barre

Refugees Aren’t Getting Needed Surgeries

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Millions of refugees aren’t getting the surgery they need, researchers report.

“When planning to take care of refugees, much thought is put into how to house and feed and clothe people who are far from home for circumstances often beyond their control. But surgery is a basic need and nobody talks about this,” said Dr. Adam Kushner, leader of a new study conducted at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

An analysis of data from the United Nations and other sources estimates that the roughly 60 million refugees worldwide may need at least 2.8 million surgeries a year. But their circumstances make it difficult to receive that type of medical care, the researchers added.

The types of surgeries required range from broken bones and hernia repair to cesarean sections, cleft lips, gallbladder removal and burn care, the study found.

The findings highlight a situation few governments and humanitarian aid agencies plan for when preparing to deal with large numbers of refugees, the researchers said.

“We are facing the largest forced migration crisis since World War II,” Kushner said in a Hopkins news release.

“While surgery is a critical component of health care, it is often neglected in times of crisis. Without access to timely and safe surgery, many people will become disabled and many will die — outcomes that could have been prevented,” he said.

Many types of surgical care are easy to do and very cost-effective, he added.

Reasons why refugees have trouble getting necessary surgery include lack of proper documentation and high costs or poor surgical infrastructure in their host country, the researchers noted.

The findings were published May 25 in the World Journal of Surgery.

More information

The World Health Organization has more on refugees.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/20W8WEe

Why Stroke in Middle Age Is More Deadly for Blacks Than Whites

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — A higher stroke rate — not differences in care after a stroke — is the reason why middle-aged black Americans are more likely to die from a stroke than whites, a new study suggests.

Researchers reviewed data from almost 30,000 people across the United States. At age 45, blacks were four times more likely to die of stroke than whites. By age 85, stroke death rates were the same for blacks and whites, the study showed.

But while middle-aged blacks were more likely than whites to die from a stroke, there were no black-white differences in the risk of death among stroke survivors, according to the study in the June 2 issue of the journal Stroke.

“The magnitude of public health burden of the racial disparity in stroke is staggering, with an estimated 22,384 ‘extra’ stroke events [occurring in black people in 2014],” study author George Howard, a professor of biostatistics at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, said in a journal news release.

The researchers said their findings show the need to boost efforts to prevent and control stroke risk factors that are more common in blacks, such as high blood pressure and diabetes.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians has more on stroke.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1VzXEG8

Stem Cells May Offer New Hope to Stroke Survivors

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Preliminary research suggests that injecting adult stems cells directly into the brain may give stroke patients a new shot at recovery long after their stroke occurred.

“We don’t want to oversell this,” stressed study lead author Dr. Gary Steinberg, chair of neurosurgery at Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo, Alto, Calif.

“This isn’t the first stem cell trial for stroke, and we’re in the early phase, with only 18 patients. But after injecting stem cells directly into the brain of chronic stroke patients, we were blown away,” he said.

“These were patients who had significant motor deficits for six months or more,” said Steinberg. “People who had a hard time moving their arm or leg, or walking. People for whom we have no real treatment. But after the injections we saw improvement in all 18 patients, as a group, within a month. Within days some were lifting their arms over their head. Lifting their legs off their bed. Walking, when they hadn’t in months or years. The results were very exciting.”

About 800,000 Americans experience a stroke every year. There are roughly 7 million chronic stroke survivors in the United States. Many of these survivors end up facing a new reality, in which lost motor function is unlikely to return, the researchers said.

“We’re used to 90 percent or more of stroke recovery taking place in the first six months,” Steinberg said. “So the thinking has been that we really can’t restore function in chronic stroke patients because their circuits are dead.”

But the new research set out to upend this thinking.

First, the research team selected people who had severe, but not extreme, motor impairment from a stroke. Most had experienced their stroke at least one year prior to the study launch. Their average age was 61.

One such patient was Long Beach, Calif., resident Sonia Olea Coontz.

“I was 31 when I had my stroke on May 14, 2011,” she said. Between then and her 2013 enrollment in the trial, Coontz struggled with a debilitating loss of mobility.

“I could only move my right arm very little,” she recalled. “And I was in a lot of pain. Same with my leg. Walking was very difficult. Every time I went to the hospital I was in a wheelchair because it was just a lot easier. And speaking was hard. I always needed someone to help me communicate.”

The experimental stem cell procedure began with doctors drilling a small hole through the skull. Patients had minimal anesthesia. In turn, neurosurgeons injected modified stem cells directly into multiple areas of the brain near the site of each patient’s stroke.

The result: with no apparent blood abnormalities or significant side effects, all of the patients experienced significant motor control recovery within the first month. Younger patients tended to fare better, the investigators found.

Mobility continued to improve throughout the first three months. Gains were maintained at both the six month and one-year follow-up.

“After the surgery I was immediately better,” said Coontz. “It was amazing. After the surgery the pain in my shoulder was gone. My arm, I could move it all the way up to the ceiling and back. And my leg was stronger. I didn’t use a wheelchair after that. Ever.”

And, she added in a clear voice, “I was also much better with speaking. I still needed a little help. But my words were stronger. And it continued to get better. Even now it’s still getting better.”

How do the stem cells seem to help?

“We’re still not exactly sure what’s happening,” admitted Steinberg. Because the stem cells tend to die off one to two months following injection, he suggested that “it’s probably not that the stem cells are becoming neurons and reconstituting circuits. That’s not what appears to be going on.”

Dr. Ralph Sacco is chairman of neurology at the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine. “A lot of people assume that the point of stem cells is that they will become new brain cells,” he said.

“But in fact, we know that much of stroke recovery seems to take place in the parallel or surrounding or connecting regions next to the damaged stroke area,” he added. Sacco is also the president-elect of the American Academy of Neurology.

“The latest thinking is that the big virtue of stem cells — in addition to their anti-inflammatory and immunological effect — may be their ability to secrete chemicals that activate those surrounding brain cells so that they can start to pick up function for the parts of the brain that no longer work right,” Sacco said.

“In other words,” Steinberg said, “we think these cells turn the adult brain into a neonatal or infant brain. And infants recover very well after a stroke, because their brains have greater plasticity, and the ability to form new connections between cells already in the brain.”

Steinberg said that “somehow putting these stem cells directly into the brain jumpstarts circuits we had thought were irreversibly damaged or dead, with remarkable results.”

But as the research team embarks on a larger study involving 156 chronic stroke patients, Sacco urged caution.

“The results do sound amazing,” he said. “But keeping in mind that everyone has long been looking for a miracle cure for stroke. It’s really premature to draw conclusions. This is one very small study that was really set up to establish safety. More work will be needed.”

But for patients like Coontz, the jury is already in.

“The other treatments before surgery didn’t work,” she said. “Not really. I felt like my whole body was dead. Like it wasn’t working at all. Rehab didn’t help. But after the surgery, it felt like my body was all of a sudden awake.”

The study was published online June 2 in the journal Stroke.

More information

The American Heart Association has more on current stroke treatments.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1VzXa2F

Prince Died From Potent Prescription Painkiller: Autopsy

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Music superstar Prince’s April 21 death was caused by a self-administered dose of the potent prescription painkiller fentanyl.

That’s was the conclusion of the long-awaited autopsy report from the Midwest Medical Examiner’s Office in Minnesota, which ruled the death of the 57-year-old music icon an accident, according to published reports.

Fentanyl is a powerful synthetic opiate similar to, but more potent than, morphine. It’s typically given to patients to treat severe pain, or to manage pain after surgery. It’s also sometimes prescribed to those with chronic pain who are physically tolerant to opioid painkillers, according to the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Prince’s body was found at his Paisley Park compound in suburban Minneapolis.

While Thursday’s news shed light on the particular experience of one exceptional individual, the broad outlines of Prince’s story are by no means unique.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has called prescription opioid misuse and addiction a full-blown “epidemic.” The drugs are typically prescribed for a variety of painful conditions, including dental and injury-related pain.

The numbers are stark. About two million Americans are now in the throes of prescription opioid abuse or dependence, according to the CDC. And more than 165,000 U.S. men and women died from a prescription opioid overdose from 1999 to 2014.

And a quadrupling of opioid-related overdoses — including heroin use — between 2000 and 2014 suggests the problem is getting worse.

The upshot: Prince was one of at least 14,000 Americans who lose their lives to prescription opioid overdoses each year, according to the CDC.

Much of the opioid addiction problem is due to illicit use. A 2014 report by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration said that 75 percent of all opioid abuse involves people accessing the pain medications through friends, family members or dealers, rather than a doctor’s prescription.

Still, at least a quarter of all opioid abuse traces back to legitimate patients, like Prince, who were initially prescribed drugs such as oxycodone (OxyContin), and hydrocodone (Vicodin) for medical problems that involve acute or chronic pain.

“Opioids are the gold standard for pain management,” said Kelly Dunn, an assistant professor with the behavioral pharmacology research unit at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. “And it’s important not to vilify physicians who are genuinely treating patients who need them.

“But ever since we embraced the notion that pain is the ‘fifth vital sign’ — back around 2000 — the increased emphasis on pain evaluation and treatment has led to a hugely increased market for opioid manufacturing and distribution,” Dunn added. “So opioid meds, which really function in the same manner as heroin, have become widely abundant.”

According to the CDC, health care providers wrote 259 million prescriptions for painkillers in 2012, enough for a bottle of pills for every American adult.

“The problem,” Dunn said, “is that most of the addiction research so far has focused on illicit users. So until recently we haven’t really thought enough about which pain patients will do well with these meds. Of course, it’s certainly true that most people can take a course of opioids and be totally fine. But the more widely they’re prescribed, and the longer patients are on them, the greater the risk.”

Therein lies the rub, according to Anita Gupta, vice chair of the department of anesthesiology in the division of pain medicine and regional anesthesiology at the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia.

“Opioids are the cornerstone of the treatment of pain,” she said. “There’s no question about it. And they can be safe. For millions of Americans it’s part of their treatment of pain.”

“But the issue is how to use them safely and responsibly,” Gupta said. “They have to be taken vigilantly, as directed. And doctors and patients have to know that other diseases and other medications can interact negatively with opioids. And be aware of factors that we now know up the risk for abuse.”

Those risk factors, she noted, include a history of prior substance abuse; a history of sleep aids prescriptions for insomnia and sleep disorders; and a history of mental health trouble.

Both Dunn and Gupta said many of those concerns are now outlined in a new set of CDC guidelines, issued in March, that for the first time direct physicians on to how to best prescribe, manage and monitor opioid treatment.

“The guidelines are very clear, and a foundation for how to handle opioid treatment going forward,” said Gupta. “Which is great, because this is an all-hands-on-deck crisis.

“But what’s needed more than anything is a real conversation between doctors, patients and family members about what the pain control goals are and what the risks are. Because there are risks,” she added. “And also how to identify signs of an overdose and how to intervene, and the importance of having (the opioid blocker) naloxone (Narcan) on hand, and how to use it.”

“Because the fact is, unintentional overdoses happen all the time,” Gupta said. “It could very well have been unintentional for Prince. We don’t know. But he was such a secretive person. And perhaps he underestimated the importance of having people around him who he could talk to and who were educated about safe opioid use. Those conversations are critical. Unfortunately, they’re not always happening.”

More information

There’s more on prescription opioid guidelines at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1VzY1R3

Avocado Nails Are the Perfect Summer Mani, Hands Down

Instagram Photo

If you’re looking for a super fresh mani idea for summer, we found it for you. Seriously, this avocado manicure is probably the cutest form of avocado you could possibly ever see, and that’s saying a lot because, well, guacamole is amazing.

The design was created by Reddit user iheart_nails_, who’s also on Instagram as @nailallie. She says that the design was inspired by a cute pattern she found while browsing Pinterest. To create the design, she used the following nail polishes: Deco Miami Don’t Call Me Baby Girl, Essie Mink Muffs, Mojito Madness, Little Brown Dress, and Off Topic, and Sally Hansen Lemon Shark, and White On. It also looks like she applied a matte top coat.

RELATED: This Product Will Make You Look Forward to Shaving Your Legs

Instagram Photo

The comments on her r/RedditLaqeristas post are as gushy as you’d expect, complete with a “Yummy looking!” by user Wild_Flower_ and “Oh my god, this is amazing!” from user jealouspony. Our favorite response, though? “Holy moly guacamole!” from IG user nailsonthames. Our thoughts exactly.

This article originally appeared on InStyle.com/MIMI.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1sPDZXc

Why Lena Dunham Trying to Meditate Is All of Us

Oh, meditation. You are so good for us, and yet so hard to do.

Taking a short breather in a comfortable, quiet place should be a no-brainer, right? Experts say 20 minutes of meditation is really all you need. But even when the stars align (you remembered to silence your phone, you’re wearing a shirt that doesn’t itch) it can be seriously hard to chill out.

Feel familiar? Then you need to watch this new Vogue video, in which Lena Dunham hysterically portrays how challenging it can be to get your thoughts to just shut up.

RELATED: The Beginner’s Guide to Meditation

As Dunham settles into the lotus position on her bed, she starts to get hyper-aware of the sensations in various parts of her body (“Now my toe’s numb. That’s a thing. That’s a thing but it’s a thing that’s O.K.“). Then come the anxious thoughts: If she and her boyfriend have a kid, will their relationship fall apart? Flash to visions of said kid tearing up her Vogue cover. You get the idea.

As the worries begin whirling through Dunham’s mind (including the possibility that she will develop a lazy eye), she repeatedly brings herself back to the task at hand (“I am focused, I am breathing“) until—finally—she achieves a blissful moment of zen. That peaceful, deeply restorative state is worth all the frustration it takes to get there.

And lucky for us, getting there gets easier with practice.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ZgKMDL

The Teen Brain Likes Social Media ‘Likes’

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Social media “likes” appear to have a powerful effect on the teen brain, new research suggests.

Getting a large number of likes on their own photos or the photos of their peers activated the same brain circuits turned on by such things as eating chocolate or winning money, the study found.

“When the teens saw their own photos with a large number of likes, we saw activity across a wide variety of regions in the brain,” said study lead author Lauren Sherman, a researcher in the University of California, Los Angeles’ Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center.

The study included 32 teens, 13 to 18 years old, looking at social media. They had functional MRI (fMRI) scans while looking at photos and the number of likes the photos received. Each of the teens submitted 40 of the photos they were shown while undergoing fMRI. In reality, the researchers controlled the number of likes each photo received, but this was not revealed to the teens.

During the test, one especially active region was a part of the brain’s reward circuitry, which is believed to be particularly sensitive during adolescence, Sherman explained.

When the teenagers saw their photos with a large number of likes, there was also activation in brain regions known as the social brain and those linked to visual attention, the researchers said.

The researchers also found that when teens were deciding whether to indicate they liked a photo, they were highly influenced by the number of likes the photo already had.

“We showed the exact same photo with a lot of likes to half of the teens and to the other half with just a few likes,” Sherman said in a UCLA news release. “When they saw a photo with more likes, they were significantly more likely to like it themselves. Teens react differently to information when they believe it has been endorsed by many or few of their peers, even if these peers are strangers.”

In real life, the influence of friends on teens is likely to be even stronger, according to study co-senior author Mirella Dapretto, a professor of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences at UCLA’s Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior.

“In the study, this was a group of virtual strangers to them, and yet they were still responding to peer influence; their willingness to conform manifested itself both at the brain level and in what they chose to like,” Dapretto said.

“We should expect the effect would be magnified in real life, when teens are looking at likes by people who are important to them,” she added.

Many teens and young adults befriend unfamiliar people online, and that should concern parents, Dapretto said.

“That opens up the possibility of a child being more influenced by people who may engage in more risk-taking behavior than your child or your child’s immediate friends,” she said.

Study senior co-author Patricia Greenfield is director of UCLA’s Children’s Digital Media Center, Los Angeles, where Sherman is also a researcher. “Parents used to know their child’s friends, but when they have several hundred friends, there’s no way parents can know who they are,” Greenfield said.

The study was published May 31 in the journal Psychological Science.

More information

The American Psychological Association has more about social media and kids.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/24lcsIV

Zika Threat Calls for Extra Mosquito Protection This Summer

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — With the Zika threat growing in the United States, people need to take extra steps to protect themselves against the mosquito species that carries the virus, experts say.

The Zika virus is spread by the Aedes aegypti mosquito. Symptoms of infection include fever, rash, joint pain and red eyes that may last for a week. The virus is especially dangerous for pregnant women and those considering becoming pregnant because it increases the risk of a birth defect called microcephaly, in which a baby has an abnormally small head and brain.

Brazil has been the epicenter of the Zika outbreak, with close to 5,000 cases of microcephaly. But two infants have been born in the United States with the condition, in Hawaii and New Jersey. And health officials expect more cases of Zika in the southeastern part of the country as the summer season starts.

The Nebraska Regional Poison Center suggests that you protect yourself and your family from mosquitoes by following “the 3 D’s”:

  • Drain water from garbage cans, tarps on outdoor furniture, coolers, planters, pet bowls and other sources of standing water where mosquitoes can breed. Check for standing water after every rain and every time you water the lawn/garden, and wipe out birdbaths every few days.
  • Dress to ward off mosquitoes. Wear clothing that is loose, light-colored and has long sleeves and covers your legs. Cover cribs, strollers and baby carriers with mosquito netting.
  • Defend against mosquitoes using a number of methods. Mosquitoes are weak flyers, so consider using a fan when sitting outside. Plant marigolds or citronella, which are considered natural mosquito repellents. Instead of regular light bulbs, use LED lights outdoors because they do not attract mosquitoes.

Insect repellent is one of the best defenses against mosquitoes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-registered repellents are considered safe and effective, even for pregnant and breast-feeding women, according to the poison center.

When you come inside, wash repellents off with soap and water. Do not use repellents under clothing, do not apply them on skin that is cut or scraped, and do not use them on children younger than 2 months of age. When applying repellents to children, avoid their eyes and mouth. Apply the repellent to your hands and then apply to the child’s face.

More information

Visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for more on the Zika virus.

This Q&A will tell you what you need to know about Zika.

To see the CDC list of sites where Zika virus is active and may pose a threat to pregnant women, click here.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/24ldkgA

Low-Dose Aspirin Tied to Longer Colon Cancer Survival

By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Colon cancer patients who take low-dose aspirin may have a somewhat better chance of surviving the disease, a large study hints.

Norwegian researchers found that among over 23,000 colon cancer patients, those who used aspirin were 15 percent less likely to die of the disease over the next several years.

But these findings alone don’t prove that aspirin prolongs colon cancer patients’ lives. There could be other reasons that aspirin users had better survival odds, according to lead researcher Dr. Kjetil Tasken, a professor of medicine at the University of Oslo, in Norway.

Still, he said, there is a large body of evidence that low-dose aspirin can help cut people’s risk of developing colon cancer in the first place.

In fact, recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force say that adults in their 50s and 60s may want to consider taking low-dose aspirin to reduce their risk of colon cancer (and heart disease and stroke).

What’s unclear, Tasken explained, is whether people who already have the disease can benefit from adding aspirin to standard treatment.

Based on the current findings, that possibility is “well worth pursuing,” Tasken said. But he stressed that clinical trials — where researchers directly test aspirin as a colon cancer treatment — are needed to know for sure.

Those trials are already underway, and Tasken said that patients should wait for the results before turning to aspirin on their own. Aspirin does have risks, including bleeding in the stomach or brain, the study said.

The findings are based on records from more than 23,000 Norwegian adults. They were all diagnosed with colon cancer between 2004 and 2011. More than one-quarter were prescribed daily low-dose aspirin for more than six months after their diagnosis. And, most had been taking aspirin before their diagnosis, too.

In Norway, low-dose aspirin is available only by prescription, at doses of 75 milligrams (mg) or 160 mg a day. It’s usually prescribed for lowering the risks of heart disease and stroke, Tasken said.

Overall, the study found, 66 percent of aspirin users were still alive after about three years. That compared with 58 percent of nonusers, the study found.

The researchers tried to account for other explanations — such as age, the severity of the cancer, and whether patients were taking other drugs to protect their hearts.

Still, the survival benefit for aspirin users remained.

When the researchers dug deeper, the benefit was concentrated among patients who’d been taking aspirin before their diagnosis: They were 23 percent less likely to die of colon cancer — and 14 percent less likely to die of any cause — than patients who did not use aspirin at all.

An expert not involved in the study said it raises an “interesting scientific question.” That is, do aspirin users tend to develop less-aggressive colon cancers, and why?

But the results “do not necessarily mean that people with colorectal cancer will benefit from taking aspirin,” said Eric Jacobs, strategic director of pharmacoepidemiology for the American Cancer Society (ACS).

It’s “biologically plausible” that aspirin could help treat colon cancer, based on lab research, Jacobs said.

Aspirin inhibits blood cells called platelets, he explained, and there is evidence that “activated” platelets can encourage tumors to grow and spread.

But Jacobs agreed that everyone needs to wait for the ongoing clinical trials to wrap up. “Those trials should provide clearer answers in the next few years,” he said.

For now, Jacobs advised people wondering whether they should be taking low-dose aspirin: “Talk to a health care provider who can help you weigh the benefits against the risks.”

He also stressed the importance of colon cancer screening, to help prevent the disease or catch it early.

“Whether a person takes aspirin or not,” Jacobs said, “one of the best defenses against developing colorectal cancer is getting a screening test.”

People at average risk of colon cancer should start having screening tests at age 50, according to the ACS. Some tests, like colonoscopy, can prevent colon cancer by allowing doctors to find and remove precancerous growths called polyps.

The study was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more on aspirin use and cancer.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/286opqD

Reports: Prince Died From Prescription Painkillers

By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, June 2, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Music superstar Prince’s April 21 death was caused by an overdose of prescription painkillers, according to published reports.

Both the Minneapolis Star Tribune and the Associated Press, citing unnamed sources, reported Thursday that opioid painkillers caused the 57-year-old entertainer’s death.

Prince’s body was found at his Paisley Park compound in suburban Minneapolis. The medical examiner plans to release the results of Prince’s autopsy on Friday, the AP reported, citing an anonymous source.

While Thursday’s reports shine a light on the particular experience of one exceptional individual, the broad outlines of Prince’s story are by no means unique.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has called prescription opioid misuse and addiction a full-blown “epidemic.” The drugs are typically prescribed for a variety of painful conditions, including dental and injury-related pain.

The numbers are stark. About 2 million Americans are now in the throes of prescription opioid abuse or dependence, according to the CDC. And more than 165,000 U.S. men and women died from a prescription opioid overdose from 1999 to 2014.

A quadrupling of opioid-related overdoses — including heroin use — between 2000 and 2014 suggests the problem is getting worse.

The upshot: Prince was one of at least 14,000 Americans who lose their lives to prescription opioid overdoses each year, according to the CDC.

Much of the opioid addiction problem is due to illicit use. A 2014 report by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration said that 75 percent of all opioid abuse involves people accessing the pain medications through friends, family members or dealers, rather than a doctor’s prescription.

Still, at least a quarter of all opioid abuse traces back to legitimate patients who were initially prescribed drugs such as oxycodone (OxyContin), and hydrocodone (Vicodin) for medical problems that involve acute or chronic pain.

“Opioids are the gold standard for pain management,” said Kelly Dunn, an assistant professor with the behavioral pharmacology research unit at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. “And it’s important not to vilify physicians who are genuinely treating patients who need them.

“But ever since we embraced the notion that pain is the ‘fifth vital sign’ — back around 2000 — the increased emphasis on pain evaluation and treatment has led to a hugely increased market for opioid manufacturing and distribution,” Dunn added. “So opioid meds, which really function in the same manner as heroin, have become widely abundant.”

According to the CDC, health care providers wrote 259 million prescriptions for painkillers in 2012, enough for a bottle of pills for every American adult.

“The problem,” Dunn said, “is that most of the addiction research so far has focused on illicit users. So until recently we haven’t really thought enough about which pain patients will do well with these meds. Of course, it’s certainly true that most people can take a course of opioids and be totally fine. But the more widely they’re prescribed, and the longer patients are on them, the greater the risk.”

Therein lies the rub, according to Anita Gupta, vice chair of the department of anesthesiology in the division of pain medicine and regional anesthesiology at the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia.

“Opioids are the cornerstone of the treatment of pain. There’s no question about it. And they can be safe. For millions of Americans it’s part of their treatment of pain,” she said.

“But the issue is how to use them safely and responsibly,” Gupta added. “They have to be taken vigilantly, as directed. And doctors and patients have to know that other diseases and other medications can interact negatively with opioids. And be aware of factors that we now know up the risk for abuse.”

Those risk factors, she noted, include a history of prior substance abuse; a history of sleep aids prescriptions for insomnia and sleep disorders; and a history of mental health trouble.

Both Dunn and Gupta said many of those concerns are now outlined in a new set of CDC guidelines, issued in March, that for the first time direct physicians on how to best prescribe, manage and monitor opioid treatment.

“The guidelines are very clear, and a foundation for how to handle opioid treatment going forward, which is great, because this is an all-hands-on-deck crisis,” said Gupta.

“But what’s needed more than anything is a real conversation between doctors, patients and family members about what the pain control goals are and what the risks are. Because there are risks,” she added. “And also how to identify signs of an overdose and how to intervene, and the importance of having (the opioid blocker) naloxone (Narcan) on hand, and how to use it.”

Because, Gupta said, “the fact is, unintentional overdoses happen all the time. It could very well have been unintentional for Prince. We don’t know. But he was such a secretive person. And perhaps he underestimated the importance of having people around him who he could talk to and who were educated about safe opioid use. Those conversations are critical. Unfortunately, they’re not always happening.”

More information

There’s more on prescription opioid guidelines at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/286oxGL