barre

Super Bowl Safety: Protect Kids From Toppling TVs

SATURDAY, Feb. 6, 2016 (HealthDay News) — As families gather to watch the Super Bowl on Sunday, they should protect children from television tip-overs, experts say.

More than 17,000 children are treated in U.S. emergency departments each year for injuries from a toppling TV, according to a study published in the journal Pediatrics. That works out to about one child every 30 minutes, with kids younger than 5 years at greatest risk, the researchers said.

In most cases, the television fell from a dresser or armoire, and about 30 percent fell from an entertainment center or TV stand, the study found.

With TVs the star attraction in many homes on game day, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center shared the following safety tips:

  • Place TVs on low, stable pieces of furniture and install safety anchors and anti-tip devices on all TVs not mounted to the wall.
  • Never place remote controls or toys on top of TVs because children might try to climb and reach them. It’s also important to keep TV cords out of reach so children can’t pull on them.
  • Recycle any old TVs no longer in use.

More information

Safe Kids Worldwide has more about TV and furniture tip-overs.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RcSYDW

Super Bowl Safety: Protect Kids From Toppling TVs

SATURDAY, Feb. 6, 2016 (HealthDay News) — As families gather to watch the Super Bowl on Sunday, they should protect children from television tip-overs, experts say.

More than 17,000 children are treated in U.S. emergency departments each year for injuries from a toppling TV, according to a study published in the journal Pediatrics. That works out to about one child every 30 minutes, with kids younger than 5 years at greatest risk, the researchers said.

In most cases, the television fell from a dresser or armoire, and about 30 percent fell from an entertainment center or TV stand, the study found.

With TVs the star attraction in many homes on game day, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center shared the following safety tips:

  • Place TVs on low, stable pieces of furniture and install safety anchors and anti-tip devices on all TVs not mounted to the wall.
  • Never place remote controls or toys on top of TVs because children might try to climb and reach them. It’s also important to keep TV cords out of reach so children can’t pull on them.
  • Recycle any old TVs no longer in use.

More information

Safe Kids Worldwide has more about TV and furniture tip-overs.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PrfXGx

7 Facts About Having a Baby With a Gestational Surrogate

Surviving Spouse Still Influenced By the Other

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The influence of a husband or wife on their spouse’s quality of life remains strong even after death, a new study says.

Couples who have been married a long time develop a high level of interdependence, and one partner’s quality of life at death continues to influence the survivor, the University of Arizona researchers said.

“If your partner has higher quality of life before they pass away, you’re more likely to have higher quality of life even after they’re gone. If he or she has lower quality of life before they pass away, you’re then more likely to have lower quality of life,” lead author Kyle Bourassa, a psychology doctoral student, said in a university news release.

The researchers examined data from thousands of older couples in 18 European countries and Israel taking part in an ongoing study of health, aging and retirement. Specifically, the researchers compared 546 couples in which one partner had died and 2,566 couples in which both partners were still alive.

There was no difference between the two groups in the strength of the quality-of-life interdependence, according to the study published recently in the journal Psychological Science.

“Even though your marriage ends in a literal sense when you lose your spouse, the effects of who the person was still seems to matter even after they’re gone. I think that really says something about how important those relationships are,” Bourassa said.

This ongoing connection after death is likely due to the thoughts and emotions a person has when thinking or talking about a deceased spouse, according to the researchers.

The findings could prove valuable for end-of-life care and for helping people who have lost their spouses.

“Relationships are something we develop over time and they are retained in our mind and memory and understanding of the world, and that continues even after physical separation,” said study co-author Mary-Frances O’Connor, an assistant professor of psychology who specializes in grief and the grieving process.

“If you can boost someone’s quality of life before they pass, that might affect not just their life, but the quality of life of their partner and their family,” Bourassa said.

More information

The U.S. National Institute on Aging discusses mourning the death of a spouse.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Pc9rWq

Record Heat, Drought May Explain Zika Outbreak in Brazil: Research

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — There may be a link between the recent hot and dry winter and spring in Brazil and the outbreak of the Zika virus, preliminary research suggests.

“The extreme temperature and drought are due to a combination of the El Nino phenomenon and the climate changes of recent years,” researcher Shlomit Paz, from the department of geography and environmental studies at the University of Haifa in Israel, said in a university news release.

This week, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the mosquito-borne Zika virus a global health threat because it may have caused thousands of cases of a severe birth defect in Brazil in the past year. The birth defect, known as microcephaly, causes babies to be born with permanent brain damage and very small heads.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that pregnant women consider not traveling to about 30 countries and territories where Zika infection is active.

In addition, pregnant women with a male sexual partner who has traveled to, or lives in, an area affected by active Zika virus transmission should refrain from sex or use condoms during sex until the pregnancy is over, the CDC advised on Thursday.

Some scientists have said the outbreak is associated with El Nino-related heavy rains in parts of Latin and Central America. But Paz and Jan Semenza, of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control in Stockholm, have a slightly different take on the problem.

Instead, the study authors reported that the outbreak is due to the record-high temperatures and severe drought that occurred in northeast Brazil in the latter half of 2015, which is winter and spring in the southern hemisphere.

The hot temperatures and lack of rainfall were actually due to a combination of El Nino and climate change, the researchers explained.

High temperatures can boost the growth rates of the Aedes mosquitoes, which carry the Zika virus. Mosquitoes also require water, something that could be a problem for them in a drought. However, people in northeast Brazil store water in containers during droughts, and these containers provide a perfect habitat for the mosquitoes, Paz said.

The study was published online Feb. 1 as a research letter in The Lancet.

The researchers are continuing their investigation into how climate conditions may have contributed to the outbreak.

“In light of the health risk, and the fact that the Aedes mosquitoes also carry other viruses, such as dengue fever and chikungunya, it is important to address the impacts of climate which we have found when analyzing the causes of the current outbreak,” Paz said in the news release.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about the Zika virus.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1T3u0YM

Science Says Resting Bitch Face Is Real

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

If, like me, you’ve ever been told to “smile” a countless number of times by complete strangers while you’re innocently trying to grocery shop, catch a train (or, alternately, valet your car), work out at the gym, or complete any other innocuous activity, you’ve probably considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, you have Resting Bitch Face (RBF).

The term has been thrown around a lot over the past few years, often jokingly, but, in truth, there are a hella lot of people out there whose seemingly neutral faces are perceived as angry, upset or just plain disgusted.

Finally science is catching up with RBF. Last October researchers Abbe Macbeth and Jason Rogers, employees of Noldus Information Technology, a software-developing company that focuses specifically on observational and behavioral research, analyzed the faces of a slew of celebs who boast what one might consider RBF (we’re looking at you K-Stew). They ran the mugs of the stars through Noldus’ FaceReader software and the results are not only interesting, but a relief for anyone with RBF.

When faces are analyzed, typically the software will read the face as 97 percent neutral with three percent underlying expression (the culprit for showing shade of emotions like sadness or happiness).

RELATED: Barbie Ferreira Just Got Candid About That “Other” Barbie

“We see that people who have this RBF expression [have] double the amount of emotionality expressed,” Macbeth told CNN. Those afflicted with RBF may show a jump of trace emotions as high as 6 percent and most of the emotion expressed is of contempt: the feeling that something is worthless or deserving scorn.”

Armed with these findings, Rogers and Macbeth next want to explore why some people have RBF while others don’t, and why people consider the trait to be such a bad thing.

RELATED: Here’s What Happened When a Reporter Asked Why Serena Williams Wasn’t Smiling

Personally, I’m looking at it this way—shouldn’t we all relax our facial muscles when we’re not engaged in any sort of banter? If my “neutral” face happens to settle into what others perceive to be sad or annoyed, so be it. But I’m glad scientific research is interested in backing me up.

This article originally appeared on MIMIchatter.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1T3q1vo

Why Organic Food Might Be Worth the High Price

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

TIME-logo.jpg

The most infamous fact about organic food is that it’s expensive—about 47% more expensive, according to a recent analysis from Consumer Reports. But a new review study published in Nature Plants analyzed everything research currently knows about organic farming versus the conventional kind and found that organic offers a lot of good that outweighs its sticker shock.

When organic farming first began, it was derided as an idealistic and inefficient way of feeding people. Not surprisingly, there was little research about it. “There were just a couple handfuls of studies back in the ‘80s,” says John Reganold, professor of soil science and agroecology at Washington State University and co-author of the new study. Reganold has been studying organic agriculture for more than 30 years. “At the turn of the century, it just skyrocketed, and now there are probably at least 1,000 studies,” he says.

Reganold analyzed 40 years of available data and focused on how organic farming impacts several types of sustainability: productivity, impact on the environment, economic viability and social wellbeing.

“If I had to put it in one sentence, organic agriculture has been able to provide jobs, be profitable, benefit the soil and environment and support social interactions between farmers and consumers,” Reganold says. “In some ways, there are practices in organic agriculture that really are ideal blueprints for us to look at feeding the world in the future.”

Organic may even be our best bet to help feed the world in an increasingly volatile climate, he says.

At first, this might sound unlikely, given that the crop yields of organic agriculture are typically 10-20% lower than conventional. That’s because conventional growers can use synthetic fertilizers, most of which aren’t allowed in organic food production. “When farmers add fertilizers, those nutrients are immediately available to the plant, and the plants can grow faster,” Reganold explains. Organic crops, on the other hand, are fertilized by organic matter like compost or animal manure, which takes more time to decompose and release its nutrients. (This slow, steady approach is called building the soil.)

RELATED: 17 Cheap Organic Foods You Should Be Buying

But Reganold found one scenario where the research shows that organic yields are consistently greater than conventional: during periods of drought. Organic soil is built up with organic material, which can hold onto water, he says. That means that by the time a farmer plants and grows a crop, the plant has access to more water, so yields increase. For every inch of rainwater soaked up by soil, a plant can produce another 7-8 bushels of wheat, Reganold says.

Organic farming typically uses less energy, too. “When you look at ecosystem services, organic agriculture really shines,” he says. “The value they bring in areas like biodiversity, pollination, soil quality—if you were to put an economic value on those, and some researchers have, then it more than makes up for the higher price or price premium of organic food.”

A 2015 meta-analysis about the economics of organic farming, published in the journal PNAS, even determined that organic farming is more profitable than conventional, earning farmers 22% to 35% more money. They determined that the organic price premium (which was around 30% in the study) only had to be about 5% for organic profits to break even with conventional.

There’s a lot left to learn about organic food, including whether or not it’s healthier than conventional in a meaningful way. The latest study points out that of the 15 or so scientific reviews focusing on nutrition, 12 studies have found evidence that organic is more nutritious than conventional by having more vitamin C, antioxidants and omega-3 fatty acids. Other studies indicate that children who eat organic foods have lower levels of pesticide metabolites in their bodies than those who eat conventional.

The popularity of organic food is growing fast. Back in 1997, less than 1% of the food and beverage market was organic, and now it’s 5%, Reganold says. But organic faces several setbacks. “We have policies that support the more conventional model,” Reganold says, along with a relative dearth in research about organic agriculture.

“The challenge facing policymakers is to create an enabling environment for scaling-up organic and other innovative farming systems to move towards truly sustainable production systems,” the study concludes. “This is no small task, but the con- sequences for food and ecosystem security could not be bigger.”

This article originally appeared on Time.com.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1K3gIZH

Wildfires May Boost Ozone Levels in Cities: Study

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Wildfire smoke may boost levels of dangerous ozone air pollution, researchers report.

Colorado State University scientists analyzed data collected over nearly 10 years at hundreds of air monitoring sites across the United States.

They found that ozone levels were higher on days when there was wildfire smoke in the air than on days without the smoke.

This association was particularly evident in certain areas, including the Northeast corridor, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Birmingham and Kansas City, according to the study published recently in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

This is “not what you’d expect,” because most wildfires don’t occur near cities, study co-author Emily Fischer, an assistant professor of atmospheric science, noted in a university news release. However, the study data showed that as wildfire smoke plumes travel, higher levels of ozone are more likely to occur in cities than in rural areas.

That suggests that wildfire smoke interacts with pollutants in city air to create ozone, the researchers explained.

Ozone air pollution can harm the lungs, and poses the greatest threat to the young, elderly and people with asthma. It also damages crops and ecosystems, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of wildfires, the researchers added.

More information

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more about ozone air pollution.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PY0Cg2

CDC: Black Americans With HIV Still Less Likely to Get Ongoing Medical Care

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — While HIV diagnoses dropped significantly over the past decade in the United States, blacks with HIV are less likely than whites or Hispanics to receive routine, ongoing care, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

From 2005 to 2014, annual HIV diagnoses fell 19 percent in the United States. Infections among black women dropped 42 percent during this period. Despite this progress in the fight against HIV, racial disparities persist, the CDC found. While black people make up 12 percent of the U.S. population, they accounted for nearly half of all HIV diagnoses in 2014.

“CDC has been working for many years to eliminate the HIV disparities that exist within the black community,” Dr. Eugene McCray, director of the CDC’s Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, said in an agency news release. “While we are seeing signs of success, we must continue our focus on prevention strategies that will have the greatest impact on African American communities and the nation overall. A key area of focus is ensuring that people living with HIV are diagnosed early, quickly linked to care and receive consistent care that improves their lives and protects the health of their partners.”

In addition to helping people with the virus improve their health, ongoing care can prevent new HIV infections. The CDC pointed out that HIV is most often spread by infected people who are not being treated and those who are unaware that they have the virus.

Dr. Jonathan Mermin is director of CDC’s National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention. “Consistent care matters. It enables people with HIV to live longer, healthier lives, and it prevents new infections,” he said in the news release. “And closing this gap in care will be essential if we are to see the narrowing racial divide in HIV diagnoses close completely.”

From 2011 to 2013, only 38 percent of black HIV patients received consistent treatment. During this period, however, about 50 percent of whites and Hispanics with the virus had continuous care, according to the CDC’s Feb. 4 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Black women with HIV fared better than black men, the CDC noted. While 44 percent of black women benefitted from routine care, just 35 percent of black men did the same. Most of the black HIV patients who received ongoing care were infected during heterosexual contact.

Health officials in the United States are striving for a more coordinated response to the HIV epidemic, the CDC said. These efforts include using HIV prevention strategies that target blacks and others at greatest risk to ensure those who are diagnosed receive continuous medical care. State health departments will also receive funding to expand HIV prevention services and treatment to black people, particularly gay, bisexual and transgender youth.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease provides more information on HIV/AIDS.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PY0D3K

Breast Cancer Survivors Vulnerable for Thyroid Tumors, and Vice Versa: Study

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Feb. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Women who survive breast or thyroid cancer are linked to an increased risk for the other, according to a new analysis.

University of Chicago researchers who reviewed 37 published studies found breast cancer survivors were 1.55 times more likely to develop thyroid cancer than women who hadn’t had breast cancer. And, female thyroid cancer survivors were 1.18 times more likely to get breast cancer than women who hadn’t had thyroid cancer, researchers said.

“This is a real risk,” said study lead author Dr. Raymon Grogan, director of the university’s endocrine surgery research program.

“People who have had one of these cancers need to be aware that they are at higher risk for developing the other cancer,” he said.

Thyroid cancer cases have nearly tripled in the United States over the past 30 years, and breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, according to background notes with the study. Thanks to medical advances, more women are surviving each cancer, Grogan said.

Doctors need to be more aware of the link between the two cancers, Grogan said.

“It should just become one of the common discussions between a patient and her doctor,” he said. “It doesn’t change the recommendations for screening, but people need to be aware and be screened at the appropriate time.”

The report was published Feb. 5 in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.

Carol DeSantis, director of breast and gynecological cancer surveillance at the American Cancer Society, said the connection between thyroid and breast cancer is known.

She said her concern with this new report is that by lumping together so many studies that differ in their methods and findings, it’s impossible to come up with a single number that accurately reflects the risk of having one cancer after having had the other.

“The review of different studies is helpful to see that there is that link, but combining them all together, I am not sure who that would be applicable to,” DeSantis said.

Grogan said the research team tried to control for those differences as best they could.

Nineteen of the studies analyzed breast cancer patients and their risk of thyroid cancer. Another 18 looked at thyroid cancer cases and their incidence of breast cancer.

The researchers then combined these data and calculated the odds of a women having thyroid cancer after breast cancer and vice versa.

In addition, the researchers combed through the studies to find reasons why these cancers seemed related. One explanation was that women who survive either cancer were more likely to be screened and examined so that other cancers were found early.

Another possible connection was that breast and thyroid cancers share hormonal risk factors. There is some evidence that exposure to estrogens and to thyroid-stimulating hormones may contribute to both cancers, Grogan said.

A third theory points to radiation therapy, which has been shown to increase the risk for lung, esophageal and blood cancers, and sarcomas. Also, earlier research found that radioactive iodine, used to treat thyroid cancer, may play a small role in the development of other cancers, including breast cancer, but that is not clear, Grogan said.

Finally, it is possible that a genetic mutation might be responsible for the connection, Grogan said.

DeSantis said that cancer survivors should be aware of the increased risk of developing other cancers.

“Generally, cancer survivors are at risk for developing a second cancer,” she said. “Breast cancer survivors are at risk for blood cancers, uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other cancers. Likewise, thyroid cancer survivors are at risk for a number of other cancers, including breast cancer.”

More information

For more on cancer, visit the U.S. National Cancer Institute.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1nSp5xt