barre

Shorter, Intensive Radiation Works for Prostate Cancer: Study

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A slightly higher dose of radiation therapy for early stage prostate cancer may reduce treatment time without compromising effectiveness, researchers report.

The study included about 1,100 men with early-stage prostate cancer that had not spread beyond the gland. Half received the traditional radiation therapy program of 41 treatments over eight weeks, while the others received slightly higher doses during 28 treatments over about 5.5 weeks.

After five years, cancer-free survival rates were just over 85 percent for those in the traditional group and just over 86 percent for those in the shorter treatment group, while overall survival rates were 93.2 percent and 92.5 percent, respectively.

“This study has implications for public policy,” said lead investigator Dr. W. Robert Lee. He is a professor at the Duke Cancer Institute’s department of radiation oncology, in Durham, N.C.

“Because the shorter regimen has advantages such as greater patient convenience and lower costs, it’s important to establishing whether we can cure as many patients with the shorter regimen. Our study provides that information for the first time,” he added in a university news release.

“An estimated 220,000 men are expected to be newly diagnosed with prostate cancer each year in the United States, and the majority will have early-stage disease at low risk for recurrence,” Lee said.

The study, published April 4 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, was partly funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the U.S. National Cancer Institute.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on prostate cancer.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1S4AnFG

Scientists Try to Stop Another Deadly Virus

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — An experimental drug could offer a new weapon against the virus that causes Argentine hemorrhagic fever — a potentially fatal infection that is considered a “bioterror” threat.

The findings are based on lab studies of guinea pigs. And researchers said it’s not clear when the treatment might advance to human trials.

But they said there’s a vital need for new ways to battle Argentine hemorrhagic fever, which is caused by a virus called Junin. There is no drug against it, and the only treatment is a plasma transfusion from someone who has survived the disease — and, therefore, has built up antibodies against the virus.

Those transfusions are effective, said Dr. Larry Zeitlin, lead researcher on the new study.

But in the event of an outbreak, the supply could fall well short of the demand, said Zeitlin, who is president of the San Diego-based Mapp Biopharmaceutical.

Mapp Bio is one of the companies that developed a similar treatment against the Ebola virus during the 2014-2015 outbreak. That drug, called ZMapp, is still experimental, but last September the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave it “fast-track” status, to speed its approval process.

Junin virus occurs in rural parts of Argentina and, for now, remains confined to that country. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the virus is carried by certain rodents, and humans can become sick if they come in contact with contaminated droppings, urine or saliva.

Person-to-person transmission is rare, but possible, says the Public Health Agency of Canada.

In Argentina, between 10 and 50 people are infected with Junin virus each year, said Dr. Delia Enria, a scientist with Argentina’s National Laboratories and Health Institutes Administration, who also worked on the study.

It’s a small number, but within Argentina, the areas affected by Junin have expanded, Enria said.

And there is always the potential for the virus to escape its confined area, Zeitlin said.

“As we’ve seen with the Ebola outbreak in West Africa and the ongoing Zika epidemic, it’s very difficult to predict when and where viruses like these will spread,” he said. Junin “is not a virus I lose sleep over, but it’s one to keep a watchful eye on.”

Junin is also on the U.S. government’s list of potential bioterror weapons — along with other viruses that cause hemorrhagic fever. Their symptoms vary, but most often include high fever, dizziness and fatigue. Some people will develop internal bleeding and neurological complications, such as delirium and seizures.

Untreated, Junin infection has a death rate of 20 percent to 30 percent, Zeitlin’s team said.

Similar to ZMapp, the experimental drug against Junin is a monoclonal antibody. Antibodies are immune system proteins that recognize foreign invaders; monoclonal antibodies are generated in the lab and designed to latch onto a specific target, like a cancer cell or virus.

The monoclonal antibody against Junin, dubbed J199, was isolated from mice exposed to a key Junin protein, then genetically altered to make it more like a human antibody, the researchers said.

When Zeitlin’s team tested it in guinea pigs infected with Junin, the antibody prevented death in all of the animals when started within six days. When given on day seven, 92 percent survived.

A monoclonal antibody capable of fighting Junin would be “very welcome,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja, a spokesman for the Infectious Disease Society of America. He was not involved in the study.

Now, Adalja said, monoclonal antibodies are mainly used to treat certain cancers and some autoimmune diseases.

But the antibodies are an “elegant approach” to treating serious infections, he said. “Hopefully, we’ll see more of them being used in infectious disease,” Adalja added.

The question is, will J199 advance to human testing any time soon?

“Drug development is very expensive and it may be challenging to move J199 much further along,” Zeitlin said. “We may need to ‘park’ J199, so it’s available for rapid advancement should a large-scale Junin outbreak occur.”

A better move, Zeitlin said, could be to focus on finding a “broad-spectrum” antibody against Junin and other viruses in the same family, which are also on the U.S. government’s list of possible bioterror weapons.

The study findings were reported April 4 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on viral hemorrhagic fevers.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1S4AmBR

Study: Smoking Hikes Chances of Early Death for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Smoking increases the chances of early death in people with rheumatoid arthritis, but quitting smoking significantly reduces that risk, a new study suggests.

“This research provides important evidence that the risk of early death starts to decline in patients who stop smoking, and continues year on year,” said researcher Deborah Symmons. She is a professor of rheumatology and musculoskeletal epidemiology at the University of Manchester in England.

Symmons and her colleagues analyzed data from rheumatoid arthritis patients in the United Kingdom. The investigators found that the patients who smoked were nearly twice as likely to die prematurely as those who never smoked.

The risk among former smokers was similar to that of those who never smoked, and fell for each additional year they no longer smoked, the researchers said.

“We hope that this research can be used by public health professionals and rheumatologists to help more people quit smoking and reduce premature deaths, particularly for newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Symmons added in a university news release.

Previous research has shown that smoking plays a role in the development of rheumatoid arthritis, so the smoking rate among people with the disease is higher than in the general population, the researchers noted.

People with rheumatoid arthritis also have an increased risk for death due to other health problems, such as heart disease, cancer, severe infection and respiratory diseases, the study team explained.

According to Stephen Simpson, director of research and programs at Arthritis Research UK, “Rheumatoid arthritis is a debilitating and painful condition … it can begin at any age and is unpredictable — one day you can feel fine and the next day be confined to bed, unable to get up to dress, even go to the toilet unaided.”

The study was published online recently in the journal Arthritis Care and Research.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about rheumatoid arthritis.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1S4AmBL

Weight-Loss Surgery May Help Control Type 2 Diabetes in Long Run

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — New research adds to growing evidence that weight-loss surgery helps patients with type 2 diabetes lower their blood sugar levels for at least five years.

“Left unchecked, diabetes can lead to kidney failure, blindness and limb amputation,” study co-author Dr. Sangeeta Kashyap, an endocrinologist at the Cleveland Clinic’s Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute, explained in a hospital news release.

“At the five-year mark, bariatric [weight-loss] surgery’s metabolic effect persists and is more effective at treating type 2 diabetes in moderate and severely obese patients when compared to medical therapy,” Kashyap added.

Diabetes affects 29 million people in the United States, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More than 70,000 people die each year from complications associated with diabetes, the American Diabetes Association reports.

About half of those taking medication to treat type 2 diabetes are still not able to keep their blood sugar levels under control, the researchers noted.

But British researchers reported in The Lancet medical journal last September that weight-loss surgery helped type 2 diabetes patients fight their disease. Five years after surgery, half of 38 patients who had surgery saw their diabetes go into remission, compared to none of the 15 patients in the medication-only group.

In this latest study, 150 overweight people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes were divided into three groups. The first group received counseling and medications (“medical therapy”). The second group received medications and also had gastric bypass surgery. The final group had medications and had a different weight-loss surgery, called sleeve gastrectomy.

In gastric bypass surgery, the stomach is divided into a small upper pouch and a much larger lower “remnant” pouch, and the small intestine is rearranged to connect to both. With sleeve gastrectomy, a large portion of the stomach is actually removed.

The effectiveness of each treatment strategy was assessed using a hemoglobin A1C test. This test gauges a person’s average blood sugar control over the past three months. The researchers examined which patients achieved a level of 6 percent or less — a more aggressive blood sugar level target than recommended by the American Diabetes Association.

After five years, the rates of reaching and maintaining blood sugar levels of 6 percent or less were significantly higher among those who had weight-loss surgery. The findings showed that 29 percent of those who had gastric bypass surgery and 23 percent of those who had a sleeve gastrectomy reached the target level, while only 5 percent of the medication-only group did.

The use of heart medications, insulin or other drugs to treat diabetes was also much lower among patients who had either weight-loss surgery, the investigators found.

And, more than 88 percent of those who had surgery were able to keep their blood sugar levels in check without insulin, according to the report.

“Our findings show continued durability of glycemic [blood sugar] control after metabolic surgery, as well as persistent weight loss, [and] reduction in diabetes and cardiovascular medications at five years,” study author Dr. Philip Schauer said in the news release. Schauer is a bariatric surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

However, the researchers noted that weight-loss surgery is associated with some risk for certain complications.

“The superior benefits of surgery to attain diabetes treatment goals must be carefully balanced with the long-term risks associated with surgery for individual patients,” said Kashyap.

The study authors also suggested that gastric bypass may have greater benefits than other forms of weight-loss surgery.

“Some advantages of gastric bypass over sleeve gastrectomy have emerged during follow-up,” Schauer said. “At five years, gastric bypass maintained greater weight loss than sleeve gastrectomy, while requiring fewer medications.”

The researchers suggested the findings could increase the number of people with poor blood sugar control who could be considered candidates for weight-loss surgery.

“Most clinical guidelines and insurance policies for bariatric surgery limit access to patients with a BMI [body mass index, which measures body fat] of 35 or above,” said Schauer. “Our five-year results demonstrate that glycemic improvement in patients with a BMI of 27 to 34 is durable at least up to five years.”

The findings were to be presented Monday at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology, in Chicago. Research presented at medical meetings is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases has more about bariatric surgery.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1S4Amlp

Move of the Week: Low-Belly Leg Reach

Want to learn a move that will totally chisel your lower abs? What about one you can do any time, anywhere? Introducing the low-belly leg reach—a simple yet effective exercise that tightens and tones the core. Learn how to execute this strengthening move with the help of Health’s resident fitness expert, Kristin McGee.

RELATED: 4 Ab-Sculpting Plank Variations

Here’s how to do it: Lie on your back with hands behind head, knees bent to 90 degrees. Inhale as you lift your shoulders to crunch up; hold for 3-5 seconds. Extend your legs to 45 degrees and hold for 3-5 seconds. That’s one rep. Do 10-15 reps, and aim for 2 sets.

Trainer tip: Focus on contracting your abs and keeping your back flat against the ground.

Meet Kristin McGee at the Health‘s Total Wellness Weekend at Canyon Ranch resort April 22-24. For details, go to http://ift.tt/1AYb7dA.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1UE9CP9

Cara Delevigne Opens Up About Her Depression and a ‘Particularly Rough Patch of Self-Hatred’

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

Model and actress Cara Delevigne has reappeared in the public eye in more ways than one. Not only is she the face of Saint Laurent’s new ad campaign, but she also opened up on Twitter about the real reason she decided to take a break from modeling last year.

RELATED: 12 Surprising Causes of Depression

The 23-year-old’s “rant” is a powerful one. The world could benefit from hearing such honest talk about depression more often. More than 16 million adults in the U.S. suffer from depressive symptoms each year, according to the Anxiety and Depression Association of America. And yet mental health issues are typically kept secret, thanks to painful stigmas and prejudice.

By sharing her own story, Delevigne reminds us that speaking up about these kinds of struggles is a sign of profound strength. And she’s not alone: Just last week, Ruby Rose also opened up about her battle with depression, after a fan retweeted a post by Rose from three years ago, when the model and Orange Is the New Black star had hit “rock bottom.”

Rose posted the tweet on Instagram along with a moving and hopeful message: “I chose to fight and I thought it meant I’d be able to live. I DIDNT think it meant I’d be able to live my dream,” she wrote. “It just makes me wonder how many others are days, hours, seconds away from realizing their worth.”

Instagram Photo

RELATED: 12 Signs of Depression in Men 

Both Rose and Delevigne received an overwhelming response from fans, many of whom shared their own challenging experiences with depression.

After the flood of replies, Rose was inspired to tweet one more message to anyone who may be feeling the darkness she once felt.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1UE3zdn

The Best Anti-Allergy Bedding

Allergy sufferers, listen up: your bedroom may be the source of your sniffles. Dust mites are the most common cause of allergies from house dust, according to the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. These tiny bugs live in pillows, mattresses, carpets, and upholstery, and even if you keep a sparkling clean home, they can still burrow their way into your bedding. Soothe your sneezing by washing all of your bedding in hot water weekly. You can also invest in tightly woven encasements with zippers that fully seal, like the following 12 allergy-proofing products.

Pillowcases

MISSION: ALLERGY Dust Mite- and Allergen-Proof Pillow Encasing ($19; amazon.com)

Tough enough to keep mites out for the night, but airy enough to keep you cool and comfortable, these medical-grade covers make for the perfect protector.

allergy proof pillowcase

Photo: amazon.com

Allersoft 100-Percent Cotton Dust Mite & Allergy Control Standard Pillow Encasement ($12; amazon.com)

Along with its allergy-controlling encasement, the 280-thread-count case gets high ratings for its softness.

allersoft pillowcase

Photo: amazon.com

SureGuard Pillow Protectors ($50; amazon.com)

The superfine zipper in this pillowcase set keeps even the smallest mites out.

sure guard pillow protector

Photo: amazon.com

Pillows

AllerEase Hot Water Washable Allergy Protection Pillow ($23; amazon.com)

Gone are the days of ruining your pillow’s shape in the wash. This AllerEase option is designed to withstand hot, mite-ridding temps without loosing its fluff.

aller ease pillow

Photo: amazon.com

Restwel Hypoallergenic Body Pillow ($80; amazon.com)

This full body pillow cushions from head to toe with hypoallergenic memory foam.

bamboo tech body pillow

Photo: amazon.com

Mattress covers

MISSION: ALLERGY Dust Mite- and Allergen-Proof Mattress Encasing ($140; amazon.com)

The tightly wound microfiber keeps out dust and dander while you catch up on Z’s.

mattress encasement

Photo: amazon.com

Elf Sleep Safe Bed Bug, Dust Mite, and Allergen Proof Mattress Cover ($80; amazon.com)

This zippered encasement keeps allergens out with all environmentally safe, raw materials.

elf mattress cover

Photo: amazon.com

Sky Bedding Mattress Protector ($120; amazon.com)

With the promise to fit all mattresses, this protector will keep any bed allergen free.

sky mattress cover

Photo: amazon.com

Allersoft 100-Percent Cotton Dust Mite and Allergy Control King Duvet Protector ($80; amazon.com)

This protective cover easily slips over your comforter, yet under your decorative cover, to seal out allergens without sacrificing your bedroom style.

allersoft duvet protector

Photo: amazon.com

Comforters

Natural Comfort Classic Down Alternative Comforter ($57; amazon.com)

This 200 thread-count goose down comforter is so luxurious, you’ll almost forget that it’s 100% allergy free.

goose down alternative comforter

Photo: amazon.com

Aller-Ease Allergy Bedding Medium-Warmth Down-Alternative Comforter ($180; jcpenney.com)

This medium-weight comforter is hot-water washable and can be used comfortably year-round to keep out pet dander, pollen, dust mites, and other allergens.

down alternative comforter

Photo: jcpenney.com

Dust Buster Allergy Relief Down-Alternative Comforter ($250; jcpenney.com)

In addition to keeping allergies at bay, this comforter is water- and stain-resistant.

allergy relief comforter

Photo: jcpenney.com




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/200KD85

Loose Bristles From Grill-Cleaning Brushes May Pose Dangers

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A new study suggests that you might want to take one last look after cleaning your grill this summer, to make sure no bristles from your wire brush are left behind.

That’s because those loose bristles can stick to the grill, end up in your food, and cause mouth, throat and stomach/intestinal injuries, researchers found.

Some of the patients required surgery for these injuries, which were more common in the summer and occurred more often in the mouth and throat than in the stomach/intestines, the investigators reported.

The study was published April 4 in the journal Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.

“The issue is likely under-reported and thus underappreciated,” study author Dr. C.W. David Chang said in a journal news release. He is an associate professor of clinical otolaryngology at the University of Missouri’s School of Medicine, in Columbia, Mo.

“Because of the uncommon nature of wire bristle injuries, people may not be as mindful about the dangers and implications. Awareness among emergency department physicians, radiologists and otolaryngologists is particularly important so that appropriate tests and examinations can be conducted,” Chang added.

In the study, the researchers reviewed studies and analyzed U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission data. The team identified almost 1,700 grill brush injury-related visits to U.S. emergency rooms between 2002 and 2014. That estimate does not include people who were seen at urgent care or other outpatient facilities, the researchers added.

People need to be careful when cleaning barbeque grills with wire bristle brushes, and should examine the brushes before use, and throw them out if bristles are too loose. It’s also important to check the grill before use and to consider different cleaning methods, the study authors said.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on injuries caused by wire grill brush bristles.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RAl6Ro

Treating Depression Might Help Stem Heart Woes: Study

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Effective treatment of depression seems to reduce a person’s risk of heart disease, according to a new study.

Depression is a known risk factor for heart disease, but how treatment for depression affected that risk was unclear, researchers said.

This study of 7,550 people found that effective treatment for depression could lower a patient’s heart risks to the same level as those who never had depression, reducing their chances of stroke, heart attack, heart failure and death.

The risk of major heart problems was: 4.6 percent among those successfully treated for depression: 4.8 percent among those without depression; 6 percent among those with depression who did not respond to treatment; and 6.4 percent among those who developed depression during the study.

The findings from the researchers at the Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute in Salt Lake City were to be presented Saturday at an American College of Cardiology meeting in Chicago. Studies presented at meetings are usually considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

“Our study shows that prompt, effective treatment of depression appears to improve the risk of poor heart health,” Heidi May, a cardiovascular epidemiologist, said in medical center news release.

“With the help of past research, we know depression affects long-term cardiovascular risks, but knowing that alleviating the symptoms of depression reduces a person’s risk of heart disease in the short term, too, can help care providers and patients commit more fully to treating the symptoms of depression,” she said.

“The key conclusion of our study is: If depression isn’t treated, the risk of cardiovascular complications increases significantly,” May said.

Further research is needed to determine which types of depression treatment are most effective in reducing heart risks, the researchers said.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Mental Health has more on depression.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RAl6Rg

Stem Cell Therapy Shows Promise Against Heart Failure

MONDAY, April 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Stem cell therapy shows promise for people battling heart failure, a new study finds.

The clinical trial found that end-stage heart failure patients treated with stem cells harvested from their own bone marrow had 37 percent fewer cardiac events than those who received a “dummy” placebo.

“For the last 15 years, everyone has been talking about cell therapy and what it can do. These results suggest that it really works,” study author and cardiac surgeon Dr. Amit Patel, director of Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine at the University of Utah School of Medicine in Salt Lake City, said in a university news release.

Another expert was cautiously optimistic about the results.

While the findings are promising, “further long-term data — and hopefully improved levels of heart efficiency and performance — would still need to be seen,” said Dr. David Friedman, chief of heart failure services at Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Valley Stream Hospital.

In heart failure, a weakened or damaged heart no longer pumps blood the way it should. This potentially fatal disease affects about 5.7 million Americans, according to the American Heart Association.

The new study involved 126 heart failure patients. Sixty received the stem cell treatment, while the other 66 got a placebo.

After one year, 4 percent of the stem cell therapy patients had died and about 52 percent had been hospitalized for heart failure. That was an improvement on the group receiving the placebo, where 8 percent of patients died and more than 82 percent ended up in the hospital, Patel’s team said.

“This is the first trial of cell therapy showing that it can have a meaningful impact on the lives of patients with heart failure,” Patel added.

If further studies are successful, stem cell therapy may one day offer an alternative to current treatments for end-stage heart failure, such as heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device therapy, the researchers said.

The study was published online April 4 in The Lancet journal and presented simultaneously at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in Chicago.

There was other potentially good news from the ACC meeting for heart failure patients. On Sunday, a 10-year study led by researchers at Duke University found that bypass surgery plus medication appears to work better for heart failure patients, compared to the use of medications alone.

The study involved more than 1,200 patients with severe heart disease and heart failure who were tracked for about a decade. All of the patients got standard heart drugs, but those who also underwent coronary bypass lived a median of 16 months longer. They also suffered fewer heart attacks, strokes and hospitalizations, the study found.

“This now demonstrates that the advantages of [bypass] are robust and durable and the procedure saves and extends lives,” study author Dr. Eric Velasquez, heart failure specialist at the Duke Clinical Research Institute in Durham, N.C., said in a university news release.

The Duke study was also reported online April 3 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more on heart failure.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RAl6R8