barre

5 Easy Swaps to Get More Fiber and Boost Weight Loss

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

When you think about “slimming” foods beans probably don’t spring to mind. Most people think green salads and lean proteins as the keys to shedding pounds, while forgetting about how much beans, and the larger food group they belong to called pulses (which also include lentils and peas), can bolster weight loss.

In fact, there’s a ton of research about the ability of these gems to help. Evidence that pulses help boost calorie and fat burning, curb hunger, and reduce belly fat led me to recommend a daily serving as one of the key strategies in my newest book Slim Down Now. And it just keeps piling up.

For example, a new study from the University of Minnesota found that the fiber in beans can keep you feeling surprisingly full. Researchers asked men and women to test two “meatloaf” lunches, made from either beef or beans. Both meals provided an equal number of calories and fat grams, but differed in protein and fiber, with the meat loaf providing 26 grams of protein and 3 grams of fiber, and the bean version 17 grams of protein and 12 grams of fiber. Despite the beef meatloaf’s higher protein content, three hours after eating, both groups reported similar feelings of fullness and satisfaction.

This bonus fiber has been proven to help you slim down: each additional gram of fiber consumed can lead to an extra quarter-pound of weight loss, a 2009 study found. Other research shows that every gram of fiber we eat essentially “cancels out” about seven calories, because fiber bonds to some of the calories consumed, and prevents them from being absorbed into the blood.

Fortunately beans are also gluten-free, affordable, readily available, and incredibly versatileOh yeah, and they’re chock full of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants.

Bottom line: eating more beans is a simple and sustainable way to shed pounds and keep them off. Try these five easy (and delicious) ways to work them into your regular eating routine.

RELATED: 16 Ways to Lose Weight Fast

Use beans in place of or with meat

Aside from being far less expensive (extra lean ground beef costs about $9 a pound compared to just $1 for a can of beans) and better for the environment, using beans in place of meat is also a major time-saver. Use black, pinto, or white beans instead of meat in anything from taco salads to chili, or even as the study suggested, “meatloaf.” I use whole or mashed beans in a wide variety of dishes, including burgers, lasagna, and stuffed peppers. Another option is to cut your meat portion in half and fill the rest with beans.

Swap beans for other starches

Because beans provide both protein and fiber-rich carbohyrdrates they serve double dutyyou can use them in place of animal protein, or as a replacement for traditional starches, like rice, corn, or potatoes. They work well as a side dish or incorporated into dishes. For example, in soups I often use beans instead of pasta or noodles, or toss them in a salad instead of quinoa. I’ve even served stir-frys over a small bed of beans rather than brown rice.

Swap dairy for beans

Pureed whole beans or bean flours, like fava, black, or white bean flour, make ideal bases or thickeners for creamy sauces and soups, and using them instead of whole milk or cream, along with water can slash hundreds of excess calories. In many dishes mashed beans can also take the place of cheeses. For example, in veggie lasagna I trade ricotta cheese for mashed white beans, seasoned with garlic and Italian herbs.

RELATED: Best Superfoods for Weight Loss

Eat beans as a snack

In addition to bean dips and hummus scooped up with raw veggies you can also oven roast beans on a baking sheet for a hearty, crunchy snack. Try different combos, like black beans sprinkled with chipotle seasoning, or white beans with rosemary or curry. Bean soups, or chilled bean side dishes, marinated in balsamic vinaigrette with chopped veggies, also make filling and nutrient-rich substitutes for processed options that can zap energy or leave you feeling unsatisfied.

Use beans in dessert recipes

You’ve probably heard of black bean brownies or even bean ice cream, both of which are delicious. It may be hard to believe at first, but trust me, there are plenty of yummy ways to incorporate beans into sweet treats.

I use them in puddings, smoothies, and frozen popsnot only are they undetectable flavor wise, but they add a thick, rich texture that seriously ups the satisfaction factor to a level that rivals traditional versions of these goodies. In baking, you can use bean flour in place of all-purpose to get that same texture. Plus, this makes your treats gluten-free, and is yet another simple (and fun) way to up your fiber intake.

What’s your take on this topic? Chat with us on Twitter by mentioning @goodhealth and @CynthiaSass.

Cynthia Sass is a nutritionist and registered dietitian with master’s degrees in both nutrition science and public health. Frequently seen on national TV, she’s Health’s contributing nutrition editor, and privately counsels clients in New York, Los Angeles, and long distance. Cynthia is currently the sports nutrition consultant to the New York Yankees, previously worked with three other professional sports teams, and is board certified as a specialist in sports dietetics. Cynthia is a three-time New York Times best-selling author, and her brand new book is Slim Down Now: Shed Pounds and Inches with Real Food, Real Fast. Connect with her on FacebookTwitter and Pinterest.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1LxPHMl

I Am Training for a Marathon. So Why Am I Getting Fat?

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

scienceofusLogos

I ran 6 miles this morning, I’ll run 5 tomorrow, and on Saturday morning I’ll run 20. I’m running the New York City Marathon next month, and this training schedule, by the way, is about as chill as marathon training schedules ever get. Still, it’s a lot of miles. And so you would think all of this running must come with the happy side effect of some substantial weight loss, wouldn’t you?

I would, too, and yet this is not at all what has happened. I seem to have either stayed at exactly the same weight I was before I started this thing or, if anything, put on a few pounds. It’s the second marathon I’ve run, and this happened last time too. What kind of cruel physiological quirk is going on here? The answer, as it turns out, has implications that are more far-reaching than marathons, and hint at the fact that the way Americans currently think about exercise is not ultimately very accurate or helpful.

When Mary Kennedy coached a charity team of marathon runners back in 2009, she regularly heard the marathon-weight question. “Several of them would come to me and they would say exactly that: ‘I am working out more than I ever have in my entire life. I’m doing this for a lot of reasons, but I really thought I’d look better in my clothes,’” said Kennedy, who is an exercise physiologist at the Institute of Lifestyle Medicine, a nonprofit research center founded in 2007 by Harvard Medical School and the Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. She conducted a small, simple pilot study, limited to her group of 64 charity runners, comparing their weight before starting the training program to their weight after completing it. About 11 percent of them did lose weight, but just as many gained weight (and of those who gained, 86 percent were women). But for the remaining 78 percent, their weight stayed almost exactly the same, even after three months of running four days a week.

Her results aren’t published yet, but they echo those of a 1989 study in which Danish researchers took 18 months to train a small group of sedentary people — 18 men and nine women — to run a marathon. By race day, the men had lost an average of five pounds. For the women, on the other hand, “no change in body composition was observed,” the researchers write. “This idea that you’re going to run a marathon and the pounds are going to melt away is not realistic,” Kennedy said. She’s currently coaching a group of high-school runners, and she and her co-director have a sad little joke: “You train for the marathon, and then you do the weight-loss program afterward.”

Sadly, the marathon weight gain isn’t likely a result of increased muscle mass, Kennedy said. Instead, the reason this happens has more to do with psychology than physiology, with much of it stemming from a misunderstanding of the purpose of exercise. For one, research suggests that most people assume they’re exercising harder than they actually are. Last year, a team of Canadian scientists published a study in which they asked their volunteers to run on a treadmill at what they felt was an easy pace and then pick it up to a vigorous one — with vigorous defined as increasing their heart rate to somewhere between 77 and 93 percent of its full capacity. The majority of the participants did just fine at estimating the easy pace, but not so for the vigorous one; most of them didn’t even increase their heart rate to 75 percent.

And this overestimation may be something novice marathoners are especially likely to do, most of whom are encouraged to adopt the “just finish” goal; it’s about getting the miles done and getting across the finish line, not running at any particular pace. That may mean they’re running a lot slower than they’re capable. “I don’t mean this in any derogatory way, but marathoning has really become accessible for everyone — which is amazing and wonderful,” Kennedy said. “But just because you cross the finish line doesn’t mean you were running at a really vigorous pace seven days a week … You’re so focused on going far, so you’re not necessarily doing a vigorous run.” Additionally, running a marathon sounds like a really impressive, intimidating goal — and, on the one hand, it is. But “if you really start to look at a lot of the novice training programs, people are running three or four days a week — it’s not an overly aggressive workout schedule. Even if you’re not training for a marathon, going to the gym three or four times a week — that’s not that out of the ordinary.” And this, by the way, is assuming that you actually do every single workout on your training plan.

Additionally, there is the small fact that exercising a lot makes you really, really hungry. “I’m ravenous after a long run,” Kennedy said. It’s incredibly easy to overeat without entirely realizing you’re doing it, and there also may be a misconception among novice runners about the importance of carb-loading. Carbs are important, sure, but it doesn’t mean “you have a giant plate of spaghetti with four pieces of bread,” she continued.

Beyond that, the entire idea that the purpose of exercise must be to lose weight — to pay a penance for the junk you’ve consumed — is not ultimately a very useful one. “It helps with mental health, it helps with so many things, but we focus so much on weight loss,” Kennedy said. “We make exercise overwhelmingly annoying. You need to do it, but you should find joy in it, because, my goodness, it’s doing so many good things for you.” In fact, thinking of physical activity in terms of weight loss tends to backfire, anyway. In one study published last year by Cornell University’s Brian Wansink, people who were told to take a two-kilometer “exercise walk” ended up consuming 124 percent more M&Ms afterward than those who were told they were taking a “scenic walk.” You’d be better off thinking of exercise as something to be enjoyed, in other words, rather than something to be suffered through.

One way to do that could be to keep in mind all the benefits that physical activity brings: It improves your mood, increases your energyhelps you sleep, and probably improves your sex life, too. For marathons in particular, the training often brings with it new running buddies, and relationships are among the most reliable predictors of well-being; the same goes for setting and making progress on a goal. Besides, “losing weight” is going to feel like a very flimsy motivator somewhere around mile 22, when you’re exhausted and bored and desperate for an excuse to stop running. There are many reasons to run a marathon, and there are many good reasons to exercise, but the link between physical activity and weight is probably not as clear-cut as many of us would like to think.

More from Science of Us:

Marathon Runners Forget How Awful Marathons Are

The Worst Way to Cheer On a Marathoner

Willpower (or Lack of It) Is the Wrong Way to Think About Weight

Your Personality Could Be Making You Fat

Weight Discrimination Might Be Deadly

Exercise Might Help Mitigate the Effects of Bullying

scienceofuslogos.jpg Science of Us is a smart but playful window into the latest science on human behavior, with the goal of enlightening, entertaining, and providing useful information that can be applied to everyday life.



from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1k9SDVd

Drew Barrymore Doesn’t Care About Having a Bikini Body: ‘I Am Who I Am’

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Drew Barrymore sits high on our list of celebrities that would make an amazing BFF. She’s just like us: She does her makeup on the subway! She goes crazy for Chinese food! So it’s no surprise that she got so real about her body struggles in her latest interview.

The actress and author of her upcoming memoir, Wildflower ($17, amazon.com), explained to InStyle that while she’s more accepting of her body than she used to be, she still struggles with body image now and again.

“I’ve beaten myself up about not being a certain thing,” Barrymore said. “If someone says, ‘Let’s go to the beach today,’ my first thought is, ‘F––, what am I going to wear?’ I remember when Amy Schumer was on Ellen, she called her midsection a ‘lava lamp.’ I thought, That was perfect! That’s what I’ve been trying to say. But then I saw her in Trainwreck, and she looked so good in a tiny bra and short skirt. I was like, ‘No, you don’t have a lava lamp.’”

RELATED: How Kate Winslet Talks to Her Daughter About Body Positivity

“I am who I am and I just don’t have a bikini body,” Barrymore continued. “I don’t even have a one-piece body anymore! But I am loving the long rash guard, board-shorts look.”

But more than anything, she’s focusing on raising her two adorable daughters, and wants to be an honest mother to them—which means not hiding her tumultuous childhood.

“I’m not going to pretend to my daughters that I’m pure as the driven snow,” she said. “The best I can do is open up my heart to them. That’s soul-baring enough. Making bad decisions doesn’t make you a bad person. It is how you learn to make better choices.”

And just how much Barrymore opens up her heart to others is clearly what we all love about her—so Drew, wine night later?

RELATED: 10 Best Body-Positive Quotes From the Female Athletes Who Posed Nude for ESPN




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KdfYu3

Big Brain Doesn’t Mean Big Smarts

FRIDAY, Oct. 16, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Having a big brain doesn’t guarantee you’ll have an outsized IQ, a new analysis indicates.

Researchers who examined 148 studies that included more than 8,000 people found only a weak association between brain size and IQ.

“The presently observed association means that brain volume plays only a minor role in explaining IQ test performance in humans. Although a certain association is observable, brain volume appears to be of only little practical relevance,” said review author Jakob Pietschnig, of the Institute of Applied Psychology at the University of Vienna in Austria.

“Rather, brain structure and integrity appear to be more important as a biological foundation of IQ,” he explained in a university news release.

The researchers noted that men tend to have larger brains than women, but there are no differences in overall IQ levels between the genders.

Their research was published online Oct. 9 in the journal Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has more about the brain.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KdfWlU

Study Sees Link Between High Cholesterol and Tendon Trouble

FRIDAY, Oct. 16, 2015 (HealthDay News) — High cholesterol levels may increase your risk of tendon problems and pain, a new study suggests.

Tendons are the tough fibers connecting the body’s muscles and bones. The researchers suspect cholesterol buildup in immune cells can lead to chronic low-level inflammation, prompting tendon abnormalities and pain.

They analyzed 17 studies published between 1973 and 2014 that included more than 2,600 people. Compared to those with normal tendon structure, people with abnormal tendon structure had higher total cholesterol. They also had higher levels of “bad” low-density cholesterol, lower levels of “good” high-density cholesterol, and higher levels of blood fats called triglycerides, the researchers found.

People with high cholesterol levels were also much more likely to have tendon injuries, higher levels of musculoskeletal-related pain in their arms, and thicker tendons.

The study was published online Oct. 16 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

“Together, these findings provide significant support for a metabolic hypothesis of tendon injury and implicate [levels of body fats] as a potential link,” Jaime Gaida, an associate professor of physiotherapy at the University of Canberra, Australia, and colleagues said in a journal news release.

However, the study results don’t prove a direct cause-and-effect relationship between elevated cholesterol levels and tendon abnormalities.

More information

The American Heart Association has more about cholesterol.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1k9PWmu

Study Sees Link Between High Cholesterol and Tendon Trouble

FRIDAY, Oct. 16, 2015 (HealthDay News) — High cholesterol levels may increase your risk of tendon problems and pain, a new study suggests.

Tendons are the tough fibers connecting the body’s muscles and bones. The researchers suspect cholesterol buildup in immune cells can lead to chronic low-level inflammation, prompting tendon abnormalities and pain.

They analyzed 17 studies published between 1973 and 2014 that included more than 2,600 people. Compared to those with normal tendon structure, people with abnormal tendon structure had higher total cholesterol. They also had higher levels of “bad” low-density cholesterol, lower levels of “good” high-density cholesterol, and higher levels of blood fats called triglycerides, the researchers found.

People with high cholesterol levels were also much more likely to have tendon injuries, higher levels of musculoskeletal-related pain in their arms, and thicker tendons.

The study was published online Oct. 16 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

“Together, these findings provide significant support for a metabolic hypothesis of tendon injury and implicate [levels of body fats] as a potential link,” Jaime Gaida, an associate professor of physiotherapy at the University of Canberra, Australia, and colleagues said in a journal news release.

However, the study results don’t prove a direct cause-and-effect relationship between elevated cholesterol levels and tendon abnormalities.

More information

The American Heart Association has more about cholesterol.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1k9PWmu

Brain Inflammation May Be Linked to Schizophrenia

FRIDAY, Oct. 15, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Researchers say they’ve found a link between brain inflammation and schizophrenia.

British investigators used PET scans to assess immune cell activity in the brains of 56 people. Some had schizophrenia, some were at risk for the mental disorder, and others had no symptoms or risk of the disease.

The results showed that immune cells are more active in the brains of people with schizophrenia and those at risk for the disease.

“Our findings are particularly exciting because it was previously unknown whether these cells become active before or after onset of the disease,” lead author Peter Bloomfield, of the Medical Research Council’s Clinical Sciences Center at Imperial College London, said in a college news release.

“Now we have shown this early involvement, mechanisms of the disease and new medications can hopefully be uncovered,” he added.

The findings could change the current understanding of schizophrenia and raise the possibility that testing people at risk for the disease could enable them to undergo treatment early enough to prevent the most severe symptoms, according to the researchers.

Exactly what causes schizophrenia is still unclear. It’s currently thought that genetics, biology (an imbalance in the brain chemistry), and/or possible viral infections and immune disorders might play a role, says Mental Health America.

The study findings, which didn’t prove that inflammation is linked to schizophrenia, were published Oct. 16 in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

“Schizophrenia is a potentially devastating disorder and we desperately need new treatments to help sufferers, and ultimately to prevent it,” Oliver Howes, head of the psychiatric imaging group at the Clinical Sciences Center, said in the news release.

“This is a promising study as it suggests that inflammation may lead to schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. We now aim to test whether anti-inflammatory treatments can target these. This could lead to new treatments or even prevention of the disorders altogether,” he added.

According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health, people with schizophrenia may hear voices other people don’t hear. They may think people are trying to hurt them. Sometimes they don’t make sense when talking. The disorder can make it very hard for patients to hold a job or care for themselves.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Mental Health has more about schizophrenia.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KdfW5s

Positive Outlook May Help Heart Disease Patients Heal

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Oct. 16, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Heart disease patients with a sunny disposition are more likely to exercise, stick with their medications and take other steps to ward off further heart trouble, a new study suggests.

Researchers said the findings add to a large body of evidence linking a positive approach to better heart health.

Specifically, the results support the theory that healthier habits are a key reason that positive people tend to have less heart trouble.

It all makes sense, according to James Maddux, a senior scholar at the Center for the Advancement of Well-Being at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.

“Over the years, we’ve learned a lot about this complex process called self-motivation,” said Maddux, who was not involved in the study.

When faced with a challenge — a diagnosis of heart disease, for example — people who are generally positive will become “task-oriented,” Maddux explained. “They’ll think, ‘OK, what do I need to do to address this challenge?’ ” he said.

In contrast, people who tend to be more negative often feel there is little they can do about life’s challenges — including a diagnosis of heart disease, Maddux suggested.

“Your disposition affects your ability to set goals and to put those plans in motion,” Maddux said.

The good news, he added, is that even a lifelong pessimist can learn to change his or her outlook.

Lead researcher Nancy Sin, a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Healthy Aging at Pennsylvania State University, agreed. “Is it possible to change? I think so,” she said.

Sin pointed out that her team’s findings do not prove that heart disease patients’ positive outlook directly led to healthier habits. In fact, it’s likely a two-way street, she said: Physical activity, for example, typically makes people feel better mentally and emotionally, as well.

So people who tend to land on the pessimistic side might start with small steps that could do their hearts and minds good, Sin suggested.

“Take a walk every day,” she said. “Have a conversation with a good friend. Take a moment just to think about what you’re grateful for in your life.”

The findings, published recently in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine, were based on surveys and physical exams of over 1,000 adults with heart disease.

Participants rated themselves on a standard scale of positive and negative emotions: They were considered to be more positive if they agreed that they were enthusiastic, determined, strong, interested and active.

In general, Sin’s team found, those positive people were anywhere from one-quarter to 50 percent more likely to be getting regular exercise, sleeping well and sticking with their heart medications, compared to their less-positive peers. They were also less likely to be smokers.

And when people’s positive outlook increased over the next five years, so did their likelihood of adopting healthy habits, the study found.

“We can’t say that positive emotions led to those healthier behaviors,” Sin said. But again, she added, the important thing is that the two are connected, and may feed each other.

Maddux agreed. “Everything is so closely connected, there is no chicken and no egg,” he said.

To be sure, a person’s general disposition has a genetic component, Maddux noted. Some people are programmed to see the glass as half-empty, while others will naturally see it as half-full.

“But we also know that people can change,” Maddux said.

If you have a chronic health condition and can’t find the motivation to make lifestyle changes or take medications, that doesn’t mean there’s “something wrong” with you, according to Maddux.

“It just means you need more support,” he said.

He suggested talking to your doctor about ways to overcome the obstacles you’re facing. Support groups can also help, Maddux added, because you’ll be around other people dealing with similar challenges.

“You can find some practical help with integrating these changes into your life,” he said.

More information

The American Heart Association has more on healthy lifestyle changes.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1k9PUuL

3 Small Appliances Worthy of Your Counter Space

Forget one-job wonders:  These countertop appliances give you multiple ways to whip up healthy food.

Electrolux Masterpiece Collection Blender

Photo: Will StyerPhoto: Will Styer

High-speed blenders are now a must-have; nearly half of Europe’s Michelin-starred restaurants use ones from Electrolux. This new, relatively quiet machine offers four blending and three speed options plus a power-burst button, along with six titanium blades (stronger than stainless steel). Both the jar and blades have a unique, five-degree tilt, helping gravity pull in ingredients and giving a more consistent blend. ($349; electroluxappliances.com)

Cuisinart Prep 9 9-Cup Food Processor 

Photo: Will StyerPhoto: Will Styer

There may be fancier machines on the market, but this model gets high marks from pros and consumers. It features the brand’s signature extra-large feed tube, which means minimal pre-chopping. It comes with three blades—for slicing, shredding, and chopping and mixing—and works with other Cuisinart specialty blades. The powerful motor has a 10-year warranty, longer than most at this price level. ($140; amazon.com)

Hamilton Beach Easy Reach Convection Oven 

Photo: Will StyerPhoto: Will Styer

Not your mama’s toaster oven! This workhorse can bake a 12-inch pizza (or toast six slices of bread) and has a convection setting; other models with both features cost two to three times as much. The smart roll-top door takes up hardly any space and makes it easier to remove food, so there’s less mess. Set it at 150°F to keep food warm, or up to 450°F to bake or broil. ($60; amazon.com)




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1jsvc9n

Study Links Flu Vaccine to Short-Term Drop in Stroke Risk

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Oct. 15, 2015 (HealthDay News) — With flu season underway, many people will choose to be vaccinated, in the hopes of warding off a debilitating bout of fever, sneezes, coughs and aches.

But a new British study suggests they may end up getting a bonus protection they hadn’t even considered: a drop in their short-term risk for stroke.

According to a team of scientists from the University of Lincoln, the flu shot seems associated with a reduced risk for stroke by about one-fifth over two months. However, the study did not prove that the flu vaccine causes a drop in stroke risk.

Exactly why there seems to be an association between the two remains unclear.

Study co-author Niro Siriwardena said that evidence of the flu vaccine’s impact on stroke risk does not come as a complete surprise, since earlier research has shown a similar link.

“The main surprise about the finding,” he said, “is that the flu vaccination is given every year to prevent respiratory complications of flu like pneumonia, rather than to prevent stroke.”

Siriwardena, a professor of primary and pre-hospital health care with the Community and Health Research Unit at the University of Lincoln, and his team reported the finding recently in the journal Vaccine.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates the number of flu-related deaths at between 3,000 and 49,000 each year. An estimated 80 percent to 90 percent of those occur among people 65 and older.

To explore the possible association between the flu vaccine and stroke risk, the investigators pored over the health records of nearly 18,000 adult patients in the United Kingdom who had experienced a stroke sometime between 2001 and 2009.

All the patients had received a flu vaccine. But because the vaccine has a maximum effectiveness of just six months, the study team was able to compare the number of strokes occurring within the 180 days following inoculation to the number of strokes that occurred after 180 days.

The team observed an immediate 55 percent plunge in stroke risk over the first three days following vaccination. And though stroke risk rose gradually over the following days, it remained 36 percent lower between days four and seven; 30 percent lower between days eight and 14; 24 percent lower between days 15 and 28, and 17 percent lower between days 29 and 59.

What’s more, patients who were vaccinated relatively early in the flu season — between Sept. 1 and Nov. 15 — garnered the most benefit in terms of stroke risk reduction, the researchers said.

The upshot: Those for whom the flu shot is recommended should get it, and get it sooner rather than later. Since a move toward “universal vaccination” in 2010, that basically means all Americans over the age of 6 months are recommended to get the shot.

Siriwardena noted that it remains to be seen whether the benefit of the flu vaccine might be lesser or greater, depending on a patient’s particular risk profile for stroke.

Dr. Gregg Fonarow, a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, said that “while those at higher risk for stroke may derive the greatest benefit in terms of stroke risk reduction, given the devastating impact that strokes can have, even modest reductions in stroke risk [are] worthwhile.”

More information

There’s more on the flu and the flu vaccine at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1X7VLPq