barre

I Tried Jeans That Moisturize Your Legs as You Wear Them

Photo: guess.com

Photo: guess.com

Here’s a 21st-century claim if I’ve ever heard one: jeans that moisturize your legs as you wear them. GUESS’s new SMART GUESS Jeancare line promises to do just that. It isn’t the first collection of so-called moisturizing denim—Wrangler actually holds that title—but the question remains: do we really need this? I put the Jeancare High-Rise Jeggings With Silicone Rinse ($118; guess.com) to the test to see how they’d perform against my dry, scaly winter skin.

First impressions

The jeans, for the most part, look like any other pair, and feel the same, too—except stretchier, like a legging, hence “jegging.” In addition to moisturizing your legs, GUESS touts their slenderizing fit, but they weren’t exactly the most flattering pants I’ve ever put on. They’re much lighter wash than most people can pull off, other than maybe Gigi Hadid.

The fabric is infused with ginkgo extract and vitamin E, plus a lavender scent that’s supposed to be released with each wear. After a few hours of wearing them, I decided to check the progress. Normally, when I take off my pants, I would notice dead skin flaking off my legs (sorry if that’s TMI), but I didn’t seem to have that issue with the Jeancare pants. But to the touch, my legs didn’t feel any different than they normally would.

RELATED: 18 Exercises to Tone Your Legs and Butt

Take 2

The next day, I decided to pull on the pair of jeans post-shower, without using any creams or lotions. The struggle of getting jeans on with skin still slightly was very real, but once I had them fastened around my waist, the fabric seemed to melt into my skin. It was a strange sensation, and honestly, I’m not sure if I liked it—but I hoped it meant my legs were transforming into silky-smooth stems. The lavender scent seemed a little stronger than during the previous wear (but again, do I need jeans that give off a scent?). This time when I took them off, I did notice a bit of a difference in my legs; they felt a little smoother. But was that in my head? Or was it because I used a moisturizing shaving cream in the shower? I can’t be 100% sure.

Final thoughts

The third and final time I put these babies to the test, I got pretty much the same outcome as the first time I wore them. I love how stretchy and comfy they are, but when it comes to my dry skin, these jeans didn’t do much for me. So for now, I think I’ll stick to my regular non-moisturizing pants.




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1UuO1r6

This is the Secret to JLaw’s Banging Body, According to Her Trainer

Photo: Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images

There is no doubt about it: Jennifer Lawrence stunned at the 88th Academy Awards last night in a sheer black lace gown by Dior. Not to take anything away from the dress, but part of the reason it looked so fabulous on Jennifer (aside from the fact that she is in incredible shape) was because her posture was perfectly on point.

“I tell all of my clients, ‘Shoulders back, chest up, chin tucked,’” says Dalton Wong, author of The Feelgood Plan ($22, amazon.com), director of the Twenty Two Training studio in London, and, yes, JLaw’s trainer. “It automatically makes you feel amazing.”

RELATED: Jennifer Lawrence Just Dropped a Major Truth Bomb About Body-Shaming in Hollywood

You know what else makes women feel amazing? A banging body. For that, Wong has his female clients, including Jennifer, do exercises that target the posterior chain (muscles and ligaments in the back of the body) which never seems to make it onto our gym to-do list. Here are three ways Wong suggests you work that rear view.

Incorporate rowing motions

Think: low, medium, and high cable rows. “These are good strength training exercises that work your back and will pull your shoulder blades down, which also lifts breasts too,” says Wong, who advises against the rowing machine in this instance. No access to a cable machine? Try this dumbbell-based balance row instead: Start on hands and knees, with a 5-pound dumbbell in left hand. Extend right leg and lift it to hip height. Bend left elbow; draw weight up until even with torso. Lower weight. This is one rep. Do 12-15 then switch sides.

Perk up postural muscles

“Imagine your back, you have the deep muscles that help keep shoulder blades down and the little postural muscles that hold you in place while you are working, and you need to do both of those,” says Wong. To challenge those postural muscles, you’ll have to channel your inner yogi for poses like cobra, and hold them for at least 60 seconds to get the benefits. To do cobra, lie on your stomach. Place your hands near your shoulders or slightly forward and start to lift your upper body off the mat. Keep your pubic bone on the mat and make sure your shoulders are down and away from your ears. Hold for one minute.

RELATED: 18 Moves to Tone your Butt, Thighs, and Legs

Build that butt…

…And your hamstrings too. Women are very quad dominant, explains Wong, and tend to naturally use their quadriceps over their their butt or hamstrings. “Having a strong butt makes it looks nice and perky, but it also helps prevent back pain,” he says. “And stronger hips help control how well your knees moves.” Wong’s suggestion for bringing sexy back: step-ups and hip extensions.

Step-ups: Step up onto a low bench or stair with your right foot, and then bring up your left foot. Step back down, right foot first. Do 20 reps; then repeat, starting with your left foot. Too easy? Make the move more challenging by holding a dumbbell at your shoulder with your right arm when stepping with your left leg, and your left arm when stepping with your right leg.

Single-Leg Hip-Ups: Rest your back on a Swiss ball, with right foot on the floor and left foot extended straight out, foot flexed (A). Lift hips so that body forms a straight line from chest to foot (B). Lower back to “A.” Do 10 to 12 reps, then switch legs and repeat. This is just one variation on a hip extension. Find one you love to hate!




from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1RB7W50

Sleep Apnea May Take Toll on Your Mood, Thinking Skills

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Sleep apnea may have an impact on brain function, new research suggests.

“In previous studies, we’ve seen structural changes in the brain due to sleep apnea, but in this study we actually found substantial differences in … two chemicals that influence how the brain is working,” said lead researcher Paul Macey. He is an associate professor at the UCLA School of Nursing in Los Angeles.

These changes could help explain why people with the disorder develop symptoms that interfere with their daily lives, the investigators suggested. But the study could not prove that these altered levels of brain chemicals actually cause thinking and memory problems.

Moderate to severe sleep apnea affects one in 15 adults. The condition can cause people to experience as many as 30 interruptions in breathing per hour while they sleep. Sleep apnea is also associated with trouble concentrating, memory problems, poor decision-making, depression and stress.

For the study, the researchers examined levels of two brain chemicals: glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid, also known as GABA. These chemicals are found in a part of the brain called the insula. This part of the brain combines and coordinates signals from other brain regions to help regulate emotions, thinking, and certain physical functions such as blood pressure and perspiration, the researchers said.

People with sleep apnea have lower levels of GABA and abnormally high levels of glutamate, according to the study published online recently in the Journal of Sleep Research.

While GABA acts as a mood inhibitor, slowing things down and keeping people calm, glutamate has the opposite effect. When glutamate levels are high, the brain is stressed and doesn’t work as well, the researchers explained in a university news release.

“It is rare to have this size of difference in biological measures,” Macey said. “We expected an increase in the glutamate, because it is a chemical that causes damage in high doses and we have already seen brain damage from sleep apnea.

“What we were surprised to see was the drop in GABA. That made us realize that there must be a reorganization of how the brain is working,” he said.

The researchers said their findings highlight the importance of treating sleep apnea.

“What comes with sleep apnea are these changes in the brain, so in addition to prescribing continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, a machine used to help an individual sleep easier … physicians now know to pay attention to helping their patients who have these other symptoms,” Macey said. “Stress, concentration, memory loss — these are the things people want fixed.”

Looking ahead, the researchers plan to investigate whether available treatments for sleep apnea help return patients’ brain chemical levels to normal.

More information

The U.S. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute provides more information on sleep apnea.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KZ5ztj

Risk of Getting Ebola From Survivors Seems Low, Study Finds

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The risk of infection with the often-fatal Ebola virus from non-sexual contact with survivors seems low, researchers report.

The British team analyzed nearly 6,000 articles on Ebola and found that, while the virus may be present in certain areas of survivors’ bodies for an extended time, it is typically cleared from the blood within 16 days.

In general, that means there is little risk of contracting Ebola from a survivor, the researchers concluded.

However, an important exception is transmission of the virus through sex because Ebola remains in semen for months after a patient has recovered, the scientists added.

The study was published Feb. 29 in the journal PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

In 2014, three West African countries — Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone — were hit hard by the worst Ebola outbreak in history. More than 28,000 people were infected and more than 11,000 died, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The recent Ebola outbreak was very different to anything we’d seen before — it lasted longer than any previous Ebola emergence, and it left behind thousands of survivors,” said lead study author Paul Hunter, a professor at Norwich Medical School at the University of East Anglia in England.

“We wanted to know how long the Ebola virus persists in different body fluids after people have recovered — in order to assess how much of a transmission risk those survivors pose to their family, communities and medical professionals,” he said in a university news release.

Other than blood and semen, most other body fluids pose a low risk of transmitting Ebola, the investigators reported. However, there was too little evidence to come to a strong conclusion on breast milk, they added.

“This research is important because there has been little evidence to give definitive guidance about which body fluids are infectious and when they pose a risk. Above all, this research strengthens the case for scientific evidence to be used rather than fear when managing infectious diseases such as Ebola,” Hunter said.

The new study shows that “the Ebola virus is usually no longer present in most body fluids after a few weeks (apart from in semen), but other later health complications have been widely reported, especially in the most recent outbreak. We did not find any evidence that the virus can reactivate to the point that it becomes infectious for others by non-sexual contact,” he said.

“Consequently,” Hunter added, “transmission from social contact with an Ebola survivor is not something that is likely to be a problem, even if that person is suffering from longer term complications.”

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about Ebola.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KZ5x4S

Car Crash Risk May Nearly Double in People Prone to Fainting

By Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — People with a history of fainting may be almost twice as likely as others to get into a car crash, a new study finds.

The researchers say the study results suggest officials should consider fainting among various risk factors when they decide who can or can’t drive legally.

“This risk is small but it raises important questions about policies towards driving,” said study lead author Dr. Anna-Karin Nume, a graduate student with the cardiology department at Copenhagen University Gentofte Hospital in Denmark.

The findings don’t prove a direct connection between fainting spells and car crashes, and it’s not clear who caused the accidents in the study. Still, a history of fainting raises the danger that a driver could lose consciousness on the road, experts say.

According to Nume, an estimated 35 percent of people faint during their lives. “It is common in both young and older persons, but the cause usually differs,” she said. “Although fainting is usually benign, it could be caused by underlying heart conditions.”

About one-third of patients who have fainted with have a subsequent episode within three years, according to the researchers.

In the United States, rules vary among states about whether residents can continue to drive after fainting.

According to the American Diabetes Association, Wyoming, for example, will cancel driving privileges if notified by a doctor that a patient has a disorder that’s caused a lapse in consciousness. California distinguishes between fainting cases that are one-time incidents and those that could recur.

For the new study, researchers tracked more than 41,000 adults in Denmark, average age 66, who suffered a first-time diagnosis of fainting between 2008 and 2012. The authors compared their experiences to those of 4.2 million other Danish residents, average age 45.

After the researchers adjusted their statistics for factors such as age, they found that those with fainting episodes were nearly twice as likely to have gotten into crashes.

Over five years, 8 percent of those aged 18 to 69 who’d been treated for fainting got into crashes, compared to 5 percent of the general population.

But the study results suggest that age and health may play roles. Those treated for fainting were more likely to be 70 or older (37 percent compared to 13 percent of the general population), and more than one-third had heart disease compared to 10 percent of the others.

Those treated for fainting were also more likely to suffer from conditions such as diabetes or alcoholism and take anti-anxiety medications. There was little difference in fainting rates between men and women.

It’s not clear, however, who was at fault in the accidents. “The records we have do not contain enough detail to work out exactly what happened in these accidents. Our study looked at the larger picture and did not capture this level of detail,” Nume said. “But it would be worth doing a study to interview patients after the accidents and identify the sequence of events.”

It’s also not clear whether certain disorders that cause fainting are more dangerous to drivers. “We don’t know which diagnoses have clear warning symptoms that allow plenty of time for the driver to compensate, get off the road safely, and subsequently continue normally,” said Dr. Donald Redelmeier, senior core scientist with the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Toronto.

Redelmeier, co-author of a commentary accompanying the study, also believes overconfidence may be a factor if drivers don’t take precautions despite their fainting history.

At age 70 in Denmark, patients undergo mandatory driver’s license screenings from their doctors, according to background notes with the study.

Nume said the results can be helpful as officials consider guidelines about who should and shouldn’t be allowed to drive. But, she said, fainting shouldn’t be the only factor considered.

Redelmeier agreed the findings should remind physicians to consider driving safety when they treat patients who have fainted.

The study appears in the Feb. 29 issue of JAMA Internal Medicine.

More information

For more about fainting, see the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1KZ5zcS

iPads Often Used to Pacify Difficult Kids

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Some parents use mobile phones and tablets to calm young children with behavioral problems, a new study finds.

“We know that parents of babies and toddlers with difficult behavior disproportionately use television and videos as calming tools. We wanted to explore whether the same might be true for mobile technology like phones and tablets,” lead author Dr. Jenny Radesky, of C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital at the University of Michigan, said in a university news release.

“We found that the less control and more frustration parents felt over their children’s behavior, the more likely they were to turn to mobile devices to help calm their kids down,” Radesky said.

The study included 144 children, aged 15 to 36 months, in low-income families. Their parents were asked how often they allowed use of mobile phones and tablets during different situations.

The devices were most likely to be used to “pacify” children with social and emotional difficulties, the researchers said.

But parents’ use of mobile technology was no different for children with social-emotional problems and other children in other situations, such as eating, being in public, doing chores or bedtime, according to the study. The findings are published Feb. 29 in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.

“We need to further study whether this relationship between digital technology and social-emotional development difficulties applies to a more general population of parents as well, and what effect it might have on kids’ longer-term outcomes,” added Radesky, who conducted the study while at Boston Medical Center.

Previous studies have shown that increased television time can hinder young children’s language and social development, partly because they reduce human-to-human interaction, Radesky said.

“Now that screens can be taken anywhere, they have become part of our interpersonal space,” she added. “We’re interested in identifying the ways that mobile devices sometimes interfere with family dynamics, but also how we can use them as a tool to increase parent-child connection.”

More information

The American Academy of Pediatrics has more on child behavior.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OIzGjt

‘Female Libido’ Pill May Not Be Worth It: Researchers

By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — The much-touted “female libido” pill seems to cause a host of serious side effects while failing to spark much additional passion in a woman’s life, a new review suggests.

Addyi (flibanserin) quadruples the risk of dizziness and sleepiness, more than doubles the chances of nausea, and increases the risk of fatigue by more than half, according to the analysis.

For all that trouble, a woman taking Addyi can expect to gain one-half of one additional satisfying sexual event per month, on average, according to the report. It was published online Feb. 29 in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

“We found women had, on average, 2.5 satisfying sexual events per month before entering the study, and flibanserin added one-half additional satisfying sexual events per month,” said senior study author Ellen Laan, a professor of sexology and psychosomatic gynecology at the University of Amsterdam, in the Netherlands.

The side effects are troubling, said Dr. Mamta Mamik, an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive science at Mount Sinai’s Icahn School of Medicine in New York City.

“The article is pretty comprehensive in addressing the issues. They raise valid concerns,” Mamik said. “I think we have to be careful when a drug is marketed before its safety profile is approved and proper trials have been conducted.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Addyi last year after a contentious review process, making it the nation’s first drug designed to help women with low libido.

Only 227 prescriptions for the drug were filled in its first few weeks on the market, Bloomberg reported.

In the new review, Laan and her colleagues reviewed eight clinical trials conducted with Addyi, including five published and three unpublished studies involving almost 6,000 women.

The combined evidence showed that Addyi provides marginal benefit for women who are suffering hypoactive sexual desire disorder, a condition involving a persistent or recurrent lack of interest in sex.

For example, women taking the drug scored just 0.3 points higher on a 5-point sexual desire scale and experienced a minimal increase in satisfying sexual events each month, the review authors found.

However, Mamik noted that it’s hard to judge how well Addyi performs because female desire is difficult to assess.

“When you try to judge efficacy for a drug without an accurate measure of what the drug’s supposed to do, it becomes fairly difficult,” she explained. “It’s not like blood cholesterol levels, where there’s a number. How do you measure it? That’s where the problem lies.”

Whether or not Addyi works, it appears to greatly increase a woman’s risk of nausea, dizziness and fatigue. Mamik said that large-scale clinical trials that involve women from a wide range of backgrounds are needed to learn more about these side effects.

Addyi underwent three FDA reviews and two agency advisory committee meetings before its approval last August, said Dr. Steven Woloshin, a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in Lebanon, N.H. He wrote an accompanying editorial in the journal.

Woloshin argued that the FDA caved to public pressure from a manufacturer-sponsored advocacy campaign alleging that sexism had held up the drug’s approval. He noted that the agency approved the drug even though no new positive data had surfaced between the second and third reviews.

“All of the clinical reviewers, the people closest to the data, voted to reject the drug, but they were overruled by the senior administrative people,” he said.

The FDA approval did come with significant restrictions because the drug can cause severely low blood pressure and loss of consciousness. Addyi’s label includes a boxed warning saying the drug shouldn’t be taken while drinking alcohol and shouldn’t be used with certain other drugs. Also, it should not be used by women with liver problems.

Within 48 hours of FDA approval, Valeant Pharmaceuticals purchased the company that developed Addyi, Sprout Pharmaceuticals, for about $1 billion, Woloshin said.

Valeant officials said that all three Phase 3 trials of Addyi showed an increase in sexually satisfying events for participants.

“That data was affirmed by an FDA advisory panel and FDA approval,” Dr. Tage Ramakrishna, chief medical officer and president of research and development and quality at the Canadian company, said in a statement.

“The JAMA Internal Medicine meta-analysis confirmed those findings and provided little additional context,” Ramakrishna noted.

Valeant officials did tell The New York Times in December that logistical problems have hampered sales. Given Addyi’s potential side effects, the FDA requires doctors and pharmacists to be specially certified to prescribe and dispense the drug, creating a logjam of unfilled prescriptions.

However, the drug’s continued approval is contingent on a series of follow-up studies, including several that will examine Addyi’s interaction with alcohol, Woloshin said. When combined, the two can cause a dangerous decrease in blood pressure that might result in fainting, he explained.

These studies are supposed to be completed over the next one to three years, Woloshin added.

“The FDA always responds to new information, and sometimes drugs are pulled from the market if important harms come up,” he said. “These alcohol studies, the FDA will be paying close attention to them and it’s possible if the results are scary, that might prompt them to pull the drug.”

More information

Visit the U.S. National Institutes of Health for more on Addyi.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OIzGjm

Study Compares Drugs for Common Diabetic Eye Disease

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — People with diabetes are at risk for blurred vision or even a loss of vision from a condition called macular edema.

Three drugs for the disease — Avastin, Eylea and Lucentis — vary widely in price, but new research suggests all work equally well for patients with mild vision loss.

However, when diabetic macular edema leads to more severe vision loss, researchers found Eylea to be the better choice.

The study, funded by the U.S. National Eye Institute (NEI), “will help doctors and their patients with diabetic macular edema choose the most appropriate therapy,” study lead author Dr. John Wells said in an institute news release.

“The study suggests there is little advantage of choosing Eylea or Lucentis over [much cheaper] Avastin when a patient’s loss of visual acuity from macular edema is mild, meaning a visual acuity of 20/40 or better,” Wells explained.

“However, patients with 20/50 or worse vision loss may benefit from Eylea, which over the course of the two-year study outperformed Lucentis and Avastin,” said Wells, a retinal specialist at the Palmetto Retina Center in Columbia, S.C.

As the researchers explained it, diabetic macular edema can cause fluid to leak from abnormal blood vessels in the retina. This can result in blurry vision or vision loss. Drugs used to treat the condition are injected into the eye and work by blocking a substance that can trigger the leakage.

Cost is a factor, too. Although they work in similar ways, the three drugs vary dramatically in price. Based on Medicare’s pricing guidelines, the per-injection cost for Eylea is $1,850, $1,200 for Lucentis and only $60 for Avastin, the news release noted.

The two-year clinical trial compared the effectiveness of the three drugs in 660 patients with diabetic macular edema. Patients were treated at 89 sites across the United States.

The patients averaged 61 years of age and had type 1 or type 2 diabetes for an average of 17 years. None of the patients had vision better than 20/32.

Half of the patients had already experienced “mild to moderate” vision loss, the researchers said. The rest had moderate to severe vision loss — 20/50 or worse vision. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drugs, and were checked regularly over the next two years.

Most patients received monthly injections for the first six months. After that, they received additional injections of the drug they were assigned until their condition resolved or their vision stabilized and stopped improving.

Patients that experienced a relapse of macular edema after their treatment was suspended resumed receiving their injections. Any whose macular edema persisted after six month of injections were given laser treatment — the standard treatment before newer drugs for the condition became available.

According to Wells and colleagues, all three drugs performed similarly among participants with mild vision loss when the study began. On average, participants’ vision improved from 20/40 vision to 20/25, the study showed.

“This rigorous trial confirms that Eylea, Avastin, and Lucentis are all effective treatments for diabetic macular edema,” NEI director Dr. Paul Sieving said in the news release. “Eye care providers and patients can have confidence in all three drugs.”

Patients with moderate to severe vision loss also reported significant improvements in their ability to see. Halfway through the study, however, Eylea outperformed Avastin and Lucentis. By the two-year mark, Eylea and Lucentis produced similar gains in vision, the team found.

The researchers reported that the average visual acuity was 20/32 to 20/40 among participants in each treatment group by the end of the study.

Patients needed about the same number of injections over the course of the study, regardless of the type of drug taken, the study authors said. On average, the participants were given nine injections during the first year of the study and five more injections the following year.

The need for laser treatment varied. Of the patients taking Eylea, 41 percent needed laser treatment. In contrast, 64 percent of the patients in the Avastin group and 52 percent of those in the Lucentis group also needed laser treatment.

Two experts said the study provides important guidance for patients and physicians.

“There are 7.7 million diabetic patients in the United States with approximately 750,000 of those suffering from diabetic macular edema,” said Dr. Mark Fromer, an ophthalmologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “This study will help both retina specialists and patients alike understand the benefits of choosing these drugs in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.”

Dr. Nazanin Barzideh is chief of vitreoretinal surgery at Winthrop-University Hospital in Mineola, N.Y. She said that the study findings were in line with her experience.

“I have seen my diabetic patients with macular edema having a better response to Elyea compared to other [similar] drugs available on the market, especially those patients with severe visual acuity,” she said.

The study was published online Feb. 27 in the journal Ophthalmology.

More information

The American Diabetes Association has more about eye complications associated with diabetes, including macular edema.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1OIzG2U

Physically Fit May Bounce Back Better After Heart Attack

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Physically fit people may be less likely to become depressed after a heart attack, a new study suggests.

Heart attack survivors are three times more likely to have depression than people who haven’t had a heart attack. But this study found that a history of regular exercise can reduce that risk.

“Physical activity protects people from depression after a heart attack,” study author Linda Ernstsen, an associate professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, said in a university news release.

For the study, the researchers looked at 189 middle-aged and older people in Norway who had suffered a heart attack. On average, 11 percent of them suffered depression after their heart attack. But there were significant differences in risk depending on how much people had exercised before their heart attack, the investigators found.

Depression occurred in 17 percent of those who never exercised, 12.5 percent of those who once exercised but stopped before their heart attack, 9 percent of those who were inactive but began exercising before their heart attack, and 7.5 percent of those who were consistently physically active, the findings showed.

The researchers said that people who exercised regularly over several years were less than half as likely to become depressed after a heart attack than those who never exercised.

However, the study could not prove a cause-and-effect relationship between regular exercise and depression risk after a heart attack.

The study was published recently in The American Journal of Medicine.

More information

The American Heart Association has more about depression after heart attack.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ThDKj5

Fidgeting May Help Students With ADHD Learn

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 29, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Students who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often get into trouble for fidgeting in the classroom, but that fidgeting may help them learn, new research suggests.

“The prevailing view has been and continues to be that hyperactivity is a core deficit in ADHD,” said study author Michael Kofler, an assistant professor of psychology at Florida State University in Tallahassee. “When we think of it as a deficit, we are saying it’s a bad thing and it’s interfering [with schoolwork]. Our work has been challenging that thought.”

Kofler’s team gave 25 boys and girls with ADHD, aged 8 to 12, a series of working memory tasks, observing the amount of fidgeting as the children did them. In one set, the students had to remember where a series of dots appeared on a screen and then reorder them mentally, based on color. They had to then remember a series of numbers and letters, mentally reordering them, numbers first from smallest to biggest, then the letters.

In the easier test of dots on a screen, the children knew in advance how many items they would have to remember. In the more difficult test, the amount of items they would have to remember was random so they didn’t know in advance how many items they would have to remember.

The children fidgeted during all the tests, but fidgeted about 25 percent more when they couldn’t predict how many items they would have to remember. The tests were alike in every other way, so Kofler said this shows that demands on working memory affect the level of hyperactivity in ADHD students.

The fidgeting may increase “physiological arousal,” Kofler speculated, similar to what stimulant medication does for a child with the disorder. But the study didn’t prove that point, he said, and the researchers don’t know if the kids were fidgeting on purpose.

The study was published online this month in the Journal of Attention Disorders.

The findings echo some from a study published last year from the University of California, Davis. Researchers there looked at 26 children with ADHD and 18 without. They found that when the children with ADHD fidgeted more, they did better on a test. Fidgeting among kids without ADHD had no effect on test performance.

Dr. Trevor Resnick, a pediatric neurologist at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami, said, “We’ve known [intuitively] for many years that kids with ADHD often do better when they are fidgeting.”

However, Resnick said, the interpretation of why they fidgeted more has not been proven. “We don’t know whether they do it to help or because they are anxious, or whether it is helping,” he said.

Kofler agreed, saying his team next plans research “to link the movement with the arousal and the performance, to see if we are right about that is why the movement is helpful.”

Meanwhile, until more is known, students with ADHD should not have free rein to do what they want in the classroom, Kofler said.

But the new study does suggest that teachers and parents should focus less on whether a child is sitting still and more on whether the work is getting done, regardless of the movement level, he said.

More information

To learn more about ADHD, visit U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.





from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1ThDKj1