barre

Barbie Is Now Available In Curvy, Tall, and Petite Body Types

 

barbie-new

Thanks to a new makeover, Barbie now looks a little more like a “normal” woman.

Mattel, the maker of the iconic doll, announced today that they are introducing three new body types for Barbie: Petite, Tall, and Curvy. The new dolls (sold alongside Original Barbie) are available with a variety of skin tones, eye colors, hair colors, hair textures, and even flat feet. All of this means young girls will now have a better chance of playing with a Barbie that more closely resembles their own appearance.

RELATED: 5 Body-Positive Resolutions You Should Make in 2016

First released in 1959, Barbie has long faced criticism for sending the wrong message to girls. (Many have argued that if a real person had Barbie’s proportions she would be severely anorexic.) But in recent years, as the body positivity movement has taken off, Barbie’s crazy-unattainable shape has seemed even more absurd. At the same time, competitors have started selling dolls with real-life proportions and characteristics, such as the Lammily doll, which has stretch marks, acne, cellulite, and even gets her period.

As Time reports in their cover story:

American beauty ideals have evolved: the curvaceous bodies of Kim Kardashian West, Beyoncé and Christina Hendricks have become iconic, while millennial feminist leaders like Lena Dunham are deliberately baring their un-Barbie-like figures onscreen, fueling a movement that promotes body acceptance. In this environment, a new generation of mothers favor what they perceive as more–empowering toys for their daughters. 

RELATED: 5 Rules for Loving Your Body From Model Ashley Graham

In recent years, Mattel has made strides to combat Barbie’s reputation as anti-feminist. Last year, it launched its “Imagine the Possibilities” ad campaign, which portrayed young girls in different professions; and released 23 new dolls with different hair and skin colors. But this latest update is the first time that Barbie’s body shape has changed to reflect real-life proportions.

The new dolls are available today on Mattel’s website as part of the “Fashionistas” line and will start appearing in stores later this year. Welcome to the real world, Barbie.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1NDnzDK

Does Dry Brushing Really Reduce Cellulite and Help You Look Younger?

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

There’s always a new skin trend popping up rumored to vanish wrinkles, smooth dimples and zap cellulite. But most turn out to be temporary tricks and, more often than not, too good to be true. Cue dry brushing—is it really worth the hype?

Dry brushing, as the term suggests, quite literally entails brushing your bare skin—thighs, butt, arms, you name it—with a soft-bristled brush in order to give skin a fresher, smoother appearance. While there is scant scientific research to back up claims that it cures cellulite, it has some cosmetic benefits, explains Mona Gohara, MD, a dermatologist at the Yale School of Medicine—although they are fleeting at best.

The motion improves circulation and helps flush waste and toxins by stimulating the lymphatic system, explains Dr. Gohara, who is also a fellow of American Academy of Dermatology. “Doing all of that can certainly parlay into skin radiance and glow and a plumper appearance.”

Another power of dry brushing is the element of exfoliation, she adds. While exfoliating “won’t shave off 20 years,” Dr. Gohara says, it helps remove dry, dead skin cells and makes your derm more susceptible to moisture and hydration. “Exfoliation really is a tenant of healthy, younger-looking skin.”

RELATED8 Steps to Healthy Skin at Every Age

How to dry brush properly

Using a brush made with natural, ultra-fine bristles, run the brush over your bare skin in gentle, circular motions. It’s best to do it before you shower; both your skin and the brush should be dry. “I generally recommend doing it once a week, one pass per body part,” Dr. Gohara adds.

The brush makes all the difference; stiff or synthetic bristles can cause irritation or even microscopic cuts. “You should use a brush that would be safe even on a baby’s skin,” Dr. Gohara recommends.

You should avoid dry brushing if you have very sensitive skin, acne, or a condition like rosacea or eczema. “There’s a good chance any type of sensitive skin will react to this type of stimulation,” she says.

You may notice plump, fresh skin for a couple of hours. “Think about it,” Dr. Gohara explains, “when we go for a jog, our hearts are pumping blood to our organs, our face gets flushed, and then it fades away. Or imagine what happens when you pinch your cheeks.”

The bottom line: Dry brushing can act as a short-lived fix to energize your skin. But is it a permanent anti-aging solution for all lumps and bumps? “Absolutely not,” she says. “All of us would be scrubbing ourselves with brushes constantly, every day.”

RELATED: 15 Myths and Facts About Cellulite

Five dry brushes to try

Our top picks boast natural, soft-to-the-touch bristles and various handle lengths to reach any lower or upper body area.

Best for: Brushing hard-to-reach spots

Skin Brush .jpg

Skin Brush .jpg

Elemis Spa At Home Body Brush ($45; timetospa.com)

Best for: Brushing beginners who don’t want to spend a lot

16602235

The Bathery Bath Brush ($6; target.com)

Best for: Super-controlled brushing

617ivRz6DpL._SX522_

Wholesome Beauty Dry Body Brush ($12; amazon.com)

Best for: Keeping on display between uses

s1743368-main-zoom

Dry Revive: Dry Body Brush ($14; sephora.com)

Best for: Hanging in the bathroom

7390310474574p

Brush the Fuzz Brush ($9; amazon.com)




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1lWRnVE

Bedbugs Biting Back Against Insecticide

THURSDAY, Jan. 28, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Bedbugs in some American cities have developed resistance to the key insecticides used to control them, according to a new study.

It’s the first research to document bedbugs with resistance to neonicotinoids (neonics), the study authors said. Neonics are the most widely used class of insecticides.

Researchers collected bedbugs from homes in Cincinnati and Michigan and exposed them to four different neonics: acetamiprid, dinotefuran, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam. They were compared to laboratory bedbugs known to be vulnerable to neonics.

Only 0.3 nanograms of acetamiprid was needed to kill 50 percent of the nonresistant bedbugs, but it took more than 10,000 nanograms to kill 50 percent of the bedbugs from Cincinnati and Michigan.

Just 2.3 nanograms of imidacloprid killed 50 percent of the nonresistant bedbugs, but 365 nanograms and 1,064 nanograms were needed to kill the Cincinnati and Michigan bedbugs, respectively, the study found. The amounts were similar for dinotefuran and thiamethoxam.

Compared to the nonresistant bedbugs, those from Michigan were 462 times more resistant to imidacloprid, 198 times more resistant to dinotefuran, 546 times more resistant to thiamethoxam, and 33,333 times more resistant to acetamiprid.

The Cincinnati bedbugs were 163 times more resistant to imidacloprid, 226 times more resistant to thiamethoxam, 358 times more resistant to dinotefuran, and 33,333 times more resistant to acetamiprid, according to the study in the Journal of Medical Entomology.

Pest control companies “need to be vigilant for hints of declining performance of products that contain neonicotinoids,” said study author Alvaro Romero from New Mexico State University.

“For example, bedbugs persisting on previously treated surfaces might be an indication of resistance. In these cases, laboratory confirmation of resistance is advised, and if resistance is detected, products with different modes of action need to be considered, along with the use of non-chemical methods,” Romano said in a journal news release.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about bedbugs.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/207S9ly

Prenatal Antidepressant Use Not Linked to Infant Heart Defects: Study

THURSDAY, Jan. 28, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Taking antidepressants during pregnancy does not appear to increase the risk of having a baby with heart birth defects, a new British study suggests.

This week, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended screening for depression during pregnancy and the period after giving birth, and treating those who meet the criteria. Women may wonder how depression medication might affect their unborn child.

Some previous research has suggested a link between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs — the most widely used antidepressants in pregnancy) and heart birth defects. This class of medications includes Paxil (paroxetine), Lexapro (escitalopram) and Zoloft (sertraline).

But many of those studies did not take into account other risk factors that could cause such birth defects, according to the authors of the new review, researchers at University College London.

They studied data from more than 200,000 pairs of mothers and children in the United Kingdom. Their conclusion: A greater risk was posed by factors such as diabetes, obesity, and a history of alcohol and drug use. But these risk factors were more common among women who took antidepressants, the researchers noted.

The study was published Jan. 27 in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

“Women often receive conflicting messages on whether they should continue taking antidepressants during pregnancy, and many women may discontinue antidepressants in pregnancy because they fear adverse effects on their unborn child,” said study lead author Irene Petersen, of the department of primary care and population.

“Our research adds to the ongoing debate on whether these drugs cause congenital heart anomalies, and we have found no evidence to any such effect,” she said in a university news release. “However, health care professionals should counsel women on other risks contributing to congenital heart anomalies in children such as age, weight, diabetes, alcohol problems and illicit drug use.”

Previous studies by the same research team found that 80 percent of women on antidepressants stop taking them when they get pregnant.

“We know from a U.S. study that up to 70 percent of pregnant women who stop an antidepressant have a recurrence of depression, which also can have major consequences. So it is important to consider both the pros and cons before women stop taking antidepressants during pregnancy,” Petersen said.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more about antidepressants.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/207S9lu

Wearable Electric Patch May Ease PTSD

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Jan. 28, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Can a small electrical patch that jolts the brain while patients sleep offer significant relief from the debilitating effects of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)?

Iraq war veteran and PTSD patient Ron Ramirez thinks the answer is yes.

In May 2006, machine gunner Ramirez was seriously injured when a roadside bomb exploded during a tour of duty.

“About a year later they figured out that I had a brain injury,” recalled the 38-year-old Gardena, Calif. resident. And like many veterans of war, that injury was further compounded by a diagnosis of PTSD, a condition typically triggered by exposure to traumatic or threatening situations that provoke extreme fear.

PTSD brought on a significant shift in Ramirez’ mood, thoughts and behavior, he said, resulting in a shattered quality of life.

“I had no motivation,” he said. “I had constant nightmares, and I couldn’t sleep. And I would get very irritated by other people, getting into altercations, sometimes even with other patients. I couldn’t even take my two daughters out on my own without an escort.”

Both before and after his release from the hospital in 2009, Ramirez was offered all the standard interventions available for PTSD patients, including a “trial-and-error” array of prescription drugs, behavioral therapy, PTSD counseling and anger management sessions.

But the result was little improvement. “It just wasn’t really blending very well,” he said. “In all honesty, I felt useless.”

Enter an experimental electrical brain treatment for PTSD called “trigeminal nerve stimulation” (TNS).

“TNS is a new approach to PTSD,” said senior study author Dr. Andrew Leuchter. He is director of the neuromodulation division in the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine in Los Angeles.

“The challenge,” he said, “is that despite offering the best treatments that we can, most PTSD patients are left, sometimes for decades, with significant residual symptoms, like anxiety, irritability, explosive outbursts and sleep difficulty, not to mention depression.”

“But with TNS we approach the brain by thinking of it as a large network,” Leuchter said. “And like any electrical network it’s sensitive to any energy that gets put into it. So, with TNS we pulse the brain with an external source of energy through the trigeminal nerve,” a nerve tasked with transmitting sensations between the face and brain.

“The hope,” said Leuchter, “is that by doing this we can reset the brain network, and offer difficult-to-treat patients some relief.”

The UCLA team that developed TNS set out to address the unmet needs of the roughly 3.5 percent of Americans who struggle with PTSD, including survivors of rape, car accidents, domestic abuse and other traumas. That figure rises to 17 percent of active veterans, and as many as 30 percent of vets who served in Iraq or Afghanistan, according to background information from the study.

The treatment relies on a 9-volt battery that powers a low-level current that zaps the brain through an external forehead patch worn during sleep, according to the researchers. The current targets the patient’s autonomic nervous system and brain regions that regulate mood, behavior and thought.

The Jan. 28 issue of Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface outlines the findings of a pilot study funded by Los Angeles-based Neurosigma, Inc., which is licensing the technology.

Eight hours a night for eight weeks, 12 civilian patients with both PTSD and “major depressive disorder” underwent TNS treatment while continuing routine therapies. Participants were between the ages of 18 and 75.

“Patients reported mood improvement,” Leuchter said. “And much better sleep, less anxiety and a decreased startle response,” a reflexive defensive reaction to perceived threats. On average, PTSD symptoms appeared to drop by more than 30 percent, while depression severity fell by more than 50 percent, according to the researchers.

Side effects appeared limited to skin irritation at the patch site, the researchers said.

A follow-up trial, now underway, is slated to take another two to three years, and will ultimately involve 74 veterans with PTSD. But Ramirez has already completed his eight-week run.

“The first two weeks were the hardest, because it was annoying,” he acknowledged. “It would shock you with a really sharp electrical impulse if you turned a certain way. But eventually I saw that I was a lot calmer. And my sleep was the best I had had in years. It took away my nightmares. I was more motivated. Usually I would lay in bed, and never leave the house. This rejuvenated me.

“And even after the eighth week, when we were done, it seemed to keep working,” Ramirez added. “I do get irritated some times, but not as bad as before. Now I can go out on my own.”

Dr. Jeffrey Deitz is an assistant professor of psychiatry at Quinnipiac University’s Frank Netter School of Medicine in Hamden, Conn., and a supervising psychiatrist at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City. He described the new effort as “a very significant piece of work.”

“This represents a whole paradigm shift in psychiatric treatment,” he said. “The notion that disorders are all about biochemical imbalances in the brain, around since the ’60’s, is giving way to thinking about psychiatric issues in terms of brain circuitry that’s overstimulated or under-stimulated.

“So this is very early in the process,” said Deitz. “But it’s also very exciting. And makes perfect sense.”

More information

There’s more on PTSD at the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/207S7dt

Study Finds No Proof of ‘Seasonal’ Depression

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Jan. 28, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new study cast doubts on the existence of seasonal depression — a mood disorder linked to reduced sunlight in the winter months.

This form of depression — known as seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and recognized by the mental health community for nearly 30 years — “is not supported by objective data,” the new study claims.

Depression comes and goes, said study lead researcher Steven LoBello. If someone experiences depression in the fall and winter, “it doesn’t mean that seasonal changes have caused the depression,” added LoBello, a professor of psychology at Auburn University at Montgomery, Ala.

For the study, LoBello and colleagues used data from a telephone survey of more than 34,000 U.S. adults asked about depression and then gathered information on time of year, latitude and more when measuring depression.

LoBello noted the study found no evidence that symptoms of depression were season-related and said, “If this seasonal pattern of depression occurs at all, it may be fairly rare.”

Dr. Matthew Lorber, acting director of child and adolescent psychiatry at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, also said that seasonal affective disorder may not be a “legitimate diagnosis.”

Big drug companies, Lorber said, pushed to have SAD recognized as a standard diagnosis. “It then allowed them to market to a new population to use their medications. That was a motivating factor in creating this disorder,” said Lorber, who wasn’t involved in the new study.

LoBello thinks the seasons have no place in the diagnosis of depression, and he would like to see these criteria discontinued.

His reasoning? Assuming a cause that isn’t accurate may lead patients to pursue treatments that won’t deliver relief, LoBello said.

According to the new report, published Jan. 20 in Clinical Psychological Science, seasonal affective disorder was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) — the bible of psychological diagnosis — in 1987.

LoBello isn’t the first to explore the validity of this diagnosis.

Kelly Rohan, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Vermont, has done her own research on seasonal depression and found “no season differences in reports of depressive symptoms.”

“I certainly did not argue that this means SAD does not exist,” she said. “However, only a minority of depression cases are actually SAD.”

So, how come other research has found that a significant percentage of the public suffers from this condition? (The American Academy of Family Physicians says up to 6 percent of U.S. adults have winter depression, and as many as one in five have mild SAD symptoms).

It all depends on how the studies are done and how the questions are asked, Rohan said. “Also, SAD depressive symptoms tend to be less severe than in nonseasonal major depression and mood tends to be back to normal in the spring and summer,” she said. “So when you take all the depressed people in this sample — including the minority that claims to be SAD — and look at seasonal differences in their depression scores, I am not surprised that it is a wash.”

For the study, LoBello and colleagues used the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The 34,000-plus respondents had been asked about the number of days they felt depressed in the past two weeks. The researchers matched these responses with the location of each person and the day, month, latitude and amount of sun exposure when interviewed.

People who responded to the survey in the winter months, when sunlight exposure was low, had no greater levels of depressive symptoms than those who responded to the survey at other times, the researchers said.

In addition, the researchers found no evidence for seasonal differences in mood when they zeroed in on more than 1,700 participants with clinical depression.

More information

For more on seasonal affective disorder, visit the American Academy of Family Physicians.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ZVAx6W

Study Finds No Proof of ‘Seasonal’ Depression

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Jan. 28, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new study cast doubts on the existence of seasonal depression — a mood disorder linked to reduced sunlight in the winter months.

This form of depression — known as seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and recognized by the mental health community for nearly 30 years — “is not supported by objective data,” the new study claims.

Depression comes and goes, said study lead researcher Steven LoBello. If someone experiences depression in the fall and winter, “it doesn’t mean that seasonal changes have caused the depression,” added LoBello, a professor of psychology at Auburn University at Montgomery, Ala.

For the study, LoBello and colleagues used data from a telephone survey of more than 34,000 U.S. adults asked about depression and then gathered information on time of year, latitude and more when measuring depression.

LoBello noted the study found no evidence that symptoms of depression were season-related and said, “If this seasonal pattern of depression occurs at all, it may be fairly rare.”

Dr. Matthew Lorber, acting director of child and adolescent psychiatry at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, also said that seasonal affective disorder may not be a “legitimate diagnosis.”

Big drug companies, Lorber said, pushed to have SAD recognized as a standard diagnosis. “It then allowed them to market to a new population to use their medications. That was a motivating factor in creating this disorder,” said Lorber, who wasn’t involved in the new study.

LoBello thinks the seasons have no place in the diagnosis of depression, and he would like to see these criteria discontinued.

His reasoning? Assuming a cause that isn’t accurate may lead patients to pursue treatments that won’t deliver relief, LoBello said.

According to the new report, published Jan. 20 in Clinical Psychological Science, seasonal affective disorder was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) — the bible of psychological diagnosis — in 1987.

LoBello isn’t the first to explore the validity of this diagnosis.

Kelly Rohan, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Vermont, has done her own research on seasonal depression and found “no season differences in reports of depressive symptoms.”

“I certainly did not argue that this means SAD does not exist,” she said. “However, only a minority of depression cases are actually SAD.”

So, how come other research has found that a significant percentage of the public suffers from this condition? (The American Academy of Family Physicians says up to 6 percent of U.S. adults have winter depression, and as many as one in five have mild SAD symptoms).

It all depends on how the studies are done and how the questions are asked, Rohan said. “Also, SAD depressive symptoms tend to be less severe than in nonseasonal major depression and mood tends to be back to normal in the spring and summer,” she said. “So when you take all the depressed people in this sample — including the minority that claims to be SAD — and look at seasonal differences in their depression scores, I am not surprised that it is a wash.”

For the study, LoBello and colleagues used the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The 34,000-plus respondents had been asked about the number of days they felt depressed in the past two weeks. The researchers matched these responses with the location of each person and the day, month, latitude and amount of sun exposure when interviewed.

People who responded to the survey in the winter months, when sunlight exposure was low, had no greater levels of depressive symptoms than those who responded to the survey at other times, the researchers said.

In addition, the researchers found no evidence for seasonal differences in mood when they zeroed in on more than 1,700 participants with clinical depression.

More information

For more on seasonal affective disorder, visit the American Academy of Family Physicians.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ZVAyYH

This Mom-to-Be Is 7 Months Pregnant and Still Has a Six Pack

Eating Certain Fruits, Veggies May Help a Bit With Weight Control

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Eating fruits and vegetables that have high levels of substances called flavonoids may help a bit with weight control over time, a new study suggests.

“We looked at seven different classes of flavonoids, and we found increased consumption was associated with less weight gain,” said study author Monica Bertoia, a research associate at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.

Apples, pears, berries and peppers were on the list of flavonoid-rich produce that seemed to make a difference, the researchers found.

Bertoia and her colleagues followed more than 124,000 men and women enrolled in three large-scale U.S. studies, evaluating how much of seven types of flavonoids they ate over the 24-year follow-up period.

The study was published online Jan. 27 in the BMJ.

The participants were various ages when they enrolled in the studies. They reported their weight, lifestyle habits and any diagnosis of disease every two years from 1986 through 2011. They also reported on their diet every four years.

The investigators found the greatest link with weight maintenance for flavonoids known as flavonols, flavan-3-ols, anthocyanins and flavonoid polymers.

The effect on weight was modest, Bertoia said, but still important. For instance, for anthocyanins, “we found that about one-quarter cup of strawberries or cherries give you 10 milligrams [mg] of anthocyanins, and each 10 mg-increase was linked with a quarter-pound less weight gain over four years.”

On average, Bertoia pointed out, the men and women were still gaining weight over the years. Eating the flavonoid-rich produce, for most, simply meant they were gaining less. “But there were a handful that were losing weight,” she said.

Exactly why the produce seems to help with weight control is not clear, said Bertoia, who’s also an instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School. In some small studies, produce rich in flavonoids has been found to decrease total calorie intake, she added.

Other research has suggested that the flavan-3-ols decrease fat absorption from foods and increase energy expenditure, she said.

However, the study was observational only, so it can’t prove a cause-and-effect link between flavonoids and weight control, Bertoia said.

The effect found was also modest, she acknowledged, but still valuable. “Preventing even small amounts of weight gain — even 10 pounds — can lower your risk of developing some diseases, for example diabetes,” Bertoia explained.

Connie Diekman, director of university nutrition at Washington University in St. Louis, said, “While this study shows interesting outcomes, it does not show cause-and-effect. It does provide more validation of the health benefits for fruits and vegetables, which for me as a registered dietitian, is good news.”

One piece of information that is lacking, Diekman said, is what the group consumed with the produce or in place of it, noting that looking at the whole dietary pattern would give more information.

But even eating a single portion of some of the flavonoid-rich produce every day could have a good impact on health at a population level, the researchers said.

More information

To learn more about eating healthy fruits and vegetables, see the American Heart Association.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ScntLH

Did Studies Lack Key Data on Link Between Antidepressants, Youth Suicides?

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 27, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Antidepressants appear to be much more dangerous for children and teens than reported in medical journals, because initial published results from clinical trials did not accurately note instances of suicide and aggression, a new study suggests.

Young people actually have a doubled risk of aggression and suicide when taking one of the five most commonly prescribed antidepressants, according to the new analysis published in the Jan. 27 issue of BMJ.

Earlier published drug trial results masked those risks by not accurately reporting suicide attempts or suicidal thoughts, and by not emphasizing instances of increased aggression, said study author Tarang Sharma, a researcher with the Nordic Cochrane Centre at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.

The new analysis revealed these risks by skipping the published studies, and instead gathering information from detailed clinical study reports filed with government regulators as part of the drug approval process, Sharma explained.

Sharma said the differences between the published results and the data provided to regulators has shaken her faith in the summary findings of clinical trials that appear in medical journals.

“For me, the biggest lesson was never to trust a journal publication of a trial again,” she said, arguing that all drug trial data should be made public. “We all need to move towards developing guidance and doing systematic reviews using the original complete data, at the individual patient level.”

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America responded to the new analysis by pointing out a set of principles for responsible clinical drug trial data sharing that went into effect for its members in 2014.

“While we cannot comment on the specific clinical trials of various companies, our members are committed to sharing data,” the industry trade group said in a statement.

Anecdotal reports have been piling up of suicidal behavior and aggression in children taking two types of antidepressants — selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), the study authors said in background information.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a public warning in 2004 about the risk of suicide in children and teens treated with SSRIs.

That warning came after a government review found youngsters who took the drugs were twice as likely to try to harm themselves as those who took inactive “placebo” pills. The agency expanded its black box warning on the drugs in 2007 to include adults younger than age 25.

But more recent research has challenged the idea that antidepressants are dangerous for kids and young adults.

To try to assess the true extent of the dangers, Sharma and her colleagues requested clinical study reports for approved SSRIs and SNRIs from two European regulatory agencies.

The research team wound up focusing on 68 clinical study reports from 70 drug trials that involved more than 18,500 patients. The trials involved five specific antidepressants: duloxetine (Cymbalta), fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), sertraline (Zoloft) and venlafaxine (Effexor).

Researchers analyzed the data in those reports, and compared their findings to results published in medical journals.

Their analysis concluded that the risk of aggression and suicide doubled in kids taking one of these antidepressants, a result that had not been reported in earlier published reports. They found no similar association in adults.

Risks to children from antidepressants included deaths, suicidal thoughts and attempts, as well as aggression and akathisia, a form of restlessness that may increase suicide and violence.

Published reports from clinical trials appeared to misclassify deaths and suicidal events in people taking antidepressants, the researchers found.

For example, four deaths were misreported by a pharmaceutical company, in all cases downplaying the role of the antidepressant, the authors of the new analysis said.

Researchers also found more than half of the suicide attempts and instances of suicidal thoughts in the clinical trials were coded as “emotional lability” or “worsening of depression,” again downplaying the seriousness of side effects, the study authors said.

In summary trial reports from drug maker Eli Lilly and Co., almost all deaths were noted but suicidal attempts were missing in 90 percent of instances, and information on other outcomes was incomplete, according to the new analysis.

“I would not like to speculate whether the drug companies left out certain information from their results on purpose or why,” Sharma said. “That said, most of the errors favored the drug of interest, which is disturbing, and the obvious financial conflict of interest is overwhelming.”

In response to the findings, Eli Lilly issued a statement “to set the record straight.”

“There is nothing more important to Lilly than the safety of our medicines. The medical issues about these antidepressants have been addressed in our data submissions to the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] or regulators in other countries and in scientific journals and conferences for more than 20 years,” the statement said. “No regulatory authority has ever determined that Lilly withheld or improperly disclosed any data related to these medications.”

Joanna Moncrieff, a senior lecturer of psychiatry at University College London in England, said this is the first analysis that links antidepressants to increased aggression in children.

“Doctors should be more cautious about prescribing to everyone and to young people especially, and regulators should put a warning on drug labels about aggressive behavior as well as suicide,” said Moncrieff, who wrote an accompanying editorial in the journal.

Sharma suggested that parents whose children take antidepressants should talk with their doctor.

“No one should stop taking their antidepressants suddenly, that would be very dangerous,” she said. “In my view, patients and their families should work with their clinical professionals to plan a stopping strategy, which could be a very long process as many people have long-lasting withdrawal effects from the drugs. This should also be done in combination with starting other effective alternative therapies.”

Sharma and her colleagues also expressed concern that the risks to kids may be even greater than what they reported in their new analysis. Clinical study reports could not be obtained for all drug trials and all antidepressants, and individual listings of adverse outcomes for all patients were available for only 32 trials.

Moncrieff and Sharma agreed that the data from these drug trials need to be made publicly available, so independent researchers can assess the true risks of antidepressants.

However, Moncrieff said even that may not be enough to gain a complete understanding.

“Drug company information, even that supplied to regulators, is not reliable,” she said. “We need studies of risks and benefits of antidepressants and other drugs that are funded and conducted by organizations that do not have profits at stake.”

More information

For more on depression, visit the U.S. National Institutes of Health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1UrLiwm