barre

5 Non-Dairy Ice Creams That Taste As Great As the Real Thing

Photo: Ben and Jerry's

Photo: Ben and Jerry’s

Well, if you live in the world, you know that Ben & Jerry’s released four vegan ice cream flavors this week, and nearly broke the Internet. But there are plenty of other non-dairy frozen, creamy treats out there to love! Below, we’ve rounded up five of our favorite make-you-want-to-eat-the-whole-pint brands. (Just remember, they’re dairy free not sugar free, so, you know, go easy.)

So Delicious

Whether you prefer almond-, coconut- or cashew-based ice cream, you’ll find just the pint for you made by So Delicious. With flavors like Salted Caramel Cluster, Cherry Amaretto and Butter Pecan (alongside the classic vanilla, chocolate, mint chip, etc.), there’s plenty to dig your spoon into.

Try it: $52 for 8 pints, amazon.com

Photo: amazon.com

Photo: amazon.com

Luna & Larry’s Coconut Bliss

Three words: Chocolate Hazelnut Fudge. If we had to pick one flavor among Luna & Larry’s aptly named Coconut Bliss pints, this would be … oh wait, there’s also Mocha Maca Crunch. And Ginger Cookie Caramel. And Summer Berry Swirl. Never mind, we can’t pick just one. One caveat: These luscious, organic, and gluten-free concoctions do taste of coconut (some more strongly than others), so that’s something to consider if you don’t care for the flavor.

Try it: $7, wholefoodsmarket.com

Photo: wholefoodsmarket.com

Photo: wholefoodsmarket.com

RELATED: 14 Non-Dairy Foods That Are High in Calcium

Steve’s Ice Cream

We remember going to Steve’s Ice Cream shop when mix-ins in ice cream were the newest thing. These days, thankfully, you don’t have to wait on line at one store in New York City for Steve’s. Even better, the non-dairy flavors, which are organic and coconut-based, include the likes of Burnt Sugar Vanilla, Blackberry Honey, and Speculoos Cookie Butter.

Try it: $6, wholefoodsmarket.com

Photo: wholefoodsmarket.com

Photo: wholefoodsmarket.com

AlmondLicious Ice Supreme

It’s a given that this almond- and cashew-based ice cream is smooth and luscious, and comes in fantastic flavors (Chocolate Nibs, Coconut Supreme, Pecan Passion, Strawberry Bliss…). But what we love most is what it doesn’t have— namely, gums and stabilizers. We can pronounce all of the ingredients in these treats, which is a huge plus in our book.

Try it: $30 for 4 pints, amazon.com

Photo: amazon.com

Photo: amazon.com

RELATED: 14 Best Vegan and Vegetarian Protein Sources

Laloo’s Goat Milk Ice Cream

If you’re reading this and thinking, Wait a minute. Isn’t goat milk considered dairy? Yes, you’re right. But we wanted to include this ice cream because a) it’s delicious and b) some people who can’t tolerate cow’s milk do fine with goat’s milk. Goat’s milk more closely resembles mother’s milk than cow’s milk, so it’s easier to digest. (Of course, if you’re allergic to milk or have a very strong lactose intolerance, a truly nondairy milk is a better choice for you.) We love the yogurt-y tang of Laloo’s, which works beautifully in traditional flavors like Vanilla Snowflake, Deep Chocolate and Mystic Strawberry, as well as more exotic ones. That’s you, Black Mission Fig and “Capraccino” Almond Fudge.

Try it: $8, icecreamsource.com

Photo: icecreamsource.com

Photo: icecreamsource.com




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PZBTym

3 Reasons You Feel Awkward When Someone Compliments You

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

At the Producers Guild Awards last month, Shonda Rhimes began her acceptance speech for the Norman Lear Award for Achievement in Television by deadpanning, “I’m going to be totally honest with you, I completely deserve this.”

She was kidding, and she wasn’t. That night the mega-talent behind some of prime-time’s buzziest shows went on to deliver a powerful message about diversity on TV. (“It’s not trailblazing to write the world as it actually is,” she told the room full of industry influencers.) But she managed to do it while simultaneously owning her success in a way that we rarely get to see.

From her memoir, Year of Yes: How to Dance It Out, Stand in the Sun and Be Your Own Person ($25; amazon.com), we know that Rhimes wasn’t born with such “badassery,” as she would call it. She has worked hard to learn to appreciate praise without negating it, or laughing it off, as if it were a big, fat joke. That struggle, Rhimes points out, is one that a lot of women share. When faced with a compliment, many of us duck our heads, embarrassed, when all that’s really necessary is a “thank you” and a smile.

via GIPHY

Here, Health’s contributing psychology editor, Gail Saltz, MD, explains some of the possible reasons for this ingrained habit—and why it’s so important to start accepting praise with grace.

You’re highly attuned to others

Women are the more empathetic sex, says Dr. Saltz. We are more likely to put ourselves in another person’s shoes (be it a sister, friend, classmate or coworker) to imagine that person’s internal reaction to our own success—and whatever insecurity or jealousy or frustration it may bring up for them. It might be hard for you to bask in our own glory because you’re afraid of throwing others into your shadow, explains Dr. Saltz. But the bottom line? It’s never a good idea to make yourself smaller to make somebody else feel better.

RELATED: 5 Habits to Steal from Powerful People

You don’t want to come off as conceited

So you downplay your achievements, and wave off the praise. You don’t want others to think that you think that you’re better than them. As a result, you’re quick to second guess your confidence, says Dr. Saltz. You wonder, Am I acting confident or am I acting arrogant? But “knowing the difference for yourself, as a woman, is really important,” she says. Because there is a big difference between the healthy recognition, I accomplished this fantastic thing; and the egotistical fantasy, Everything I do is amazing because I’m me.

You’re afraid you don’t deserve it

You might be suffering from the “extremely common” fear of being a fraud, says Dr. Saltz, which means that “every time you achieve [something], you are overcome by this feeling of, ‘That was a fluke.’” The underlying anxiety is that you don’t belong where you are, among your peers; and when you fall into that kind of negative thought trap, you brush off every victory as a lucky break before you allow yourself a moment enjoy it.

RELATED: 12 Worst Habits for Your Mental Health

The lesson

“Accomplishments feed self-esteem,” says Dr. Saltz. That’s why acknowledging your achievements—and accepting the praise that comes your way—can be so powerful. “What’s important is not necessarily what [others think of you], but what you know yourself,” she explains. So the next time someone tries to compliment you, go on and let them. Take the praise, and appreciate it for what it is: a reminder of that great thing you did that you really deserve to celebrate.

 

 

 




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/20LVfIT

Do More ‘Selfies’ Mean More Relationship Woes?

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Posting too many “selfies” on social media might lead to serious problems with your romantic partner, according to a new study.

Researchers conducted an online survey of 420 users of the social media site Instagram. The users were aged 18 to 62. The investigators found that those who believed they were good-looking were more likely to post selfies, which are photographic self-portraits.

But the more selfies someone posted, the more likely the behavior was tied to jealousy and arguments in their romantic relationship, along with emotional or physical infidelity, breakups and divorces, the findings showed.

“Although we cannot directly assume cause-and-effect due to the [study’s design], the results here show that body-image satisfaction can be detrimental to Instagram users’ romantic relationships, especially when users’ body-image satisfaction is promoted in the form of Instagram selfie posts,” study co-author Russell Clayton, an assistant professor at Florida State University in Tallahassee, said in a school news release.

The study was published recently in the journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.

According study author Jessica Ridgway, “the results from this study provide an avenue for future body-image research.” Ridgway is a visiting professor of retail merchandising and product development at Florida State.

“For instance,” she said in the news release, “future research could examine whether social media users post images of their actual selves or their virtual ideal selves, and whether such online behaviors are associated with similar negative outcomes found in our study.”

More information

The American Psychological Association offers tips for healthy romantic relationships.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PbuGHH

Many Donor Livers for Sickest Patients Rejected, Study Finds

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — It’s common for transplant centers to reject donor livers for the sickest patients on the transplant waiting list, a new study suggests.

That means those patients have a higher risk of death while they wait for a lifesaving transplant, the researchers found.

The new study reviewed 23,000 donor liver offers to 13,255 U.S. patients on the liver transplant waiting list between May 2007 and June 2013. It found that only 37 percent of the organ offers were accepted for the sickest patients on the list.

“We found that not only is there a wide variation in acceptance rates for donor organs among transplant centers, these variations directly correlated with whether the sickest patients would die waiting for a lifesaving transplant, with patients 27 percent more likely to die without a transplant for every 5 percent decrease in a center’s adjusted organ offer acceptance rate,” said study leader Dr. David Goldberg. He is an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

The decision to accept or reject an organ is most often made by a transplant surgeon at a center. A number of factors go into the decision, including the donor’s age, how well the donor liver matches the recipient for size, and the opinion of whether or not a patient lower on the priority list has a greater risk of dying and would be a better match for the organ, the researchers explained.

The size of a transplant center didn’t predict whether a liver would be accepted. But, the researchers said they were surprised to find that centers in regions with more transplant centers were more likely to reject livers offered for the sickest patients.

Among transplant centers nationwide, acceptance rates of livers for the sickest patients ranged from 16 percent to 58 percent. The differences remained even when the researchers looked at the best-quality livers, according to the study published recently in the Journal of Hepatology.

“What this shows us is that these differences weren’t based on geography, as centers in the same area — in some cases, within a few miles of each other — varied dramatically in the probability that they would accept an organ for the sickest patient, which determined in many cases whether the patient would live or die,” Goldberg said in a university news release.

“The variability in life-or-death decisions among different transplant centers highlights that decisions of individual transplant centers, rather than geographic borders, are just as much of a source of inequities in transplant care,” he added.

Reducing the differences between transplant centers may help provide more equal access to liver transplants and reduce deaths among patients on transplant waiting lists, the researchers said.

They suggested one possible way to achieve that is to make data on centers’ organ acceptance rates public, and to include those rates when assessing center performance.

More information

The American Liver Foundation has more about liver transplants.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PbuGrh

Texting After Dark May Harm Teens’ Sleep, Grades

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Instant messaging can be a source of emotional support for teens and help them collaborate on school projects, but new research shows that texting after the lights go out takes a toll on students’ sleep quality and academic performance.

“We need to be aware that teenagers are using electronic devices excessively and have a unique physiology,” study author Xue Ming, a professor of neuroscience and neurology at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, said in a university news release. “They tend to go to sleep late and get up late. When we go against that natural rhythm, students become less efficient.”

During the study, researchers examined the link between instant messaging (such as texting) and academic and sleeping troubles among young people.

“During the last few years I have noticed an increased use of smartphones by my patients with sleep problems,” Ming said. “I wanted to isolate how messaging alone — especially after the lights are out — contributes to sleep-related problems and academic performance.”

The researchers surveyed students at three New Jersey high schools. The investigators examined more than 1,500 survey responses. Researchers compared the students’ grades and gender, as well as how long and when they engaged in instant messaging. Specifically, they considered if the teens were using instant messaging before or after they turned out their lights.

The study, published online recently in the Journal of Child Neurology, found the students who turned off their devices or messaged for less than 30 minutes after lights out had significantly better grades than those who messaged for more than 30 minutes in the dark.

Texting before lights out didn’t affect students’ academic performance, the researchers said. But those who continued to text in the dark slept fewer hours and were more tired during the day than those who stopped sending instant messages when they went to bed, the findings showed.

Overall, the young women in the study sent more messages and experienced more daytime sleepiness, but they performed better in school than the young men involved in the study.

“I attribute this to the fact that the girls texted primarily before turning off the light,” Ming said.

Short wavelength “blue light” can delay melatonin release, making it more difficult to fall asleep, the researchers explained. These effects are intensified when people look at smartphones and tablets in a dark room, the researchers added.

“When we turn the lights off, it should be to make a gradual transition from wakefulness to sleep,” Ming said. “If a person keeps getting text messages with alerts and light emission, that also can disrupt his circadian rhythm.” Circadian rhythm is regulated by the body’s internal clock.

“Rapid eye movement [REM] sleep is the period during sleep most important to learning, memory consolidation and social adjustment in adolescents. When falling asleep is delayed but rising time is not, REM sleep will be cut short, which can affect learning and memory,” the researcher said in the news release.

The study authors suggested that teachers incorporate sleep education into their curriculum so students realize its importance.

“Sleep is not a luxury; it’s a biological necessity,” said Ming. “Adolescents are not receiving the optimal amount of sleep; they should be getting 8-and-a-half hours a night. Sleep deprivation is a strong argument in favor of later start-times for high schools — like 9 a.m.”

More information

The National Sleep Foundation explains how technology affects sleep.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PbuE2G

Allergies, Asthma Tied to Lower Risk of Brain Cancer

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — People with respiratory allergies, asthma and the skin condition eczema may be less likely to develop glioma brain cancer, a new study suggests.

The international team of researchers looked at more than 4,500 glioma patients and almost 4,200 people without brain cancer. The investigators found that a history of respiratory allergies, asthma and eczema was associated with a reduced risk for glioma.

People with respiratory allergies or eczema were 30 percent less likely to develop the deadly brain cancer than those without such conditions, the study found.

Although the study found an association between allergic conditions and a lower risk of gliomas, it wasn’t designed to prove a cause-and-effect relationship between those factors.

The study was released online Feb. 5 in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

“Many other studies have shown this relationship,” study author Melissa Bondy, associate director for cancer prevention and population science at Baylor College of Medicine’s Cancer Center, said in a college news release.

“We sought to verify this relationship in the largest study to date so that we could provide a scientific consensus statement on the topic. We feel it’s now time for the next steps to be taken in this research area,” she added.

And, that next step is figuring out the mechanism behind the association, Bondy said.

Glioma is the term used to describe tumors arising from the gluey or supportive tissue of the brain, according to the American Brain Tumor Association. Just over one-quarter of all brain tumors and 80 percent of all malignant brain tumors are gliomas.

More information

The American Brain Tumor Association has more about glioma.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PbuE2w

CDC Adds New Zika Warning for Pregnant Women and Their Sex Partners

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Pregnant women with a male sexual partner who has traveled to, or lives in, an area affected by active Zika virus transmission should refrain from sex or use condoms during sex until the pregnancy is over, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advised on Thursday.

The CDC said the precaution is in place “until we know more” about the dangers of sexual transmission of the mosquito-borne virus, which is linked to thousands of cases of microcephaly in newborns in Brazil.

“The potential hazard to the fetus is so substantial and so tragic that this looks like a very prudent recommendation until we learn more,” Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist from Vanderbilt University Medical School, told The New York Times.

In the same advisory, the CDC added two new countries, Jamaica and Tonga, to its travel alert list of nations that pregnant women should avoid due to ongoing Zika virus transmission.

While the Zika epidemic first surfaced in Brazil last spring, Zika virus has since spread to 30 countries and territories in South and Central America and the Caribbean. Though a cause-and-effect link has not been proven, many public health experts fear the virus can cause microcephaly, a condition that causes babies to be born with permanent brain damage and very small heads.

On Tuesday, local health officials in Texas confirmed a case of Zika virus infection that was transmitted by sex, and not by the bite of a mosquito.

The Dallas County Health and Human Services Department said that an unidentified patient had become infected with the Zika virus after having sex with an individual who had returned from Venezuela, one of the Latin American countries where Zika is circulating.

Scientists have suspected that Zika could be transmitted sexually, and there have been scattered reports of similar occurrences in recent years.

If research proves that the virus can be spread through sex, it could complicate efforts to contain infections from the virus, which health officials have said is “spreading explosively” across South and Central America.

Ashley Thomas Martino is an assistant professor of pharmaceutical sciences at St. John’s University, in New York City, who teaches infectious disease.

“We are dealing with an emerging strain of this virus. Zika is not new — it has been around since the 1950s — but this strain is showing that it can be transmitted from the mother to the developing fetus,” he said. “So, the occurrence of sexual transmission may be new, but it’s not that surprising given that we’re dealing with a new strain of this virus.”

Martino added that “most cases will be transmitted via mosquito, and this form of sexual transmission is likely to be a rare occurrence of infection.”

The blood supply is also being monitored closely. The American Red Cross on Wednesday asked potential blood donors who have traveled to areas where Zika infection is active to wait 28 days before giving blood.

The chances of Zika-infected blood donations remain extremely low in the United States, Dr. Susan Stramer, vice president of scientific affairs at the American Red Cross, said in a statement

“The Red Cross continues to use safety measures to protect the blood supply from Zika and other mosquito-borne viruses,” she said.

On Tuesday, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Zika virus a global health threat, based on the suspicion that the virus may be to blame for thousands of birth defects in Brazil in the past year.

Dr. Margaret Chan, director general of the WHO, said Monday that the explosive growth of microcephaly cases in Brazil constitutes an “extraordinary event and a public health threat to other parts of the world.”

Chan made her remarks during an emergency meeting at the U.N. health agency’s headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, to assess what is known about the Zika virus and its potential relation to the surge of birth defects in Brazil.

The WHO estimates there could be up to 4 million cases of Zika in the Americas in the next year. However, no recommendations were made Monday to restrict travel or trade, the Associated Press reported.

U.S. health officials have said it’s unlikely that the Zika virus will cause a widespread threat here, but some infections are likely to occur.

The Zika virus was first identified in Uganda in 1947, and until last year was not thought to pose serious health risks. In fact, approximately 80 percent of people who become infected never experience symptoms.

But the increase of cases and birth defects in Brazil in the past year — suspected to exceed more than 4,100 — has prompted health officials to warn pregnant women or those thinking of becoming pregnant to take precautions or consider delaying pregnancy.

“It is important to understand, there are several measures pregnant women can take,” Chan said, the AP reported. “If you can delay travel and it does not affect your other family commitments, it is something they can consider.

“If they need to travel, they can get advice from their physician and take personal protective measures, like wearing long sleeves and shirts and pants and use mosquito repellent,” she said.

There have been no outbreaks of Zika virus in the United States so far. But, limited U.S. outbreaks are “possible” and “even likely” given that the same sort of aggressive, day-biting mosquito that spreads Zika is present in the southern United States, said Dr. Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the CDC.

However, Schuchat emphasized that the main health concern at this time is for pregnant women who are exposed to the virus.

Although health officials view some U.S. cases of Zika infection as likely, particularly in southern states, the United States enjoys certain advantages that should keep such an outbreak limited to a small area, Schuchat said.

Urban areas in the United States are less congested than they are in other countries of the Americas, making it more difficult for mosquitoes to spread disease hopping from one person to the next, she said.

Also, people in the United States are more likely to have their windows shut, thanks to air conditioning, or to have screens on open windows, which keep mosquitoes from invading their homes, she added.

More information

For more on Zika virus, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

To see the CDC list of sites where Zika virus is active and may pose a threat to pregnant women, click here.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1nRQTlv

Super Bowl Foods Can Be a Win, Win: Healthy and Delicious

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Super Bowl Sunday is as much about eating as it is about whether the Panthers or the Broncos score the first touchdown.

Commonly served Super Bowl snacks, however, are often loaded with calories, fat and salt, cautioned Dana Angelo White, a clinical assistant professor of athletic training and sports medicine at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Conn.

But there are some easy ways to make game-day foods delicious and healthy, noted White. She offered the following tips:

  • Drink water. If you’re drinking alcohol, stay hydrated. Drink one glass of water for every alcoholic beverage you consume. Opting for other sugar-free drinks, like seltzer, can also slash calories.
  • Pace yourself. Eat normally before kick-off so you aren’t overdoing it even before higher-calorie foods are served.
  • Keep things simple. When choosing a Super Bowl party menu, stick with a few key dishes. This way you won’t be tempted to sample many different foods.
  • Fill up. High-calorie appetizers may not be satisfying, causing you to eat more. Instead, prepare satisfying main dishes, such as a batch of healthy chili.
  • Lighten up. Replace ingredients that are high in calories and fat with healthier alternatives. For example, swap out high-fat cheese or mayonnaise with low-fat cheese or plain Greek yogurt.
  • Limit portions. Exercise restraint at the buffet table. You can enjoy a variety of foods but don’t overdo the size of your portions.
  • Cut the chips. Replace salty chips with a variety of fresh veggies.
  • Be prepared. If you are a guest, bring along a healthy dish.
  • Try healthier crowd pleasers. Rather than ordering greasy pizza, make a healthier homemade version with flatbread, chicken, sausage or peppers.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides more on game-day food safety.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PXeO9g

NFL Linemen Keep Growing, Putting Their Health at Risk, Experts Say

By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — As the Denver Broncos and Carolina Panthers gear up for Sunday’s Super Bowl 50 showdown, many may be focused on the potential dangers of concussion, but that’s not the only health risk football players face.

Concern about the size of players — especially linemen — has been growing along with the players’ waistlines. And some researchers are now suggesting that these athletes should be monitored for health problems.

Physicians who work with overweight National Football League and college-level football players “should be aware of the potential for elevated blood pressure, diabetes and abnormal cholesterol levels,” said Jeffrey Potteiger, co-author of a commentary reviewing the possible risks facing these young men. And the risk is especially high in athletes who pack plenty of fat around the abdomen, he added.

Potteiger, a physical education specialist and dean of the graduate school at Grand Valley State University in Allendale, Mich., said these players may face even greater risks once their playing days are finished.

For years, researchers have tracked the ever-widening bodies of football players. The average weight of offensive and defensive linemen in American college football ballooned from around 190 pounds in the 1950s to 290 pounds in 2010, previous research has shown.

At the end of the 2014 college football season, an analysis of most teams found that the average offensive lineman weighed more than 300 pounds; the average weight on the University of Mississippi’s offensive line was a stunning 334 pounds. On the pro level, the Buffalo Bills offensive line was about as heavy at an average of 332 pounds in 2014, background information in the study said.

“In general, bigger athletes have more success in sports where size is a determining factor for success. This is especially true in American football,” Potteiger said.

“Bigger athletes are usually more powerful, harder to move, more difficult to tackle and better blockers. And if the defensive linemen are bigger, they are harder to block or move. So there is a need for bigger offensive linemen to move the defensive linemen out of the way,” he said.

Higher levels of weight and more fat in the abdomen, in particular, boost the risk of type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, Potteiger said. They also raise the risk of metabolic syndrome, which refers to a group of related problems — such as high blood pressure, high blood sugar and high cholesterol — that increase the risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and stroke, the researchers said.

While heightened fitness may protect the athletes from health problems when they’re young and active, they could fall victim to disease after their athletic careers are over, Potteiger suggested.

Dr. James Borchers agreed. He’s a team physician and director of sports medicine at Ohio State University in Columbus. “The biggest issue for the football athlete comes after they’re finished,” he said.

Some professional football players may finish their careers by the age of 26, “when you’ve got a lot of life to lead,” Borchers said.

When they’re on the field, he said, fitness may indeed protect heavy football players, even if their movements on the field during plays only last seconds.

“In many places today, especially professional athletics and collegiate athletics, there’s so much emphasis placed on fitness and nutrition. Players are better off even if they’re carrying extra weight than they were 20 to 25 years ago,” Borchers said.

Still, Borchers said he doesn’t see any end to continuing weight gain in football linemen. “It’s amazing,” he said, pointing to news about a Baylor University player who’s 6 feet, 8 inches tall, and reportedly weighs 403 pounds. And 7-foot high school player from California has topped him at 440 pounds, according to news reports.

As for the idea of instituting rules about how heavy players can be, Borchers said it would be difficult to set limits based on something such as body mass index, a common measurement that doesn’t separate fat from muscle.

Borchers believes physicians must pay more attention to the issue of body weight in football players. And he acknowledged that “it’s not one of the classic things we think about in sports medicine, like concussion, and muscle and skeletal injuries.”

The study was published recently in the Strength and Conditioning Journal.

More information

For the NFL’s perspective about player health, check its health and safety page.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PXeO95

Waning Whooping Cough Immunity Blamed in Outbreaks

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The booster shot given to pre-teens to ward off whooping cough only works for a short time — a fact that has played a big role in recent outbreaks in California, a new study finds.

The study, of children in one large California health plan, found that the whooping cough booster shot offered “moderate” protection for about a year. But that immunity waned so quickly that little protection remained after two or three years.

Experts said the findings, reported online Feb. 5 and in the March print issue of Pediatrics, underscore the limits of today’s whooping cough vaccines.

It’s been clear for years that cases of whooping cough, or pertussis, are rising in the United States. In 2012, more than 48,000 cases were reported nationwide — the highest number since 1955, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

What’s more, the agency says, older children and teenagers are accounting for a growing proportion of cases.

A major reason, experts believe, is that in the 1990s, U.S. health officials switched from the traditional whooping cough vaccine to a new one known as DTaP — which also protects against diphtheria and tetanus. DTaP works well in the short term, the CDC says, but slowly wanes each year after a child’s final dose, which is given around age 5.

So a booster shot, called Tdap, is routinely given to kids at age 11 or 12. But that shot doesn’t last long either.

“The issue is, the old vaccine against whooping cough had a difficult safety profile,” explained Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and a professor of infectious diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

It could cause high fevers and seizures in young children, he said — which understandably worried parents. There were also concerns about possible, albeit rare, neurological effects, Offit added.

That led to the development of DTaP, which has far fewer antigens than the old vaccine, Offit said. Antigens are proteins that trigger an immune system response; with fewer antigens, DTaP is much less likely to cause side effects. But it also offers shorter-lived immunity.

“Basically, we traded effectiveness for safety,” Offit said.

For the new study, researchers with Kaiser Permanente Northern California used information on all kids in their health system, aged 10 and up, who’d received DTaP vaccination. Nearly all — over 96 percent — also had the Tdap by their 14th birthday.

Just over 1,200 children and teens were diagnosed with whooping cough between 2006 and 2015. Most fell ill during two statewide epidemics, in 2010 and 2014, the research found.

Based on those cases, the researchers estimated that the Tdap vaccine was about 69 percent effective in the first year after it was given. After that, immunity faded fast — so that by year three, little protection remained, the study authors said.

The fact that Tdap immunity wanes is nothing new, said lead researcher Dr. Nicola Klein, co-director of Kaiser’s Vaccine Study Center, in Oakland, Calif.

“But,” she said, “I was surprised to see how much disease occurred, even in this vaccinated group.”

The bottom line, according to Klein, is that the current vaccines are not enough to prevent epidemics.

“I think waning immunity — primarily from the DTaP but also Tdap — are the main drivers of these outbreaks,” Klein said.

Offit agreed. “These vaccines are not as good as they should be,” he said.

There’s probably no chance that health officials would go back to the old whooping cough shot, according to Offit. But, he said, manufacturers could make a better one.

For now, he and Klein both said that the current vaccines provide fairly good shorter-term protection.

And they stressed that it’s essential for pregnant women to get a Tdap booster during each pregnancy. That way, babies are born with some of their mom’s immune system antibodies against whooping cough.

That’s critical, Offit explained, because young infants are most at risk of becoming severely ill with whooping cough.

Whooping cough typically causes cold-like symptoms, followed by bouts of coughing that can go on for weeks. For infants, that can lead to dangerous breathing problems, lung infection or convulsions. Of babies younger than 1 year who get whooping cough, half end up in the hospital, according to the CDC.

Short of more effective vaccines, Klein said health officials may want to think about how the Tdap is given. Instead of routinely giving it to preteens, for example, it might be more effective to give it in “anticipation” of an outbreak, she said.

“I think we need to open the discussion on how to best utilize the vaccine,” Klein said.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on whooping cough.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/23NoY6F