barre

Here’s Why Some People Go Off Their HIV Meds and Why That’s a Really Bad Idea

 

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

At first glance, Charlie Sheen’s recent decision to go off his HIV medication—and travel to Mexico to pursue a cure instead—seems almost unthinkable. (The actor said on a pre-taped segment of The Dr. Oz Show Tuesday that he had stopped taking his meds for about a week, but didn’t reveal what kind of alternative treatment he was receiving in the meantime.)

Before Sheen went to Mexico, he was on antiretroviral therapy to keep the HIV virus from multiplying. It’s hard to understate the importance of these drugs: They not only help keep the immune system healthy, but also lower the risk of transmitting the virus to others. In fact, at the time of Sheen’s exclusive interview with the TODAY show in mid-November, he said he had “undetectable” levels of the virus in his blood. (After he stopped taking the drugs, his numbers went up, he told Dr. Oz.)

When people with HIV don’t take antiretrovirals, they might expect to live for about 6 months, says Larry Corey, MD, a principal investigator for the HIV Vaccine Trials Network at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. If they take antiretrovirals, they can live for about 40 years.

RELATED: 20 New Things You Need to Know About HIV

Seems like a no-brainer, right? Well, it’s not always that simple. In fact, a 2011 global meta-analysis found that only about 3 in 5 people take at least 90% of their prescribed antiretroviral drugs.

The truth is, there are a few reasons why people might stop taking these meds. But unless you’re in someone else’s shoes, they can be hard to understand, says Ken Ho, MD, an instructor of medicine in the division of infectious disease at the University of Pittsburgh. Here, we break them down:

“Treatment fatigue” can set in.

Since there’s no cure for HIV, treating the virus is a life-long process. Translation: You have to take medication every day, forever. Not only that, but you also have to schedule appointments with your doctors and refill your prescriptions, too.

Now we know what you’re thinking: That’s a small price to pay for a pretty big benefit. Fair enough—but just think about how your schedule would look if you suddenly added a bunch of doctor’s appointments and pharmacy visits to your already-jam-packed schedule.

It’s the difference between dealing with an acute illness, like a cold, and a chronic illness, like HIV, explains Dr. Corey. Oftentimes, people are used to catching a bug and feeling sick until they fight it off. It’s different when you have a condition like HIV—especially because while you’re on your meds, you can feel healthy. “But [chronic diseases] are always one step ahead of you,” he says.

RELATED: 16 HIV Symptoms

Some of the drugs can have side effects.

In the short-term, the meds may cause nausea, diarrhea, headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and more. Long-term side effects include insulin resistance and a loss of bone density. But Dr. Ho says that some of the short-term effects can fade with time; doctors can also prescribe other meds for the queasiness.

It can be emotionally draining to take meds every day.

Research has shown that people with severe depression are less likely to adhere to their antiretroviral therapy. Others may simply not want to be reminded of their HIV-positive status every day, says Dr. Ho. “There’s still some shame and a fear of stigma associated with the disease.”

That said, antiretroviral therapy is the best way to treat the HIV virus—and you have to stick with it. Taking a “drug holiday” is actually dangerous, according to the Centers for the Disease Control and Prevention. Not only can that give the virus a chance to multiply, but it also can cause drug resistance, too.

“It’s natural that people want to be cured,” says Dr. Corey. But no one should disregard one of the most important medications we have—especially not for a false hope.

RELATED: 7 Myths About HIV and the Facts You Need to Know

 




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RIatNz

Fewer Cruises Rocked by Gastro Illness Outbreaks: CDC

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Jan. 14, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Although outbreaks of illness on cruise ships tend to dominate the news when they occur, the actual number of outbreaks is small, a new U.S. government report says.

Outbreaks of diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, headache, muscle aches or fever — called gastroenteritis — dropped significantly on cruise ships between 2008 and 2014, researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday.

“Of the more than 29,000 voyages between 2008 and 2014, outbreaks occurred on only 133, which is 0.5 percent,” said lead researcher Amy Freeland, an epidemiologist with CDC’s Vessel Sanitation Program.

About 92 percent of outbreaks were caused by a norovirus, the leading cause of illness and outbreaks from contaminated food in the United States. Others were caused by bacteria such as E. coli, she said.

A small fraction — just 0.18 percent — of the nearly 74 million passengers who took a cruise between 2008 and 2014 suffered from acute gastroenteritis, Freeland said. Of approximately 28 million crew members, only 0.15 percent reported having gastroenteritis. This rate remained unchanged during the study period, the new research found.

Freeland said the cruise industry has been doing a better job of preventing and controlling outbreaks. In addition, requirements of the CDC’s Vessel Sanitation Program have made a difference in reducing outbreaks by recommending which cleaning procedures and disinfectants be used on cruise ships, she said.

The report was published in the Jan. 15 issue of the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Only a small proportion of norovirus cases in the United States are from outbreaks on cruise ships, Freeland said. From 2008 to 2014, only about 15,000 cases of norovirus occurred on cruise ships — 0.01 percent of the total number of norovirus cases in the United States during that period.

A new strain of norovirus caused an increase in the rate of gastroenteritis in 2012, Freeland said.

The best way for passengers to prevent getting gastroenteritis on a cruise is to wash their hands, especially after using the toilet and before putting anything in their mouth, Freeland said. In addition, passengers should report any symptoms.

“Often, people don’t want to report feeling sick because they don’t want to be isolated during their vacation,” she said. “The problem with that is if there is illness onboard, crew members don’t know and they can’t step up their sanitation efforts.”

Dr. Marc Siegel, an associate professor of medicine at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, said the biggest problem on cruise ships is norovirus because it’s very contagious, and a ship is a confined space.

Siegel agrees that hand washing is the key to staying healthy. “Hand wipes are not enough,” he said. “You’ve got to wash your hands vigorously in soap and water.”

More information

For more information on norovirus, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1SQLwi7

For Seniors, Poor Sleep May Mean Higher Stroke Risk, Study Suggests

THURSDAY, Jan. 14, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Poor sleep may raise seniors’ risk of hardening of the brain arteries, and possibly contribute to the chances of a stroke, a new study suggests.

Researchers examined the autopsied brains of 315 people, average age 90, who had undergone at least one full week of sleep quality assessment before their death. Twenty-nine percent of them had suffered a stroke, and 61 percent had moderate-to-severe damage to blood vessels in the brain.

Those with the highest levels of sleep fragmentation — repeated awakenings or arousals — were 27 percent more likely to have hardening of the brain arteries. Among study participants, sleep was disrupted an average of nearly seven times an hour.

For each additional two arousals during one hour of sleep, there was a 30 percent greater likelihood of having visible signs of oxygen deprivation in the brain, the study authors said.

However, the study was not designed to prove a cause-and-effect link between poor sleep and stroke risk.

The findings were independent of other stroke and heart disease risk factors, such as weight, diabetes, smoking and high blood pressure, as well as other health conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, depression, heart failure and pain, according to the study published Jan. 14 in the journal Stroke.

“The forms of brain injury that we observed are important because they may not only contribute to the risk of stroke but also to chronic progressive cognitive and motor impairment,” lead investigator Dr. Andrew Lim, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Toronto, said in a journal news release.

“However, there are several ways to view these findings: sleep fragmentation may impair the circulation of blood to the brain, poor circulation of blood to the brain may cause sleep fragmentation, or both may be caused by another underlying risk factor,” said Lim, who is also a neurologist and scientist at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center in Toronto.

While the findings suggest that sleep monitoring could help identify seniors at risk for stroke, further research is needed to clarify a number of areas.

One expert praised the research, but added that it wasn’t the last word on the topic.

“This is an excellent study, highly provocative, but not definitive because of the design, as mentioned by the authors themselves,” said Dr. Richard Libman, vice chairman of neurology at Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New Hyde Park, N.Y.

“There appears to be a clear association between poor sleep [sleep fragmentation] and hardening of the arteries and risk of stroke,” Libman said. “As noted, the direction of this association is uncertain.

“Sleep, to some degree, is within our control and we should all make attempts to improve the quality of our sleep,” he added.

More information

The U.S. National Institute on Aging has more about sleep.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1SQLwhZ

7 Red Lipsticks Makeup Artists Swear By

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Finding the perfect red lipstick can be something of a lifelong challenge. Just thinking about the different formulas, shades, and textures is enough to make someone go crazy! Cue makeup artists whose literal job it is to find and test said lipsticks. Here, the go-to reds that have proven worthy of a coveted spot in their kits.

For subtle color

Photo: Nordstoms.com

Photo: Nordstom.com

Lipstick Queen ‘Saint Sheer’ Lipstick in Rouge ($24; Nordstrom.com)
“If you’re intimidated by sporting a rich color, Lipstick Queen has an amazing array of sheer and cream formulas so that you don’t have to go for a bold look right off the bat. This one has the power to make you feel empowered, not intimidated. It’s not your typical red. It’s a bit deeper but creates a flattering flush,” says Rebecca Perkins, New York City makeup artist and co-founder of Rouge NY.

RELATED: 10 Surprising Beauty Uses for Coconut Oil

For a matte finish

Photo: Sephora.com

Photo: Sephora.com

Bite Beauty Cashmere Lip Cream in Rioja ($28; sephora.com)
“This is my current favorite, especially for myself! It’s a cashmere formula so the texture stays matte, without being drying. I love that it’s super bright, which keeps my skin looking fresh and my teeth sparkling white,” says Janessa Paré, New York City makeup artist who has created looks for the runway shows of DKNY, Marissa Webb and Nautica to name a few.

For high-shine

lipstick-avonAvon Beyond Color Lipstick in Heat Wave ($5; avon.com)
“It’s a classic crimson that flatters all complexions and it has a satin finish that feels great. The formula is moisturizing and plumping!” says Lauren Andersen, Los Angeles celebrity makeup artist whose A-list clientele includes Jessica Alba, Jaime King and Eva Mendes.

For a younger looking pout

lipstick-macMAC ‘The Matte’ in Ruby Woo ($17; nordstrom.com)
“I always seem to return to this beautiful shade of blood red. It’s a statement red and it stays on really well without bleeding into lip creases. A must-have for the more mature woman,” says Silver Bramham, Los Angeles celebrity makeup artist who has counted Kate Moss, Amber Valletta and Jane Fonda as clients.

RELATED: 8 Best Overnight Beauty Products to Wake Up Gorgeous

For a vintage look

Photo: Nordstrom.com

Photo: Nordstrom.com

Chanel Rouge Allure Luminous Intense Lip Color in Pirate ($36; nordstrom.com)
“I love this one for its classic satin finish. It has a touch of luminousness that gives gorgeous depth. I’ve used this shade on Brittany Snow and she looked oh-so-retro!” says Brett Freedman, Hollywood makeup artist who has worked with Camilla Belle, Reba Mcentire and Amy Poehler.

For a sophisticated red

 

nars-lipstick

Photo: Sephora.com

NARS Velvet Matte Lip Pencil in “Cruella” ($26; sephora.com)
“This deeper scarlet is a good red to have for every occasion—very modern and chic. I love the formula because it feels silky and light on your lips, almost like you have nothing on,” says Andréa Tiller, New York City celebrity makeup artist who has glammed up Amy Schumer, Allison Williams and Olivia Palermo.

RELATED: 15 Red Carpet Beauty Tips for Real Life

For the perfect fiery red

Photo: Nordstrom.com

Photo: Nordstrom.com

Tom Ford in Wild Ginger ($52; nordstrom.com)
“I like a more poppy, orange-based shade of red. This one suits many skin tones—from light to dark—and is the best texture and finish. It can also be layered over a deeper shade of a matte red for a more intensified full looking lip,” says April Greaves, New York City makeup artist who has worked on advertising campaigns for Athleta, Barneys New York and Intermix.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1mYTlFT

Cancer No. 1 Killer of Asian-Americans, Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders: Study

THURSDAY, Jan. 14, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Cancer is the leading cause of death among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders, even though overall cancer incidence and death rates in these groups are lower than among white Americans, a new study finds.

There will be about 57,740 new cancer cases and nearly 17,000 cancer deaths among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in 2016, the American Cancer Society report estimated.

The three leading causes of cancer death among Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander men are lung (27 percent), liver (14 percent) and colon/rectum (11 percent). Among women, they are lung (21 percent), breast (14 percent) and colon/rectum (11 percent), the findings showed.

Even though Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders have cancer incidence and death rates that are 30 percent to 40 percent lower for all cancers combined than whites, their rates of stomach and liver cancers are nearly double those of whites. And they also have higher rates of nasopharynx (upper throat behind the nose) cancers.

The researchers also found that Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders are less likely than whites to be diagnosed with cancer before it has spread.

Within Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander subgroups, there are also wide variations in cancer incidence rates.

“The variations we see in cancer rates in [these groups] are related to risk factors, including lifestyle factors, use of screening and preventive services, and exposure to cancer-causing infections,” study co-author Lindsey Torre said in a journal news release. Torre is an epidemiologist in the surveillance research group at the cancer society.

Between 2006 and 2010, incidence rates per 100,000 men ranged from about 217 among Asian Indians/Pakistanis to almost 527 among Samoans. The rate among white men was 554.

Among Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander women, rates ranged from 212 among Asian Indians/Pakistanis to almost 443 among Samoans. The rate among white women was about 445, according to the report.

Among both men and women in this population, the highest rates after Samoans were among Native Hawaiians and Japanese, the study authors said.

“Cancer-control strategies among this population include improved use of vaccination and screening; interventions to increase physical activity and reduce excess body weight, tobacco use and alcohol consumption; and research to get a more detailed understanding of differences in the cancer burden and risk factors between subgroups,” Torre concluded.

The study was published Jan. 14 in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more about cancer.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RQAqIX

Smokers With Pneumonia at Risk for Lung Cancer: Study

THURSDAY, Jan. 14, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Smokers diagnosed with pneumonia may be at greater risk for developing lung cancer, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that 9 percent of smokers admitted to the hospital for pneumonia developed lung cancer within one year, so they recommend early screening for the disease among heavy smokers treated for pneumonia.

“Lung cancer is truly aggressive. The only chance of recuperation is if it’s caught before it begins to cause any symptoms at all. The idea is to find the tumor well in advance,” said study leader Dr. Daniel Shepshelovich, from Tel Aviv University’s Sackler Faculty of Medicine and the Rabin Medical Center, in Israel.

“Previous studies have shown that a low-dose radiation CT scan conducted once a year on heavy smokers has the potential to lower lung cancer mortality rates,” he said in a university news release. “But this requires huge resources, and we still don’t know how it will perform in real-world conditions, outside of strictly conducted clinical trials.”

But screening heavy smokers while they are hospitalized for pneumonia can help doctors diagnose lung cancer sooner, improving the odds for survival, the researchers added.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The disease has a five-year survival rate of only 17 percent, the researchers said.

In conducting the study, Shepshelovich and his team sought to develop a more cost-effective strategy to lower lung cancer death rates by targeting those at particularly high risk for the disease.

The researchers analyzed the records of 381 heavy smokers admitted to the hospital between 2007 and 2011 with community-acquired pneumonia, or pneumonia that was spread outside the health care system.

Rates of lung cancer were significantly higher in patients admitted with upper lobe pneumonia, the study published Jan. 7 in the American Journal of Medicine showed. Lung cancer was usually located in the same lobe affected by pneumonia. This was the case in almost 76 percent of the admissions.

“We discovered that smokers hospitalized with pneumonia are diagnosed with cancer after the infection because often the cancer masquerades as pneumonia, physically obstructing the airway and creating such an infection, Shepshelovich said. “Considering that only 0.5 to 1 percent of smokers without pneumonia have a chance of being diagnosed with lung cancer every year, the fact that 9 percent of our study group developed lung cancer is alarming.”

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides more information on the health effects of smoking.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RQAqIR

Green, Leafy Vegetables Each Day May Help Keep Glaucoma at Bay

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Jan. 14, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Eating green leafy vegetables daily may decrease the risk of glaucoma — a serious eye disease — by 20 percent or more over many years, a new study suggests.

“We found those consuming the most green leafy vegetables had a 20 to 30 percent lower risk of glaucoma,” said study leader Jae Kang. Kang is an assistant professor of medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston.

Glaucoma is an eye condition that usually develops when fluid increases in the front part of the eye and causes pressure, damaging the optic nerve. It can lead to loss of vision, according to the U.S. National Eye Institute.

Although the study found an association between eating more leafy greens and a lower risk of glaucoma, it didn’t prove cause-and-effect.

Kang’s team followed nearly 64,000 participants in the Nurses’ Health Study from 1984 through 2012, and more than 41,000 participants in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study from 1986 through 2014. The men and women were all 40 or older. None had glaucoma at the start of the study, and they had eye exams every two years.

Over the 25-year follow up, almost 1,500 people developed glaucoma. The researchers looked at the consumption of green leafy vegetables among the participants.

The investigators divided the participants into five groups, from the highest level of leafy green vegetable consumption to the lowest. Those who ate the most averaged about 1.5 servings a day, or about one and a half cups a day, Kang said. Those in the group eating the least leafy greens ate about a serving every three days, according to Kang.

What is it about leafy greens that may help eye health?

“In glaucoma, we think there is an impairment of blood flow to the optic nerve,” Kang said. “And an important factor that regulates blood flow to the eye is a substance called nitric oxide.” Green leafy vegetables contain nitrates, which are precursors to nitric oxide, the researchers said.

“When you consume the higher amount of green leafy vegetables, you have greater levels of nitric oxide in your body,” Kang said.

Findings from the study were published online Jan. 14 in the journal JAMA Ophthalmology.

The findings make sense, said Dr. Rahul Pandit, an ophthalmologist at Houston Methodist Hospital, who reviewed the new research.

This study, he said, is the first study to look at a large population and show that higher consumption of green leafy vegetables appears to decrease glaucoma risk.

“We do have some data that people with glaucoma have impaired nitric oxide production in the eye,” added Pandit, who is also an associate professor of ophthalmology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City.

The findings suggest that “maybe this is something we can apply clinically,” Pandit said.

The advice to eat more green leafy vegetables seems low risk, Pandit said. He suggested people ask their doctor whether eating and increasing green leafy vegetables is a good idea for them.

More information

To learn more about glaucoma, visit the American Academy of Ophthalmology.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RQAqsv

Why You Can Get So Many Diseases from Mosquitoes

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

TIME-logo.jpg

Zika virus, the latest mosquito-borne virus to hit the United States, joins a long list of other infections the insects can carry, like malaria, dengue fever, chikungunya, and West Nile. How can these bugs—so tiny that we often miss them at first swipe—be responsible for so many infections? It turns out their vampire-like tendencies are largely to blame.

“Mosquitoes literally drink blood, and by doing so ingest microbes directly and can pass them directly into the bloodstream of others,” says Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease physician at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center’s Center for Health Security. “They are very mobile and can move over distances—a few miles—allowing them to have some trajectory in finding their blood meals and spreading disease in the process.”

It’s the female mosquitoes we really have to worry about, since they’re the ones that ingest blood, which provides nutrition needed for their eggs.

According to Janet McAllister, an entomologist with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), not all mosquitoes are good at transmitting disease, but the ones that are have evolved to live closer to humans. “Some of these species have even developed a preference for feeding on humans over other animals,” she says. “Mostly, those that will bite humans have become very good at taking blood from us without us noticing. Some prefer to bite at night when we are sleeping. Others, those that bite during the day or early evening, have chemicals in their saliva that allow them to bite without us noticing it right away. That way, they can get their meal and leave more disease-causing organism before the itching starts.”

The movements of mosquitoes (often via human travelers) are to blame for bringing the once uncommon ailments to new places. “A lot of these viruses are arboviruses,” says Nikos Vasilakis, an assistant professor at the Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. “They are ancient viruses, like dengue and Zika, that have evolved alongside mosquitoes. The most prevalent vector is the domestic Aedes aegypti mosquito, which originated in Africa, but now its range is global.”

Climate change is also at least partially responsible for where mosquitoes and the diseases they carry end up. “Whereas in the past, Aedes aegypti would not establish itself in more temperate regions, climate change would result in its northern or southern expansion,”says Vasilakis. “That change in range will also be accompanied by the introduction of these viruses in these territories.”

Consider chikungunya, a virus that causes debilitating joint pain and infected more than one million people globally in 2014. It started in Africa but spread rapidly into the Caribbean and Central and South Americas, and even hit the United States. In previous years, the CDC would report an average of around 28 cases of the infection in the U.S., mostly brought in by travelers, but in 2014, more than 2,811 stateside cases were reported. “We are very concerned about chikungunya moving into the Western Hemisphere,” Dr. Roger Nasci of the CDC told TIME at the end of 2014. “We have the two different species of mosquitoes in the U.S. capable of spreading the virus.”

The saving grace for Americans is that the U.S. climate is not the most welcoming for mosquitoes, since regular winters kill many of them off. As TIME previously reported, the new Zika virus case could pose more of a problem for warmer regions in the country.

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1J5tiHm

This Bath Is Therapy for a Bad Cold

Why Having a Best Friend Is Good for Your Health, According to Science

schumer-lawrence

Photo: Getty Images

Research has long shown that friendship is essential for your physical and mental well-being. Having a social network can lengthen your lifespan, help you stay slim, and keep your brain healthy as you get older.

But now picture that one friend (or two, or three, if you’re lucky) you can send selfies to even when your face is polka-dotted with acne medication, or the pal you reserve the dancing-girls emoji for. Perhaps even the headline made her pop into your head. Yep, she’s your bestie—and the closeness you share as a duo comes with its own list of surprising health benefits.

“I call those close friendships emotional health clubs, the gyms for our souls,” says Shasta Nelson, author of Frientimacy: How to Deepen Friendships for Lifelong Health and Happiness ($14; amazon.com).

But what makes a bestie a bestie? “These types of deep friendships are where we get to be the most vulnerable, where we get to practice being the best versions of ourselves, and sometimes even the worst versions,” explains Nelson. Here are even more unbelievable perks that’ll have you running to go hug your No. 1 pal.

RELATEDHow Friends Save Our Lives (And Waistlines! And Sanity, Too!)

She makes you more optimistic

Your closest girlfriends make hills in your path look smaller, just knowing they’re standing beside you help tackle it.

We’re not speaking figuratively. In 2008, researchers asked a group of University of Virginia students to stand at the bottom of a hill wearing a heavy backpack. They were then asked to estimate the steepness of the hill in front of them, either while standing alone or with a friend. Those who stood with a friend rated the hill as less steep than students who were alone. But there’s more: The longer participants knew their friends, the less steep they estimated the hill to be, too.

She helps block out anxiety

Cue The Beatles’ “With a Little Help From My Friends.” Not only do close friends help you work through your stress, they may actually help protect your body from stress better than when you try to handle it solo.

James Coan, PhD, associate professor of clinical psychology at the University of Virginia, studied women using MRI brain scans to witness the difference in anxiety levels right before they were jolted with an electric shock alone, or while holding the hand of a close companion. The result? Every participant’s scan showed that the parts of the brain that sense danger were much less active when they gripped a pal’s hand.

RELATED: 21 Reasons You’ll Live Longer Than Your Friends

“The burden of life’s many stressors, when you have to deal with them by yourself, not only does it feel more exhausting, it literally creates more wear on your body,” Coan explained to CBS News.

She gives you physical and emotional strength

Your confidant may be a better emotional resource than a family member, says a 2014 study, published in Health Psychology.

The researchers followed nearly 750 adults, who were mostly older women, for 12 years to assess the power of friendship in keeping one’s health from deteriorating after losing a spouse. Over the course of the study, they looked at the physical health differences between those who lost a spouse and had a close confidant and people who suffered the loss and only had familial support. They learned that having support from relatives didn’t have the same positive health benefits, like feeling less depressed, that were associated with having close friends.

So why does a best friend provide an even better shoulder to cry on than, say, a sister or mom? Friendships are discretionary, while family relationships are obligatory in nature, lead study author Jamila Bookwala, a psychology professor at Lafayette College, explained in a press release. She added that in family relationships, you may feel close with the person, but also bothered by them.

RELATED: 14 Things Heart Doctors Tell Their Friends

Nelson agrees: “Family members, even children or spouses, often add a lot more stress by default. They come with more logistics, whether it’s chores or errands. Your best friend, you don’t have to schedule her doctor’s appointments or know what she wants for lunch,” she jokes. “You get the benefits of friendship often times with a large amount of external stressors and responsibilities.”

 




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1J5ljdp