barre

Top fat loss tips

 

From recovery sessions to food intolerances, trainer and IsoWhey sports ambassador Alexa Towersey shares her top five tips for fat loss.

 

1. Complete a lifestyle diary

This includes what you eat, when you go to bed, how often you go to the bathroom and how much water you drink. This will make you accountable and aware of any bad habits outside of the gym that could be hindering your results.  

2. Schedule at least two recovery sessions per week

I liken your body to a bank balance.  Every training session is a withdrawal; every recovery session is a deposit. If you are always training (withdrawing) and never recovering (depositing), you will eventually end up overdrawn and injured. Recovery practices include foam rolling, contrast showers, ice baths, massages and long walks.

3. Embrace hot yoga

The hot room allows for increased range of movement (which will translate into better range in your weight training), the heat enhances detoxification processes and the twisting movements improve digestion and lymphatic drainage in addition to massaging the internal organs.  Yoga is also great for stress management, and when you are stressed you will hold fat.

4. Test for food intolerances

Just because a food is ‘healthy’, doesn’t mean it’s healthy for you. If it doesn’t make you feel good, don’t eat it. Some of the most common intolerances include eggs, gluten, wheat, dairy, soy, corn and nuts. Intolerances can also be a result of eating too much of the same foods, so try and rotate your meal options regularly.

5. Support your liver and your detoxification channels using alternative body treatments

Think acupuncture, lymphatic drainage massage, Epsom salt baths, body brushing and infra-red saunas. Drink plenty of water to flush out toxins and try starting the day with a glass of warm water with fresh lemon juice.

For more fat loss tips, visit our weight loss section.

 

{nomultithumb}

 



Source Weight Loss http://ift.tt/1nCtnIe

Anesthesia Not Linked to Long-Term Mental Decline, Study Finds

FRIDAY, March 11, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Major surgery and general anesthesia don’t cause long-term mental decline in older adults, a new study indicates.

The findings suggest older patients should not put off surgery because they’re concerned that general anesthesia might affect their thinking and memory in the future, the researchers concluded.

The study included nearly 4,300 twins younger than 70 and about 4,200 twins aged 70 and older in Denmark who were given tests to assess their thinking and memory abilities.

The researchers compared twins who had various types of surgery between 18 and 24 years earlier with those who did not have surgery.

There was no significant link between major surgery, general anesthesia and long-term mental decline, according to the study published recently in the journal Anesthesiology.

“Our use of twins in the study provides a powerful approach to detect subtle effects of surgery and anesthesia on cognitive functioning by minimizing the risk that the true effects of surgery and anesthesia are mixed up with other environmental and genetic factors,” lead author Unni Dokkedal, of the University of Southern Denmark, said in a journal news release.

“We found no significant cognitive [thinking] effects related to surgery and anesthesia in these patients,” Dokkedal said. This suggests that other factors, such as preoperative mental decline and underlying diseases, are more important to mental functioning in aging patients following surgery.

The study adds to growing evidence that “older patients should today be reassured that surgery and anesthesia are unlikely to be implicated in causing persistent cognitive decline or incident dementia,” Michael Avidan and Dr. Alex Evers, of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, wrote in an accompanying editorial.

More information

The U.S. National Institute on Aging has more on surgery.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Rc58rZ

Doctor’s Empathy Boosts Patient Satisfaction

FRIDAY, March 11, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Patients do better and are more satisfied with their care if they believe their doctor is empathetic, a new study suggests.

Researchers asked 112 patients, average age 51, to rate their dealings with their hand surgeon.

The results showed that doctor empathy accounted for 65 percent of patient satisfaction.

Patient satisfaction wasn’t influenced by wait time for an appointment or wait time in the office, time spent with the surgeon, resident/fellow involvement, whether or not patients were seeking a second opinion, patients’ health knowledge or type of treatment.

The study, published recently in the Journal of Hand Surgery, was presented earlier this month at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, in Orlando, Fla.

Good medical skills are important in hand and orthopedic surgery, but “this study shows that physician empathy is the best opportunity to improve the patient experience,” said principal investigator Dr. David Ring, of the department of orthopedic surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital.

“In prior studies, we’ve had trouble determining what specifically contributes to patient satisfaction, so a finding that empathy explains 65 percent of the variation in satisfaction is really powerful,” he added in an academy news release.

Empathetic doctors seem to understand what their patient is going through. Doctors can be coached to show more empathy, Ring said. It also helps if they have staffers who excel in communication and customer service, he added.

Ring also noted that health care reimbursement is increasingly linked to patient satisfaction and outcomes.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians offers tips for talking with your doctor.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Rc58rT

Exercise Doesn’t Seem to Affect Breast Density

FRIDAY, March 11, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Researchers report that exercise does not appear to affect breast density — a major risk factor for breast cancer.

Women with dense breasts are at increased risk for breast cancer, and physical activity is known to help protect against breast cancer. Previous research looking at a possible connection between exercise and breast density have been inconclusive.

This latest study found no link between the two. This suggests that physical activity’s protective effect against breast cancer is due to other factors, according to lead researcher Shadi Azam, from the University of Southern Denmark, and colleagues.

The findings were culled from a review of the physical activity levels of more than 5,700 women in Denmark. The women were screened for breast cancer between 1991 and 2001.

The study was presented Thursday at the European Breast Cancer Conference in Amsterdam, Holland.

“We know that breast density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer risk. Women with high density breasts — more than 75 percent mammographic density — have a four to six times’ higher risk of developing the disease than do those women with a breast density of lower than 25 percent,” Azam said in a conference news release.

“This is because increased breast density reduces the sensitivity of mammograms and makes it far more difficult to spot small tumors. It is also because breast density per se can lead to an increased risk of most of the cellular abnormalities that lead to breast cancer,” she explained.

About 56 percent of the women in the study had mixed or dense breasts. More than 47 percent played sports, and about 70 percent cycled. Just over 50 percent of the women gardened and nearly 93 percent walked, according to the study.

Initially, the researchers noted a link between participation in sports and cycling with the odds of having denser breasts. But, when they adjusted for other potential risk factors, the association was no longer significant, Azam said.

The researchers also didn’t find any big differences in breast density from walking or gardening, Azam added.

Azam noted that exercise is known to reduce breast cancer risk, and “further studies should now be focused on other mechanisms that might explain the association between physical activity and breast cancer risk.”

In the meantime, women with dense breasts need to know that not everyone with dense breasts has a higher risk of breast cancer, the researchers said. If a woman is concerned about her risk of breast cancer, the researchers said there are things women can do to reduce their risk.

They recommended eating more fruits and vegetables, along with increasing physical activity. They also suggested consuming less red and processed meats, sweets, full-fat dairy and alcohol to reduce the risk of breast cancer.

If you’re overweight, losing weight reduces the risk of breast cancer, and if you smoke, the researchers advised quitting.

Findings presented at meetings are generally considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more on breast cancer prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Rc55wp

Diabetes May Raise Risk for Dangerous Staph Infection

FRIDAY, March 11, 2016 (HealthDay News) — People with diabetes may be significantly more likely to develop potentially deadly “staph” blood infections than those without diabetes, a new study suggests.

As the Danish researchers explained, Staphyloccus aureus bacteria live on the skin and are normally harmless. However, the germs can cause dangerous infections if they enter the bloodstream.

In fact, the 30-day death rate from such infections is 20 percent to 30 percent, according to the research team from Aalborg University Hospital and Aarhus University Hospital.

In their new study, the researchers tracked the medical records of 30,000 people in Denmark over 12 years.

Overall, they found that people with any form of diabetes were almost three times more likely to acquire a staph blood infection outside of a hospital, compared to those without diabetes.

The risk jumped to more than seven times higher among people with type 1 diabetes, and almost three times higher for those with type 2 diabetes.

About 95 percent of people with diabetes have the type 2 form of the disease, which is often (but not always) linked to obesity and involves a dysfunction in the body’s ability to use insulin. About 5 percent of diabetes is type 1, where the body has lost its ability to produce insulin, the hormone that converts blood sugar to energy for cells.

The new study also found that the combination of diabetes and related kidney problems boosted the odds for staph blood infection by more than fourfold, compared to people without these conditions. People with other diabetes-linked complications, such as heart and circulation problems and diabetic ulcers, were also at increased risk.

The study was published March 10 in the European Journal of Endocrinology.

“It has long been a common clinical belief that diabetes increases the risk of S. aureus infection, but until now this has been supported by scant evidence,” study author Jesper Smit said in a journal news release.

His team also found that the risk of staph bloodstream infection rose with the number of years a person had diabetes. Poor control of diabetes was another factor that upped the infection risk.

The findings suggest that long-term diabetes patients may require closer monitoring for infections, Smit’s team said.

“Poor management of diabetes can lead to an impaired immune response,” he explained. “This may be the reason why diabetes patients are at higher risk of infection. Similarly, diabetic patients often suffer associated illnesses — the burden of multiple health care problems can also increase susceptibility to infection.”

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on staph infections.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Rc56Aj

If Younger Sibling Arrives Before 1st Grade, Kids Less Likely to Be Obese: Study

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, March 11, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Children who have younger siblings before they reach first grade may be less likely to become obese, new research suggests.

If they are between the ages of 2 and 4 when a second child arrives, they “are significantly less likely to end up being obese,” said study author Dr. Julie Lumeng, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor.

Conversely, those children who did not have a younger sibling born by the time they reached first grade were nearly three times more likely to be obese.

The study was published online March 11 and will appear in the April print issue of the journal Pediatrics.

About one in six children and teens in the United States is obese, putting them at risk for a host of other health problems, including type 2 diabetes, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Lumeng couldn’t explain the association she found in the study. She pointed out that she found a link, but not a cause-and-effect relationship. “In the study we did, we did not have data that would help us understand the mechanism,” she said.

The researchers analyzed data from nearly 700 children across the United States, tracking their weight status and whether they had a new sibling born before first grade.

Those who had a younger sibling born when they were between the ages of 3 and 4 had the least amount of obesity. Just under 5 percent of those children were obese by first grade. Of those who had a sibling born when they were 2 and 3 years of age, 8 percent were obese by first grade, the investigators found.

But nearly 13 percent of the children who did not have a younger sibling born by the time they reached first grade were obese, the findings showed.

When people hear the results, Lumeng said, they often ask if she is recommending women have more babies to save their children from obesity. Not at all, she said.

The finding raises more questions than it answers. And research that discovers why kids with siblings before first grade were at healthier weights may help experts counsel families about how to help their kids avoid obesity, she suggested.

Lumeng speculates that a child with a younger sibling may become more physically active, perhaps engaging in sibling play more than playing video games or watching television. “Maybe you go to the park more,” she said, “or maybe there is just more activity in the house.”

The dynamics could change in other ways when a sibling is born, she suggested. For now, the findings simply indicate that something changes when the younger sibling is born, and it may help the older child keep a healthy weight.

Dr. Elsie Taveras, chief of general pediatrics at Massachusetts General Hospital for Children in Boston, called the study findings novel and interesting.

“The study was excellent and really well done,” Taveras said. But without research on the mechanism, which was beyond the scope of the study, it’s too early to give any advice or propose a program to help the older siblings maintain a healthy weight, she said.

“I don’t think this [finding] should be a factor in family planning,” Taveras added. Like Lumeng, she hopes more research will uncover why those children who had younger siblings before first grade seemed less likely to be obese.

More information

To learn more about how to keep a healthy weight, visit the Campaign to End Obesity.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1QMvTHx

If Younger Sibling Arrives Before 1st Grade, Kids Less Likely to Be Obese: Study

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, March 11, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Children who have younger siblings before they reach first grade may be less likely to become obese, new research suggests.

If they are between the ages of 2 and 4 when a second child arrives, they “are significantly less likely to end up being obese,” said study author Dr. Julie Lumeng, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor.

Conversely, those children who did not have a younger sibling born by the time they reached first grade were nearly three times more likely to be obese.

The study was published online March 11 and will appear in the April print issue of the journal Pediatrics.

About one in six children and teens in the United States is obese, putting them at risk for a host of other health problems, including type 2 diabetes, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Lumeng couldn’t explain the association she found in the study. She pointed out that she found a link, but not a cause-and-effect relationship. “In the study we did, we did not have data that would help us understand the mechanism,” she said.

The researchers analyzed data from nearly 700 children across the United States, tracking their weight status and whether they had a new sibling born before first grade.

Those who had a younger sibling born when they were between the ages of 3 and 4 had the least amount of obesity. Just under 5 percent of those children were obese by first grade. Of those who had a sibling born when they were 2 and 3 years of age, 8 percent were obese by first grade, the investigators found.

But nearly 13 percent of the children who did not have a younger sibling born by the time they reached first grade were obese, the findings showed.

When people hear the results, Lumeng said, they often ask if she is recommending women have more babies to save their children from obesity. Not at all, she said.

The finding raises more questions than it answers. And research that discovers why kids with siblings before first grade were at healthier weights may help experts counsel families about how to help their kids avoid obesity, she suggested.

Lumeng speculates that a child with a younger sibling may become more physically active, perhaps engaging in sibling play more than playing video games or watching television. “Maybe you go to the park more,” she said, “or maybe there is just more activity in the house.”

The dynamics could change in other ways when a sibling is born, she suggested. For now, the findings simply indicate that something changes when the younger sibling is born, and it may help the older child keep a healthy weight.

Dr. Elsie Taveras, chief of general pediatrics at Massachusetts General Hospital for Children in Boston, called the study findings novel and interesting.

“The study was excellent and really well done,” Taveras said. But without research on the mechanism, which was beyond the scope of the study, it’s too early to give any advice or propose a program to help the older siblings maintain a healthy weight, she said.

“I don’t think this [finding] should be a factor in family planning,” Taveras added. Like Lumeng, she hopes more research will uncover why those children who had younger siblings before first grade seemed less likely to be obese.

More information

To learn more about how to keep a healthy weight, visit the Campaign to End Obesity.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1QMvTHx

How to Pull Off the Bright, Metallic Makeup That’s So Hot This Spring

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Move over, muted neutrals! Step up your look this spring with the most flattering new colors for your complexion.

Sunset shades

sunset

The metallic of the moment is burnt copper, which casts a glow on darker skin. Smudge a shimmery rust above your upper lash line, or paint it on your lids with a damp brush for a “super reflective long-wear finish,” says Los Angeles celebrity makeup artist Brett Freedman. Try Fiona Stiles Beauty Radiant Aqua Eye Veil in Hudson ($22; ulta.com). Then blend a brick blush on cheeks and add sheer gold-tinged gloss to lips.

RELATED: 10 Surprising Beauty Uses for Coconut Oil

Pretty in plum

plum

Shades of purple—from lilac to eggplant—complement olive complexions (the skin’s warm undertones make it work). Buff a matte plum shadow, like L’Oréal Paris Colour Riche Monos in Violet Beaute ($6; walgreens.com), into lids. Then go back and deepen the shade at the outer corners and crease to add “polished depth,” says Los Angeles celebrity makeup artist Fiona Stiles. On lips, opt for violet. “Staying within the color family is striking and modern—not a matchy-matchy no-no,” notes Stiles.

Pastel 2.0

pastel

Lavender with a grayish undertone “reads more edgy than sweet,” says Stiles. It’s especially great on fair skin. Dust a “dirtied-up lavender,” as Stiles calls it—such as Lancôme Color Design Sensational Effects Eye Shadow in Drama ($20; macys.com)—over your lids, building it up with two or three coats for an opaque finish. Babypink blush is a natural complement. The twist? Add a pop of fuchsia to your lips. “It gives an otherwise light look some attitude,” says Stiles. We like Butter London Plush Rush Lipstick in Rebellious ($22; nordstrom.com).

RELATED: 5 Pretty Hairstyles You Can Do at Home

Teal appeal

teal

What is it about this blue-green hybrid that flatters warm complexions? Part jewel tone, part water shade, “it has the brightness to pop on medium skin,” explains Freedman. First smudge a teal eyeshadow crayon into your upper lash line; try The Estée Edit by Estée Lauder Edgiest Kohl Shadowstick in Twisted ($22; sephora.com). Then draw up to the crease, covering the lid, and blend with a shadow brush to your desired intensity. Pair with a nude lip, which “virtually disappears into skin,” says Freedman, “keeping the look all about the eyes.”




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1Rbk4g4

Mom’s Smoking May Put Kids at Higher Risk of COPD in Adulthood

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, March 10, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The children of mothers who smoke heavily may face a much higher risk for developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as adults, new research suggests.

The finding is based on the tracking of COPD risk among nearly 1,400 adults, and it suggests that heavy maternal smoking — more than 20 cigarettes per day — increases a child’s long-term COPD risk nearly threefold.

“The findings were not surprising to us,” said study author Jennifer Perret. She is a postdoctoral fellow with the Centre for Air Quality and Evaluation in the Melbourne School of Population & Global Health at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

“Smoking in later life can result in deficits in lung function by middle age. So it was not unexpected to see that mothers’ smoking . . . could also adversely influence the growing lungs of [their children],” Perret said. And, “reduced lung function potential in childhood predisposes an individual to having reduced lung function as an adult,” she added.

However, the study did not prove that a mother’s heavy smoking habit caused her children to have an increased risk for COPD later in life; the researchers only found an association.

Perret and her colleagues reported their findings in the March 10 issue of the journal Respirology.

According to the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, COPD is a progressively worsening illness that greatly compromises a person’s ability to breathe. Smoking is the leading cause of COPD, which is now the third leading cause of death around the world, the researchers said.

To see how COPD risk related to parental smoking patterns, the authors reviewed surveys completed in 2004 by more than 5,700 men and women (average age of 45) who had been participating in a long-running study that began in 1968.

Nearly 40 percent said that when they were 7 years old they lived with a mother who smoked, and 17 percent of this group said their mothers were heavy smokers. Nearly 60 percent grew up with smoking fathers, 34 percent of whom were heavy smokers.

Twelve percent said they grew up in households where both parents were heavy smokers. Only 8 percent grew up in a household where the mom was the sole smoker.

About two-thirds of the study participants said they had a history of asthma, and one-quarter said they still had the respiratory condition. More than four in 10 said they had never smoked themselves.

Nearly 1,400 of the survey respondents underwent lung-function tests between 2006 and 2008. The investigators uncovered no evidence of elevated COPD risk among those who had grown up with smoking dads, or moms who smoked less than 20 cigarettes a day.

But those who grew up with mothers who smoked heavily were 2.7 times more likely than others to have a kind of lung impairment that is indicative of COPD. Additional testing revealed that the already elevated risk for COPD seen among offspring who smoked themselves was driven even higher if they had grown up with a mom who smoked heavily.

There were indications that boys might be somewhat more vulnerable to the negative impact of maternal smoking than girls. Perret suggested this could be due to a range of gender-based “biological differences” that unfold throughout childhood development.

Regardless, the team said the findings should bolster current recommendations that pregnant women and young mothers should avoid smoking altogether.

Meanwhile, for those whose moms smoked heavily, what can be done to minimize their COPD risk?

“If there are concerns or symptoms such as breathlessness on exertion, cough or phlegm, they may wish to seek the advice of a doctor who could measure their lung function,” Perret advised.

And, she suggested, “as there may be a combined effect with other smoking and environmental exposures, it would be advisable for them not to smoke, and avoid smoky, dusty and polluted environments where possible.”

Dr. David Mannino, chief scientific officer for the COPD Foundation, expressed little surprise at the findings.

But he cautioned that there is no specific magic bullet for reducing COPD risk among those with this kind of family history.

As for everyone, said Mannino, the focus should be placed on the “same factors that are important to maintaining good health: don’t smoke, exercise, and watch your diet.”

More information

There’s more on COPD at the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RCL96f

Mom’s Smoking May Put Kids at Higher Risk of COPD in Adulthood

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, March 10, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The children of mothers who smoke heavily may face a much higher risk for developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as adults, new research suggests.

The finding is based on the tracking of COPD risk among nearly 1,400 adults, and it suggests that heavy maternal smoking — more than 20 cigarettes per day — increases a child’s long-term COPD risk nearly threefold.

“The findings were not surprising to us,” said study author Jennifer Perret. She is a postdoctoral fellow with the Centre for Air Quality and Evaluation in the Melbourne School of Population & Global Health at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

“Smoking in later life can result in deficits in lung function by middle age. So it was not unexpected to see that mothers’ smoking . . . could also adversely influence the growing lungs of [their children],” Perret said. And, “reduced lung function potential in childhood predisposes an individual to having reduced lung function as an adult,” she added.

However, the study did not prove that a mother’s heavy smoking habit caused her children to have an increased risk for COPD later in life; the researchers only found an association.

Perret and her colleagues reported their findings in the March 10 issue of the journal Respirology.

According to the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, COPD is a progressively worsening illness that greatly compromises a person’s ability to breathe. Smoking is the leading cause of COPD, which is now the third leading cause of death around the world, the researchers said.

To see how COPD risk related to parental smoking patterns, the authors reviewed surveys completed in 2004 by more than 5,700 men and women (average age of 45) who had been participating in a long-running study that began in 1968.

Nearly 40 percent said that when they were 7 years old they lived with a mother who smoked, and 17 percent of this group said their mothers were heavy smokers. Nearly 60 percent grew up with smoking fathers, 34 percent of whom were heavy smokers.

Twelve percent said they grew up in households where both parents were heavy smokers. Only 8 percent grew up in a household where the mom was the sole smoker.

About two-thirds of the study participants said they had a history of asthma, and one-quarter said they still had the respiratory condition. More than four in 10 said they had never smoked themselves.

Nearly 1,400 of the survey respondents underwent lung-function tests between 2006 and 2008. The investigators uncovered no evidence of elevated COPD risk among those who had grown up with smoking dads, or moms who smoked less than 20 cigarettes a day.

But those who grew up with mothers who smoked heavily were 2.7 times more likely than others to have a kind of lung impairment that is indicative of COPD. Additional testing revealed that the already elevated risk for COPD seen among offspring who smoked themselves was driven even higher if they had grown up with a mom who smoked heavily.

There were indications that boys might be somewhat more vulnerable to the negative impact of maternal smoking than girls. Perret suggested this could be due to a range of gender-based “biological differences” that unfold throughout childhood development.

Regardless, the team said the findings should bolster current recommendations that pregnant women and young mothers should avoid smoking altogether.

Meanwhile, for those whose moms smoked heavily, what can be done to minimize their COPD risk?

“If there are concerns or symptoms such as breathlessness on exertion, cough or phlegm, they may wish to seek the advice of a doctor who could measure their lung function,” Perret advised.

And, she suggested, “as there may be a combined effect with other smoking and environmental exposures, it would be advisable for them not to smoke, and avoid smoky, dusty and polluted environments where possible.”

Dr. David Mannino, chief scientific officer for the COPD Foundation, expressed little surprise at the findings.

But he cautioned that there is no specific magic bullet for reducing COPD risk among those with this kind of family history.

As for everyone, said Mannino, the focus should be placed on the “same factors that are important to maintaining good health: don’t smoke, exercise, and watch your diet.”

More information

There’s more on COPD at the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RCL96f