.” Technically, a product can claim to provide zero grams of trans fat if it contains less than 0.5 grams per serving. That means you could still be getting several grams per package. The only way to really tell if a product contains trans fat is to check the ingredient list. If the words “partially hydrogenated” appear, then there’s trans fat in the product. And while the amount may be small per serving, the fat grams can add up quick: If you eat a dozen foods over the course of a week that each contain 0.4 grams, you’ll take in almost 5 grams of trans fat total. And that’s very easy to do: The EWG report found partially hydrogenated oil in a slew of common supermarket items, including breakfast bars, granola, peanut butter, pretzels, crackers, bread, graham crackers, non-dairy creamer, cupcakes, and ice-cream cones.

RELATED: 6 ‘Bad’ Carbs That Are Actually Good For You

One replacement may be worse for you than trans fat

Some companies have begun replacing partially hydrogenated oil with fully hydrogenated oil, also referred to as interesterified oil. While this replacement is technically trans fat-free, there is some indication that it may be worse for your health. A study from Brandeis University found that volunteers who consumed products made with interesterified oil experienced a drop in their “good” HDL cholesterol and a significant rise in blood sugar—about 20%—in just one month. To scope out interesterified oil, again, check the ingredient lists on packaged food; if you see the word “hydrogenated,” whether partially or fully, you’ve identified artificial fat, and it should be avoided, period.

In fact, the best advice for steering clear of unhealthy fats is to eat fewer packaged and processed foods overall. Instead of buying microwave popcorn, pop your own on the stove top using organic popcorn kernels and sunflower oil. In place of pie, bake or grill fresh fruit, and top with a “crumble” made from rolled oats, cinnamon, and almond butter. There are many simple and healthy ways to make DIY versions of foods you might normally buy, and going homemade as much as possible means you get to control exactly what’s going into your meals, and into your body.

RELATED: 9 Quick and Easy Make-Ahead Casseroles

What are your thoughts on this topic? Chat with us on Twitter by mentioning @goodhealth and @CynthiaSass.

Cynthia Sass is a nutritionist and registered dietitian with master’s degrees in both nutrition science and public health. Frequently seen on national TV, she’s Health’s contributing nutrition editor, and privately counsels clients in New York, Los Angeles, and long distance. Cynthia is currently the sports nutrition consultant to the New York Rangers NHL team and the New York Yankees MLB team, and is board certified as a specialist in sports dietetics. Cynthia is a three time New York Times best selling author, and her brand new book is Slim Down Now: Shed Pounds and Inches with Real Food, Real Fast. Connect with her on FacebookTwitter and Pinterest.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1MMw7K4

Pregnancy May Conceal Ebola

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Ebola infection continues to surprise scientists. The latest twist: The deadly virus may hide in pregnant women without obvious symptoms.

A new case report describes a 31-year-old woman in late pregnancy who went to a hospital in Liberia complaining of mild stomach pain, possibly pregnancy-related.

Routine Ebola testing revealed she was infected with the virus, though she had no obvious symptoms, such as body pain, vomiting and diarrhea, or bleeding.

After three days, however, Ebola symptoms emerged. Several days later she and her unborn child were dead, according to a letter published June 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The researchers suspect the woman’s reduced immune response — a normal part of pregnancy — could have allowed the virus to remain in her body undetected for some time.

“The unique immunologic status of pregnant women might alter disease presentation and progression,” wrote Dr. Emma Akerlund of Doctors Without Borders and two colleagues. “This case highlights the challenges that clinicians may face in assessing pregnant women for possible infections, including Ebola, and the potential risk for health care staff.”

It’s possible that she could have infected others before her symptoms appeared, the researchers said. But experts said the implications really aren’t clear.

“We don’t know enough about Ebola to tell what all the complications might be,” said Dr. Debra Spicehandler, co-chief of infectious disease at Northern Westchester Hospital in Mount Kisco, N.Y. She had no role in the study.

The main limitation of the study is that this is a single case, said Thomas Geisbert, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston.

“If it turns out that there are a fair number of cases where high levels of virus are detected in body fluids from asymptomatic patients, then, yes, that could have important implications in explaining the magnitude of this outbreak and certainly for how outbreaks are managed,” said Geisbert, who wasn’t involved in the study.

The recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa — the worst in history — has infected more than 27,000 people and killed more than 11,000 of them since late 2013. Health officials believe the worst of the epidemic is over, even though a small number of cases continue to surface.

David Sanders, an associate professor of biological sciences at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., explained that it’s not Ebola itself that causes the symptoms, it’s the body’s immune response that causes the symptoms.

It’s entirely possible that someone whose immune system is suppressed can carry Ebola and not show the classic symptoms, he said.

Sanders added there may be others who carry Ebola without obvious signs because their immune system is subdued.

“Fortunately, however, this appears to be rare,” Sanders said. “You have to have the conjunction of immunosuppression with the infection.”

While noting this is something doctors can take into account, Sanders added, “I don’t think it’s something we need to panic about.”

He believes the mode of transmission remains the same even when the virus is concealed.

That means someone would have to have contact with body fluids to contract the virus. Ebola appears to be most transmissible from contact with infected patients just a few days before death and by handling their dead bodies, he said.

More information

For more on Ebola, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1N3TKOR

Online Community Helps People Manage Epilepsy

WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Being part of an online community may help people with epilepsy better manage their disease, a new study suggests.

“Epilepsy is a complicated disease, and many people who live with it are not well informed about their condition and how to manage it. Formal, in-person education can be expensive and difficult to coordinate, especially when people live in rural areas. We wanted to see whether an online community could benefit people with epilepsy,” study author Dr. John Hixson, of the University of California San Francisco and the San Francisco VA Medical Center, said in a news release from the journal Neurology.

The research included almost 100 epilepsy patients who participated in an online forum called PatientsLikeMe. In the forum, people with epilepsy can share information and support. It also has digital tools for tracking seizures, symptoms and medications. The study volunteers participated in the forum for six weeks.

Participants could use the website as often as they wanted. At the start and end of the study, they completed questionnaires about their ability to manage their disease. The largest improvements noted by patients were in managing information about their disease, such as tracking seizures in a diary and tracking side effects.

Patients also became more confident about taking care of themselves. They also did better in managing their care, such as getting enough sleep and avoiding seizure triggers, according to the study.

Results were published online June 17 in the journal Neurology.

PatientsLikeMe is run by a for-profit company. The study was funded by pharmaceutical company UCB Inc., which is a partner of PatientsLikeMe.

“The overall improvements were modest, but they were similar to those seen with other, more resource-intensive education programs. This study shows that online communities may be a feasible, convenient method for improving care for people with epilepsy,” Hixson said.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more about epilepsy.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1LfXAq7

Too Much ‘Feel Good’ Brain Chemical May Trigger Social Phobia

WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Levels of the brain chemical serotonin are too high in people with social phobia, rather than too low as previously believed, a new study says.

Researchers at Uppsala University in Sweden conducted brain scans on volunteers and found that those with social phobia — also called social anxiety disorder — produced too much serotonin in the amygdala, which is part of the brain’s fear center.

The more serotonin their brains produced, the more anxious they were in social situations, the investigators found.

“Serotonin can increase anxiety, and not decrease it as was previously often assumed,” researcher Andreas Frick, a doctoral student in the psychology department at Uppsala, said in a university news release.

The study was published June 17 in the journal JAMA Psychiatry.

Serotonin, which is produced by nerve cells, helps to relay messages from one area of the brain to another.

Previous research showed that nerve activity in the amygdala is higher in people with social phobia and that the fear center in their brain is oversensitive. These new findings suggest that too much serotonin plays a role.

Social phobia is often treated with drugs called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which increase the amount of available serotonin in the brain.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Mental Health has more about social phobia.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1FmZAVl

COPD Patients Less Active, Which Can Worsen Outcomes

WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2015 (HealthDay News) — People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) become less physically active, leading to further declines in their health, a new study shows.

Decreased physical activity results in worsening lung function and overall health. Sustained inactivity is also associated with progression of muscle loss and inability to exercise, the researchers said.

Their study of more than 130 people with COPD found that their physical activity decreased each year. The declines occurred regardless of the severity of their disease. Reduced physical activity was associated with an increase in breathing problems and decreases in overall health, quality of life and sense of well-being.

Long-term physical inactivity was associated with larger declines in muscle mass and in 6-minute walk distance results.

The study was published online recently in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

“Treatment guidelines call for regular physical activity for COPD patients at all levels of severity, and our study clearly supports this recommendation. Regular exercise will improve their health and quality of life,” study author Dr. Benjamin Waschki, of the Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic in Grosshansdorf, Germany, said in a journal news release.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more about COPD.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1FmZDjO

Trans Fats From Foods May Worsen Memory, Study Finds

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Trans fats may play havoc with your memory along with your cholesterol levels, a new study suggests.

Younger men who ate high levels of trans fats performed more poorly on a memory test involving word recall than those who ate lower levels, the researchers found.

In the study, each gram of trans fats eaten per day was associated with 12 to 21 fewer words recalled, out of an average score of 86, said lead author Dr. Beatrice Golomb, a professor of family and preventive medicine at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine.

“It’s a pretty sizeable relationship,” Golomb said. “This adds to a body of evidence that trans fats are not something that people should be sticking in their mouth.”

But, it’s important to note that the study wasn’t designed to definitively prove a cause-and-effect relationship; it can only show an association between higher consumption of trans fats and worsened recall.

The findings were published online June 17 in the journal PLOS One.

Golomb’s study appears the day after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced a three-year phase-out of partially hydrogenated oils from the American food supply. These oils are a primary source of trans fats.

Golomb calls trans fats an “anti-food,” noting that they increase levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol while simultaneously driving down levels of “good” HDL cholesterol.

Trans fats also increase inflammation and interfere with hormone production, which might explain the association between trans fats and memory, she said.

“The purpose of food is to provide your body with the nutrients it needs to function properly,” Golomb said. “This actually does the opposite. It subverts cellular and organ function.”

Golomb decided to look into trans fats following another study in which chocolate was favorably linked to memory. Chocolate is an antioxidant that has anti-inflammatory properties, so it stood to reason that trans fats might harm memory by promoting inflammation, she said.

In the study, researchers evaluated data from 645 healthy men who were asked to complete a dietary survey and take part in a memory test.

The test involved a set of 104 cards, each bearing a word. The men had to say whether each word was new, or had been shown to them before.

On average, men 45 and younger recalled 86 words. But for each additional gram of trans fats consumed daily, their performance dropped by 0.76 words, the study revealed.

Men whose daily diet contained about 16 grams of trans fats recalled 12 fewer words correctly, while men who consumed as much as 28 grams of trans fats daily recalled about 21 fewer words, the study found.

“This study does provide ‘food for thought’ about potential adverse effects of dietary trans fatty acids on cognitive [mental] function,” said Dr. Marc Gordon, chief of neurology for Zucker Hillside Hospital in Glen Oaks, N.Y.

However, Gordon said that the study doesn’t prove a direct link between trans fats and memory, but only shows a potential association that might have some other explanation.

Besides causing inflammation, trans fats might also inhibit the body’s production of omega 3 fatty acids, which play a crucial role in brain function, Golomb said.

“It would not be unexpected for that to lead to worse brain function,” she said.

Trans fats also might affect a person’s serotonin levels, said Jim White, a nutrition expert in Virginia Beach, Va., and a spokesman for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Serotonin is a hormone that regulates mood, appetite and sleep, and also plays a role in brain function.

“If trans fat is reducing serotonin levels, it can really affect depression and memory,” said White, noting that previous studies have shown increased depression in people who consume high amounts of trans fats.

On June 16, the FDA ruled that partially hydrogenated oils are no longer “generally recognized as safe,” the designation that for decades has allowed companies to use the oils in a wide variety of food products.

Companies have until June 18, 2018 to either reformulate their products and remove all partially hydrogenated oils, or petition the FDA to permit specific uses of the oils, the agency announced.

Even though food manufacturers have cut trans fats by 86 percent since 2003, trans fats still make up 2 percent to 3 percent of the average American diet — about 5 to 6 grams a day, White said.

“I normally don’t recommend cutting out anything completely in the diet,” White said. “Our bodies even need a small amount of saturated fats to sustain them. But I tell people, do not consume anything with trans fats in them. This is a nutrient that’s been nothing but negative.”

The study focused on men because there were too few women to include in the analysis, Golomb said. But she added that she saw no reason why trans fats would affect women differently than men.

More information

For more on trans fats, visit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GZryhn

More Breast Cancer Patients Opting for Lumpectomy: Study

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2015 (HealthDay News) — The percentage of women with early stage breast cancer who choose to have the breast-conserving surgery known as lumpectomy has risen slowly in recent years, new research shows.

In 1998, slightly more than 54 percent of eligible women chose the surgery. But, the number had passed the 60 percent mark by 2011, according to study author Dr. Isabelle Bedrosian, an associate professor of surgical oncology at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“The big picture shows most women with early stage breast cancer are opting for breast-conserving surgery,” she said.

Previous research has found that mastectomy, where the entire breast is removed, was chosen as often as lumpectomy among women with early stage breast cancer who were candidates for lumpectomy and the radiation that typically follows it.

Bedrosian views the new findings as good news, but emphasized that barriers still exist. Among them are lack of insurance and the distance some patients must travel to treatment facilities.

Most women who choose breast-conserving surgery also need whole-breast radiation, which is typically given in daily fractions over a six-week period. Some women lack transportation or can’t take a break from work or family responsibilities to do that, the researchers explained.

The study was published online June 17 in the journal JAMA Surgery.

The new study draws from a database that’s more complete than those used in other research, Bedrosian said. Her team looked at data on women treated for early stage breast cancer between 1998 and 2011. All were entered into the National Cancer Data Base, sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. It captures about 70 percent of newly diagnosed cancer cases in the United States, the study authors said.

The researchers looked at factors that influenced the surgery decision made by nearly 728,000 women. The investigators found that the decision to have breast-conserving surgery was more likely in women aged 52 to 61 compared to younger women.

Women with higher education were also more likely to have a lumpectomy. In addition, those without insurance were less likely to opt for breast-conserving surgery than those with private insurance. Lower-income women were also less likely to choose lumpectomy, the study found.

Bedrosian said it’s important to address the remaining barriers so women who are eligible and want breast-conserving surgery can get it.

Dr. Lisa Newman, a professor of surgery at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ann Arbor, wrote an accompanying journal editorial. She said, “Breast-conservation rates may well continue to rise as women become better-informed regarding its safety and as we become more successful with early detection of breast cancer, when lumpectomy is more likely to be feasible.”

Women making the decision about early stage breast cancer surgery should also know they are not “racing the clock,” although it is important to get treatment in a timely manner, she added.

“Most newly diagnosed breast cancer patients will have treatment options, and they need to take some time to inform themselves about these choices so that they select the approach that suits them best,” Newman said.

Are women who are still choosing mastectomy over lumpectomy possibly influenced by the decision of actress and activist Angelina Jolie to have a preventive double mastectomy when she found out she had a genetic mutation that greatly increased her risk of breast cancer?

Newman believes Jolie’s decision and her discussion of it publicly “was a powerful public education message regarding the importance of knowing your family history and pursuing genetic counseling when appropriate. A variety of strategies are available to women for early detection and even prevention of breast cancer, but an important first step is to understand which options are reasonable for each patient as an individual.”

More information

To learn more about breast-conserving surgery, see the American Cancer Society.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1FmZCN3

Aziz Ansari on Online Dating: ‘You Forget That You’re Talking to a Real Person’

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

It doesn’t matter if you’re 26 or 66: Dating in the age of technology is difficult for everyone. Now, comedian and Parks and Recreation (RIP) star Aziz Ansari is here to tell you how navigate this brave new world with his brand-new book, Modern Romance ($28, amazon.com). (First tip: Don’t initiate conversation with “Wsup.”)

You might be asking yourself: Why should we trust an actor to give us serious love advice? Well, Ansari joined forces with NYU professor of sociology Eric Klinenberg, PhD, to spend three years conducting hundreds of interviews and focus groups around the world on the topic of romance. Together, they analyzed behavioral data and research, enlisted the help of leading social scientists, and created an online research forum on Reddit to tap into the minds of daters. Plus, if you’ve watched Ansari’s stand-up comedy specials, you know he’s a 21st century male with the rites of modern courtship firmly in mind.

RELATED: 10 Ways to Improve Your Relationship Instantly

Intrigued? Check out some of the best advice from his book. (It must’ve worked, since Ansari’s currently in a long-term relationship himself.)

Treat potential partners like actual people, not bubbles on a screen.

With online dating and smartphones, we can message people all over the world. We can interact with potential mates on a scale that simply wasn’t conceivable for previous generations. But the shift in digital communication has a powerful side effect. When you look at your phone and see a text from a potential partner, you don’t always see the other person—you often see a little bubble with text in it. And it’s easy to forget that this bubble is actually a person. When you forget that you’re talking to a real person, you might start saying the kinds of things in a text message that no person in their right mind would ever say to a real-life person in a million years. We have two selves: a real-world self and a phone self, and the nonsense our phone selves do can make our real-world selves look like idiots. Act like a dummy with your phone self and send someone a thoughtless message full of spelling errors, and the real-world self will pay the price. Don’t just write up a stupid “Wsup” message. Try to say something thoughtful or funny and invite this person to do a nice, interesting thing. Make it personal. Your most casual encounter could lead to something bigger, so treat those interactions with that level of respect. Even if it doesn’t blossom, treating the messages with that level of respect will surely make the person on the other end more receptive as well. There is no downside to it.

RELATED: How to Create The Perfect Online Dating Profile

Don’t think of online dating as dating—think of it as an online introduction service.

Online dating works best as a forum where you can meet people whom you’d never otherwise be able to meet. It’s the ultimate way to expand the search beyond the neighborhood. The key is to get off the screen and meet these people. Don’t spend your nights in endless exchanges with strangers. Communicate with people you have some chance of liking, then, after a few messages—enough to figure out if there’s something really, really wrong with them—just ask them out. After a certain point, if you’re still trading endless back-and-forth messages online, you’re just wasting time. Have faith in your ability to size someone up in person.

Remember: No matter how many options we seem to have on our screens, we should be careful not to lose track of the human beings behind them. We’re better off spending quality time getting to know actual people than spending hours with our devices, seeing who else is out there.

RELATED: Does Online Dating Lead to More Break-Ups?

With so many romantic options, instead of trying to explore them all, make sure you properly invest in people and give them a fair chance before moving on to the next one.

We have so many options and we’re terrible at analyzing them. We go on boring dates and we’re quick to move on to the next person. Stack the deck in your favor. Go on interesting dates, and do things that are going to help you experience what it’s really like to be with this person. Don’t just stare at each other across the table while sipping a beverage and making the same small talk you’ve made a thousand times about siblings, hometowns, and where you went to college. A person may seem just okay, but if you really invest time in the relationship, maybe they’ll be greater than you assume.

RELATED: Can You Talk Your Way to Happy?




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1SoAbny

Here’s Proof That Your Dog Really Does Have Your Back

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Murray’s not alone in thinking that way: After all, dogs are considered man’s best friend for their fierce loyalty. But how devoted are they really?

Turns out, they’re so intent on defending their owners that they may avoid taking food from someone who’s mean to the human they love, a new study out of Japan has found.

RELATED: 12 Ways Pets Improve Your Health

Researchers tested this concept by creating three groups of 18 dogs and their owners. Each canine then watched a little scene play out between their owner and two strangers. In the first group, the owner asked for help when trying to open a box, but one of the strangers actively refused. In the second group, the owner asked one of the strangers for help, and assistance was gladly provided. Finally, in the control group, the owner didn’t interact with either of the two strangers.

Afterwards, both strangers in each group held out a treat for the dog. The result: Dogs in the first group were far more likely to bypass the stranger who’d refused to help and take the treat only from the other, neutral stranger. In the other scenarios, where no owner had been snubbed, the dogs didn’t distinguish between strangers—i.e., they were both equal-opportunity sources for snacks.

RELATED: How to Reduce Pet Allergens at Home

What does this mean, besides proving that your dog totally has your back? “We discovered for the first time that dogs make social and emotional evaluations of people regardless of their direct interest,” lead study researcher Kazuo Fujita, a professor of comparative cognition at Kyoto University, told the AFP. (And by direct interest, he means food.) “This ability is one of key factors in building a highly collaborative society, and this study shows that dogs share that ability with humans.”

So the next time you’re at a family get-together and that aunt who always has something mean to say stops by, just have her offer your dog a treat—your pooch will give her the evil eye in your honor. Good boy.

RELATED: America’s Healthiest Pets




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1SoAbnr