barre

How Skinny Jeans Sent One Woman to the Hospital

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Skinny jeans aren’t necessarily the most comfortable choice of attire, but they’re not a dangerous move—as long as you’re not going to be squatting in them for hours. A 35-year-old woman in Australia got a serious wakeup call about the appropriate time to wear skinnies when she ended up in the emergency room after helping a family member move, according to a case study published today in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

According to the paper, helping her loved one move “involved many hours of squatting while emptying cupboards,” and the woman’s skinny jeans had started to feel tighter and more uncomfortable as the day wore on. Then, while walking home, her feet felt numb and swollen, causing her to trip, fall, and spend several hours lying on the ground unable to get up. Once she made it to the hospital, doctors had to cut her pants off of her.

RELATED: What High Heels Are Really Doing to Your Body

The physicians wrote that the compression of the woman’s nerves as a result of the squatting combined with the constriction of her skinny jeans compressed both her peroneal nerve (which is in the knee) and the tibial nerve (which runs in the center of your leg). The pressure from the jeans promoted the development of compartment syndrome in her calves, which is when pressure in a muscle gets high enough to cut off blood supply, leading to the severe swelling, numbness, as well as other complications.

“She had quite severe ankle and foot weakness for several days and she’d suffered quite significant calf muscle injury and, as a result of that, some proteins are released into her blood stream and she needed to be on an intravenous drip to flush those proteins through so that she wouldn’t develop any damage to her kidneys,” Thomas Edmund Kimber, an associate professor in the Neurology Unit at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, where the woman was treated, explained to ABC Adelaide.

“It is well recognized that squatting for long periods of time, regardless of what you are wearing, can occasionally cause compression of the peroneal nerve which is at the knee. But this is the first case we are aware of where there has been such severe calf muscle swelling and such involvement of the two main nerves, the peroneal and the tibial,” Kimber told The Australian.

Fortunately, after four days of rest with an IV drip, the woman was able to go home and has since made a full recovery.

RELATED: 7 Exercises to Fix Muscle Imbalances




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Ix5Mwi

Hilaria Baldwin Shows What a Post-Baby Body REALLY Looks Like

Yoga pro and Extra correspondent Hilaria Baldwin (pronounced “ee-LAH-ria,” according to her Twitter page) has been snapping up a selfie storm since giving birth less than a week ago. First: Just 48 hours after giving birth on June 17 to son, Rafael—her second child with Alec Baldwin—the 31-year-old posted a lingerie-clad side shot of her after-childbirth body.

Instagram Photo

The pic is remarkable, and not just for the fact that she found a sexy bra big enough for post-baby boobs; it shows what a woman actually looks like shortly after childbirth (read: still pregnant). Those of us who already have kids know this fact all too well.

RELATED: Is It Too Late For A Baby?

I’ll never forget when, a week after having my first child, a 20-something male chiropractor asked, “When are you due?” Wrong question, dude. “I. Already. Had. The. BABY.” I hissed at the poor guy, who probably never made that mistake again.

Baldwin’s goal, an impressive one, is to visually document (#ShrinkingBaldwinBabyBump) how a new mom’s body slowly returns after birth. It’s information that many of us ladies could use before we’re greeted with the shock of our postpartum reflection in the mirror.

“I have been planning on doing post belly photos but didn’t know if I was gonna have the guts to actually follow through,” she wrote on the post. “I hope you understand my intention here: I believe it is important to accept and love our form after going through a bit of a battle bringing life into this world.”

RELATED: Choose the Sex of Your Baby (and Other Myths)

It’s simple science that nobody—not even a supermodel or celeb trainer—snaps immediately back into bikini shape. As soon as a woman gives birth, she loses about 10+ pounds (that’s baby plus placenta and amniotic fluid) but hangs on to water weight and fat. The uterus, meanwhile, starts to shrink back to its proper size. It’s a process. Most new moms lose half of their pregnancy pounds by six weeks post-birth, according to the National Institutes of Health. The goal is to gradually shed the rest with a healthy eating and exercise plan.

A few days later, Hilaria posted another bellygram, debunking rumors that she had a Cesarean section and revealing that her son was slightly premature. “This is for those of you who are getting into some pretty serious arguments with each other about if I had a c section or not…this should clear it up: as you can see from this pic, I did not have a c section.”

Instagram Photo

RELATED: How Many C-Sections Can a Woman Have?

The internet being the internet, though, her post didn’t exactly eliminate the chatter. One poster commented: “C section cuts are way lower. I had two. Just sayin”

Why does the yoga star (who is also mom to Carmen, almost 2) feel the need to distance herself from C-sections, a lifesaving surgery for many? Unclear. But her most important takeaway is that she and baby are fine. As she writes, “Rafael came a little early (nothing extreme) so we just wanted to stay an extra night and make sure all is ok. Due dates are estimates and he came out a healthy weight. I’m actually lucky because given another few weeks, he would have been HUGE!”

RELATED: Burn Calories With Your Baby




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Hc9nVB

Here’s What Science Says About Medical Marijuana

Getty Images

Getty Images

TIME-logo.jpg

 

There’s a big difference between anecdotal evidence and scientific proof, and the field of medical marijuana research is filled with more of the former than the latter—in part because marijuana is notoriously difficult to study because it’s classified as a schedule-1 drug.

Scientists led by Penny Whiting from University Hospitals Bristol in the U.K. report in JAMA that there is only moderate-quality evidence supporting the benefits of medical marijuana, and only for certain conditions. The majority of studies involving medical marijuana are of lesser quality and therefore more likely to be biased and provide unreliable results.

In all, Whiting and her colleagues analyzed 79 randomized trials, the gold standard in medical research in which volunteers are randomly assigned to take a cannabis-related product or a placebo. The studies evaluated marijuana’s ability to relieve a range of symptoms including nausea from chemotherapy, loss of appetite among HIV positive patients, multiple sclerosis spasms, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, psychosis and Tourette syndrome. Most of the studies showed improvements among the participants taking the cannabinoid products over those using placebo, but in many, the scientists admitted that they could not be sure that the effect wasn’t simply due to chance since the association was not statistically significant.

The strongest trials supported cannabinoids’ ability to relieve chronic pain, while the least reliable evidence involved things like nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy, sleep disturbances and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were, however, connected to more adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, disorientation and hallucinations than placebo.

Summing up the state of the evidence, Whiting and her colleagues write that “Further large, robust, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the effects of cannabinoids, particularly on weight gain in patients with HIV-AIDS, depression, sleep disorders, anxiety disorders, psychosis, glaucoma, and Tourette syndrome.”

That puts patients who try medical marijuana products at a crossroads — in 23 states and Washington, DC, laws allow doctors to recommend cannabis products for their patients for medical reasons. But with little in the way of solid scientific evidence for which products works best, and in which doses, it’s up to the patients to adopt trial-and-error to figure out which, if any cannabinoids help to relieve their symptoms.

Adding to the confusion for patients, another study published in the same JAMA issue shows that medicinal marijuana food products, which include things such as candies, brownies and teas, aren’t often labeled correctly when it comes to their most active cannabis ingredient, and that the amounts are inconsistent. Ryan Vandrey, associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and his colleagues evaluated the contents of 75 products from 47 different brands purchased at marijuana dispensaries in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Seattle, where medicinal marijuana use is legal. When they analyzed them for their content of THC and cannabinoids, the two most concentrated chemicals found in marijuana, they found wildly divergent amounts from what was noted on the products’ labels. Among them, only 17% were accurately labeled, with 23% of the products containing more of these compounds than listed, and 60% containing less than advertised. The labels noted that anywhere from 2 mg to 1000 mg of these agents were in the products, while the lab-based analysis revealed readings as low as 1mg to as high as 1237 mg. “When I have a health condition, and need to go buy my medicine, I want to make sure I know what I’m getting,” says Vandrey. “I want to make sure the dose I buy is the same today and the same the next time and the same the next time I buy it. I want reliability and accuracy so I don’t end up with problems.”

But medical marijuana products, he says, aren’t regulated by the same system that vets other pharmaceutical drugs. In fact, cannabinoids are not regulated at all, since the federal government still considers marijuana an illegal substance and therefore does not acknowledge that marijuana-based therapies exist at all. So far, 23 states have legislated such medicinal marijuana into legality, which means that legislation, and not scientific criteria, have “approved” these compounds for medical use. The results? “What we saw was that there cant’ be much if any consumer confidence within the cities we purchased and tested products,” says Vandrey.

For the larger medical marijuana distributors who see the emerging market as a profitable business, there’s the concern that profit motives may push them to under-deliver the amount of THC or cannabinoid they note on the label. And for the smaller outfits, it could be a matter of not knowing how to extract and measure the active ingredients from the cannabis plant and distribute it in a consistent way in a batch of tea or baked goods.

How can consumers know what they’re getting in a medical marijuana edible? They can do their homework and talk to other consumers and the dispensary about dosing of THC and cannabinoids, says Vandrey. Or they can try to test the products themselves, which some states offer in an effort to standardize and gain more control over these products. But ultimately, he says. “if states are going to supersede federal law and say we think there is medical benefit in marijuana, and we want it to be available to our residents, then it should also be the responsibility of the states to set up appropriate programs for regulating and overseeing the quality assurance and manufacturing standards for medications being sold.”

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1SHugKu

Evidence Supports Medical Pot for Some Conditions, Not Others

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Medical marijuana can be useful in treating chronic pain, but may be less effective for other conditions, a new analysis reveals.

A review of nearly 80 clinical trials involving medical marijuana or marijuana-derived drugs revealed moderately strong evidence to support their use in treating chronic pain, says a report published June 23 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The evidence also showed that the medications could help multiple sclerosis patients who suffer from spasticity, which involves sustained muscle contractions or sudden involuntary movements.

But the review found weaker support for the drugs’ use in treating sleep disorders; nausea or vomiting related to chemotherapy; for producing weight gain in people with HIV; or for reducing symptoms of Tourette syndrome, a nervous system disorder characterized by repetitive movements or sounds.

The researchers also found no evidence that marijuana-based drugs could help treat psychosis or depression.

“There is evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity,” said lead author Penny Whiting, a senior research fellow at the University of Bristol in England.

“However, this needs to be balanced against an increased risk of side effects such as dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, sleepiness and euphoria,” she said.

Other common side effects include confusion, loss of balance and hallucination.

The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health commissioned the research team to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of medical marijuana products, Whiting said.

The researchers singled out 79 clinical trials for inclusion in their analysis. The studies tested the effects either of medical marijuana itself or drugs that contain plant-derived or synthetic compounds found in marijuana.

For example, they included studies of dronabinol, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medication that contains synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the chemical in pot that produces intoxication.

The authors said that they found and included only two studies that evaluated medical marijuana itself, rather than a derivative medication.

However, Paul Armentano, deputy director of the pro-marijuana group NORML, said many more clinical trials have been conducted involving medical marijuana, but were not included in this analysis.

Armentano also took issue with the report’s conclusions regarding treatment of chemotherapy side effects.

“I find the conclusion that there exists only ‘low-quality evidence’ suggesting that cannabinoids are associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy and weight gain in HIV to be a bit perplexing given that the FDA has approved cannabinoids explicitly for these purposes,” Armentano said.

“Are we to believe that the FDA approved a pharmaceutical, particularly one as politically charged as a synthetic cannabis pharmaceutical, on the basis of ‘low-quality’ evidence?” he added.

Dr. Robert Wergin, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, said that the analysis shows more research is needed on the potential medical benefits of marijuana.

“There are so many compounds in some marijuana products, it’s hard to say whether any single one works, either alone or in concert with other compounds,” Wergin said. “We need more study and clarification to determine which products are the main contributing factors to the outcomes you’re trying to reach.”

Wergin added that the federal classification of marijuana as a class I controlled substance is impeding the type of research that needs to be done to clarify the potential benefits.

In an accompanying editorial, two Yale University medical researchers argued for better clinical research before more states adopt medical marijuana laws.

“If the states’ initiative to legalize medical marijuana is merely a veiled step toward allowing access to recreational marijuana, then the medical community should be left out of the process, and instead marijuana should be decriminalized,” wrote Dr. Deepak Cyril D’Souza and Dr. Mohini Ranganathan of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Conn.

“Conversely, if the goal is to make marijuana available for medical purposes, then it is unclear why the approval process should be different from that used for other medications,” they continued. “Evidence justifying marijuana use for various medical conditions will require the conduct of adequately powered, double-blind, randomized, placebo/active controlled clinical trials to test its short- and long-term efficacy and safety.”

Armentano said that the conclusion that marijuana products have some medical benefit “is inconsistent with the plant’s federal classification as a schedule I controlled substance possessing no accepted medical utility.”

The U.S. government’s “reluctance to revisit this ‘Flat Earth’ position flies in the face of public opinion and available science,” Armentano said.

More information

For more on marijuana, visit the U.S. National Institutes of Health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GFgnXK

Bad Neighborhoods May Make You Age Faster

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Living in a bad neighborhood can accelerate aging, a new study suggests.

Researchers looked at more than 2,900 people in the Netherlands and found that those living in neighborhoods with high levels of noise, crime and vandalism were biologically 12 years older than those of similar chronological age living in other areas.

Previous research has found links between living in a bad neighborhood and poorer mental and physical health, wrote study author Mijung Park, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing.

“Our team examined whether these environments also have a direct impact on cellular health. We found that indeed, biological aging processes could be influenced by socioeconomic conditions,” Park said in a university news release.

But, while the study found an association between living in a certain neighborhood and faster aging, it wasn’t designed to prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

Park and her colleagues focused on telomeres, the protective caps on the end of DNA strands on genes. Telomeres naturally shorten with age, but that process can be accelerated by physical or mental stress.

“The differences in telomere length between the two groups were comparable to 12 years in chronological age,” Park said. That finding suggests that the harsher living environment of a bad neighborhood may hasten aging.

“It’s possible that their cells are chronically activated in response to psychological and physiological stresses created by disadvantaged socioeconomic, political and emotional circumstances,” she said.

The study was published online recently in the journal PLoS One.

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about telomeres.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1BKs00M

Could a Microbe in Your Gut Help You Lose Weight?

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — It’s possible that among the millions of bacteria living in your gut, at least one microbe might change how your body processes food and affect your weight, a small French study suggests.

The microbe — Akkermansia muciniphila — makes up 3 percent to 5 percent of the gut bacteria. The strain is linked with a fiber-rich diet. It’s also associated with lower levels of blood sugar, insulin and fats, which help ward off obesity, diabetes and heart disease. A. muciniphila also helps with a healthier distribution of body fat, the researchers said.

“This bacteria is a potential target for new therapies in the field of metabolic disease,” said lead researcher Dr. Karine Clement, director of the Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition at Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital in Paris.

“However, first the molecules produced by this bacteria have to be identified to explain this improvement,” she said.

This bacteria produces a variety of substances that may serve as energy sources for other bacteria in the body, Clement said.

It’s possible that A. muciniphila may contribute to the expansion of other beneficial bacteria as well as having a beneficial effect of its own, she said.

The report was published online June 22 in the journal Gut.

For the study, Clement’s team looked at the amount of this microbe and other bacteria living in the guts of 49 obese or overweight people. The majority of participants — 41 — were women. The researchers also looked at blood sugar, blood fats and other factors that influence belly fat.

Researchers measured these factors before and after participants started a six-week, low-calorie diet that included extra protein and fiber. Restricting calories alters gut bacteria, the researchers said.

At the start of the diet, people with a lot of A. muciniphila in their gut had lower blood sugar, and lower insulin levels, smaller waists and fewer fat cells under their skin than those with low levels of the bacteria, the researchers found.

In addition, people with a lot of A. muciniphila along with other types of bacteria in their gut had the lowest blood sugar and blood fat and the best distribution of body fat, the researchers said.

After six weeks of calorie restriction, those who started with the most A. muciniphila had the biggest improvement in their blood sugar, insulin levels and body fat distribution, compared with those with the lower levels of the bacteria, the study found.

The researchers noted that they measured bacteria levels from stool samples, so it isn’t clear if these levels are the same in the gut as they are in the feces. They also said it’s not clear if changes in bacteria levels would last after calorie restriction.

Samantha Heller, a senior clinical nutritionist at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, said that the bacteria in your gut are essential for life.

“Our gastrointestinal tract houses an assortment of 1,000 or so species of bacteria,” she said.

There are about 1 trillion microbes “renting space in our gut,” Heller said. “We offer them housing and they in turn help retrieve nutrients from food, improve digestion, keep the gut wall healthy, fight off germs and create compounds that fight disease,” she explained.

In fact, research is finding that these microbes play such important roles in human health and disease that the very survival of the human species may be dependent upon them, Heller said.

“Researchers are in the midst of teasing out which microbes have what effects in the body, but they believe that a balance of the various kinds of good microbes is important,” she said.

A more plant-based diet, regular exercise and sleep have been found to help support a thriving and diverse gut community, Heller said.

In terms of weight management, the research in this area is very new, she said.

“However, obesity was not the problem 50 or 100 years ago that it is now,” Heller said. “What we do know is that consuming excess calories, eating highly processed foods, junk and fast foods, and being sedentary are huge contributors to obesity. One single microbe can’t undo an unhealthy lifestyle,” she said.

More information

Learn more about obesity from U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1BKrZKo

Lung Scans May Help Track Suspicious Masses, Study Says

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — For people with noncancerous lung nodules, which are small masses of tissue, annual CT scans may be all that’s needed to monitor their condition, a new study suggests.

Such monitoring could potentially save people from unneeded treatments, the researchers said.

“A safe approach that involves careful observation can safely be employed for the management of non-solid nodules,” said lead researcher Dr. Claudia Henschke, director of lung cancer screening at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City.

Lung nodules can be benign or cancerous. They are classified as solid, part solid or non-solid, based on their appearance on a CT scan.

In non-solid lung nodules, normal lung tissue is visible through the nodule. Non-solid nodules could be caused by inflammation, infection or fibrosis, and could be cancerous or precancerous, Henschke said.

Lung cancer that starts as a non-solid nodule does not require immediate surgery and can be safely managed with annual scanning to see if it’s becoming aggressive. This is determined by seeing if solid components develop in it, Henschke said.

“These types of cancers are among the group commonly thought of as representing overdiagnosis — meaning that they would not have led to death if left alone,” she said. “By having an approach to following these lesions, we can avoid over treating them.”

The report was published online June 23 in the journal Radiology.

Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said lung cancer screening can save lives, but it can also result in harm from a biopsy or procedures to remove nodules that may not be cancerous.

“About 38 percent of people who have three lung CTs are going to have abnormal findings — and that’s potentially 38 percent who are going to be scared out of their wits that they have lung cancer,” he said.

That’s a large number of people who end up getting surgery, he said. One study has shown that for every five lives saved one person dies from these procedures, Brawley said.

“With low-dose CT lung cancer screening, there is a proven benefit and a proven harm,” he said. “It saves lives, but it also costs lives. So, people need to make a decision about whether they want to be screened.”

Brawley said lung cancer screening is only for people at high risk. It’s not for nonsmokers or light smokers or people under 55, he said.

For people who smoke 20 cigarettes a day for 30 years — 30 “pack-years” — and are 65 years old, the risk of screening is lower than the harm, Brawley said.

“For people who have 30 pack-years of smoking and are 55, the odds that their life will be saved are smaller than for people with a longer smoking history who are older,” he said.

For the study, researchers collected data on almost 58,000 people who took part in the International Early Lung Cancer Program, a worldwide initiative to reduce deaths from lung cancer.

At the start of the study, Henschke and colleagues found non-solid nodules in just over 4 percent of those screened, which led to 73 cases of lung cancer.

With annual screenings, another 0.7 percent of the participants had new nodules identified with 11 cases of early lung cancer. Patients were followed for an average of six years and surgery was able to cure all these cancers, regardless of the time between initial identification and treatment, the study found.

Non-solid nodules developed into solid tumors in 22 cases before treatment, the researchers said. However, the average time from non-solid to part-solid tumors was more than two years.

The findings suggest that non-solid nodules can be safely followed with yearly CT scans, the researchers concluded.

More information

For more information on lung cancer, visit the American Cancer Society.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GFgpis

Labels on Edible Medical Marijuana Products Often Misleading: Study

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 23, 2015 (HealthDay News) — When it comes to edible medical marijuana products, new research shows that ailing people are unlikely to get what they pay for in that pot brownie or chocolate chunk cookie.

Most edible pot products sampled in three major U.S. cities were mislabeled, often containing less active ingredient than promised on the packaging, according to a report published in the June 23 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

“The concern is that people are purchasing a product, and not getting what they are paying for,” said study author Ryan Vandrey, an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. “These are individuals who are using cannabis for a medical benefit, and they won’t get the benefit if the drug is not in there.”

Only 17 percent of 75 marijuana edibles purchased in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Seattle carried packaging that accurately reported the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the chemical in pot that produces a high, the researchers found.

Three out of five marijuana edibles contained less THC than promised. “We had products that were supposed to have 200 milligrams and only had 2 or 3 milligrams,” Vandrey said.

On the other hand, nearly a quarter of edible pot products contained more THC than expected. Patients who take these might overdose and wind up experiencing anxiety, a panic attack, paranoia and, in extreme cases, even hallucinations or acute psychosis, Vandrey said.

“It can be a miserable experience, and through the edible route of administration, that miserable experience can last many hours,” he said of taking more THC than expected.

For the study, researchers collected 75 different edible cannabis products — baked goods, beverages and candy or chocolates — representing 47 different brands. The products were legally purchased from a sample of three medical dispensaries in each of the three cities.

The cities were chosen based on the location of the labs chosen to test the edibles, “because you can’t transport these products across state lines legally,” Vandrey explained.

Researchers also found that a substantial number of medical marijuana edibles — two out of five — did not contain detectable levels of cannabidiol (CBD), a chemical in marijuana that provides medical benefit but does not get the patient “high.”

Only 13 of the 75 products even bothered to label their CBD content, and all were mislabeled, according to the report. Four products contained less CBD than promised, and nine contained more.

The average ratio of THC to CBD was 36-to-1. Only one product had a 1-to-1 ratio, which some research suggests is associated with fewer side effects and improved clinical benefit compared with higher ratios of THC to CBD, the researchers explained.

Mitch Earleywine, chair of the pro-marijuana group NORML, decried the mislabeling.

“A couple of the under-dosed edibles were short over 90 percent of the THC. That’s just plain theft, in my opinion,” said Earleywine, a professor of psychology at the State University of New York at Albany. “The overdosed ones had at least one with more than 50 percent extra. That’s clearly unacceptable and has the potential to be very disorienting.”

However, Earleywine said that the published report did not make clear precisely how much or how little THC the mislabeled products contained, or how far outside the acceptable range they fell.

“I can’t tell if that was a 10-milligram item where 50 percent extra could be a little extra laughter and an earlier bedtime, or an 800-milligram item where a 50 percent increase could mean a really, really rough night,” he said of the product containing too much THC.

Plant-based medical products often can have widely varying amounts of an active ingredient, depending on the crop from which they were manufactured, said Dr. Jeremy Koppel, an investigator at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, in Manhasset, N.Y.

“If these guys don’t have to, they aren’t going to spend a lot a money testing and retesting and retesting to make sure their labeling is accurate,” said Koppel, who is studying the use of medical marijuana to treat agitation in Alzheimer’s patients.

Strict regulations that require accurate labeling have not been forthcoming. Marijuana remains illegal at the federal level, and the 23 states that have legalized marijuana for medical use have not committed the resources to make sure consumers get what they pay for, Vandrey said. Four states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for recreational use.

“If states are going to take on the authority and responsibility of making cannabis products available to their residents, then they have an equal responsibility to institute quality-control policies and regulations that ensure labeling accuracy on par with other medicines,” Vandrey said.

Not only medical marijuana products show surprising levels of THC. A recent study conducted in Colorado, where recreational use of marijuana is legal for those aged 21 and older, found the levels of THC in the state’s retail supply was 30 percent. That is three times the level of THC that was typically found in street marijuana three decades ago, the researchers reported.

More information

Visit the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse for more on medical marijuana.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GFgpik

This Man’s Tribute to His Dog Will Make You Want to Hug Your Pets NOW

If you’ve ever lost a beloved dog, you know that unique brand of heartbreak mixed with gratitude for the incredible bond you shared. Those are the emotions behind this beautiful seven-minute film shot by Oregon photographer Ben Moon as a tribute to his husky-pit bull mix, Denali, who passed away last year.

RELATED: Get Healthy Pet Guide

Told from the dog’s perspective, the film chronicles the pair’s friendship and adventures against breathtaking backdrops. “[Ben] didn’t feel as comfortable in the city, so we traveled a lot,” a voice meant to be Denali’s explains. The two were inseparable—even when Moon was battling cancer: “If anyone had tried to take me out of that hospital room, I would have bitten their face,” Denali says.

Instagram Photo

RELATED: How My Pet Helped Me Heal

Years later, their roles are reversed when Denali is the one struggling with cancer. As the dog reaches his last days, Ben takes Denali on a tour of all their favorite spots—until Denali lets him know he’s ready to go.

It doesn’t seem at all surprising that Moon’s soulful tribute won the Best of Festival and People’s Choice awards at Colorado’s 5Point Film Festival this spring; even if you’ve never had a pup, or lost one, you may need to grab more than a few hankies after screening it.

Instagram Photo

RELATED: 12 Ways Pets Improve Your Health




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RtF8cs

This Hilarious Video by Norway’s Women’s Soccer Team Slams Sexist Stereotypes

It’s no secret that women’s sports often receive less attention from the press than men’s sports, and when they do get attention, it tends to focus more on their appearance than on their athleticism, mental toughness, or skill.

Norway’s women’s national soccer team has come up with a hilarious comeback for all the haters, courtesy of a new satirical video. With deadpan humor (and English subtitles), they tell a reporter from the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) that it’s plain and simple: They really are no good at soccer.

RELATED: Olympic Athletes: Learn Their Secrets

The video, which is set to dramatic, documentary-style music, features goalkeeper Ingrid Hjelmseth calling her goal kicks a “nightmare” because she is unable to get the ball off the ground. Ingrid also notes that there should be two or three goalkeepers—the net is too large for one woman to handle. Team captain Trine Ronning complains that, “I sometimes watch women’s soccer on TV. Soooo boring.”

Midfielder Cathrine Dekkerhus lamented that her personal best is 25 kick-ups…”with a balloon.”

The athletes make numerous suggestions for making the game easier for women: a smaller field; a smaller, lighter ball; and “free throws” instead of free kicks.

By skewering the insults people regularly level at women in sports with classy comebacks and a keen sense of humor, these women have shown that they’re as impressive smarts-wise as they are on the field. That’s a play we’re happy to cheer for.

RELATED: 3 Motivating Mantras to Steal From Badass Female Athletes




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1GmyNua