barre

Helping With Health Care Takes Heavy Toll on Caregivers

By Karen Pallarito
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Millions of family and friends who help older, disabled adults manage medications and navigate the health system may be sacrificing their own well-being, a new study suggests.

Caregivers who provided “substantial help” with health care in these settings were roughly twice as likely to experience physical, financial and emotional difficulties as those who did not provide that help, the study found.

Such caregivers, if they worked for a living, were three times more likely to be less productive on the job due to caregiving-related distractions and fatigue, according to the analysis.

The researchers believe it’s the first nationally representative study of the effects of caregiving experienced by those who assist older adults with health care.

“Families are really invisible, even though they’re commonly attending medical visits or they’re involved when someone’s in the hospital, managing the transition back home,” said study author Jennifer Wolff. She is an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

The study is published in the Feb. 15 online edition of JAMA Internal Medicine.

Caregivers see themselves as daughters, sons, spouses and friends — not necessarily as “caregivers,” Carol Levine, director of the New York City-based United Hospital Fund’s Families and Health Care Project, explained in a commentary in the same issue. They may feel uncomfortable or too overwhelmed to take advantage of support groups and services, she said.

Yet, they are the ones asking questions about treatments, giving injections and managing medications — a stressful role that can take a toll on their well-being, she said.

“By expecting family members to do all this stuff with relatively little support, we’ve created a multigenerational set of health problems, and so I think it’s extremely concerning,” Levine said.

Using data from two national surveys, Wolff and colleagues estimated that 14.7 million unpaid caregivers in the United States — mostly family members — assist 7.7 million older adults. Nearly half of the older adults have dementia, and more than a third have a severe disability, the study findings showed.

And 6.5 million of those caregivers provide substantial help with health care, meaning they assist with coordinating care and managing medications. Another 4.4 million provide some help, and 3.8 million provide no help with health care, the investigators found.

Caregivers who provide substantial help with health care are more likely to live with the older adult than those who provided some or no care, the researchers said. And they devote much more time to caregiving — more than 28 hours a week — than caregivers who don’t help with health care (just over eight hours a week).

Almost half of caregivers who provided substantial help were assisting an older adult with dementia, the researchers reported.

Caregivers who provide substantial help are five times more likely to curb participation in things they enjoy — such as visiting friends, attending religious services or participating in clubs or group activities — than those who provide no help with health care, the study revealed.

Health care reforms aimed at rewarding teams of providers for the value of care they provide have largely ignored the role that family caregivers play, the study authors explained.

“It’s a crisis of the system,” Wolff said. “I think that families are often really disadvantaged because they don’t have a recognized role in the health system.”

Dr. Eric Coleman, a geriatrician at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, said caregivers don’t want to be assessed by the health care system; “they want to feel more confident and prepared.”

Coleman, winner of a 2012 MacArthur Foundation “genius” fellowship for his work on transitioning patients from hospital to home, has developed a website and tools to help caregivers manage a loved one’s care at home.

Likewise, the United Hospital Fund’s Next Step in Care website provides advice and tips for caregivers navigating the complex health care system.

Such tools, though, are only part of the solution, Levine said.

What’s needed, she said, is more creative thinking about how to help caregivers unwind and de-stress. For example, Levine mentioned one program that brings together people with Alzheimer’s and their caregivers to sing and perform in concert.

Respite care that provides caregivers a needed break from their responsibilities may be helpful, too, but tough to find in rural areas, she said.

“We need to give caregivers the freedom to say you matter as a person, and that doesn’t just mean your physical health; that means your mental well-being, your quality of life,” Levine said.

More information

There’s more on caregiving at the University of Colorado, Denver.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OcoXxr

Advanced 3D Printer Shows Potential for New Tissues, Organs

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new type of 3D printer may be capable of making muscle, bone and other types of tissue that are good enough for implanting in humans, scientists report.

So-called 3D “bioprinters” are machines that can print out cells in layered patterns, with the goal of creating body tissue or even complex organs. But until now, a major stumbling block has been the scale of the printed structures.

“If you try to make something that’s larger, it turns gooey and falls apart,” explained Dr. Glenn Green, an associate professor of pediatric otolaryngology at the University of Michigan.

Another limitation, Green said, has been the lack of blood vessels in bioprinted tissue: Larger structures are not possible without blood vessels to supply nutrients and oxygen.

The new technology, described in the Feb. 15 online edition of Nature Biotechnology, seems to surmount those challenges.

“This is exciting,” said Green, who was not involved in the research, but has studied 3D bioprinting. “This is a big breakthrough in identifying a way to make tissue that is larger and could be applied to humans.”

Ultimately, the hope is to have 3D printers that can churn out any kind of human tissue — to replace tissue damaged by trauma, disease or birth defects, said Dr. Anthony Atala, the senior researcher on the new study.

To make that replacement tissue, cells would be taken from a patient’s own body, which should avoid the risk of an immune system attack, said Atala. He directs the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, in Winston-Salem, N.C.

But that’s the goal for the future, and many hurdles remain before the technique might be used in humans.

For now, Atala said, his team has shown that it’s feasible to create ear, bone and muscle tissue that are “human-scale.”

The researchers developed the new printing system over 10 years. It creates a biodegradable, plastic-like material that gives the printed tissue its shape, along with cells suspended in a water-based “ink.” The tissue also has a system of “micro-channels” that allows nutrients and oxygen from the body to diffuse into the structure until a system of blood vessels can form.

Atala’s team found that when it implanted bioprinted bone, muscle and cartilage into rodents, the structures matured into functional tissue, complete with a network of blood vessels.

The researchers also printed a human jawbone fragment that was the right size and shape to be used in facial reconstruction surgery.

According to Green, there’s “no technical barrier” to implanting such printed tissues into humans — but there are some critical questions.

“We don’t know what happens with these tissues long-term,” Green said. Plus, he added, the experiments described in this study used materials that are not approved for use in humans. The jawbone fragment, for instance, was created with stem cells from human amniotic fluid.

As 3D bioprinting moves forward, Green said, it will probably focus first on simpler structures that don’t move or bear weight — including the ears, nose or bones in the skull — before trying to tackle more complicated tissue, or organs such as the heart, kidneys and pancreas.

Atala said his team plans to implant bioprinted cartilage, bone and muscle tissue into patients in the future, with funding from the Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine. The institute, which partly financed the current study, focuses on using regenerative medicine to treat battlefield injuries.

More information

The U.S. National Institutes of Health has more on regenerative medicine.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OcoZp6

4 Personal Hygiene Mistakes You’re Probably Making

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Here’s the gross truth: Research says that 15 percent of Americans still don’t wash their hands after using a public bathroom. Even if you do, you may not be soaping up properly. Your official guide to top-notch personal hygiene:

RELATED: 6 Ways to Prevent Cold and Flu

1. Hand washing

Wet your hands with warm or cold water, then lather up with regular soap. (Research shows that using antibacterial kinds is no better at removing germs.) Scrub for at least 20 seconds before you rinse.

2. Ear cleaning

Skip the cotton swabs: they can push wax deeper into the ear canal and damage the eardrum. Plus, earwax has antibacterial properties. If buildup is a problem for you, it’s best to have your physician remove it, or try an OTC wax softener.

RELATED: 5 Ways You’re Washing Your Hands Wrong

3. Toenail clipping

Cut them with a clean clipper that has been used on your tootsies only. Trim nails straight across and not too short to avoid ingrown nails. Don’t cut the cuticles: it can cause infections.

4. Teeth brushing

Using a pea-size amount of fluoride toothpaste and a soft-bristled brush, move the brush in gentle back-and-forth strokes across all tooth surfaces and your tongue. Brush twice a day for a full two minutes.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TjtXHn

WHO: Neurological Disorder on the Rise in Zika Zones

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — More cases of the rare but potentially devastating neurological disorder Guillain-Barre syndrome are appearing in some Latin American countries where the Zika virus is also present, according to the World Health Organization.

The United Nations-affiliated health group said in a weekly report Saturday that Guillain-Barre syndrome, which can cause temporary paralysis, has been reported in Brazil, Colombia, El Salvador, Suriname and Venezuela, the Associated Press reported.

But, the WHO added, the “cause of the increase in GBS (Guillain-Barre syndrome) incidence . . . remains unknown, especially as dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus have all been circulating simultaneously in the Americas.”

According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health, Guillain-Barre syndrome is a rare disorder that causes the immune system to attack the peripheral nervous system. As a result, muscles have trouble responding to signals from the brain. No one knows what causes the syndrome. Sometimes it is triggered by an infection, surgery, or a vaccination.

Patients typically reach the point of greatest weakness or paralysis days or weeks after the first symptoms. The symptoms then stabilize for a period of days, weeks, or even months. The recovery period may be as little as a few weeks or as long as a few years, according to the NIH.

Meanwhile, U.S. health officials began shipping test kits for the Zika virus late last week to health departments around the country. They are to be used by pregnant women returning from Latin America and the Caribbean, where the virus may be to blame for severe birth defects.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is also recommending that pregnant women avoid those regions of Central and South America and the Caribbean where Zika virus has been identified and officials have described it as spreading “explosively.”

So far, the epidemic has seemingly been limited to Brazil. It is suspected — but not proven — that the virus is to blame for a birth defect called microcephaly that causes babies to be born with abnormally small heads and possible brain damage.

The CDC is telling doctors to test the women for Zika infection between two weeks and 12 weeks after they return home. Those thought to have been infected could then have ultrasound scans to monitor their fetus’ development.

The CDC’s director, Dr. Tom Frieden, said Thursday that the agency has shipped about 12,000 of 62,000 available Zika tests to health departments in three dozen states and is working to produce 30,000 more tests.

The CDC has said it does not expect the Zika virus, which is transmitted by mosquito bites, to become widespread in the United States.

Frieden and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, appeared before a Congressional panel last week to lobby for President Barack Obama’s request for $1.8 billion in emergency funds from Congress to combat the threat of Zika virus.

The Zika virus was first identified in Uganda in 1947, and until last year was not thought to pose serious health risks. In fact, approximately 80 percent of people who become infected never experience symptoms.

But the increase of cases and birth defects in Brazil in the past year — believed to exceed more than 4,100, making that nation the epicenter of the epidemic — has prompted health officials there to warn pregnant women or those thinking of becoming pregnant to take precautions or consider delaying pregnancy.

On Thursday, it was reported that two American women who had contracted the Zika virus while traveling abroad had miscarried after returning home. The virus was found in their placentas, according to a CDC spokesman, the Washington Post reported.

This is the first time that U.S. health officials have reported miscarriages in American women who had become infected while traveling abroad, although there have been many miscarriages reported in Brazil, the newspaper said.

Since the Zika epidemic first surfaced in Brazil last spring, the virus has spread to 30 countries and territories in Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Health Organization now estimates there could be up to 4 million cases of Zika in the Americas in the next year.

The Obama administration’s request for funding would allow for an expansion of mosquito-control programs, speed development of a vaccine, develop diagnostic tests and improve support for low-income pregnant women.

The earliest a vaccine could be developed would be some time next year, Fauci has said.

More information

For more on Zika virus, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

To see the CDC list of sites where Zika virus is active and may pose a threat to pregnant women, click here.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TjeK9c

Widely Used Heartburn Drugs Linked to Dementia Risk in Study

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A popular class of heartburn medications might raise a senior’s risk of dementia, a new study suggests.

Called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), this group of drugs includes Prilosec, Nexium and Prevacid. They work by lowering the amount of acid produced by the stomach.

But German researchers found that people 75 or older who regularly take the medications had a 44 percent increased risk of dementia, compared with seniors not using the drugs. The study only found an association, however, and not a cause-and-effect link.

“To evaluate cause-and-effect relationships between long-term PPI use and possible effects on cognition in the elderly, randomized, prospective clinical trials are needed,” said corresponding author Britta Haenisch, from the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Bonn.

In the meantime, “Clinicians should follow guidelines for PPI prescription, to avoid overprescribing PPIs and inappropriate use,” Haenisch said.

The report was published Feb. 15 in the journal JAMA Neurology.

The results are surprising enough that at least one leading expert on aging, Dr. Malaz Boustani, plans to share the findings with older patients who are using PPIs.

Boustani said earlier studies have linked another type of antacid, H2 blockers, with an increased risk of dementia. Up to now, he’s recommended that patients use PPIs to treat acid reflux and steer clear of H2 blockers like Tagamet, Pepcid and Zantac.

“I’m going to disclose the finding to my patients and then let them decide whether they will take the risk or not,” said Boustani, a professor of medicine with the Indiana University Center for Aging Research and a spokesman for the American Federation for Aging Research. “On Monday I have clinic, and if I have patients taking a PPI or an H2 blocker I will tell them exactly what I’m telling you, and then they can decide.”

More than 15 million Americans used prescription PPIs in 2013, at a total cost of more than $10 billion, according to a report by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Several popular PPIs — Prilosec, Prevacid and Zegerid — also are available over-the counter, further boosting their use.

Concern has been increasing that Americans might be overusing PPIs to treat minor cases of heartburn or acid reflux.

As many as 70 percent of PPI prescriptions in the United States have been inappropriately handed out by doctors, and 25 percent of long-term users could stop taking the medication without suffering increased heartburn or acid reflux, according to a study published in January in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Overuse of PPIs could have drastic effects on health, that study found. For example, the medications have been linked to a 20 percent to 50 percent higher risk of chronic kidney disease.

And now the German researchers report there also is some evidence that PPI use might affect a person’s ability to reason.

PPIs appear to effect levels of amyloid beta and tau, which are proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease, the German authors said. PPI use can also lead to vitamin B12 deficiency, which has been associated with cognitive decline.

To test the possible association between PPIs and dementia, the German researchers collected data from a large German health insurance firm on almost 74,000 seniors aged 75 or older. The data ran from 2004 to 2011, and included diagnoses and drug prescriptions.

About 2,950 patients regularly used PPIs, which for this study was defined as at least one PPI prescription in each quarter of an 18-month interval.

Regular users of PPIs had a 44 percent increased risk of dementia compared with those not receiving PPI medications.

However, the study doesn’t make clear whether PPIs are also available over the counter in Germany, as they are in the United States, said Dr. Arun Swaminath, director of the inflammatory bowel disease program at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City.

If over-the-counter PPIs are available, then more people might have been taking them and the dementia risk described in this paper could be overestimated, Swaminath said.

“However, I think the point here is that for some patients, weaning off PPIs is reasonable and they should make this decision with their doctors,” he said.

People who want to ease off PPIs can take a number of steps to reduce excess acid or prevent acid reflux, Boustani said. They can eat smaller meals, lay off chocolate and caffeine, and stay upright for a few hours following each meal.

Boustani added that his group has received federal funding to design clinical trials in which people would be weaned off PPIs, to see how it affects their ability to remember and think.

Dr. Gisele Wolf-Klein, director of geriatric education at North Shore-LIJ Health System in New Hyde Park, N.Y., added that even the researchers aren’t sure why PPIs would affect the aging brain.

“We don’t know what is causing the brain to deteriorate. Until we know this, there’s no reason for people who are taking PPIs to be too concerned about that and stop taking those agents if they are needed,” Wolf-Klein said.

Another expert agreed.

While the study is intriguing, it’s not enough for doctors to warn patients off PPI use, said Keith Fargo, director of scientific programs and outreach for the Alzheimer’s Association.

“It does not tell us anything that should change medical practice right now,” Fargo said. “I don’t think there’s going to be an uprising among doctors telling patients not to take their PPIs. This doesn’t rise anywhere near the level of evidence you would need for that.”

One of the paper’s main flaws is that researchers could not control for diet and body weight as risk factors, Fargo said.

“Both of those things, we know, are risk factors for developing cognitive decline and dementia in later life, and both of those are reasons why a person might need to take a proton pump inhibitor,” Fargo explained.

More information

For more information on dementia, visit the U.S. National Institutes of Health.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TjeKGf

Lots of Fish in Pregnancy Tied to Higher Obesity Risk in Kids

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Babies whose mothers eat high amounts of fish during pregnancy appear to be at raised risk for obesity in childhood, and pollutants in the fish may drive the effect, a new study finds.

A research team led by Dr. Leda Chatzi, of the University of Crete in Greece, tracked data from more than 26,000 pregnant women and their children in the United States and Europe. The children’s weight was followed until they were 6 years old.

Children of women who ate fish more than three times a week during pregnancy were more likely to grow rapidly from birth to 2 years of age. And they were also more likely to be overweight or obese at 4 and 6 years of age, the researchers found.

This effect was greater in girls than boys, according to the study published online Feb. 15 in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.

The study wasn’t designed to prove cause-and-effect. However, Chatzi’s team noted that organic pollutants in fish can disrupt the body’s hormones, possibly raising the risk of obesity.

Already, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency recommend that women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or likely to become pregnant should eat no more than three servings of fish a week, to minimize toxins, such as mercury, the study authors said in a journal news release.

The researchers said they did not have enough data to distinguish between the types of fish eaten by the women, how the fish was cooked, or the water source of the fish.

One U.S. expert said the finding may be another reason for women to avoid fish in pregnancy.

“I would be very interested to see if this link is tied to exposure to specific harmful substances, such as mercury,” said Erin Keane, a registered dietitian and nutritionist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City.

“The current recommendations are that seafood that is lower in mercury — such as salmon, pollock, sardines, canned light tuna and shrimp — should be limited to 12 ounces per week,” Keane said. “Canned albacore tuna should be limited to no more than 6 ounces per week. Fish known to have high mercury levels — such as shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tile fish — should be avoided.”

If there’s no good information on levels of mercury in locally sourced fish, “women should stick with having no more than 6 ounces per week,” Keane suggested.

More information

The U.S. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion explains how to keep your child at a healthy weight.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1TjeKG6

Seriously, You Need to Take All Your Vacation Days This Year

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Go ahead: Stop checking your email during vacation. It will make you a better worker in the long run.

Late last year, LinkedIn joined the ranks of tech companies (like Netflix) offering employees unlimited time off. Here’s the catch: Research shows that without set guidelines, some people will never ask for vacation. But it’s key to take full advantage of however much time off you’re given, says Christine Carter, PhD, a sociologist at UC Berkeley: “Not doing any work is critical to reaping the benefits of vacation,” which include reducing your risk of heart attack and depression. Get the most out of your breaks.

RELATED: 10 Signs You Really Need a Vacation

1. See how it helps your boss

Don’t regard your day off as a hassle. “Studies show that net productivity increases before and after a vacation,” says Dr. Carter.

2. Have a vacation buddy

Ask a trusted colleague to check your emails while you’re away and organize them by priority, so you don’t return to an overstuffed inbox.

3. Schedule a re-entry day

Plan a day once you’re home to return emails and restock the fridge. You’ll stay more relaxed if you’re not scrambling to catch up.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PzHyYw

This Playlist from Health Cover Star Ashley Benson Will Make You Want to Workout

Photo: James White

Photo: James White

In this month’s issue of HealthAshley Benson opens up about everything from her struggle with crippling anxiety to the insane pressure she feels to be thin in Hollywood. “I get told all the time to lose weight,” says the size 2 Pretty Little Liars star. “It’s just weird.” As for her body-confidence strategy? She admits she’s still working on it (like the rest of us), which is why we love Ashley. She’s real, and not at all shy about the fact that she has to drag herself to the gym on occasion. “There are times I just want to do nothing,” she says. “But then I don’t feel good about myself.”

For those days especially, a great playlist can make a world of difference. Here, a few of the tunes that help amp up her workouts.

RELATED: The Ultimate Beyoncé Workout Playlist




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1PMw15Y

New Type of Weight-Loss Surgery May Be Less Risky, Cheaper

By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new type of weight-loss procedure offers an alternative to traditional bariatric surgery for people who are mildly to moderately obese, researchers report.

The procedure is called endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and it involves using an endoscope — a flexible tube inserted through the mouth — rather than making an incision in the body. When the endoscope reaches the stomach, the surgeon places sutures in the stomach, making it smaller and changing its shape.

A small study found that the procedure resulted in a loss of about 50 percent of excess weight when measured six, nine and 12 months after the procedure.

“We’re able to go inside the stomach to its connection to the esophagus,” said study author Dr. Barham Abu Dayyeh, a gastroenterologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. From there, the surgeons use suturing equipment to create a banana-sized sleeve that serves as a mini-stomach.

“It delays the emptying of the stomach, and food sits in it for longer periods of time. Patients will be able to follow a low-calorie diet, fewer than 1,000 calories a day, without being hungry all the time,” he said.

“We’re not cutting or removing any part of the stomach or digestive tract,” Abu Dayyeh explained. “There’s a low risk of having any nutrition deficiencies, because you’re leaving the gastrointestinal tract and stomach alone,” he added.

Although the procedure still needs to undergo further research, Abu Dayyeh believes it has potential. “It’s a whole paradigm shift,” he said. “This technique offers more effective weight loss at lower risk and cost.”

Not everyone is convinced, however.

Dr. Subhash Kini, a weight-loss surgeon and associate professor at Mt. Sinai Medical Center in New York City, is skeptical. He said surgeons have tried similar approaches using incisions, and they haven’t worked well. In addition, he said, the length of the new study was short, and it didn’t take into account the fact that weight-loss surgeries tend to fail at two years and beyond.

The findings were published recently in the journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Two of the study authors disclosed potential conflicts of interest. Abu Dayyeh is a consultant for a company called Apollo Endosurgery, which provided partial funding for the study and has supported his research. Study co-author Dr. Christopher Gostout is Apollo Endosurgery’s chief medical officer and holds a stake in the firm.

Currently, more than a third of people in the United States are obese, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Beyond just being a cosmetic problem, obesity can lead to serious health risks including type 2 diabetes, certain types of cancer, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart disease and stroke, the CDC says.

Weight-loss surgery (also called bariatric surgery), which limits the amount of food a person can eat, is one option for people with a body mass index above 40, according to the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Body mass index is a rough estimate of a person’s fat based on height and weight measurements.

Weight-loss surgery may also be recommended for people with a BMI of 35 or above if they have other health risks, such as type 2 diabetes, the society says.

But many people with a BMI under 40 don’t qualify for weight-loss surgery under current guidelines, said Abu Dayyeh. “The only thing that’s left for them is medications or lifestyle modifications,” he said.

Even people who do qualify for weight-loss surgery may choose against it because of the costs and risks, Abu Dayyeh said.

For the new study, researchers tested the new technique on 25 obese people with an average body mass index of 36. The average age of the study volunteers was 48. Only three of the subjects were men.

After the procedure, the study volunteers lost between 45 percent and 53 percent of their excess weight.

Weight information was only available for eight patients at the 20-month mark. At that time, five had maintained their weight loss, but three of the patients had regained all of the lost weight, the study reported.

Three patients had serious side effects after the procedure, including a collapsed lung and a blood clot in the lung. But all recovered, according to the study. The researchers said they adjusted the technique after these cases and didn’t encounter any more serious side effects.

The cost of the procedure is about $10,000 to $15,000, roughly a third of the cost of other weight-control procedures, Abu Dayyeh said.

What about availability of the procedure?

Abu Dayyeh said it’s now being offered at centers in the United States and worldwide. More study is needed, he said, and the researchers have just submitted a new analysis of the technique in about 270 patients.

More information

For more about weight-loss surgery, try the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1WncKft

Physically Demanding Job, High Blood Pressure a Bad Mix for Women

MONDAY, Feb. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Having a physically demanding job and high blood pressure may triple a woman’s risk of heart disease, a new study contends.

Researchers looked at more than 12,000 female nurses in Denmark, and found that those with high blood pressure and highly active jobs were much more likely to develop heart disease than those with normal blood pressure and moderately active jobs.

“Previous research has shown that men and women with physically demanding jobs have an increased risk of heart disease,” said study author Karen Allesoe, a Ph.D. student at the University of Southern Denmark.

“The two risk factors appear to work together, resulting in an even greater incidence of heart disease,” Allesoe said. “To our knowledge, this has not been shown before among women.”

However, the study only showed an association for heart disease risk, not a cause-and-effect relationship.

The study defined high-activity jobs as those that included standing and walking with lifting, carrying and other physical exertion. Moderately active jobs involved mainly standing and walking with no physical exertion.

“Lifting and carrying cause a rise in blood pressure, and may put people with hypertension [high blood pressure] at particular risk of a cardiovascular event,” Allesoe said.

The study was published Feb. 14 in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

“For nurses, physically demanding jobs may involve high-force demands during patient handling, or standing and walking all day with no time for breaks,” Allesoe said in a journal news release. “Our results may also apply to other occupations that require lifting or carrying heavy loads and standing or walking for many hours, but this needs to be confirmed in other studies.

“We need more information on which aspects of physically demanding work are harmful. Until then we cannot make specific recommendations on how much lifting, and for how many hours, is safe for women with hypertension,” she said.

More information

The U.S. National Institutes of Health explains how to reduce heart risks.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1WncJrL