barre

This Man’s Tribute to His Dog Will Make You Want to Hug Your Pets NOW

If you’ve ever lost a beloved dog, you know that unique brand of heartbreak mixed with gratitude for the incredible bond you shared. Those are the emotions behind this beautiful seven-minute film shot by Oregon photographer Ben Moon as a tribute to his husky-pit bull mix, Denali, who passed away last year.

RELATED: Get Healthy Pet Guide

Told from the dog’s perspective, the film chronicles the pair’s friendship and adventures against breathtaking backdrops. “[Ben] didn’t feel as comfortable in the city, so we traveled a lot,” a voice meant to be Denali’s explains. The two were inseparable—even when Moon was battling cancer: “If anyone had tried to take me out of that hospital room, I would have bitten their face,” Denali says.

Instagram Photo

RELATED: How My Pet Helped Me Heal

Years later, their roles are reversed when Denali is the one struggling with cancer. As the dog reaches his last days, Ben takes Denali on a tour of all their favorite spots—until Denali lets him know he’s ready to go.

It doesn’t seem at all surprising that Moon’s soulful tribute won the Best of Festival and People’s Choice awards at Colorado’s 5Point Film Festival this spring; even if you’ve never had a pup, or lost one, you may need to grab more than a few hankies after screening it.

Instagram Photo

RELATED: 12 Ways Pets Improve Your Health




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RtF8cs

This Hilarious Video by Norway’s Women’s Soccer Team Slams Sexist Stereotypes

It’s no secret that women’s sports often receive less attention from the press than men’s sports, and when they do get attention, it tends to focus more on their appearance than on their athleticism, mental toughness, or skill.

Norway’s women’s national soccer team has come up with a hilarious comeback for all the haters, courtesy of a new satirical video. With deadpan humor (and English subtitles), they tell a reporter from the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) that it’s plain and simple: They really are no good at soccer.

RELATED: Olympic Athletes: Learn Their Secrets

The video, which is set to dramatic, documentary-style music, features goalkeeper Ingrid Hjelmseth calling her goal kicks a “nightmare” because she is unable to get the ball off the ground. Ingrid also notes that there should be two or three goalkeepers—the net is too large for one woman to handle. Team captain Trine Ronning complains that, “I sometimes watch women’s soccer on TV. Soooo boring.”

Midfielder Cathrine Dekkerhus lamented that her personal best is 25 kick-ups…”with a balloon.”

The athletes make numerous suggestions for making the game easier for women: a smaller field; a smaller, lighter ball; and “free throws” instead of free kicks.

By skewering the insults people regularly level at women in sports with classy comebacks and a keen sense of humor, these women have shown that they’re as impressive smarts-wise as they are on the field. That’s a play we’re happy to cheer for.

RELATED: 3 Motivating Mantras to Steal From Badass Female Athletes




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GmyNua

Combination of ‘Safe’ Chemicals May Be Causing Some Cancers

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Fifty everyday chemicals considered safe on their own can trigger cancer through combined exposure, says an international team of scientists.

The 174 scientists from 28 countries examined 85 chemicals believed to have no link with cancer. The investigators concluded that at current exposure levels, mixtures of 50 of those chemicals can lead to cancer.

“This research backs up the idea that chemicals not considered harmful by themselves are combining and accumulating in our bodies to trigger cancer and might lie behind the global cancer epidemic we are witnessing,” said study co-author Hemad Yasaei, a cancer biologist at Brunel University in London, England.

“We urgently need to focus more resources to research the effect of low-dose exposure to mixtures of chemicals in the food we eat, air we breathe and water we drink,” he added in a university news release.

The study was published June 23 in the journal Carcinogenesis.

Current research suggests that chemicals could be responsible for as many as one in five cancers, the researchers noted.

“We are definitely concerned that we are now starting to see evidence of a wide range of low-dose effects that are directly related to carcinogenesis, exerted by chemicals that are unavoidable in the environment,” study lead author William Goodson III, a senior scientist at the California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, said in the news release.

The scientists called for greater focus on and support for research into the health effects of low-dose exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment.

One expert said not nearly enough work has been done in that regard.

“Despite a rising incidence of many cancers, far too little research has been invested into examining the pivotal role of environmental causative agents,” Professor Francis Martin, of Lancaster University in England, said in the news release. “This worldwide team of researchers refocuses our attention on this under-researched area.”

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more about cancer causes and prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ByB9ct

Teens Unfamiliar With Harms of Pot, E-Cigs, Study Finds

By Tara Haelle
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Teens may have a firm grasp on the dangers of smoking cigarettes, but they appear less clear about how using marijuana or electronic cigarettes might harm their health, new research suggests.

“The most striking finding from this study was how little information adolescents were getting regarding risks related to marijuana and e-cigarettes,” said lead author Maria Roditis, a researcher at the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco.

“The youth we talked with actually mentioned the fact that they would see commercials talking about risks related to cigarettes, but there was nothing about marijuana or e-cigarettes,” Roditis said.

The findings were published online June 23 in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

The researchers conducted six small-group discussions with 24 teens from a Northern California school known to have high rates of substance use.

Discussion guides asked the teens what positive and negative effects they knew were related to cigarettes, marijuana and e-cigarettes, where they learned about these products, and why someone might use one over another.

Then the researchers identified common themes that arose from all the discussions. Generally speaking, the teens saw no benefits to smoking tobacco except perhaps helping someone relax, but they listed several harms, such as yellowing teeth, bad breath and cancer.

However, the teens had no difficulty listing benefits of using marijuana, such as getting high, relieving stress or pain, and relaxing. The main downsides the students listed about marijuana were getting in trouble because it is illegal and getting into dangerous situations while high. They were uncertain about health risks.

Similarly, the teens expressed confusion about whether e-cigarettes could be harmful or not. Some were uncertain whether they contained nicotine, and others suggested that using them looked “classy.”

“The fact that they are seeing messaging about risks related to cigarettes means that they may wrongly infer that cigarettes carry harm but that these other products that are not being discussed do not confer risks,” said senior study author Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, a faculty member with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco.

The teens’ comments did not surprise Patricia Folan, director of the Center for Tobacco Control at North Shore-LIJ Health System in Great Neck, N.Y.

“The impact of these products on lung health is not as well known, or what is known is not as widely publicized,” Folan said about e-cigarettes and marijuana. “Perhaps the legalization in many states has contributed to the perception that smoking marijuana is safer than conventional cigarettes.”

And, Folan added, “The knowledge gap about e-cigarettes is currently being filled in large part by the e-cigarette industry advertising rather than scientific information.”

She pointed out that regular marijuana use can double a person’s risk of experiencing psychotic symptoms, lead to getting less education, increase a person’s risk of chronic bronchitis and increase the risk of car wrecks while high.

“There is much variability in e-cigarettes, and more data are needed to demonstrate whether or not they are safe and/or effective in helping people quit smoking,” Folan said. “One of the concerns surrounding e-cigarettes is the possibility of re-normalizing smoking in society.”

Authors Roditis and Halpern-Felsher pointed out that the nicotine in e-cigarettes may negatively affect teens’ cardiovascular health and developing brains.

“There is concern that the flavorants in e-cigarettes that make them so attractive to youth are harmful, especially to the lungs and respiratory system,” Roditis said. “There is also concern that adolescents may use e-cigarettes as a bridge to start smoking conventional cigarettes.”

One way to address these gaps in knowledge is formal curriculum in schools about the risks of marijuana and e-cigarettes, said Dr. Edward Goldenberg, medical director of cardiovascular prevention at Christiana Care Health System in Wilmington, Del.

“Right now, there’s no Surgeon General’s warning on an e-cigarette that it can be detrimental to your health,” Goldenberg pointed out. “With the legalization of marijuana, it will likely become a growing public health concern, including work-site accidents, and there needs to be regulation of advertising e-cigarettes to children, as there is for regular cigarettes.”

Another problem is that public health officials simply are not creating messages about these products, said Halpern-Felsher.

“There needs to be messaging and interventions that address marijuana and e-cigarettes,” Halpern-Felsher said. “States need to ensure that they are creating policies, regulations and health initiatives that address teens’ perceptions and aim to reduce youth use and access.”

More information

Visit the U.S. Office of Adolescent Health for more on substance abuse.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1FyC7AK

Climate Change a ‘Medical Emergency’ Posing Major Risks: Experts

MONDAY, June 22, 2015 (HealthDay News) — The health risks posed by climate change are potentially serious enough to undo 50 years of advancements in global health, according to the findings of a new commission.

“Climate change has the potential to reverse the health gains from economic development that have been made in recent decades — not just through the direct effects on health from a changing and more unstable climate, but through indirect means such as increased migration and reduced social stability,” said commission co-chair Dr. Anthony Costello, director of the University College London (UCL) Institute for Global Health in England.

But the scientists advised that taking steps to minimize or adapt to climate change, such as reducing air pollution or eating a healthy diet, could have significant health benefits for people around the world.

By making adjustments to climate change now, “we can also benefit health, and tackling climate change in fact represents one of the greatest opportunities to benefit human health for generations to come,” Costello said in a news release from the journal The Lancet, where this study was published June 22.

Although the funding and technology needed to implement positive changes is available, global political support is lacking as the health risks associated with climate change are largely underestimated, the report stated.

The commission included an international team of European and Chinese scientists, engineers, economists, health officials and policy experts. Their goal was to make a series of recommendations for lawmakers that might help ensure an effective response to climate change.

The greatest threats linked to climate change stem from an increase in extreme weather events, particularly heat waves. Floods, drought and storms also present significant health concerns, the report said.

Climate change also has indirect health implications, the report noted. This includes changes in air pollution, lack of food and malnutrition, forced migration, conflict and changes in infectious disease patterns.

Another commission co-chair stressed the urgency of the situation.

“Climate change is a medical emergency,” said Dr. Hugh Montgomery, director of the UCL Institute for Human Health and Performance, in the news release. “It thus demands an emergency response, using the technologies available right now. Under such circumstances, no doctor would consider a series of annual case discussions and aspirations adequate, yet this is exactly how the global response to climate change is proceeding.”

The report described several ways to address climate change that it said could have immediate health benefits for people around the world:

  • Reducing fossil fuel emissions would cause a decline in lung diseases.
  • Walking or biking, instead of driving, could reduce air pollution and the number of car accidents.
  • Commuting by foot or bike could also reduce the prevalence of serious chronic health issues such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease and stroke.
  • Eating a healthier diet and less red meat in response to climate change could also offer health benefits.

Commission co-chair Peng Gong, from Tsinghua University in Beijing, China, said, “The health community has responded to many grave threats to health in the past. It took on entrenched interests such as the tobacco industry, and led the fight against HIV/AIDS. Now is the time for us to lead the way in responding to another great threat to human and environmental health of our generation.”

The commission also recommended the creation of a new global independent body with the task of monitoring climate change and global health. This coalition would report every two years on the health effects of climate change, track the progress of policies designed to mitigate climate change and make new suggestions on how to further adapt to climate change and implement low-carbon, sustainable health systems.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides more information on the health effects of climate change.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1IvmhsJ

‘Skinny Jeans’ Linked to Woman’s Nerve Damage

MONDAY, June 22, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Long periods of squatting in tight jeans can cause muscle and nerve damage, a new case study suggests.

The research involved a 35-year-old woman who arrived at a hospital complaining of severe weakness in both her ankles. The day before, she had helped a relative move and spent many hours squatting while emptying cupboards. She said she was wearing tight “skinny” jeans that became increasingly uncomfortable as the day progressed.

That evening, she developed numbness in her feet and had difficulty walking. She tripped and fell, and spent several hours on the ground before she was found.

When she arrived at the hospital, her calves were so swollen that her jeans had to be cut off, the researchers said. She had lost feeling in her lower legs and feet, and could not move her ankles or toes properly.

Doctors determined she had a condition called compartment syndrome. Squatting for a long time in the tight jeans had caused swelling that damaged muscle and nerve fibers in her lower legs due to prolonged compression.

After four days of treatment, she was able to walk on her own again and was sent home, according to the report.

The case study was reported by Thomas Edmund Kimber, an associate professor in the neurology unit at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide in Australia. It was published online June 22 in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

More information

Read more about compartment syndrome from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1LqjRS9

Chris Pratt Says He Doesn’t Mind Objectification: ‘I’m Using It to My Advantage’

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

It’s good to be Chris Pratt.

His blockbuster, Jurassic World, continues to break box-office records, he’s slated for upcoming roles in the sci-fi thriller Passengers (opposite Jennifer Lawrence, no less) and a remake of the 1960 western The Magnificent Seven, and according to Entertainment Weekly, the 36-year-old has become “one of Hollywood’s most bankable leading men.”

How did Pratt get to be the new It Guy? According to the affable and admirably honest actor, much of his success can be credited to dropping serious poundage—transforming the less-than-toned body that he displayed as Andy Dwyer of Parks and Recreation into a ridiculously-ripped leading man who has muscled his way (quite literally) onto Hollywood’s A-list. Admitting that he once tipped the scales at 300 pounds, Pratt recently told Radio 4’s Front Row that since slimming down, “a huge part of how my career has shifted is based simply on the way that I look, and on the way that I’ve shaped my body to look.”

RELATED: Chris Pratt Recalls Life at His Highest Weight: ‘I Had Real Health Issues’

When the interviewer asks whether Pratt feels objectified by that, he said yes, noting, “I think it’s appalling that for a long time only women were objectified.”

Good for you, Chris!

Then he continues: “But I think if we really want to really advocate for equality, it’s important to…not objectify women less, but objectify men as often as we objectify women.”

Wait. What?

“There are a lot of beautiful women who got careers out of it, and I’m using it to my advantage,” he says. “And at the end of the day, our bodies are objects. We’re just big bags of flesh and blood and meat and organs that gives us to drive around.”

RELATED: Zooey Deschanel on Body Image: ‘I Don’t Buy Into That Skinny-Is-Better Mentality’

Look, Chris. We’re big fans. And you have every right to be proud of your hard-won physique. But you should know that being objectified is not all it’s cracked up to be.

See, superficiality has a way of biting you in your tight, sculpted abs, as many a good-looking actress has learned—the hard way—for decades. It’s all fun and games until the paparazzi sell a photo of your cellulite (do men even get cellulite?), or the Internet explodes with rumors about your paunch (though, fortunately, no one will be mistaking your beer binge as a baby bump). Or some director declares you too old at 37 to persuasively play the love interest to a 55-year-old (oh wait, that only happens to women).

Trust us, in a few years, you will tire of the boy-toy image and start demanding the same kind of respect—and Oscar-worthy roles. Then we’ll be hearing how you’re so much more than just a hot body and pretty face; much more multi-faceted than that guy who gets paid to run from pretend dinosaurs. You’ve got a lot going on upstairs, too! You’re talented, after all. Point is: soon, what you look like will be all anyone sees, and then you’ll know what the word “objectification” really means.

RELATED: Why Men May Struggle With Body Image Just As Much As Women

For now, though, we’ll give you a break. Not only do you seem like a genuinely nice guy, but you also happen to be married to the very cool Anna Faris (Health‘s April cover girl). We’ll chalk your curious and ill-advised remarks up to exhaustion from all those press junkets.

We’ll also admit we love ogling those newly-chiseled abs of yours. Chris Pratt, welcome to our world.

RELATED: The 5 Best Things Kelly Clarkson Has Said About Body Positivity




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1N29xgJ

Recently Bought Bottled Water From These 14 Brands May Be Contaminated with E. Coli

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

A Pennsylvania company is issuing a voluntary recall of its bottled water from stores due to a potential E. coli contamination.

Niagara Bottling, which produces store-brand water for companies including 7-11 and Wegmans, said on their website that they pulled the products “out of an abundance of caution and in the strict interest of public safety” after being “notified that the source was potentially compromised.”

According to Niagara, there have been no reported illnesses.

RELATED: Health Benefits of Drinking Water

The E. coli was found in one of Niagara’s water supplies in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. Niagara is recalling all of the water produced from their Pennsylvania facilities between June 10th and June 18th, which can be easily identified by a “best by code” on the bottle that begins with either an F or A (e.g. A610JUN152000).

E. coli is a strain of bacteria that, when consumed, can cause vomiting, diarrhea, aches, and, in more severe cases, life-threatening dehydration or kidney failure.

Several of the 14 supermarkets that sell Niagara bottled water, including ACME, Shaw’s, and Wegmans, have already pulled the water from their shelves.

RELATED: 6 Things You Should Know About Water (But Probably Don’t)

The water bottles were sold under the following names:

Acadia

Acme

Big Y

Best Yet

7-11

Niagara

Nature’s Place

Pricerite

Superchill

Morning Fresh

Shaw’s

Shoprite

Western Beef Blue

Wegmans

The incident serves as a good reminder that in some cases, bottled water is no safer than tap water. For more information on the recall, read Niagara’s full notice, including the specific codes to look for on any water you may have purchased.

RELATED: 15 Big Benefits of Water




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1dcqngr

Pregnancy Results Good for Women With Controlled Lupus: Study

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, June 22, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Not long ago, women with lupus were often told pregnancy was too risky. But new research confirms that when the disease is under control, women usually have healthy pregnancies and babies.

The study, of 385 pregnant women with lupus, found that 81 percent gave birth to a full-term, normal-weight baby.

It’s not always an easy road, though, the researchers found. And some women — including those with high blood pressure and symptom flare-ups during pregnancy — had higher risks of complications, including pregnancy loss and preterm delivery.

Black and Hispanic women also faced greater risks than white women, for reasons that are not fully clear, experts added.

The study, published in the June 23 online edition of Annals of Internal Medicine, reinforces what many doctors are already telling women with lupus: If you plan for pregnancy and get your symptoms under the best control possible, your chances of a healthy pregnancy are high.

Still, that confirmation was needed, said Dr. Bevra Hahn, who wrote an editorial published with the study.

“The teaching that disease activity is an important harbinger of poor [pregnancy] outcomes was not universally accepted before this study, because of the limitations of prior [research],” said Hahn, a rheumatologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center.

“This study puts the matter to rest,” she said.

Lead researcher Dr. Jill Buyon agreed. “We’ve come to a time where we’re telling women with lupus, ‘Yes, you can become pregnant,'” she said. “This study provides reassurance that we’ve been doing the right thing.”

But just as important, Buyon added, the findings give a clearer picture of which women are at greater risk of pregnancy complications.

According to Buyon, that doesn’t mean a woman with a risk factor should not become pregnant — but that she and her doctor should be prepared.

“We’ll be able to use this information for counseling patients,” said Buyon, who directs the rheumatology division at NYU Langone Medical Center, in New York City.

In lupus, the immune system attacks the body’s own tissue, and the onslaught can have widespread effects — damaging the skin, joints, heart, lungs, kidneys and brain. The disease mostly strikes women, usually starting in their 20s or 30s.

Treatment includes immune-suppressing drugs and other medications to control symptoms, which range from fevers and joint pain, to extreme fatigue, to depression and memory problems. Even with treatment, though, people with lupus often have symptom flare-ups.

“Twenty years ago, if a woman with lupus asked her doctor if it was safe to become pregnant, the doctor would probably say it’s too dangerous,” Buyon said.

The concern was both that pregnancy would exacerbate a woman’s symptoms and that her baby would be at risk. In recent years, though, doctors have learned that with the right care, women often have a healthy pregnancy.

The new study, done at eight U.S. and one Canadian medical center, is the largest one yet to follow pregnancy outcomes for women with lupus.

Overall, 19 percent of the women had an “adverse outcome,” such as stillbirth, preterm delivery or an underweight baby. But the risk varied depending on several factors.

The strongest risk factors were using blood pressure drugs or having antibodies called lupus anticoagulants, which can cause blood clots. Those women were seven to eight times more likely to have a pregnancy complication, versus other women.

In addition, while most women did not have lupus flare-ups during pregnancy, those who did faced a higher complication risk.

When it came to race, black and Hispanic women had higher risks: 27 percent and 21 percent, respectively, had some type of pregnancy complication.

Buyon said the reasons for the racial difference are unclear, but access to health care probably does not explain it, since all study patients were receiving care.

Hahn said she suspects genetic influences play a role — though environment, like diet or exposure to pollution, could also be at work.

As for the other risk factors, Buyon said more research is needed. She did stress, though, that in the case of high blood pressure drugs, it’s the underlying condition that threatens a healthy pregnancy.

“It’s not the drugs,” Buyon said. “We don’t want women to think, ‘Oh, I’ll just stop taking my medication.'”

She and Hahn both advised women with lupus work with their doctor in advance of becoming pregnant, to make sure their disease is under control. Certain lupus medications also have to be stopped before pregnancy.

Once a woman becomes pregnant, Buyon said, both her rheumatologist and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist — or obstetrician who specializes in “high-risk” pregnancy — should be involved.

“Be sure your doctor knows how your lupus is doing, and that you keep [the disease] as quiet as possible,” Hahn said. “Watch your blood pressure and communicate about it. Be sure your lupus anticoagulant has been measured, and discuss the various strategies you might choose with your doctor.”

Anti-clotting medications, such as low-dose aspirin, may be an option for women with lupus anticoagulant.

More information

The Lupus Foundation of America has more on lupus and pregnancy.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1dcqngk

Doctors Should Urge Against Pot Use During Pregnancy: Guidelines

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, June 22, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Doctors should discourage women from using marijuana during pregnancy, due to the potential effects that pot’s active ingredients can have on a child’s brain development, new guidelines state.

The recommendation was released Monday by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

“When you look at the evidence, it leads us to use caution in marijuana use during pregnancy,” said Dr. Jeffrey Ecker, chair of the AGOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. “For women who are pregnant or thinking about being pregnant, we would encourage them to discontinue using marijuana.”

Ecker is also director of obstetrical clinical research and quality assurance at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

Studies show that children exposed to marijuana in the womb have lower scores on tests of visual problem-solving, visual and motor coordination and visual analysis, compared with kids not exposed to pot, the report states.

Prenatal marijuana exposure also has been associated with decreased attention span and behavioral problems.

“We think that it causes some changes in the development of the brain, and can cause long-term behavioral problems in children,” said Dr. Katrina Mark, an OB-GYN instructor at the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore.

Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug during pregnancy, with roughly half of female marijuana users continuing to use during pregnancy, the ACOG committee said in its new opinion.

Self-reported prevalence of marijuana use during pregnancy ranges from 2 percent to 5 percent, but increases to between 15 percent and 28 percent among young urban women who are struggling economically, the committee said.

Four states — Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Alaska — currently have laws legalizing the recreational use of marijuana. Another 19 states allow marijuana use for medical purposes.

Mark regularly sees pregnant women who use marijuana in her practice. Most use pot recreationally, but some say they are using the drug to deal with nausea or other symptoms of pregnancy.

“When we do universal screening, we find alarmingly high numbers,” Mark said. “My personal opinion is that the decriminalization and legalization of marijuana is making it more socially acceptable. But even though it’s being legalized in some places, that doesn’t make it safe for pregnancy.”

The ingredient in pot that causes intoxication, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), has been shown in animal tests to easily cross the placenta and get into the bloodstream of a developing fetus, the ACOG committee report said.

Besides potentially affecting a child’s brain development, exposure to marijuana in the womb also might make the child more susceptible to using the drug themselves when they grow up, the report added.

The nervous system of a human fetus can respond to the chemicals in pot within 14 weeks of gestation, and studies have down that 14-year-olds are more likely to be marijuana users if their mothers used pot during pregnancy.

The ACOG committee opinion, which will be published in the July issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology, recommends that doctors counsel women to not use marijuana during pregnancy or breast-feeding, and to share with their patients the potential risks associated with pot.

However, the opinion also emphasized that women who report they are using marijuana while they are pregnant should be treated and counseled, not reported to the authorities for punishment or prosecution.

Both Ecker and Mark acknowledged that the committee made this recommendation based on evidence that is not overwhelming, given that few studies have been conducted on the effects of marijuana during pregnancy.

“For a lot of reasons, there aren’t going to be perfect studies here,” Ecker said. “It’s not a substance that’s generally prescribed, or metered and measured in a way that would allow the kind of analyses we would prefer.”

Paul Armentano, deputy director of the pro-marijuana group NORML, agreed that the evidence is scant, but added that “cannabis should not necessarily be viewed as a ‘harmless’ substance'” for pregnant or nursing mothers.

“Ultimately, treating cannabis like other legal, regulated substances means, in certain circumstances, discouraging its use among certain populations,” Armentano said. “Society makes such distinctions often, particularly in regard to the consumption of alcohol and tobacco, and no doubt one can argue that such distinctions also ought to be made for cannabis when the available evidence supports doing so.”

Women who are using marijuana to deal with morning sickness or other symptoms of pregnancy can be given other drugs that will deal with those symptoms just as effectively, Ecker and Mark said.

“If they’re using it for nausea, I offer them alternative treatments that have been studied and proven to be safe,” Mark said of her patients. “Marijuana is not the only medication we have available to treat these symptoms.”

More information

For more information on marijuana, visit the U.S. National Institutes of Health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1dcql8j